Publication Cover
International Journal of Social Psychology
Revista de Psicología Social
Volume 23, 2008 - Issue 2
50
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Incertidumbre de las tareas de grupo. Propuesta de un modelo y validación empírica

Uncertainty of group tasks. Proposal and empirical validation of a model

, , , &
Pages 259-273 | Published online: 23 Jan 2014
 

Resumen

Las tareas de grupo han sido una temática de amplio interés en décadas pasadas, proponiéndose diferentes modelos que han abordado sus posibles tipos así como sus dimensiones nucleares. En este artículo se propone un modelo de las tareas de grupo (el MITAG o modelo de incertidumbre de las tareas del grupo) que sintetiza e integra las principales dimensiones propuestas por modelos anteriores. Se presenta una escala que permite su evaluación así como una primera validación del modelo en una muestra de 164 personas pertenecientes a 34 grupos de 3 organizaciones. El análisis factorial revela una estructura de cuatro factores (con el 45% de la varianza explicada), con dos factores nucleares que explican el 36,9% de la varianza (claridad de objetivos y de procedimientos y requerimientos múltiples) y otros dos factores menores (elección entre múltiples formas/familiaridad y conflicto de demandas).

Abstract

Group tasks have been a popular topic in the last decades, and a number of authors have proposed different models dealing with their typologies as well as their core dimensions. In this article a model of group tasks is developed (the model of uncertainty of group tasks) that summarizes and integrates of the main dimensions proposed by previous models. A scale is proposed that allows the evaluation of the level of uncertainty of group tasks. We also describe a preliminary validation of the model in a sample of 164 participants belonging to 34 groups of 3 organizations. The factorial analysis reveals a structure of four factors (explaining 45% of the variance), with two nuclear factors that explain 36.9% of the variance (clarity of objectives and procedures and multiple requirements) and other two smaller factors (election between multiple forms/familiarity and conflict of demands).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.