23
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Atomic force microscopy characterisation of mechanically induced surface damage in ethylene-propylene diblock copolymeric materials

Pages 1458-1466 | Published online: 19 Jul 2013
 

Abstract

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) in tapping mode has been used to characterise surface damage induced during the scratch test in ethylene - propylene diblock copolymers. The AFM enabled prediction of the deformation resistance of two different types of copolymer. The undeformed surface microstructure of the two copolymers (designated EP-M and EP-TC) was distinguished by differences in arrangement (regular or irregular) of fibrils, depending on their melt flow conditions. Type EP-M is a copolymer with long chains obtained by low melt flow rate, whereas EP-TC is a short chain copolymer with high melt flow rate. The microfibrils in both copolymers exhibited small kinks/nodules. Atomic force nanoscale images provided details of microfibrils containing molecular chains. The long chain EP-M copolymer exhibited non-uniformity in the alignment of molecular chains in comparison with short chain EP-TC. Surface deformation induced by the scratch test led to the formation of parabolic scratch tracks. The average surface height and peak - valley height of a track (considered a measure of the depth of the induced scratch) suggested that short chain EP-TC copolymer is more resistant to mechanically induced surface damage in comparison with long chain EP-M copolymer. Also, the average thickness of track was more for EP-TC, implying that the density of tracks/area is more in EP-M than in EP-TC, consistent with scanning electron microscope observations. Scanning electron microscopy investigations suggested localised plastic flow of material in the region surrounding the track, involving the formation of voids. Also, a comparative assessment of scratch damage was done, in terms of average surface height of the plastically deformed region, in relation to homopolymer and isotactic polypropylenes under identical test conditions.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.