24
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Section

A comparison of current Orthodontic Board examinations

&
Pages 98-104 | Received 10 Mar 2003, Accepted 16 Oct 2003, Published online: 16 Dec 2014
 

Abstract

Five orthodontic clinical Board examinations were systematically compared. An attempt was made to critically evaluate the procedures, characteristics and requirements of these examinations. Many similarities were found and the differences found between Boards may be due to differences in socio-political goals of the professional orthodontic societies organizing the examinations. By setting a high standard of clinical treatment as a basic goal, all Boards aim to raise the overall quality of clinical performance.

Acknowledgments

The help of Jean-Pierre Ortial, Pierre-Georges Planché, James Moss and Lorenz Moser is thankfully acknowledged.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.