212
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cutting Edge

What’s wrong with the traditional viva as a method of assessment in orthodontic education?

Pages 128-133 | Received 17 Jul 2008, Accepted 27 Jun 2009, Published online: 16 Dec 2014
 

Abstract

The oral or viva voce (viva) examination has been a mainstay of assessment throughout the history of medical education and widely used as a component of both undergraduate and postgraduate university examinations and professional examinations conducted by the medical and surgical Royal Colleges in the United Kingdom. This form of assessment has traditionally been chosen for its flexibility and potential for the testing of clinical and academic skills, both of which are closely associated with medical practice. However, in more recent years, the viva has fallen out of favour, leading to a reduction in use as a method of assessment, particularly for examinations conducted by the Royal Colleges. This trend has been seen within orthodontics, with the introduction of structured clinical reasoning and objective structured clinical examinations to replace oral and direct clinical examination in membership examinations. This article examines the reasoning behind why the traditional viva is regarded as being unreliable, describes some methods that are available to improve it and discusses recent developments in assessment within the context of oral examination, orthodontic education and training.

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Dr David Hay for his useful comments during the preparation of this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.