Notes
1 See the work of Thomas Palley (e.g. 2013) or Engelbert Stockhammer (e.g. 2004). One should note that Palley and Stockhammer, and perhaps also Dymski, are Post-Keynesians and the RMT critique is in part a critique of Keynes. Palley in turn is critical of Piketty 2014 whose recent bestseller Capital in the Twenty-First Century is centrally concerned with income inequality (though arguably based on neoclassical tenets despite its progressive tax argument).
2 See Lo 2012.
3 See Association for Heterodox Economics 2014 for context. Skidelsky's report on his experience may be available by the time this is in print but is currently confidential.
4 Post-Crash can be contacted via http://www.post-crasheconomics.com and [email protected]. See also the report: http://www.post-crasheconomics.com/economics-education-and-unlearning/.
5 Melville 2003, 52.
1 Jessop 2010, 16.
2 Marx 1870.
3 Marx 1870.
4 Cited in Read 2003, 99.
5 Cited in Saccarelli 2007, 28.
6 Saccarelli 2007.
1 See e.g. Abram 1986.
2 Graeber 2001.
3 World People's Conference 2010.