The application of implementation science for pressure ulcer prevention best practices in an inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation program

Abstract

Objectives

To implement pressure ulcer (PU) prevention best practices in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation using implementation science frameworks.

Design

Quality improvement.

Setting

SCI Rehabilitation Center.

Participants

Inpatients admitted January 2012 to July 2013.

Interventions

Implementation of two PU best practices were targeted: (1) completing a comprehensive PU risk assessment and individualized interprofessional PU prevention plan (PUPP); and (2) providing patient education for PU prevention; as part of the pan-Canadian SCI Knowledge Mobilization Network. At our center, the SCI Pressure Ulcer Scale replaced the Braden risk assessment scale and an interprofessional PUPP form was implemented. Comprehensive educational programing existed, so efforts focused on improving documentation. Implementation science frameworks provided structure for a systematic approach to best practice implementation (BPI): (1) site implementation team, (2) implementation drivers, (3) stages of implementation, and (4) improvement cycles. Strategies were developed to address key implementation drivers (staff competency, organizational supports, and leadership) through the four stages of implementation: exploration, installation, initial implementation, and full implementation. Improvement cycles were used to address BPI challenges.

Outcome Measures

Implementation processes (e.g. staff training) and BPI outcomes (completion rates).

Results

Following BPI, risk assessment completion rates improved from 29 to 82%. The PUPP completion rate was 89%. PU education was documented for 45% of patients (vs. 21% pre-implementation).

Conclusion

Implementation science provided a framework and effective tools for successful pressure ulcer BPI in SCI rehabilitation. Ongoing improvement cycles will target timeliness of tool completion and documentation of patient education.

Keywords:

• Spinal cord injuries
• Pressure ulcer
• Risk assessment
• Best practice
• Implementation

Acknowledgments

This work was funded through a partnership of the Rick Hansen Institute, Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation, and the Alberta Paraplegic Foundation. The authors are grateful to Sandra Mills, Patient and Family Educator and Jennifer Holmes, Occupational Therapy Professional Practice Leader for their support of the Site Implementation Team, and to Meredith Kuipers and Lei Wan for support with data collection.