78
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A comparison of owner and expert evaluation of health and safety in small collision repair shops: a pilot study

, , , &
Pages 363-369 | Published online: 03 Dec 2013
 

Abstract

Background: Workplace evaluation is one of the first steps in reducing the risk of injuries and illnesses, and is part of several programs that promote a participatory approach to occupational health among small business owners. The usefulness of written safety evaluations is contingent upon non-safety professionals obtaining accurate and reliable results.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to better understand auto body shop owners’ ability to correctly identify occupational health and safety issues within their businesses.

Methods: In this study, 11 auto body shop owners used a 25-question checklist, developed specifically for this industry, to identify key safety and health problems. Owner results were compared with those of an industrial hygienist (IH) experienced in using the assessment form.

Results: The average number of safety problems identified by the IH was twice as large as the number identified by business owners (P = 0·02). The average percentage agreement of answers between owners and the IH was 81% (SD = 21%). Shop owners were more accurate in assessing the presence of written safety programs and records than the presence of unsafe work conditions. Overall, owners’ sensitivity (ability to correctly identify a safety-deficient item) was low (0·22).

Conclusions: Collision shop owners had some difficulty correctly identifying many unsafe/non-compliant items or situations in their facility. Naïve users’ ability to correctly identify potentially hazardous situations – sensitivity – should be the metric of concern for the validity of safety assessments, and efforts should be directed at bringing this number as close to one as feasible.

This study would not have been possible without the cooperation of the participating shop owners. This study was supported by grant 5R01 OH009086 from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.