![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
Abstract
Background:
There is a large and consistent body of evidence showing that research sponsored by for-profit industries tends to have pro-industry conclusions in comparison with similar research or re-analyses not funded by industry. Disclosure of financial conflicts via statements is presently the standard method for notification of potential biases. However, many journals are not consistent in publishing financial conflicts of interest (FCoI) statements. Furthermore, even when divulged, disclosure merely shifts the burden of evaluating conflicts to readers and the general public. Moreover, there has been an absence of a means of quantifying FCoI.
Objectives:
To propose a solution for the question: What are we doing about FCoI that continue to compromise the integrity of the scientific enterprise?
Methods:
The FCoI Scale was developed for scoring and comparing FCoI and describing potential biases.
Results:
The FCoI Scale consists of a score that may be expressed in whole numbers and decimal fractions, correlated to descriptive terms for potential biases and examples of financial conflicts at 11 levels.
Conclusions:
The FCoI score (FCoIS) provides a means for a more uniform and concise method of disclosure compared to statements, while at the same time permitting flexibility. It encourages the disclosure of relevant information and transparency in the reporting of financial conflicts. The FCoI Scale has the potential to become the standard basis for measuring, reporting, and comparing financial conflicts, suitable for disciplines in science, medicine, and beyond.
Acknowledgements
FCoIS = 0·0 (Maharaj SVM, this study, 2014); FCoIS = 0·0 (Maharaj SVM, financial conflicts of interest, 2004–2014); FCoIS = 0·0 [Center for Research on Environmental Medicine, all programs (), 2005 (inception)–2014].