353
Views
45
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Late-stage, primary open-angle glaucoma in Europe: social and health care maintenance costs and quality of life of patients from 4 countries

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1763-1770 | Accepted 09 Apr 2008, Published online: 09 May 2008
 

ABSTRACT

Objective: The purpose of this study was to estimate costs and quality of life (QoL) of late-stage glaucoma patients in 4 European countries.

Methods: Retrospective review of medical charts of patients with POAG who were followed in a low-vision or vision rehabilitation center in one of 4 countries for at least 1 year was used to determine patient characteristics, health status, and health care resource use. Visual impairment was measured by best-corrected visual acuity (Snellen score). Patients were also interviewed over the telephone in order to assess their health-related QoL (using EuroQol EQ-5D) and use of resources including: the number of visits to rehabilitation centers, visits to hospital and non-hospital specialists, the use of low-vision devices, medication, tests, and the use of hired home help. The costs associated with resource use were calculated from the perspective of a third-party payer of health and social care based on resource usage and unit costs in each country.

Results: Patients undergoing visual rehabilitation in France (n = 21), Denmark (n = 59), Germany (n = 60), and the United Kingdom (n = 22) were identified, interviewed and had their medical charts reviewed. Annual maintenance costs of late-stage glaucoma amounted to €830 ( ± 445) on average. Average home help costs were more than 3 times higher. QoL, on average, was 0.65 ( ± 0.28). QoL was positively correlated with the level of visual acuity in the patients' best eye. On the other hand, visual acuity was also positively correlated to health care costs, but negatively correlated to costs of home help.

Conclusions: The study was limited by its observational, uncontrolled design. The finding that late-stage glaucoma is associated with higher home help costs than health care maintenance costs suggests that potential savings from a better preventive treatment are to be found for social care payers rather than health care payers.

Acknowledgments

Declaration of interest: This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from Allergan, Inc. JT, SA, AB, SJF, KB and AA-B have no proprietary interest in Allergan, Inc. MA is a paid consultant. PB and JGW are employees of Allergan, Inc. The authors acknowledge Axelle Beriot-Mathiot, MUUSMANN Research & Consulting, Copenhagen, Denmark, and Sean Neville, Eye Outpatient Dept, Aberdeen University Hospital, Aberdeen, UK, for their technical support, and Jannie Wickstrøm, MUUSMANN Research & Consulting AS, Kolding, Denmark, and Elizabeth J.H. Davis, PhD, Allergan Inc., for manuscript preparation assistance.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 681.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.