187
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Hospitalization rates before and after initiation of paliperidone ER in patients with schizophrenia: results from open-label extensions of the US double-blind trials

, &
Pages 1807-1815 | Accepted 11 Apr 2008, Published online: 28 May 2008
 

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess differences in the number of days hospitalized among schizophrenic patients receiving paliperidone extended-release (paliperidone ER) during the open-label extension (OLE) phases, compared to a similar time period prior to the screening for entry into the double-blind (DB) trials conducted in the United States.

Methods: Mental health-related hospital days during the 52 weeks before entering the DB trials and during the OLE phases were compared. The mean number of hospital days per person per year in the pre- and post-periods was calculated and the statistical significance of pre-post differences was assessed using bootstrap resampling methods. Total person-years were also calculated for the pre- and post-periods to account for different lengths of observation.

Results: Patients' (n = 215) mean ( ± SD) age was 41.2 ( ± 11.0) years; most were male (73.0 % ); and black (52.1 vs. 45.1 % white). The mean ( ± SD) paliperidone ER treatment duration during the OLE phase was 167.0 ( ± 145.0) days and the mean ( ± SD) daily dose was 10.5 ( ± 2.0) mg. Overall, paliperidone ER patients spent an average ( ± SD) of 13.2 ( ± 1.6) and 3.1 ( ± 0.7) hospital days per person-year in the pre-and post-periods, respectively (mean ± SD change 10.0 ± 1.8, 95 % CI 6.5, 13.4, p < 0.001). Using the 2007 Federal Per Diem Base Rate (i.e., $595.09 per day), this reduction in hospital days would result in an average ( ± SD) cost savings of $5951 ( ± 1071) per person per year.

Conclusions: Patients had significantly fewer hospital days in the OLE phase compared to the 1-year period prior to entering the DB trial. Paliperidone ER may play a role in reducing mental health-related hospital days and associated costs. Important study limitations include the lack of a control group, the pre-post design comparing historical data with data collected in the trials which could create a bias due to the mismatch in settings, and patients having more frequent contact with treating physicians and investigators during the trial period, which could favor the outcomes in the OLE phase. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Acknowledgments

Declaration of interest: This article was sponsored by Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. JHW and LM are employees of Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. PGJ disclosed that he is/was the recipient of grant/research support from Astra-Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Neuronetics, Solvay, sanofi-aventis; that he is/was a consultant/advisor for Astra-Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Neuronetics, Solvay; and that he is/was a member of the speakers' bureau for Abbott, Astra-Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Pfizer.

Clinical Trial Registry number for the R076477-SCH-304 trial: NCT00077714

Clinical Trial Registry number for the R076477-SCH-305 trial: NCT00083668

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 681.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.