739
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Baseline anxiety effect on outcome of SSRI treatment in patients with severe depression: escitalopram vs paroxetine

, , &
Pages 605-614 | Accepted 12 Nov 2009, Published online: 13 Jan 2010
 

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate if treatment outcome for severely depressed patients depends on their baseline level of anxiety.

Research design and methods:

Patients with a primary diagnosis of severe major depressive disorder (n = 459) were randomised to 24 weeks of double-blind treatment with escitalopram (20 mg) or paroxetine (40 mg). Post hoc analyses of efficacy in patients with a baseline HAM-A total score ≤20 (n = 171) or >20 (n = 280) were based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) (ITT, LOCF).

Results:

At week 24, the mean change from baseline in MADRS total scores was −24.2 for escitalopram-treated patients (n = 141) and −21.5 for paroxetine-treated patients (n = 139) (p < 0.05) in high baseline anxiety patients and the mean change from baseline in HAM-A total score was −17.4 (escitalopram) and −15.1 (paroxetine) (p < 0.05). When examining the proportion of complete remitters (CGI-S = 1) after 24 weeks of treatment, there was an increasing treatment difference as a function of baseline HAM-A total score in favour of escitalopram (ITT, LOCF). There was no treatment difference in the low baseline anxiety group. Significantly more patients (p < 0.01) withdrew from the paroxetine group (31%) than from the escitalopram group (17%), partly as the result of significantly more withdrawals due to AEs (p < 0.05). Incidence of AEs and withdrawals were not related to baseline anxiety and there were no significant differences in the incidence of individual AEs with escitalopram compared to paroxetine.

Limitations:

The post hoc nature of these analyses, the absence of placebo control group, and the requirement that patients should be suffering from severe depression, limit the generalisability of the results.

Conclusion:

Patients with severe depression together with comorbid anxiety symptoms responded significantly better to treatment with escitalopram 20 mg compared with paroxetine 40 mg. Contrary to paroxetine, escitalopram maintained its efficacy with increasing baseline anxiety levels.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

H. Lundbeck A/S, Denmark, funded the original randomised clinical trial, provided the analyses as needed and reviewed the manuscript.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

J.P.B. has disclosed that he is a consultant for, has received honoraria from and has conducted clinical research supported by Lundbeck. Biostatistician A.K.T.H. and E.W. have disclosed that they are fulltime employees of Lundbeck. A.H. declares no conflicts of interest.

Some peer reviewers receive honoraria from CMRO for their review work. The peer reviewers of this paper have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank D.J. Simpson, Lundbeck, for technical assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 681.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.