210
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Impact of rosiglitazone therapy on the lipid profile, glycemic control, and medication costs among type 2 diabetes patients

, , &
Pages 1623-1633 | Accepted 05 Jun 2011, Published online: 22 Jun 2011
 

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the impact of rosiglitazone therapy on lipid profiles, glycemic control, and costs associated with cholesterol-lowering and diabetic medications among Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in a standard practice setting.

Method:

This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the General Practice Research Database during 1999–2006. T2DM patients were classified based on the addition of rosiglitazone versus either metformin or a sulfonylurea (‘comparison group’) to pre-existing glucose lowering agents. After propensity score matching to control for differences in baseline patient characteristics, 1450 matched pairs were identified. The mean changes in total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), glycosylated hemoglobin A1C (A1C), and daily medication costs were calculated. To investigate the incremental costs for lipid-lowering medications, a two-part model was utilized.

Results:

The mean changes in TC and A1C for the rosiglitazone and metformin/sulfonylurea groups were 9 vs −10 mg/dL for TC, −2 vs −9 mg/dL for LDL-C, and -0.8% vs. −1.2% for A1C, respectively. The mean changes in daily medication costs of glucose- and lipid-lowering drugs were $3.95 for rosiglitazone patients and $0.27 for metformin/sulfonylurea patients. For patients with positive incremental lipid-lowering costs, rosiglitazone use was significantly associated with costs eight times greater than metformin/sulfonylureas.

Generalizability of the study is limited due to cost estimates using the national formulary and potential selection bias.

Conclusions:

Addition of rosiglitazone to an existing antidiabetic medication regimen improved glycemic control to a lesser extent than metformin/sulfonylurea, and also deteriorated patients’ lipid profiles, leading to significantly greater daily costs. Economic evaluations of alternative therapies should consider such costs to estimate the full impact of different therapeutic approaches in diabetes.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

The study was partially funded by an unrestricted research grant from Merck & Co. Inc., USA.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

All authors have disclosed that they have no financial relationships to disclose, and were responsible for the design and conduct of the study.

CMRO peer reviewers may have received honoraria for their review work. The peer reviewers on this manuscript have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank In-Sun Choi, PhD for data analysis and assistance with manuscript preparation.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 681.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.