614
Views
38
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cardiovascular Disease: Original Articles

Revisiting the medication possession ratio threshold for adherence in lipid management

, &
Pages 175-180 | Accepted 09 Jan 2013, Published online: 01 Feb 2013
 

Abstract

Objective:

We sought to evaluate the relationship between different levels of medication possession ratio (MPR) attained and achievement of clinically meaningful reductions in lipid levels.

Research design and methods:

This was a retrospective cohort study of 4691 new statin users from the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA). Subjects were required to be eligible for VA medical and pharmacy services throughout the 1 year study period from index date and to have complete data for exposure, outcome, and adjustment variables. MPR was defined as number of days supplied with prescription medication divided by days of observation.

Main outcome measures:

Achieving 25% or greater reduction from baseline in lipid levels for three lipid outcomes: non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and total cholesterol (TC).

Results:

We observed a statistically significant trend of an increasing proportion of study subjects achieving a 25% reduction or more for all three lipid outcomes (p-values <0.001 for each of the three outcomes using the Cochran–Armitage trend test).

Using multiple logistic regression, odds ratios (ORs) for each of the three outcomes were at a maximum for the 0.9–1.0 MPR category with ORs of 12.90 (95% confidence interval (CI), 9.60, 17.35) for the non-HDL cholesterol outcome; 11.29 (95% CI, 8.61, 14.80) for the LDL cholesterol outcome; and 9.11 (95% CI, 6.62, 12.53) for the TC outcome. Direct comparison of the 0.9–1.0 MPR category versus the 0.8–0.89 MPR category demonstrated an increase in odds of achieving 25% or more reduction for all three lipid outcomes.

Conclusions:

We conclude that significant improvements in outcomes are achieved with higher MPR thresholds than commonly targeted. The authors propose consideration of an MPR-adherence threshold of 0.9 MPR. Limitations include the possible modification of study findings in non-VA settings. MPR is a secondary adherence measure based on refill frequency.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

This study received no funding.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

The authors have no relevant financial relationships to disclose. J.H.W., M.B. and T.C. supplied the study concept. Statistical analyses were performed by J.H.W. The manuscript was primarily authored by J.H.W. with critical contributions from M.B and T.C.

CMRO peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the late Michael Juzba, PharmD, MBA, MS for his support in data extraction and architecture. We also thank Josephine N. Tran, PharmD, MS for her support in data validation. We wish to thank Dr Jan Hirsch for proposing a collaboration between Dr Bounthavong and Dr Watanabe. Authors also acknowledge the journal reviewers for comments that enhanced this manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 681.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.