489
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Rheumatology: Review article

Measuring the effect of therapy in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials from the patient’s perspective

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1391-1403 | Accepted 13 Feb 2014, Published online: 09 Apr 2014
 

Abstract

Objective:

Health measurements used to evaluate the effectiveness of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapies often fail to reflect patients’ priorities, despite recommendations towards more patient-centered assessments. The goals of the current review are: (1) to present guidelines, tools, and required steps for successful implementation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement in RA clinical trials; and (2) to identify gaps between recommendations and current practices.

Methods:

The first objective was addressed by reviewing existing frameworks for assessment of health-related quality of life among patients with RA and guidelines on the evaluation of PRO instruments, with a focus on evidence required to demonstrate the adequacy of PRO-based labeling claims. The second goal was addressed by conducting an empirical investigation of the overlap between patients’ perspectives and current practices regarding PROs in RA studies, elaborated from systematic literature searches. The first search identified qualitative studies that reported direct input from patients with RA, while the second identified the main health outcomes measured in RA trials, with a focus on biologic therapy.

Results:

Our review revealed a set of outcomes that have thus far not been widely used to assess treatment benefit in RA, despite evidence of their importance to patients. The psychometric properties of PRO instruments used to evaluate commonly assessed domains are presented, as are recommendations for PRO tools that assess domains less often measured in RA studies.

Conclusions:

Although the validity of some PRO tools among patients with RA is well established, further work needs to be done in several health domains which have traditionally received insufficient attention.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

Support for this study and manuscript development was provided by Pfizer Inc.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

T.K., S.H.Z., and G.V.W. have disclosed that they are employees of Pfizer Inc., the sponsor of this study. R.R.-B., M.B., A.R., and M.K. have disclosed that they are employees of QualityMetric and acted as paid consultants to Pfizer Inc. in connection with the development of this manuscript.

CMRO peer reviewers may have received honoraria for their review work. The peer reviewers on this manuscript have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Editorial assistance was provided by Kate Silverthorne PhD of Complete Medical Communications and funded by Pfizer Inc.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 681.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.