600
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Achievement of treatment goals with canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1993-2000 | Accepted 07 Aug 2015, Published online: 28 Sep 2015
 

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate attainment of diabetes-related treatment goals with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Research design and methods:

Data were pooled from four 26-week, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 studies of patients with T2DM (N = 2313). Goal attainment with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg versus placebo was evaluated in the overall population, and in subgroups based on age and sex, at baseline and Week 26.

Clinical trial registration:

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01081834, NCT01106677, NCT01106625, NCT01106690.

Main outcome measures:

Proportion of patients achieving hemoglobin A1C (A1C) <7.0% and ≤6.5%, systolic blood pressure (SBP) <140 and <130 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <90 and <80 mmHg, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ≥40 mg/dL (1.0 mmol/L), and the composite endpoint of A1C <7.0%, BP <130/80 mmHg, and LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) at baseline and Week 26, and proportion with body weight reduction ≥5% at Week 26.

Results:

At baseline, similar proportions of patients met diabetes-related treatment goals across groups. At Week 26, a greater proportion of patients achieved A1C, SBP, DBP, and HDL-C goals with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg compared with placebo. More patients achieved body weight reduction of ≥5% with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg versus placebo at Week 26. Fewer patients had LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) at Week 26 with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg versus placebo. Canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg also provided better attainment of the composite endpoint of A1C <7.0%, BP <130/80 mmHg, and LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) compared with placebo. Attainment of diabetes-related treatment goals was generally similar regardless of age and sex. Key limitations of this analysis include the selection of specific treatment targets that may not be reflective of all patient experiences, the non-prespecified, post hoc nature of the analysis, and the short duration of studies included in the pooled population.

Conclusion:

Canagliflozin was associated with better attainment of diabetes-related treatment goals compared with placebo, and was generally well tolerated at 26 weeks.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

The studies described in this manuscript were sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Canagliflozin has been developed by Janssen Research & Development, LLC, in collaboration with Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

L.B. has disclosed that he has served as an investigator for Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; has served as a speaker for Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Merck, Janssen, and AstraZeneca; and has served as a consultant for Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Merck, Janssen, Quest Diagnostics, Intarcia Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, and GlaxoSmithKline. V.W. has disclosed that he has been a speaker, served on advisory boards, and participated in clinical trials for Janssen, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novo Nordisk, Lilly, and Sanofi. C.M. has disclosed that she has served on advisory panels for Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Sharp and Dohme Ltd, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca LP, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Mannkind; has served on the speakers bureau for Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Sharp and Dohme Ltd, Eli Lilly and Company, and Novartis; and her institution has received research support from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Sharp and Dohme Ltd, Eli Lilly and Company, and Novartis. J.Y., U.V., W.C., and G.M. have disclosed that they are full-time employees of Janssen Research & Development, LLC.

CMRO peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all investigators, study teams, and patients for participating in these studies. Editorial support was provided by Alaina DeToma, PhD, of MedErgy, and was funded by Janssen Global Services, LLC.

Previous presentation: This study was previously presented, in part, in abstract form at the 74th Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association; San Francisco, CA, USA; 13–17 June 2014.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 681.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.