Abstract
Bodybuilding is full of myths and practices that are contrary to the scientific literature, which can lead to health problems. Adopting a scientifically designed approach is very important, as it may help bodybuilders to achieve better results while preserving their health. However, I have some criticism regarding some practices adopted in the referred article as ad libitum ingestion of sugar-free cordial and flavored tea and the performance of the exercise in fasted state, as it seems to bring no benefit and have some potential problems. Some suggestion are made in order to preserve FFM, like changing training split and exercise selection; increasing carbohydrate ingestion and decreasing protein intake; changing the resistance training stimuli and reducing the volume of aerobic exercises and increase its intensity.
I would like to congratulate the authors for the interesting case study [Citation1]. Bodybuilding is full of myths and practices that are contrary to the scientific literature, which can lead to health problems, as previously reported in this journal [Citation2]. Adopting a scientifically designed approach is very important, as it may help bodybuilders to achieve better results while preserving their health.
However, I have some criticism regarding the adopted ad libitum ingestion of sugar-free cordial and flavored tea. Although sweeteners may be valuable in substitution to sugar or high caloric foods [Citation3], some large scale prospective cohort studies found positive correlation between artificial sweetener ingestion and weight gain [Citation4, Citation5]. There is a suggestion that artificial sweeteners do not activate the food reward pathways and may encourage sugar dependence [Citation5], which may be deleterious to diet adherence in long term. Moreover, the regular use of sweetener has been linked to glucose intolerance, as suggested by recent reviews [Citation6, Citation7]. So, it is recommended to employ a systematic reduction of sugar ingestion, without any substitution for sweeteners [Citation5].
Another questionable practice is the performance of the exercise in fasted state, as it brings no benefit in terms of fat loss [Citation8] and can negatively impact energy expenditure and fat metabolism [Citation9]. So, it is advisable to progressively change this habit.
That said, I would like to make some observations and suggestions. The 2014 Olympia Men’s Physique champion was 173 cm with 88 kg during off season and 75 kg during contest. It results in a BMI of 30 and 25, respectively. The participant of the study had a BMI of 27 and dropped to 23 after the preparation. It seems prudent to adopt strategies to preserve FFM loss, since he is probably undersized for competing at high level.
It is important to note that the volume of training used in this study is considerably high and previous studies suggested that it might be necessary to reduce resistance training volume during caloric restriction [Citation10]. One first thought is to change training split and exercise selection to avoid excessive stress. Previous studies suggest that multi joint exercises promote sufficient stimuli for gaining muscle size and strength in all muscles involved in the exercise [Citation11] and there seems to be no additional benefit in performing single joint exercises [Citation12, Citation13]. Therefore the use of separate sessions to train the arms does not seem to be necessary and may lead to an unbalance between stress and recovery.
The proposed diet decreased carbohydrate ingestion to 23–25 % of the calories ingested and established protein intake at approximately 2.4 g per kg of body weight. Although the benefits of high protein diets on weight loss are highlighted [Citation14], the results of meta-analyses indicate that the quantity of protein necessary to promote weight management and preserve lean mass lies somewhere between 1.2 and 1.6 g/kg [Citation15–Citation17]. The highest suggestion of protein ingestion was published by Phillips & Van Loon [Citation18], who recommended to increase protein intake to 1.8 to 2.7 g/kg in order to optimize the ratio of fat-to-lean tissue mass loss during hypoenergetic periods. However, the authors showed no convincing evidence for proposing this number.
Additionally, a systematic review by Helms et al. [Citation19] suggested that 2.3-3.1 g/kg FFM to be appropriate for lean, resistance-trained athletes in hypoenergetic conditions. However it is important to note that, among the studies used by Helms et al, only two used protein intakes over 2 g/kg [Citation20, Citation21] and, among them, only one compared the effects of different protein intakes [Citation21]. In this study, by Mettler et al. [Citation21], the low protein group ingested only 1 g/kg of protein, which is very low. Therefore, although increasing protein intake may be a valuable to strategy as suggested by recent studies [Citation22], it is important for coaches and dietitians to know that there are other nutritional strategies that can be used during precontest, especially if their athletes do not tolerate severe restrictions in carbohydrate or fat. It is important to note that the literature recommends the ingestion of 1.2 to 2 g of protein per kg of body weight for strength athletes [Citation23–Citation25] and there are some suggestions of no benefit on increasing it above this level [Citation26].
As low carbohydrate ingestion may compromise exercise performance [Citation18], one suggestion would be to increase carbohydrate ingestion and decrease protein intake. Another suggestion is to change the resistance training stimuli. Although it is commonly suggested that the optimal resistance training protocol for promoting fat loss should be done with high volume and high repetitions, there is evidence that low volume and high intensity workouts may promote more favorable acute [Citation27] and chronic outcomes [Citation28, Citation29] for those wanting to lose fat. Moreover, if one is to adopt low carbohydrate diets, using low repetition and high load resistance training protocols may be advantageous, since this type of training rely less on the glycolitic system [Citation30].
Finally, it would be recommended to reduce the volume of aerobic exercises and increase its intensity, since it has been shown that the higher the volume of aerobic exercise, the lower the muscle hypertrophy [Citation31], in this regard it is important to note that running may have a more negative effect than cycling [Citation32]. On the other hand, the higher the exercise intensity, the higher the fat loss [Citation31] and it seems that the effect of regular aerobic exercise on body fat is negligible [Citation32]. Taken together, this make high intensity interval training more recommended than long duration and low intensity training for both losing fat and preserving fat free mass.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author’s contribution
PG conceived and drafted the manuscript.
Author’s information
PG - PhD in Health Sciences. Professor of the Department of Physical Education and Dance at the Federal University of Goias, Brazil. Associate Researcher at University of Brasilia, Brazil.
References
- RobinsonSLLambeth-MansellAGillibrandGSmith-RyanABannockLA nutrition and conditioning intervention for natural bodybuilding contest preparation: Case studyJ Int Soc Sports Nutr.201512 20 25949233 4422265 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-015-0083-x
- Della GuardiaLCavallaroMCenaHThe risks of self-made diets: The case of an amateur bodybuilderJ Int Soc Sports Nutr201512 16 25908930 4407350 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-015-0077-8
- MillerPEPerezVLow-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studiesAm J Clin Nutr2014100 765 77 24944060 4135487 https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.082826 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhsVChtrbN
- FowlerSPWilliamsKResendezRGHuntKJHazudaHPSternMP et al Fueling the obesity epidemic? Artificially sweetened beverage use and long-term weight gainObesity (Silver Spring)200816 1894 900 https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.284
- YangQGain weight by “going diet?” Artificial sweeteners and the neurobiology of sugar cravings: Neuroscience 2010Yale J Biol Med201083 101 8 20589192 2892765
- SuezJKoremTZeeviDZilberman-SchapiraGThaissCAMazaO et al Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiotaNature2014514 181 6 25231862 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhslaqs7zK
- PepinoMYMetabolic effects of non-nutritive sweetenersPhysiol Behav2015152 Pt B 450 5 26095119 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.06.024 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhtVyiu7vP
- SchoenfeldBJAragonAAWilbornCDKriegerJWSonmezGTBody composition changes associated with fasted versus non-fasted aerobic exerciseJISSN.201411 54 25429252 4242477
- PaoliAMarcolinGZoninFNeriMSivieriAPacelliQF et al Exercising fasting or fed to enhance fat loss? Influence of food intake on respiratory ratio and excess postexercise oxygen consumption after a bout of endurance trainingInt J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab201121 48 54 21411835
- RebaiHChtourouHZarroukNHarzallahAKanounIDoguiM et al Reducing resistance training volume during ramadan improves muscle strength and power in football playersInt J Sports Med201435 432 7 24048913 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3sbps1Wgug%3D%3D
- GentilPSoaresSRBottaroMSingle vs multi-joint resistance exercises: Effects on muscle strength and hypertrophyAsian J Sports Med20156 e24057 26446291 4592763 https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.24057
- GentilPSoaresSRPereiraMCda CunhaRRMartorelliSSMartorelliAS et al Effect of adding single-joint exercises to a multi-joint exercise resistance-training program on strength and hypertrophy in untrained subjectsAppl Physiol Nutr Metab201338 341 4 23537028 https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2012-0176
- FrançaHSBrancoPANGuedesDPJrGentilPSteeleJTeixeiraCV et al The effects of adding single-joint exercises to a multi-joint exercise resistance training program on upper body muscle strength and size in trained menAppl Physiol Nutr Metab201540 8 822 6 26244600 https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2015-0109
- Leidy HJ, Clifton PM, Astrup A, Wycherley TP, Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Luscombe-Marsh ND, et al. The role of protein in weight loss and maintenance. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015.
- LeidyHJCarnellNSMattesRDCampbellWWHigher protein intake preserves lean mass and satiety with weight loss in pre-obese and obese womenObesity (Silver Spring)200715 421 9 https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2007.531 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXosVamtbk%3D
- SoenenSMartensEAHochstenbach-WaelenALemmensSGWesterterp-PlantengaMSNormal protein intake is required for body weight loss and weight maintenance, and elevated protein intake for additional preservation of resting energy expenditure and fat free massJ Nutr.2013143 591 6 23446962 https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.112.167593 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXmvFSmtLc%3D
- LaymanDKEvansEBaumJISeylerJEricksonDJBoileauRA et al Dietary protein and exercise have additive effects on body composition during weight loss in adult womenJ Nutr2005135 1903 10 16046715 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXnvVSmurg%3D
- PhillipsSMVan LoonLJDietary protein for athletes: From requirements to optimum adaptationJ Sports Sci201129 Suppl 1 S29 38 22150425 https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.619204
- HelmsERZinnCRowlandsDSBrownSRA systematic review of dietary protein during caloric restriction in resistance trained lean athletes: A case for higher intakesInt J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab.201424 127 38 24092765 https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2013-0054 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhtVyiurnO
- MaestuJEliakimAJurimaeJValterIJurimaeTAnabolic and catabolic hormones and energy balance of the male bodybuilders during the preparation for the competitionJ Strength Cond Res.201024 1074 81 20300017 https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cb6fd3
- MettlerSMitchellNTiptonKDIncreased protein intake reduces lean body mass loss during weight loss in athletesMed Sci Sports Exerc201042 326 37 19927027 https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181b2ef8e 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXpsVSntg%3D%3D
- AntonioJEllerbroekASilverTOrrisSScheinerMGonzalezA et al A high protein diet (3.4 g/kg/d) combined with a heavy resistance training program improves body composition in healthy trained men and women--a follow-up investigationJ Int Soc Sports Nutr201512 39 26500462 4617900 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-015-0100-0
- LemonPWTarnopolskyMAMacDougallJDAtkinsonSAProtein requirements and muscle mass/strength changes during intensive training in novice bodybuildersJ Appl Physiol.199273 767 75 1400008 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FhsFCmuw%3D%3D
- LemonPWProtein and amino acid needs of the strength athleteInt J Sport Nutr19911 127 45 1844991 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3lvVersQ%3D%3D
- CampbellBKreiderRBZiegenfussTLa BountyPRobertsMBurkeD et al International society of sports nutrition position stand: Protein and exerciseJ Int Soc Sports Nutr20074 8 17908291 2117006 https://doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-4-8
- Antonio J, Peacock CA, Ellerbroek A, Fromhoff B, and Silver T. The effects of consuming a high protein diet (4.4 g/kg/d) on body composition in resistance-trained individuals. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2014;11:19.
- PaoliAMoroTMarcolinGNeriMBiancoAPalmaA et al High-intensity interval resistance training (hirt) influences resting energy expenditure and respiratory ratio in non-dieting individualsJ Transl Med201210 237 23176325 3551736 https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-237
- PaoliAPacelliFBargossiAMMarcolinGGuzzinatiSNeriM et al Effects of three distinct protocols of fitness training on body composition, strength and blood lactateJ Sports Med Phys Fitness201050 43 51 20308971 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXovV2rs7c%3D
- PaoliAPacelliQFMoroTMarcolinGNeriMBattagliaG et al Effects of high-intensity circuit training, low-intensity circuit training and endurance training on blood pressure and lipoproteins in middle-aged overweight menLipids Health Dis201312 131 24004639 3846819 https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-12-131 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXis1Kju7k%3D
- KraemerWJMarchitelliLGordonSEHarmanEDziadosJEMelloR et al Hormonal and growth factor responses to heavy resistance exercise protocolsJ Appl Physiol199069 1442 50 2262468 1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXit1WmtLs%3D
- WilsonJMLoennekeJPJoEWilsonGJZourdosMCKimJS et al The effects of endurance, strength, and power training on muscle fiber type shiftingJ Strength Cond Res201226 1724 9 21912291
- BoutcherSHHigh-intensity intermittent exercise and fat lossJ Obes20112011 868305 21113312 2991639 https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/868305