![MathJax Logo](/templates/jsp/_style2/_tandf/pb2/images/math-jax.gif)
Abstract
Background
Caffeine supplementation (CAFF) has an established ergogenic effect on physical performance and the psychological response to exercise. However, few studies have compared the response to CAFF intake among athletes of different competition level. This study compares the acute effects of CAFF on anaerobic performance, mood and perceived effort in elite and moderately-trained recreational athletes.
Methods
Participants for this randomized, controlled, crossover study were 8 elite athletes (in the senior boxing national team) and 10 trained-recreational athletes. Under two experimental conditions, CAFF supplementation (6 mg/kg) or placebo (PLAC), the athletes completed a Wingate test. Subjective exertion during the test was recorded as the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) both at the general level (RPEgeneral) and at the levels muscular (RPEmuscular) and cardiorespiratory (RPEcardio). Before the Wingate test, participants completed the questionnaires Profiles of Moods States (POMS) and Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS).
Results
In response to CAFF intake, improvements were noted in Wpeak (11.22 ± 0.65 vs 10.70 ± 0.84; p = 0.003;
=0.44), Wavg (8.75 ± 0.55 vs 8.41 0.46; p = 0.001;
=0.53) and time taken to reach Wpeak (7.56 ± 1.58 vs 9.11 ± 1.53; p < 0.001;
=0.57) both in the elite and trained-recreational athletes. However, only the elite athletes showed significant increases in tension (+ 325%), vigor (+ 31%) and SVS (+ 28%) scores after the intake of CAFF compared to levels recorded under the condition PLAC (p < 0.05). Similarly, levels of vigor after consuming CAFF were significantly higher in the elite than the trained-recreational athletes (+ 5.8%).
Conclusions
CAFF supplementation improved anaerobic performance in both the elite and recreational athletes. However, the ergogenic effect of CAFF on several mood dimensions and subjective vitality was greater in the elite athletes.
P. Jodra, A. Lago-Rodríguez, A. F. San Juan and R. Domínguez contributed equally to this work.
Background
Caffeine (CAFF) is a nutritional supplement with a high level of scientific evidence supporting its effect of improving sports performance [Citation1]. This explains why CAFF has become one of the most widely consumed nutritional aids among athletes [Citation2, Citation3], both professional [Citation4, Citation5] and recreational/amateur [Citation6, Citation7]. Moreover, its popularity has also increased since it was removed from the list of banned substances for sports in 2004 [Citation8].
As CAFF is molecularly similar to adenosine, it blocks adenosine receptors A1, A2a and A2b [Citation9], acting as a powerful central nervous system stimulator [Citation10], and upregulating the synthesis of catecholamines with neurotransmitter activity (e.g., dopamine, epinephrine and norepinephrine) [Citation11, Citation12]. As skeletal muscle has many adenosine receptors [Citation13], CAFF intake increases neuromuscular recruitment [Citation14, Citation15]. Further, at the muscle tissue level, CAFF increases the frequency of calcium channel opening [Citation16], promoting the release of calcium into the myoplasm and thus enhancing muscle contraction [Citation17]. These effects make CAFF an effective ergogenic aid in various exercise actions such as endurance sports [Citation18], exercise efforts with high glycolytic demands [Citation19], resistance exercise [Citation20], and racket [Citation21], combat [Citation22] and team sports [Citation23].
Besides increasing catecholamine levels, the effects of CAFF supplementation on the central nervous system include increased sympathetic activity and reduced parasympathetic activity. In turn, these effects modify a person’s mood [Citation24, Citation25], enhancing alertness and reducing the feeling of fatigue [Citation26, Citation27], such that there is a subjective perception of vitality when faced with a physical activity task. Increased perceived tension reflects optimization of the state of preparation of an athlete to undertake a physical test. The relationship between subjective tension and an athlete’s preparation state follows a hump-shaped function, whereby levels of tension that are too low or too high will mean a decline in performance when adjusting to a person’s optimal performance zone [Citation28]. This explains the known effects of CAFF on emotional factors of tension and vigor, increasing their perceived levels and improving an individual’s willingness to tackle the task at hand [Citation29, Citation30]. In turn, this reduces perceived effort levels (RPE), both in trained and untrained individuals [Citation31].
With the objective of testing whether CAFF consumption is conditioned by an athlete’s training level, Skinner et al. compared blood caffeine concentrations after taking an oral CAFF supplement in untrained subjects versus trained resistance sport athletes [Citation32]. Results indicated that caffeine concentrations were higher in the trained athletes. This suggests that the ergogenic effect of CAFF supplementation could be associated with the training level (trained vs. untrained), and performance level (elite vs. recreational) of the athlete. Evidence supporting this theory is, however, scarce and results have been conflicting [Citation13, Citation33–Citation37]. Hence, while various studies have examined populations of athletes with different performance levels, so far no study has tried to assess whether an athlete’s training level could determine the ergogenic effects of CAFF supplementation. The present study was therefore designed to compare the acute effects of CAFF supplementation on physical performance and mood when executing anaerobic efforts and to assess the effort perceived by elite athletes and moderately-trained recreational athletes.
Methods
Participants
Eighteen men were enrolled. Eight of these participants were elite athletes (age: 22.0 ± 1.8 years; body mass: 65.6 ± 10.8 kg; height: 1.69 ± 0.09 m; BMI: 22.7 ± 1.3 kg/m2), members of the Spanish national senior male boxing team who had been training at the High Performance Center in Madrid, Spain, and participating in international competitions for over 2 years. The remaining 10 subjects were undergraduate students from the Department of Sport Sciences of the Universidad de Alfonso X El Sabio, Madrid, Spain (age: 22.5 ± 1.8 years; body mass: 75.0 ± 10.8 kg; height: 1.75 ± 0.04 m; BMI: 24.3 ± 2.6 kg/m2). These subjects were categorized as recreational athletes based on the following criteria: (a) at least 3 years of experience with strength training, having completed within the past 18 months ≥3 sessions/week without interruption; (b) a bench press one-repetition maximum (1 RM) greater than body weight, and a full squat 1 RM 1.5 times body weight [Citation38]; (c) no nutritional supplements taken in the 3 months before the study outset; (d) no smoking; (e) no disease or other impediment that could affect cycle ergometry performance.
Participants in both experimental groups were volunteers who signed up for this study after an informative session held 1 week before the study outset. Candidates were first informed of the possible secondary effects of CAFF supplementation. The study protocol fulfilled the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidad Alfonso X El Sabio.
Experimental design
The study design was crossover, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled. Each participant undertook two test sessions within 48 h at the university Exercise Physiology laboratory at the same time of day (±0.25 h). In each session, 50% of the athletes were randomly assigned a CAFF (6 mg/kg) or placebo (PLAC) (6 mg/kg of sucrose) supplement.
Upon arrival at the laboratory for each session, participants were given a supplement (CAFF or PLAC) and after a 60 min period of rest, they completed the questionnaires profile of mood states (POMS) and subjective vitality scale (SVS). After a standardized warm-up, the subjects performed a Wingate test on a cycle ergometer to assess anaerobic performance [Citation39]. Immediately after the test, they graded their exertion using the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) scale.
Nutritional intervention
Caffeine supplements were provided in #1 non-transparent red capsules (Guinama S.L.U, 0044634, La Pobla de Valbona, Spain). Individual capsules were prepared based on each participant’s body weight, so each capsule supplied 6 mg/kg of either CAFF or PLAC to each participant. Capsules were prepared following the standard work procedure described in the Formulario Nacional Español using a semi-automatic manual filling machine Capsunorm 2000 (Miranda de Ebro, Spain). The timing of supplement intake was based on the fact that peak blood caffeine levels are reached 1 h post-ingestion [Citation40] and on the results of a disaggregation quality assay described in the Real Farmacopea Española (2005) of 13.4 min [Citation41].
In line with previous research [Citation42], subjects were provided with a set of guidelines to ensure each individual ingested similar proportions of carbohydrates (60%), lipids (30%) and proteins (10%), aiming at avoiding interactions between the supplementation and any nutritional factor. The intake of caffeine was also restricted 24 h before the study start and the subjects were provided with a list of foodstuffs rich in caffeine (coffee, tea, mate, energizing drinks, cola drinks, chocolate drinks and chocolate) they should avoid.
Profile of mood states (POMS)
To assess the participants’ mood, we used the profile of mood states (POMS) questionnaire in its original reduced version [Citation43], translated into Spanish and validated by Fuentes et al. [Citation44]. Participants graded a set of 29 items related to mood on a Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) in reply to the question “How do you feel at this moment?” to assess six scales: tension, depression, anger, vigor, fatigue and confusion.
Subjective vitality scale (SVS)
Participants’ vitality was assessed using the Spanish version of the subjective vitality scale (SVS) [Citation45] of Balaguer et al. [Citation46]. Subjects are required to indicate their agreement with seven statements related to subjective feelings of energy and vitality using a 7-point Likert scale where 1 means “total disagreement” and 7 means “total agreement”.
Anaerobic performance
A Monark cycle ergometer (Ergomedic 828E, Vansbro, Sweden) was used for the Wingate test. The test was preceded by a standardized warm up as described previously [Citation42, Citation47] and consisted of 30 s of cycling at maximum effort with a load (Kp) corresponding to 7.5% of the subject’s body weight. The test was started from a stop position and the first round of pedaling initiated with the dominant leg. Participants were encouraged to reach the maximum rpm in the shortest time possible and try to maintain this pedaling speed until the end of the test. Throughout the test, the athletes were motivated by 5 investigators.
Power (W) was recorded during each second of the test. The following variables were subsequently calculated: the highest W value recorded during the test or peak power (Wpeak), the time in seconds (s) taken to reach Wpeak (Time Wpeak), mean W for the test duration (Wmean) and minimum power (Wmin), taken as the lowest W recorded during the last 10 s of the test.
Rating of perceived exertion (RPE)
In line with previous research [Citation48], a 6 to 20 RPE scale of Borg [Citation49] was presented as soon as the Wingate test was finished. Accordingly, participants were first asked to report RPE regarding muscular pain felt at legs (RPEmuscular); second, participants were asked to report RPE only at cardiorespiratory level (RPEcardio); and finally, participants had to declare global RPE (RPEgeneral), which included features from both muscular and cardiorespiratory dimensions.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as means ± standard deviations (SD). The normal distribution of data was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and equality of variances was established with the Levene’s test. When an inequality of variances was found, a non-parametric test was used, in which case the value of the adjusted test statistic and degrees of freedom are reported. To ensure similar anthropometric and personal variables between elite and trained-recreational athletes, separate Student t-tests for independent samples (elite vs. trained-recreational) were run for age, weight, height, and body mass index (BMI), respectively.
To compare the effects of CAFF supplementation on physical and psychological measures between the two groups of athletes, separate 2 × 2 independent analyses of variance for repeated measures (ANOVA-RM) were applied for each variable recorded. Performance level (elite vs. trained-recreational) was introduced as an inter-subject factor, whereas Supplementation (CAFF vs. PLAC) was used as an intra-subject factor. Practical significance for pairwise comparisons was assessed by calculating Cohen’s d effect size [Citation50]. Effect sizes (d) of above 0.8, between 0.8 and 0.5, between 0.5 and 0.2 and lower than 0.2 were considered as large, moderate, small, and trivial, respectively [Citation51]. Further, ANOVA-RM effect sizes were calculated using partial eta squared (), and < 0.25, 0.26–0.63 and > 0.63 considered small, medium and large effect sizes respectively [Citation52, Citation53]. All statistical tests were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 20.0 for Mac, SPSS™ Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
No significant differences between experimental groups (elite vs. trained- recreational) were detected in the variables age (t16 = 0.593; p = 0.561; d = 0.28); weight (t16 = 1.838; p = 0.085; d = 0.87); height (t9.41 = 1.694; p = 0.123; d = 0.87); and BMI (t16 = 1.594; p = 0.130; d = 0.76).
Anaerobic performance
The results found for the anaerobic performance measures are summarized in Table . A significant effect of the factors supplementation (F1,16 = 12.804; p = 0.003;
= 0.44) and group (F1,16 = 8.915; p = 0.009;
= 0.36) was observed when peak power was analyzed. Thus, participants showed higher Wpeak values after CAFF supplementation compared to placebo (11.22 ± 0.65 vs 10.7 ± 0.84 W) whereas trained-recreational athletes showed a higher Wpeak (11.31 ± 0.73) than the elite athletes (10.52 ± 0.62). However, there was no significant interaction between supplementation and group (F1,16 = 0.652; p = 0.431;
= 0.04).
Table 1 Performance variables recorded in each experimental group
For the average power exerted by participants during the Wingate test, we observed a significant effect of supplementation (F1,16 = 18.099; p = 0.001; = 0.531). Participants showed a greater Wavg after CAFF supplementation (8.75 ± 0.55) compared to placebo (8.41 ± 0.46). No significant supplementation by group interaction emerged (F1,16 = 1.197; p = 0.290;
= 0.07); nor did we observe a significant effect of group (F1,16 = 0.820; p = 0.378;
= 0.05).
As for minimum power in the Wingate test, no significant supplementation by group interaction was detected (F1,16 = 0.680; p = 0.422; = 0.04). Neither were any significant effects observed of the factors supplementation (F1,16 = 0.595; p = 0.452;
= 0.04) or group (F1,16 = 0.948; p = 0.345;
= 0.06).
Finally, when we examined the time it took the participants to achieve maximum power, a significant effect emerged of supplementation (F1,16 = 21.138; p < 0.001; = 0.57). This meant that the athletes reached Wpeak earlier after CAFF supplementation (7.56 ± 1.58) compared to placebo (9.11 ± 1.53). There was no significant supplementation by group interaction (F1,16 = 3.584; p = 0.077;
= 0.18) or a significant effect of group (F1,16 = 0.079; p = 0.783;
= 0.005).
Rating of perceived exertion (RPE)
Table details the ratings of perceived exertion awarded by the participants. A significant effect was detected for the factor group (F1,16 = 6.507; p = 0.021; = 0.29) in the exertion perceived by the athletes in the legs (RPEmuscular) whereby the trained-recreational athletes showed higher RPEmuscular (18.20 ± 1.06) than the elite athletes (15.75 ± 3.17). There were no significant supplementation by group interactions (F1,16 = 0.02; p = 0.889;
= 0.001), or significant effects of supplementation (F1,16 = 0.376; p = 0.548;
= 0.02).
Table 2 Ratings of perceived exertion recorded in each experimental group
A significant effect of the factor group was found in exertion perceived at the cardiorespiratory level (F1,16 = 6.829; p = 0.019; = 0.3) in that the trained-recreational athletes showed a larger RPEcardio (17.45 ± 1.64) than the elite athletes (14.63 ± 3.12). There was no significant supplementation by group interaction (F1,16 = 0.077; p = 0.785;
= 0.005) nor significant effect of the factor supplementation (F1,16 = 0.69; p = 0.419;
= 0.04).
No significant supplementation by group interaction (F1,16 = 0.039; p = 0.846; = 0.002) was found for the general rate of perceived exertion (RPEgeneral). Moreover, there was no significant effect of supplementation (F1,16 = 3.172; p = 0.094;
= 0.16) or group (F1,16 = 3.524; p = 0.079;
= 0.18).
Psychological measures
In Table , we provide the results found for the psychological measures. A significant supplementation by group interaction was noted for tension (F1,16 = 6.526; p = 0.021; = 0.29; Fig. ), which was accompanied by a significant effect of the factor supplementation (F1,16 = 16.552; p = 0.001;
= 0.51). However, no significant effect of group was observed (F1,16 = 0.815; p = 0.380;
= 0.05). Our post-hoc pairwise analysis revealed significantly greater tension levels reported by the elite athletes after caffeine intake compared with placebo (8 ± 4.98 vs. 1.88 ± 3.56; p < 0.001; d = 1.43).
Table 3 Psychological measures recorded in each experimental group
Fig. 1 Panel a shows the scores recorded for the dimension tension. Higher tension scores were reported by elite athletes after supplementation with caffeine compared to placebo; Panel b shows the scores recorded for the dimension vigor. Scores for vigor were significantly higher after caffeine supplementation in the elite athletes compared to the trained-recreational athletes. Further, elite athletes returned higher vigor scores after supplementation with caffeine compared to placebo; Panel c shows the scores recorded in the SVS. Elite athletes showed larger SVS values after supplementation with caffeine versus placebo. a: significant differences were detected in elite athletes when caffeine was compared with placebo. b: significant differences after caffeine supplementation were detected in elite athletes versus trained-recreational athletes
![](/cms/asset/f6e83271-6f82-482c-8886-215f2e4b7bc6/rssn_a_12130143_f0001_oc.png)
A significant effect of the factor group was noted when depression measures were analyzed (F1,16 = 5.24; p = 0.036; = 0.25). Elite athletes awarded more points to the dimension depression (3.25 ± 0.93) than the trained-recreational athletes (1.30 ± 2.7). No significant supplementation by group interaction was observed (F1,16 = 1.474; p = 0.242;
= 0.08) nor a significant effect of supplementation (F1,16 = 0.018; p = 0.894;
= 0.001).
For the dimension anger, there was no significant interaction between supplementation and group (F1,16 = 1.481; p = 0.241; = 0.08) or any significant effects of supplementation (F1,16 = 0.165; p = 0.690;
= 0.01) or group (F1,16 = 1.967; p = 0.180;
= 0.11).
When measures of vigor were analyzed, a significant supplementation by group interaction was noted (F1,16 = 11.284; p = 0.004; = 0.41; Fig. ), accompanied by a significant effect of supplementation (F1,16 = 29.070; p < 0.001;
= 0.64). However, no significant effect was detected of the factor group (F1,16 = 2.706; p = 0.119;
= 0.14). Our post-hoc pairwise analysis revealed significantly greater vigor values for the elite than trained- recreational athletes after caffeine supplementation (16,5 ± 2.62 vs. 13 ± 3.02; p = 0.20; d = 1.24). Moreover, significantly higher vigor scores were obtained for the elite athletes when these were supplemented with caffeine rather than placebo (16.5 ± 2.62 vs. 12.63 ± 2.33; p < 0.001; d = 1.56). A significant effect of supplementation was also found on self-reported fatigue (F1,16 = 9.164; p = 0.008;
= 0.36). Accordingly, participants showed higher fatigue levels after supplementation with placebo (4.89 ± 4.42) than CAFF (2.56 ± 2.77). There was no significant supplementation by group interaction (F1,16 = 3.299; p = 0.088;
= 0.17) nor significant effect of group (F1,16 = 0.850; p = 0.370;
= 0.05).
For confusion levels reported by the participants, there was no significant supplementation by group interaction (F1,16 = 1.516; p = 0.236; = 0.09), nor a significant effect of supplementation (F1,16 = 0.257; p = 0.619;
= 0.02) or group (F1,16 = 1.035; p = 0.324;
= 0.06).
As for the subjective vitality scale, a significant supplementation by group interaction was detected (F1,16 = 11.028; p = 0.004; = 0.41; Fig. ), along with a significant effect of supplementation (F1,16 = 22.863; p < 0.001;
= 0.59) but no significant effect of group (F1,16 = 0.292; p = 0.597;
= 0.02). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons revealed that elite athletes returned higher SVS scores after caffeine supplementation compared to placebo (40.63 ± 4.78 vs. 31.75 ± 7.78; p < 0.001; d = 1.41).
Discussion
The present study was designed to compare the acute effects of CAFF supplementation on anaerobic performance, mood and perceived exertion in elite athletes and moderately-trained recreational athletes. Our findings indicate that the ergogenic effect of CAFF is determined by an athlete’s performance level but only in terms of variables related to mood state. Hence, elite athletes reported significantly higher tension levels following the intake of CAFF (+ 325%) than the intake of PLAC. Similarly, CAFF supplementation led to significantly higher measures of vigor compared to the effect of PLAC (+ 31%) but only in the elite athletes. Further, vigor levels reported after the intake of CAFF were significantly higher (+ 27%) in the elite athletes than recreational athletes. Finally, elite athletes also returned significantly higher SVS scores after the intake of CAFF compared to PLAC (+ 5.8%). In contrast, it emerged that the ergogenic effect of CAFF on measures of anaerobic performance were independent of the athletes’ training level.
In line with prior work, studies have shown that CAFF supplementation produces an increase in peak and average power and that this effect is not conditioned by the performance level of the athlete [Citation19, Citation54, Citation55]. Consistently, we observed here that CAFF intake led to a shorter time needed to reach peak power in both experimental groups (− 9.9% in elite and 22.5% in trained-recreational athletes). These data suggest that an athlete’s training level does not modify the ergogenic effect exerted by CAFF supplementation on anaerobic performance (i.e., peak and average power). Our results are line with the ergogenic effect of CAFF observed both in elite athletes [Citation13, Citation35, Citation36] and in recreational athletes [Citation37], and also with the improved physical performance noted after the intake of CAFF in trained and untrained athletes [Citation34]. In contrast, Collomp et al. reported an ergogenic CAFF effect in an anaerobic capacity field test (100 m freestyle swimming) in trained swimmers but not in untrained swimmers [Citation33]. If we consider evidence suggesting that the amount of supplemented CAFF determines its potential ergogenic effect [Citation56–Citation58], it seems reasonable that this variable could explain the disparate results obtained in our study and the report by Collomp et al. [Citation33]. While the dose of CAFF in the present study was personalized (6 mg/kg), Collomp et al. used a standard dose of 250 mg (~ 4.3 mg/kg) [Citation33]. Moreover, as it has been established that CAFF supplementation produces a greater effect on movement velocity as the dose is increased and, especially, as the load is increased [Citation59], the greater amount of CAFF used here could explain our different results to those of Collomp et al. [Citation33].
Another explanation for the different results obtained by Collomp et al. could be the type of physical test used [Citation33]. Thus, while we used a standard test to assess anaerobic capacity (Wingate test), Collomp et al. employed a test that was specific for the athletes tested (i.e., 100 m freestyle) [Citation33]. This could explain why our trained-recreational athletes developed more peak power than the elite athletes, although other studies have detected no differences in physical performance between different-level athletes [Citation60, Citation61] or between boxers and physically inactive individuals [Citation62]. Notwithstanding, elite boxers were found to show improved anaerobic performance compared to amateur boxers in an arm cycle ergometry Wingate test [Citation63, Citation64]. This could suggest that the higher peak power value recorded in our recreational athletes reflected the greater adaptation of these athletes to maximal efforts executed with the legs, regardless of the specificity of the anaerobic test performed according to the given sports modality. In future work, the ergogenic effect of CAFF should be examined in different level athletes (elite vs. trained-recreational) who practice the same sports activity in physical performance tests specific to the physiological and biomechanical needs of that sport.
The effects of caffeine on anaerobic performance may be explained by both peripheral and central mechanisms. At the peripheral level, the effects of CAFF supplementation, such as enhanced neuromuscular recruitment [Citation14, Citation15] and increased bioavailability of calcium in the myoplasm [Citation16], could explain the positive effect on power production by the muscle and thus explain the ergogenic effects observed in the Wingate test. Centrally, CAFF is an adenosine antagonist, increasing neurotransmitter synthesis [Citation11, Citation12] and nervous system stimulation [Citation65]. How these effects impact RPE and physical performance are still being explored [Citation66]. Studies have shown that CAFF doses of 3–6 mg/kg give rise to improved performance and reduced RPE in sets of resistance exercise with submaximal loads [Citation67], and physical condition tests in basketball players [Citation68]. In Wingate tests, improved ergometry performance in the arms accompanied by a decline in RPE has been observed [Citation69], as well as improved performance in the legs both in moderately-trained subjects [Citation70] and trained judokas [Citation71, Citation72]. We could not confirm any beneficial effects of CAFF on RPE here. However, the improved Wavg levels observed associated with a similar RPE, suggest that CAFF supplementation exerts its positive effects by allowing a greater workload for a given RPE [Citation73, Citation74], since it would be reasonable to expect lower RPE values at CAFF condition (compared to PLAC) if similar performance were registered for both experimental conditions [Citation75]. Accordingly, CAFF seems to modify the relationship between workload and RPE, reducing RPE for a given load [Citation76]. Therefore, some of the ergogenic effects of CAFF could take place via a diminished sensation of fatigue induced by exercise [Citation77].
As adenosine increases pain and tiredness perception while it diminishes arousal [Citation10], CAFF supplementation, through its effects on adenosine, could have a positive effect on a person’s mood state [Citation25, Citation78]. Some authors propose that an increased mood state via augmented tension, reflects an optimal emotional state to approach a physical task [Citation48]. This determines that small increases in tension levels before exercise could lead to improved performance [Citation79]. Our results indicate that CAFF supplementation has an effect in high-performance athletes. This is consistent with studies in which improved performance was accompanied by increases in tension and vigor and a reduction in fatigue in elite judo athletes [Citation71, Citation72, Citation80]. In an attempt to explain such enhanced tension levels only in elite athletes, Lane et al. [Citation81] and Lane and Jarret [Citation82] argued that elite athletes are accustomed to high levels of tension and vigor, and that this leads to adaptation to variations met in situations of high physical demands to optimize the state of approaching a task [Citation26, Citation30]. This situation is uncommon in recreational athletes. In a study examining fatigue perception, Paton et al. measured sprints in trained cyclists who trained under the effects of caffeine or placebo [Citation83]. The authors noted that acute CAFF intake significantly reduced the feeling of fatigue when executing a repeated high-intensity exercise in elite cyclists, coinciding with the findings of studies conducted in moderately-trained [Citation84] and recreational athletes [Citation27]. In our study, the sensation of fatigue diminished significantly in both groups of athletes when taking caffeine as a supplement before conducting a maximum intensity task. This evidence of the effects of CAFF in increasing tension and vigor, and diminishing the sensation of fatigue in the case of elite boxers allows for adaptation to an optimal state for facing maximum intensity explosive actions.
In the depression dimension of the POMS questionnaire, the professional boxers scored higher than the recreational athletes. While several studies indicate that practicing sports improves mood in terms of improving depression [Citation85, Citation86], two literature reviews [Citation87]. reported that athletes of sports modalities possibly causing concussion (e.g., boxing), showed high prevalence of depression symptoms. Thus, repeated concussion episodes produced after a blow transmitting an inertial force to the brain can give rise to depressive symptoms [Citation88]. This is attributable to a strong correlation observed between athletes with a history of concussion and abnormalities in frontal lobe alpha waves and symptoms of depression [Citation89]. Studies have identified a substantial increase (~ 20%) in depression symptoms in athletes who have suffered concussion [Citation90, Citation91]. Further, athletes of sports with a risk of concussion such as American football, rugby or boxing are 2 to 3 times more likely to suffer from depression than the general population [Citation92–Citation94]. This means it could be that the differences detected here between groups were linked to the sports modality of the high-performance athletes (i.e., boxing). Therefore, there is need to evaluate potential associations between concussion and depression symptoms in future studies, in which different athletes’ cohorts should be recruited. This would allow researchers to analyze potential underlying mechanisms for depression, in addition to broaden our knowledge regarding concussion-related mental disorders (i.e. anxiety), which have been previously studied in retired athletes [Citation95, Citation96].
Limitations of the study
Individual caffeine tolerance has been previously associated with decreased ergogenic effect of caffeine supplementation, resulting from an increased activity of the adenosine receptors, along with a decreased β-adrenergic activity [Citation25]. Unfortunately, it was not possible for us to control for individual’s caffeine tolerance on this study, since participant’s average caffeine intake was not recorded. Therefore, habituation to caffeine may have been a potential confound variable on our study, and it should be controlled in future research aiming at comparing the ergogenic effect of caffeine between different populations.
Although a set of nutritional guidelines was given to each participant, in order to ensure similar proportions of ingested macronutrients, individual dietary compliance was not assessed. Thus, there is need for control of this variable in future research, in order to fully cancelled potential interactions between supplementation and nutritional factors.
Finally, recruitment criteria associated with strength parameters (i.e. bench press 1RM greater than body weight, and 1RM 1.5 times body weight in full squat) were only applied for the recreational group. Thus, it cannot be fully discarded that between-group differences found for peak and average power resulted from potential strength differences between experimental groups. It is recommended that future research controls for this potential confound variable.
Conclusions
Supplementation with 6 mg/kg of CAFF had an ergogenic effect on anaerobic performance, improving average power, peak power and the time needed to reach peak power in elite and in trained-recreational athletes. These improvements took place without a concomitant increase in RPE. Further, CAFF supplementation led to considerable improvements in factors contributing to mood state such as tension, vigor and vitality perception, but only in the elite athletes. In order to be able to generalize our conclusions to different athletes’ populations, future research is needed aiming at comparing caffeine’s ergogenic effect on recreationally-trained athletes and elite athletes from different sport modalities.
Authors’ contributions
R.D. and P.J. designed the experiment; R.D., P.J., P.V.H. and A.F.S.J. recruited the subjects, R.D., P.J., P.V.H., A.L.-S., A.P.-L. and A.F.S.J. held the informative session; A.J.S.-O. and P.V.-H. checked that subjects followed the diet guidelines and the timing of supplement ingestion; P.V.-H. prepared the supplements and ensured their randomization; R.D., P.J., A.L.-S., A.P.-L. and A.F.S.J. performed the experiments; P.J., A.L.-S., A.P.-L., A.J.S.-O., P.V.-H. and A.S.J.F. analyzed the data; A.L.-R. conducted the statistical analysis; A.L.-S. elaborated the figure; P.J., A.L.-R. and R.D., wrote the manuscript; P.J., A.L.-R., A.J.S.-O., A.L.-S., A.P.-L., P.V.H., and R.D. revised the manuscript; P.J., A.L.-R., A.J.S.-O., A.L.-S., A.P.-L., P.V.H., and R.D. approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This original research study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidad Alfonso X El Sabio, Madrid, Spain.
Consent for publication
An informed consent was provided to ensure that the subjects had voluntarily expressed his intention to participate in the investigation, after having understood the information given to him, about the objectives of the study, the benefits, the inconvenience, the possible risks and the alternatives, their rights and responsibilities.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Abbreviations
ANOVA | = | analysis of variance |
BMI | = | body mass index |
CAFF | = | caffeine |
PLAC | = | placebo |
POMS | = | profile of mood states |
RM | = | repetition maximum |
RPE | = | rating of perceived exertion |
RPEcardio | = | exertion perceived at the cardiorespiratory level |
RPEgeneral | = | exertion perceived at the general level |
RPEmuscular | = | exertion perceived at the level of the legs |
SD | = | standard deviation |
SVS | = | subjective vitality scale |
Time Wpeak | = | time taken (s) to reach peak power |
W | = | power |
Wavg | = | average power |
Wmin | = | minimum power output |
Wpeak | = | peak power |
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Spanish Boxing Federation (Federación Española de Boxeo) especially Rafael Lozano and Teresa, who gave their permission for their elite athletes to complete the test sessions for this study, and ensured that all diet and resting criteria for participation were fulfilled. We also thank Ana Burton for help with translating the text from Spanish.
Funding
This study was financed (supplementation, translation and publication costs) by a grant for the project Effects of caffeine supplementation on psychophysiological responses of performance and fatigue in the Olympic boxing team of the X Call for Research Projects of the UAX and Banco Santander.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- MaughanRJBurkeLMDvorakJLarson-MeyerDEPeelingPPhillipsSM et al IOC consensus statement: dietary supplements and the high-performance athleteInt J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab201828 104 125 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXht1yhtb%2FM 29589768 https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0020 29589768
- KristiansenMLevy-MilneRBarrSFlintADietary supplement use by varsity athletes at a Canadian UniversityInt J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab200515 2 195 210 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXkvVGju7c%3D 16089277 https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.15.2.195 16089277
- PetrocziANaughtonDPThe age-gender-status profile of high performing athletes in the UK taking nutritional supplements: lessons for the futureJ Int Soc Sport Nutr20085 2 https://doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-5-2 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXksVKit74%3D
- López-SamanesÁMoreno-PérezVKovacsMSPallarésJGMora-RodríguezROrtega FonsecaJFUse of nutritional supplements and ergogenic aids in professional tennis playersNutr Hosp201734 1463 1468 29280665 29280665
- López-Domínguez R, Sánchez-Oliver AJ. Use of sports nutritional supplements in elite rowers: difference between national and international. RETOS – Nuevas Tendencias en Educ. Fis. Deport. y Recreacion [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Aug 27];34:272–5. Available from: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/article/view/65026/39534.
- Sánchez-Oliver A, Miranda-León M, Guerra-Hernández E. Estudio estadístico del consumo de suplementos nutricionales y dietéticos en gimnasios. Arch Latinoam Nutr [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2017 Mar 1];58:221–7.
- TsitsimpikouChristinaChrisostomouNastasiaPapalexisPeterTsarouhasKonstantinosTsatsakisAristidisJamurtasAthanasiosThe Use of Nutritional Supplements Among Recreational Athletes in Athens, GreeceInternational Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism201121 5 377 384 21799216 https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.21.5.377 21799216
- Aguilar-NavarroMMuñozGSalineroJJMuñoz-GuerraJFernández-álvarezMPlataMDM et al Urine caffeine concentration in doping control samples from 2004 to 2015Nutrients201911 2 286 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXhtlKrsbnN 6412495 https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11020286
- Abo-SalemOMHayallahAMBilkei-GorzoAFilipekBZimmerAMullerCEAntinociceptive effects of novel A2B adenosine receptor antagonistsJ Pharmacol Exp Ther U S A2004308 358 366 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXmsFemsw%3D%3D https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.103.056036
- DavisJKGreenJMCaffeine and anaerobic performance: ergogenic value and mechanisms of actionSport Med200939 10 813 832 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MnivVOlsA%3D%3D https://doi.org/10.2165/11317770-000000000-00000
- MeeusenRExercise, nutrition and the brainSport Med201444 1 S47 S56 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0150-5
- DavisJ. MarkZhaoZuoweiStockHoward S.MehlKristen A.BuggyJamesHandGregory A.Central nervous system effects of caffeine and adenosine on fatigueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology2003284 2 R399 R404 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhtlOqsbY%3D 12399249 https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00386.2002 12399249
- WoolfKBidwellWKCarlsonAGThe effect of caffeine as an ergogenic aid in anaerobic exerciseInt J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab200818 4 412 429 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtVOnu7bI 18708685 https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.18.4.412 18708685
- KalmarJMCafarelliECentral excitability does not limit postfatigue voluntary activation of quadriceps femorisJ Appl Physiol2006100 6 1757 1764 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283otlOlsw%3D%3D 16424071 https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01347.2005 16424071
- PlaskettCJCafarelliECaffeine increases endurance and attenuates force sensation during submaximal isometric contractionsJ Appl Physiol200191 4 1535 1544 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXnsFSlsro%3D 11568134 https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2001.91.4.1535 11568134
- RousseauELadineJLiuQYMeissnerGActivation of the Ca2+ release channel of skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum by caffeine and related compoundsArch Biochem Biophys1988267 1 75 86 1:CAS:528:DyaL1MXjsFCltg%3D%3D 2848455 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(88)90010-0 2848455
- AllenDGWesterbladHThe effects of caffeine on intracellular calcium, force and the rate of relaxation of mouse skeletal muscleJ Physiol1995487 2 31 342 https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020883
- GlaisterMGissaneCCaffeine and physiological responses to submaximal exercise: a meta-analysisInt J Sport Physiol Perform201813 4 402 411 https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2017-0312
- GrgicJCaffeine ingestion enhances Wingate performance: a meta-analysisEur J Sport Sci201818 2 219 225 29087785 https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2017.1394371 29087785
- GrgicJTrexlerETLazinicaBPedisicZEffects of caffeine intake on muscle strength and power: a systematic review and meta-analysisJ Int Soc Sport Nutr201815 11 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-018-0216-0
- Lopez-SamanesAOrtega FonsecaJFFernandez EliasVEBorreaniSMate-MunõzJLKovacsMSNutritional ergogenic aids in Tennis: a brief reviewStrength Cond J201537 3 1 11 https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000141
- López-GonzálezLMSánchez-OliverAJMataFJodraPAntonioJDomínguezRAcute caffeine supplementation in combat sports: a systematic reviewJ Int Soc Sport Nutr201815 1 60 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-018-0267-2 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXhtFKnurjF
- SalineroJJLaraBDel CosoJEffects of acute ingestion of caffeine on team sports performance: a systematic review and meta-analysisRes Sport Med201927 2 238 256 https://doi.org/10.1080/15438627.2018.1552146
- DuncanMJOxfordSWThe effect of caffeine ingestion on mood state and bench press performance to failureJ Strength Cond Res201125 178 185 21157384 https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318201bddb 21157384
- SökmenBArmstrongLEKraemerWJCasaDJDiasJCJudelsonDA et al Caffeine use in sports: considerations for the athleteJ Strength Cond Res200822 3 978 986 18438212 https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181660cec 18438212
- AliAO’DonnellJVon HurstPFoskettAHollandSStarckC et al Caffeine ingestion enhances perceptual responses during intermittent exercise in female team-game playersJ Sports Sci201634 330 341 26045170 https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1052746 26045170
- SmithAEffects of caffeine on human behaviorFood Chem Toxicol200240 9 1243 1255 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XmsVers7s%3D 12204388 12204388 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(02)00096-0
- HaninYL WilliamFSA study of anxiety in sportsSport psychology: An analysis of athletic behavior1978 Ithaca Mouvement Publications 236 249
- HaninYL Emotions and athletic performance: individual zones of optimal functioning model. Essential readings in sport and exercise psychology2007 Human Kinetics Champaign
- Nehlig A. Is caffeine a cognitive enhancer? Cunha RA, de Mendonça A, editors. J Alzheimer’s Dis [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2019 Jan 17];20:S85–94. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20182035.
- KumarNWarrenGLSnowTKMillard-StaffordMCaffeine ingestion with or without low-dose carbohydrate improves exercise tolerance in sedentary adultsFront Nutr20196 9 30854370 6396727 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2019.00009
- SkinnerTLJenkinsDGLeverittMDMcGormABolamKACoombesJS et al Factors influencing serum caffeine concentrations following caffeine ingestionJ Sci Med Sport201417 5 516 520 23932441 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2013.07.006 23932441
- CollompKAhmaidiSChatardJCAudranMPréfautCBenefits of caffeine ingestion on sprint performance in trained and untrained swimmersEur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol199264 377 380 1:STN:280:DyaK383nsV2kuw%3D%3D 1592065 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00636227 1592065
- BoyettJCGierschGEWWomackCJSaundersMJHugheyCADaleyHM et al Time of day and training status both impact the efficacy of caffeine for short duration cycling performanceNutrients.20168 10 639 https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8100639 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXhsFShur4%3D
- GoodsPSRLandersGFultonSCaffeine ingestion improves repeated freestyle sprints in elite male swimmersJ Sport Sci Med201716 1 93 98
- JacobsonBHWeberMDClaypoolLHuntLEEffect of caffeine on maximal strength and power in élite male athletesBr J Sports Med199226 4 276 280 1:STN:280:DyaK3s7ksFWmtg%3D%3D 1490224 1479007 https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.26.4.276
- Graham-PaulsonTPerretCGoosey-TolfreyVImprovements in cycling but not handcycling 10 km time trial performance in habitual caffeine usersNutrients20168 7 393 4963869 https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8070393 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXhsVKitrnI 4963869
- Potach D. Entrenamiento pliométrico y de velocidad. In: Earle R, Baechle T, editors. Man. NSCA Fundam. del Entren. Pers. Barcelona, Spain: Paidotribo; 2002. p. 515–54.
- Bar-OrOThe Wingate anaerobic test an update on methodology, reliability and validitySport Med An Int J Appl Med Sci Sport Exerc19874 6 381 394 1:STN:280:DyaL1c7is1GmsA%3D%3D
- McLellanTMCaldwellJALiebermanHRA review of caffeine’s effects on cognitive, physical and occupational performanceNeurosci Biobehav Rev201671 294 312 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XhsFCmt77L 27612937 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.001 27612937
- Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. Real Farmacopea Española. Madrid; 2005.
- DomínguezRGarnacho-CastañoMVCuencaEGarcía-FernándezPMuñoz-GonzálezAde JesúsF et al Effects of beetroot juice supplementation on a 30-s high-intensity inertial cycle ergometer testNutrients20179 12 1360 5748810 https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9121360 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXitFarur%2FN
- McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF. Manual for profile of mood states. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service; 1992.
- Fuentes I, Balaguer I, Meliá JL, García-Merita M. Forma abreviada del Perfil de Estado de Ánimo (POMS). V Congr. Nac. Psicol. la Act. Física y el Deport. 1995.
- RyanRMFrederickCOn energy, personality, and Health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-beingJ Pers199765 3 529 565 1:STN:280:DyaK2svmvVGjsw%3D%3D 9327588 9327588 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x
- Balaguer I, Castillo I, García-Mertia M, Mars I. Implications of structured extracurricular activities on adolescent’s well being and risk behaviors: motivational mechanisms. 9th European Congress of Psychology. 2005.
- CuencaEJodraPPérez-LópezAGonzález-RodríguezLGda SilvaSFVeiga-HerrerosP et al Effects of beetroot juice supplementation on performance and fatigue in a 30-s all-out sprint exercise: a randomized, double-blind cross-over studyNutrients201810 9 1222 6164999 https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10091222 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXktFGhsro%3D
- Jodra P, Dominguez R, Sanchez-Oliver A, Veiga-Herreros P, Bailey SJ. Effect of beetroot juice supplementation on mood, perceived exercise and performance during a 30 s Wingate test. Int J Sport Physiol Perform. 2019:1–6.
- Medicine GB. Subjective effort and physical abilities. Scand J Rehabil [Internet]. 1978 [cited 2019 Jan 17];6:197. Available from: https://scholar.google.es/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Borg%2C+G.+%281978%29.+Subjective+effort+and+physical+abilities.+Scandinavian+Journal+of+Rehabilitation+Medicine%2C+6%2C+105–113.&btnG=.
- LakensDCalculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAsFront Psychol20134 863 24324449 3840331 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
- CohenJStatistical power analysis for the behavioral sciencesTechnometrics198831 4 499 500
- FergusonCJAn effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchersProf Psychol Res Pract200940 5 532 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808
- RichardsonJTEEta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational researchEduc Res Rev20116 2 135 147 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001
- DohertyMSmithPMHughesMGDavisonRCRCaffeine lowers perceptual response and increases power output during high-intensity cyclingJ Sports Sci200422 7 637 643 15370494 https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410310001655741 15370494
- WilesJDColemanDTegerdineMSwaineILThe effects of caffeine ingestion on performance time, speed and power during a laboratory-based 1 km cycling time-trialJ Sports Sci200624 1165 1171 17035165 https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500457687 17035165
- AstorinoTATerziMNRobersonDWBurnettTREffect of two doses of caffeine on muscular function during isokinetic exerciseMed Sci Sports Exerc201042 12 2205 2210 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhsVCrtrnK 20421833 https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e3a11d 20421833
- Boiko FerreiraLHSmolarekACMascarenhasLPGOliveiraCSZandonáBASchoenfeldBJ et al Acute effect of different doses of caffeine on strength and calcium releaseMed Sci Sports Exerc201850 5S 599 https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000537064.86488.48
- NegareshRDel CosoJMokhtarzadeMLima-SilvaAEBakerJSWillemsMET et al Effects of different dosages of caffeine administration on wrestling performance during a simulated tournamentEur J Sport Sci201919 4 499 507 30378465 https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1534990 30378465
- PALLARÉSJESÚS G.FERNÁNDEZ-ELÍASVALENTÍN E.ORTEGAJUAN F.MUÑOZGLORIAMUÑOZ-GUERRAJESÚSMORA-RODRÍGUEZRICARDONeuromuscular Responses to Incremental Caffeine DosesMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise201345 11 2184 2192 https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31829a6672 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhs1Ckt77F
- JonvikKLNyakayiruJVan DijkJWMaaseKBallakSBSendenJMG et al Repeated-sprint performance and plasma responses following beetroot juice supplementation do not differ between recreational, competitive and elite sprint athletesEur J Sport Sci201818 4 524 533 1:STN:280:DC%2BC1MvosFSgsg%3D%3D 29412076 https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1433722 29412076
- DemirkanEKozMKutluMFavreMComparison of physical and physiological profiles in elite and amateur young wrestlersJ Strength Cond Res201529 7 1876 1883 25559900 https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000833 25559900
- AbidinMAHOoiFKChenCKPhysiological profiles and bone health status of Malay adolescent male boxing, Muay Thai and silat athletesSport Sci Health201814 3 673 683 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-018-0492-8
- García PallarésJLópez-GullónJMTorres-BoneteMDIzquierdoMPhysical fitness factors to predict female Olympic wrestling performance and sex differencesJ Strength Cond Res201226 3 794 803 22207259 https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824741e7 22207259
- García-PallarésJesúsLópez-GullónJosé MaríaMurielXabierDíazArturoIzquierdoMikelPhysical fitness factors to predict male Olympic wrestling performanceEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology2011111 8 1747 1758 21221989 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1809-8 21221989
- GrahamTECaffeine and exercise metabolism, endurance and performanceSport Med200131 11 785 807 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrjsFahtw%3D%3D https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200131110-00002
- Marcora SM, Staiano W. The limit to exercise tolerance in humans: mind over muscle? Eur J Appl Physiol [Internet]. Springer; 2010 [cited 2019 Jan 17];109:763–70. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00421-010-1418-6.
- DuncanMJStanleyMParkhouseNCookKSmithMAcute caffeine ingestion enhances strength performance and reduces perceived exertion and muscle pain perception during resistance exerciseEur J Sport Sci201313 392 399 23834545 https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2011.635811 23834545
- StojanovicEStojiljkovicNScanlanATDalboVJStankovicRAnticV et al Acute caffeine supplementation promotes small to moderate improvements in performance tests indicative of in-game success in professional female basketball playersAppl Physiol Nutr Metab201944 8 849 856 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXhtlSlsr3F 30633542 https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2018-0671 30633542
- DuncanMJDobellAPCaygillCLEyreETallisJThe effect of acute caffeine ingestion on upper body anaerobic exercise and cognitive performanceEur J Sport Sci201919 1 103 111 30102874 https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1508505 30102874
- ChtourouHTrabelsiKAmmarAShephardRJBragazziNLAcute effects of an “Energy drink” on short-term maximal performance, reaction times, psychological and physiological parameters: insights from a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced crossover trialNutrients201911 5 992 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXhslOrur3I 6566184 https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11050992
- SouissiMAbedelmalekSChtourouHAtheymenRHakimASahnounZEffects of morning caffeine’ ingestion on mood states, simple reaction time, and short-term maximal performance on elite judoistsAsian J Sports Med20123 161 168 23012635 3445643 https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.34607
- SouissiMAbedelmalekSChtourouHBoussitaAHakimASahnounZEffects of time-of-day and caffeine ingestion on mood states, simple reaction time, and short-term maximal performance in elite judoistsBiol Rhythm Res201344 897 907 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXjslegt7s%3D https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2013.780700
- DesbrowBBiddulphCDevlinBGrantGDAnoopkumar-DukieSLeverittMDThe effects of different doses of caffeine on endurance cycling time trial performanceJ Sports Sci201230 2 115 120 22142020 https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.632431 22142020
- LaurenceGWallmanKGuelfiKEffects of caffeine on time trial performance in sedentary menJ Sports Sci201230 12 1235 1240 22647089 https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.693620 22647089
- CasadoArturoMoreno-PérezDiegoLarrosaMarRenfreeAndrewDifferent psychophysiological responses to a high-intensity repetition session performed alone or in a group by elite middle-distance runnersEuropean Journal of Sport Science201919 8 1045 1052 30922192 https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2019.1593510 30922192
- KillenLGGreenJMO’NealEKMcIntoshJRHornsbyJCoatesTEEffects of caffeine on session ratings of perceived exertionEur J Appl Physiol2013113 3 721 727 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXis1Kqurc%3D 22926324 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2480-z 22926324
- MotlRWO’ConnorPJDishmanRKEffect of caffeine on perceptions of leg muscle pain during moderate intensity cycling exerciseJ Pain20034 6 316 321 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXms1yjsrg%3D 14622688 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-5900(03)00635-7 14622688
- LiebermanHRThe effects of ginseng, ephedrine, and caffeine on cognitive performance, mood and energyNutr Rev200959 4 91 102 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2001.tb06995.x
- StevensMJLaneAMTerryPCMood profiling during Olympic qualifying judo competition: a case study testing transactional relationshipsJ Sport Sci Med20065 143 151
- SouissiMAlouiAChtourouHAouichaHBAtheymenRSahnounZCaffeine ingestion does not affect afternoon muscle power and fatigue during the Wingate test in elite judo playersBiol Rhythm Res201546 291 298 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhsVaitbc%3D https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2014.994857 Taylor and Francis Ltd
- Lane AM, Jackson A, Terry PC. Preferred modality influences on exercise-induced mood changes. J Sports Sci Med [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2019 Aug 27];4:195–200. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24431976.
- Lane AM, Jarrett H. Mood changes following golf among senior recreational players. J Sports Sci Med [Internet]. Department of Sports Medicine, Medical Faculty of Uludag University; 2005 [cited 2019 Aug 27];4:47–51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24431960.
- PatonCarl D.LoweTimothyIrvineAthenaCaffeinated chewing gum increases repeated sprint performance and augments increases in testosterone in competitive cyclistsEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology2010110 6 1243 1250 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXitlahsw%3D%3D 20737165 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1620-6 20737165
- Duncan MJ, Oxford SW. The effect of caffeine ingestion on mood state and bench press performance to failure. J Strength Cond Res [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2017 Feb 23];25:178–85. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00124278-201101000-00026.
- TeychenneM.BallK.SalmonJ.Physical activity, sedentary behavior and depression among disadvantaged womenHealth Education Research201025 4 632 644 20145009 https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyq008 20145009
- Brosse AL, Sheets ES, Lett HS, Blumenthal JA. Exercise and the treatment of clinical depression in adults. Sport Med [Internet]. Springer; 2002 [cited 2019 Aug 27];32:741–60. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.2165/00007256-200232120-00001.
- SolomonGary S.KuhnAndrew W.ZuckermanScott L.Depression as a Modifying Factor in Sport-Related Concussion: A Critical Review of the LiteratureThe Physician and Sportsmedicine201544 1 14 19 26567843 https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2016.1121091 26567843
- YrondiAntoineBraugeDavidLeMenJohanneArbusChristopheParienteJérémieDepression and sports-related concussion: A systematic reviewLa Presse Médicale201746 10 890 902 28919268 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2017.08.013 28919268
- Moore RD, Sauve W, Ellemberg D. Neurophysiological correlates of persistent psycho-affective alterations in athletes with a history of concussion. Brain Imaging Behav [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Aug 27];10:1108–16. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11682-015-9473-6.
- VargasGrayRabinowitzAmandaMeyerJessicaArnettPeter A.Predictors and Prevalence of Postconcussion Depression Symptoms in Collegiate AthletesJournal of Athletic Training201550 3 250 255 25643158 4477919 https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-50.3.02
- Yang J, Peek-Asa C, Covassin T, Torner JC. Post-concussion symptoms of depression and anxiety in division I collegiate athletes. Dev Neuropsychol [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 Aug 27];40:18–23. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/87565641.2014.973499.
- MakdissiMDavisG McCrory P. Updated guidelines for the management of sports-related concussion in general practice. Aust. Fam. Physician [Internet] [cited 2019 Aug 27];43:94–92014 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24600668
- GUSKIEWICZKEVIN M.MARSHALLSTEPHEN W.BAILESJULIANMCCREAMICHAELHARDINGHERNDON P.MATTHEWSAMYMIHALIKJOHNA REGISTERCANTUROBERT C.Recurrent Concussion and Risk of Depression in Retired Professional Football PlayersMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise200739 6 903 909 https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e3180383da5
- DecqPhilippeGaultNathalieBlandeauMathiasKerdraonTristanBerkalMiassaElHelouAmineDusfourBernardPeyrinJean-ClaudeLong-term consequences of recurrent sports concussionActa Neurochirurgica2015158 2 289 300 26711286 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2681-4 26711286
- McMillan TM, McSkimming P, Wainman-Lefley J, Maclean LM, Hay J, McConnachie A, et al. Long-term health outcomes after exposure to repeated concussion in elite level: rugby union players. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Nov 27];88:505–11. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27951526.
- Kerr ZY, DeFreese JD, Marshall SW. Current physical and mental health of former collegiate athletes. Orthop J Sport Med. 2014:2, 1 Sage.