![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Background and objectives: Successful employment outcomes for pregnant women result from a complex interplay between the woman, her employer, her prenatal care provider, laws and other influences.
Methods: A mail survey about management of employment during pregnancy was sent to directors of US residency programs that train prenatal care providers. Each physician was randomly assigned one of 4 vignette patients whose job involved prolonged standing, rotating shifts and lifting 40 lbs. Half the vignette patients had risk factors for preterm birth and half would have financial difficulty if placed on an unpaid antenatal leave.
Results: The 301 respondents estimated that they provide a written job restriction for 20% of their employed pregnant patients, although in 6 clinics the job restriction rate was 100%. For vignettes with preterm birth risk factors, 62.5% of physicians would always recommend a job restriction, 35.6% would do so sometimes, and 2.2% would rarely do so. When the vignette did not have risk factors for preterm birth, 21.5% of the physicians would always recommend a job restriction, 51.3% would do so sometimes, 25.9% would do so rarely and 1.3% would never do so. Economic factors were not associated with prescribing job restrictions. One in 5 of the residency programs provides no teaching on occupational health issues in pregnancy, and 65.1% provide 2 hours or less.
Conclusions: Variability in employment recommendations suggests that some women may not obtain the job modifications that they need, whereas others may be restricted unnecessarily. The limited curriculum time devoted to this topic may make it difficult to train physicians about complex employment issues during pregnancy.