Deception research has not taken into account that children are often interviewed repeatedly about their experiences. This study is an experiment concerning adults' (n = 88) ability to correctly detect deception and truth in repeatedly interviewed children (11-year-olds), who had watched a live show by a magician, or had invented such an event. The overall accuracy (59%) was not significantly better than chance, in line with previous research. The three most frequent self-reported cues to deception were, in order, consistency between the child's statements, the child's confidence, and richness of detail. Truth-telling children were more prone to make both omissions and commissions than deceptive children. The reality monitoring technique was able to correctly discriminate between truthful and deceptive accounts. The theoretical and applied implications of the results are discussed.
Children's Repeated Lies and Truths: Effects on Adults' Judgments and Reality Monitoring Scores
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.