Abstract
Introduction: Use of both the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor bevacizumab and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors cetuximab and panitumumab as potential first-line therapies for patients with RAS-wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer presents clinicians with an important decision. We review clinical data evaluating first-line treatment with EGFR inhibitors. Additionally, by undertaking an integrated ‘bench-to-bedside’ approach, we provide potential models, testable hypotheses and biological rationales that might account for these clinical observations.
Areas covered: A literature search encompassing PubMed and the ASCO/ESMO websites was undertaken in October 2014. Search terms included ‘colorectal cancer’, ‘cetuximab’, ‘panitumumab’ and ‘bevacizumab’.
Expert opinion: A number of clinical studies indicate a survival benefit for patients receiving EGFR inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line setting, relative to both chemotherapy alone and VEGF inhibitors plus chemotherapy. Existing preclinical and clinical data suggest that a biological basis exists for providing RAS-wild-type patients with first-line EGFR inhibitors, followed by second-line VEGF inhibitors. More specifically, first-line treatment with EGFR inhibitors may elicit unique biological changes that sensitize tumors to subsequent lines of therapy; conversely, first-line treatment with VEGF inhibitors may elicit biological changes that desensitize tumors to subsequent lines of therapy.
Declaration of interest
The authors acknowledge medical writing assistance provided by Scott Valastyan (ClinicalThinking, Hamilton, NJ, USA), funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb. ZA Wainberg has received research funding from Celgene, Genentech, and Novartis and has participated in Celgene and Genentech advisory boards. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
Notes
This box summarizes key points contained in the article.