1,361
Views
79
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Selective estrogen receptor modulators in clinical practice: a safety overview

, BSc MBBS MRCP(UK) MFPM (Senior Director, Safety Surveillance and Risk Management) , , &
Pages 921-934 | Published online: 02 May 2015
 

Abstract

Introduction: Selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulators (SERMs) are a class of nonsteroidal compounds that interact with ERs, each with a distinct tissue-specific profile. Depending upon the degree of ER agonism/antagonism at the target tissue, SERMs show efficacy for various indications including osteoporosis, dyspareunia, and breast cancer, and are associated with safety risks.

Areas covered: This review describes the safety profile of SERMs (tamoxifen, raloxifene, toremifene, bazedoxifene, lasofoxifene, and ospemifene) and fulvestrant (a pure ER antagonist) from Phase III trials, long-term extension studies, and active comparator studies. Tamoxifen, a first-generation SERM, is indicated for breast cancer prevention and treatment but is associated with serious safety concerns including endometrial cancer, venous thromboembolic events (VTE), and stroke. Toremifene, raloxifene, bazedoxifene, lasofoxifene, and ospemifene present generally improved, though distinctly different, safety profiles compared with tamoxifen, especially with endometrial cancer and stroke. However, the risk of VTE remains a concern for most SERMs.

Expert opinion: Each SERM presents a unique risk/benefit profile based on varying indications and tissue-specific ER agonist and antagonist effects, making careful patient selection and ongoing patient monitoring crucial aspects of treatment. Future research may focus on identifying new SERMs for endocrine-resistant and endocrine-responsive cancers and post-menopausal symptoms.

View correction statement:
Erratum

Acknowledgements

Medical writing support was provided by Karen Dougherty, PhD and Lauren Cerruto, at Peloton Advantage, LLC, and was funded by Pfizer.

Declaration of interest

This manuscript was funded by Pfizer Inc. A Ellis and V Hendrick are employees of Pfizer Laboratories, Sandwich, Kent, UK and R Williams and B Komm are employees of Pfizer Inc. USA. Medical writing support, funded by Pfizer, was received from Karen Dougherty and Lauren Cerruto of Peloton Advantage LLC. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Notes

This box summarizes key points contained in the article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 752.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.