5,073
Views
86
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Coacervate delivery systems for proteins and small molecule drugs

, BS & , PhD

Abstract

Coacervates represent an exciting new class of drug delivery vehicles, developed in the past decade as carriers of small molecule drugs and proteins. This review summarizes several well-described coacervate systems, including: i) elastin-like peptides for delivery of anticancer therapeutics; ii) heparin-based coacervates with synthetic polycations for controlled growth factor delivery; iii) carboxymethyl chitosan aggregates for oral drug delivery; iv) Mussel adhesive protein and hyaluronic acid coacervates. Coacervates present advantages in their simple assembly and easy incorporation into tissue engineering scaffolds or as adjuncts to cell therapies. They are also amenable to functionalization such as for targeting or for enhancing the bioactivity of their cargo. These new drug carriers are anticipated to have broad applications and noteworthy impact in the near future.

1. Introduction

A coacervate is a liquid−liquid separation held together and apart from their surrounding liquid by hydrophobic forces. Coacervates exist as spherical droplets, often on the nanometer or micron scale in diameter, resembling an emulsion except that they do not necessarily contain stabilizing molecules such as surfactants. Coacervates have been investigated since the mid-20th century mostly within the context of food science research Citation[1]. With the advancement in drug delivery, the use of coacervates as controlled delivery vehicles has started only recently. One particularly attractive feature of coacervates for drug delivery is their high loading capacity and the fact that they form by self-assembly in an aqueous medium Citation[2]. Once encapsulated within the coacervate phase, labile proteins or drugs are separated and protected from the surrounding environment, thereby preserving their bioactivity. Compared to other common vehicles such as hydrogels and microparticles, coacervates form quickly and do not require organic solvents that could reduce protein drug retention and bioactivity. Finally, their size often enables coacervates to be applied via fine gauge needles, important for minimizing damage associated with injection.

Several themes have become apparent among coacervates developed for drug delivery. One major theme is the incorporation of native extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins such as heparin, elastin, hyaluronic acid (HA) and chondroitin sulfate. These approaches strategically employ the body’s own charged molecules as one or both components of the coacervate. Secondly is the slow and sustained manner of release of loaded cargos, avoiding burst release experienced with many other types of delivery systems. Thirdly is their existence in dynamic equilibrium with their environment, highly susceptible to disaggregation in response to changes in ionic concentration or temperature of their environment. The consequences of these characteristics are thankfully very well understood and can be anticipated and even exploited to engineer coacervate drug carriers with precise design requirements.

The purpose of this review is to exhibit several coacervate systems that have been developed for the delivery of small molecule drugs and proteins. Despite their apparent similarity with coacervates, nanogels Citation[3], charge-based polyplexes for nucleic acid delivery Citation[4] and lipid-based emulsion delivery systems Citation[5] are thoroughly reviewed elsewhere and will therefore not be considered here.

2. Current coacervate delivery systems

2.1 Elastin-like peptides

Elastin-like peptides (ELPs) were developed in the late 20th century Citation[6], then further explored as drug delivery vehicles more recently Citation[7]. ELPs are recombinant proteins designed to mimic the hydrophobic regions of tropoelastin. They consist of simple pentapeptide repeats, most commonly VPGXG, where X represents any amino acid except proline, termed the ‘guest residue.’ ELPs exhibit an inverse temperature phase transition, aggregating to form a coacervate above their transition temperature (Tt), which is tunable based on the guest residue and ELP chain length Citation[8].

Drug delivery using ELPs has been focused on targeting and abolition of solid tumors Citation[9]. One approach is local injection of ELPs with a Tt between room and body temperature, enabling in situ coacervation to form drug depots that slowly release their cargo. After intratumoral injection of radionuclide-conjugated ELPs, tumor regression was observed in more than two-thirds of the mice treated and the therapeutic effects lasted for at least 2 months Citation[10]. A second approach is systemic injection of ELPs with a Tt between body temperature and 42°C in combination with mild hyperthermia at the target tumor site. Local heating of the tumor, achieved clinically by methods such as ultrasound, increases extravasation of the ELPs and induces in situ coacervation. This method resulted in twofold higher accumulation of doxorubicin-conjugated ELPs at the tumor site compared to non-heated tumors and even greater accumulation if multiple thermal cycles were applied Citation[11,12]. ELP coacervate has also demonstrated usefulness in tissue engineering applications as a viscous medium for delivery and differentiation of chondrocytes or progenitor cells Citation[13,14].

2.2 Heparin: polycation coacervate

Another coacervate delivery system utilizes heparin to first bind one or more heparin-binding (HB) proteins, including numerous growth factors, cytokines and morphogens Citation[15]. A synthetic polycation containing arginine Citation[16] or lysine Citation[17] as the positive charge-bearer is then introduced to interact with the highly sulfated heparin by polyvalent charge attraction. A complex coacervate instantly forms with droplet sizes range from 0.1 to 10 µm in diameter, dependent on the loaded protein and the ionic environment. The strong, specific interaction between heparin and HB proteins results in very high loading efficiency of this coacervate, often > 99%. The release rate is influenced by multiple factors, including the HB affinity of the protein of interest, the net charge of the coacervate, and the polycation molecular weight, charge density and biodegradation rate Citation[18,19].

One significant advantage of this coacervate system is owed to pre-conjugation of the growth factors to heparin, which potentiates their bioactivities by mimicking the way that ECM proteoglycans present these factors to cell receptors Citation[18,19]. In one instance, a single injection of heparin-based coacervate delivering fibroblast growth factor-2 induced stable angiogenesis subcutaneously Citation[20]; a similar benefit was observed after injection into the infarcted myocardium, which resulted in improved cardiac function Citation[21]. A second formulation for cardiac repair contained sonic hedgehog, establishing the versatility of the heparin:polycation coacervate to deliver morphogens Citation[22]. In another study, skin wound healing was accelerated after a single application of the heparin:polycation coacervate containing HB-EGF into the wound Citation[23]. This coacervate system also proved useful in combination with adult stem cells, slowly releasing bone morphogenetic protein-2 to stimulate their osteogenic differentiation and ectopic bone formation Citation[24]. Another advantage of this controlled release system is its simple incorporation into tissue engineering scaffolds by adsorption. This technique was recently employed to recruit progenitor cells into a porous polymer graft by slowly releasing the stem cell trafficking chemokine, stromal cell-derived factor-1α Citation[25].

2.3 Carboxymethyl chitosan-based coacervates

Carboxymethylation increases the water solubility of chitosan, and the resulting carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC) has become a commonly studied polymer with a variety of applications, including drug delivery. The polyanionic nature of CMC enables its coacervation with positively charged molecules via electrostatic interactions. This method was employed using unmodified chitosan as the polycation to deliver doxorubicin in an oral formulation that slowly released it within the GI tract, significantly increasing its intestinal absorption and bioavailability in the blood Citation[26]. The group went on to encapsulate the coacervate beads within sodium alginate shells for further stabilization and protection in the low pH gastric environment Citation[27].

2.4 Mussel adhesive proteins

Another common coacervate system exploits the unique properties of charged proteins secreted by marine organisms such as tubeworms and mussels. These polyelectrolyte proteins undergo complex coacervation to produce a robust underwater adhesive that facilitates anchoring to a surface or cementing together sand and shell fragments. Recombinant mimics of these mussel adhesive proteins (MAPs) have been characterized and evaluated for numerous applications Citation[28]. Of particular importance for drug delivery, coacervation of recombinant hybrid MAPs with HA creates micron-sized droplets that are stable for at least 8 days in phosphate-buffered saline Citation[29]. Recombinant MAPs also retain their adhesive qualities after coacervation with HA, allowing their use as a device coating or easy integration into tissue engineered scaffolds Citation[30]. Although these systems have yet to be used in a drug delivery setting, these explorations are anticipated in the near future.

3. Expert opinion

Compared with other drug delivery vehicles including micro- and nanoparticles, liposomes, hydrogels and dendrimers, coacervate is a very recent development, with just over a decade of history. Despite the short history, coacervate delivery vehicle as a class has already shown that: i) it forms rapidly in water by self-assembly; ii) it can substantially improve the bioactivity of proteins in vitro and in vivo; iii) it readily coats a biomaterial surface either alone or combined with other molecules; iv) it can increase the efficacy of cell therapy; and v) targeting is feasible. Self-assembly in water and affinity to proteins that significantly reduce protein denaturation and burst release make coacervate a rational choice for controlled release of proteins and peptides. Ionic coacervates can be less stable compared with conventional drug delivery vehicles in biological fluids because of their ionic nature, and this needs to be addressed for a systemic delivery route when the coacervate will be carried by blood. To this end, much can be borrowed from strategies for stabilization of liposomes. Furthermore, active targeting of a specific tissue or pathology (e.g., cancer, infarction or inflammation) will greatly expand the utility of this new class of drug delivery vehicles. Other future growth areas are ‘control’ over release kinetics including stimulus-responsive release and external guidance of the coacervate post-injection. In all, we anticipate that coacervate will evolve into a versatile tool for controlled drug delivery in the near future and a likely catalyst for the ‘big bang’ of this field will be a successful clinical translation of any coacervate vehicle.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Bibliography

  • Overbeek JT, Voorn MJ. Phase separation in polyelectrolyte solutions. Theory of complex coacervation. J Cell Comp Physiol 1957;49(S1):7-26
  • De Kruif CG, Weinbreck F, De Vries R. Complex coacervation of proteins and anionic polysaccharides. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 2004;9(5):340-9
  • Liu G, An Z. Frontiers in the design and synthesis of advanced nanogels for nanomedicine. Polym Chem 2014;5(5):1559-65
  • Pack DW, Hoffman AS, Pun S, Stayton PS. Design and development of polymers for gene delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2005;4(7):581-93
  • McClements DJ, Li Y. Structured emulsion-based delivery systems: controlling the digestion and release of lipophilic food components. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2010;159(2):213-28
  • Urry DW. Physical chemistry of biological free energy transduction as demonstrated by elastic protein-based polymers. J Phys Chem B 1997;101(51):11007-28
  • MacEwan SR, Chilkoti A. Elastin-like polypeptides: biomedical applications of tunable biopolymers. Biopolymers 2010;94(1):60-77
  • Urry DW, Luan CH, Parker TM, et al. Temperature of polypeptide inverse temperature transition depends on mean residue hydrophobicity. J Am Chem Soc 1991;113(11):4346-8
  • McDaniel JR, Callahan DJ, Chilkoti A. Drug delivery to solid tumors by elastin-like polypeptides. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2010;62(15):1456-67
  • Liu WG, McDaniel J, Li XH, et al. Brachytherapy using injectable seeds that are self-assembled from genetically encoded polypeptides in situ. Cancer Res 2012;72(22):5956-65
  • Meyer DE, Kong GA, Dewhirst MW, et al. Targeting a genetically engineered elastin-like polypeptide to solid tumors by local hyperthermia. Cancer Res 2001;61(4):1548-54
  • Dreher MR, Liu W, Michelich CR, et al. Thermal cycling enhances the accumulation of a temperature-sensitive biopolymer in solid tumors. Cancer Res 2007;67(9):4418-24
  • Betre H, Ong SR, Guilak F, et al. Chondrocytic differentiation of human adipose-derived adult stem cells in elastin-like polypeptide. Biomaterials 2006;27(1):91-9
  • Betre H, Setton LA, Meyer DE, Chilkoti A. Characterization of a genetically engineered elastin-like polypeptide for cartilaginous tissue repair. Biomacromolecules 2002;3(5):910-16
  • Ori A, Wilkinson MC, Fernig DG. A systems biology approach for the investigation of the heparin/heparan sulfate interactome. J Biol Chem 2011;286(22):19892-904
  • Chu H, Gao J, Wang Y. Design, synthesis, and biocompatibility of an arginine-based polyester. Biotechnol Prog 2012;28(1):257-64
  • Johnson NR, Ambe T, Wang Y. Lysine-based polycation:heparin coacervate for controlled protein delivery. Acta Biomater 2014;10(1):40-6
  • Chu H, Johnson NR, Mason NS, Wang Y. A [polycation:heparin] complex releases growth factors with enhanced bioactivity. J Control Release 2011;150(2):157-63
  • Zern BJ, Chu HH, Osunkoya AO, et al. A biocompatible arginine-based polycation. Adv Funct Mater 2011;21(3):434-40
  • Chu H, Gao J, Chen CW, et al. Injectable fibroblast growth factor-2 coacervate for persistent angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108(33):13444-9
  • Chu H, Chen CW, Huard J, Wang Y. The effect of a heparin-based coacervate of fibroblast growth factor-2 on scarring in the infarcted myocardium. Biomaterials 2013;34(6):1747-56
  • Johnson NR, Wang Y. Controlled delivery of sonic hedgehog morphogen and its potential for cardiac repair. PLoS One 2013;8(5):e63075
  • Johnson NR, Wang Y. Controlled delivery of heparin-binding egf-like growth factor yields fast and comprehensive wound healing. J Control Release 2013;166(2):124-9
  • Li H, Johnson NR, Usas A, et al. Sustained release of bone morphogenetic protein 2 via coacervate improves the osteogenic potential of muscle-derived stem cells. Stem Cells Transl Med 2013;2(9):667-77
  • Lee KW, Johnson NR, Gao J, Wang Y. Human progenitor cell recruitment via sdf-1alpha coacervate-laden pgs vascular grafts. Biomaterials 2013;34(38):9877-85
  • Feng C, Wang Z, Jiang C, et al. Chitosan/o-carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles for efficient and safe oral anticancer drug delivery: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J Pharm 2013;457(1):158-67
  • Feng C, Song R, Sun G, et al. Immobilization of coacervate microcapsules in multilayer sodium alginate beads for efficient oral anticancer drug delivery. Biomacromolecules 2014;15(3):985-96
  • Lee BP, Messersmith PB, Israelachvili JN, Waite JH. Mussel-inspired adhesives and coatings. Annu Rev Mater Res 2011;41:99-132
  • Lim S, Choi YS, Kang DG, et al. The adhesive properties of coacervated recombinant hybrid mussel adhesive proteins. Biomaterials 2010;31(13):3715-22
  • Hwang DS, Waite JH, Tirrell M. Promotion of osteoblast proliferation on complex coacervation-based hyaluronic acid - recombinant mussel adhesive protein coatings on titanium. Biomaterials 2010;31(6):1080-4

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.