![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
While noninvasive imaging of the coronary lumen remains challenging, great strides have been made with computed tomography. Two variations of computed tomography are used in the study of the coronary tree: multislice or multidetector computed tomography and electron-beam computed tomography. Both have high spatial and temporal resolutions as well as excellent signal-to-noise ratios, which allows major branches of the coronary tree to be depicted. Impaired image quality, due to dense calcifications and multiple image artifacts including coronary artery motion and breathing artifacts, limits the clinical utility of noninvasive coronary angiography. Early studies with electron-beam angiography demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 89% for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease. With early diastolic imaging, the sensitivity and specificity increases to 92 and 93%, respectively (rather than 80% of the cardiac interbeat interval, where coronary motion is more pronounced). Multidetector computed tomography, with improved spatial resolution but decreased temporal resolution, produces results that vary depending on the equipment. Four-slice scanners have an average sensitivity of only 61%, and only 38% of patients have all four vessels or 15 segments available for analysis, due to both cardiac motion and calcification. Thinner slice collimation with eight and 16 slices have allowed for improved detection. Sensitivity and specificity improve to 80 and 86%, respectively. Furthermore, the number of assessable segments with eight-2011; to 16-2011;slice scanners improves significantly, compared with four-slice scanners (85 vs. 73%; p < 0.001). If only assessable segments are included in analysis, sensitivity and specificity for multidetector-row computed tomograpy improves to nearly 90%. Compared with magnetic resonance imaging, with a reported accuracy of 72% in the only multicenter study, computed tomography has great promise to become the primary method of noninvasive coronary angiography.