Figure derived from a reanalysis of CETC data and reproduced from AR Naylor by permission of The Surgeon [8].
![Figure 3. Strokes prevented per 1000 CEAs at 5 years: effect of female gender and timing from event to CEA relative to degree of stenosis at randomization.Figure derived from a reanalysis of CETC data and reproduced from AR Naylor by permission of The Surgeon [8].](/cms/asset/260db755-d277-49e3-8042-58c80c9d9a42/ierk_a_11210318_f0001_b.jpg)
After the publication of the Perspective by A Ross Naylor, Interventions for carotid artery disease: time to confront some ‘inconvenient truths’ published in the November 2007 issue of Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 5[6] 1053–1063 [2007]), it has been brought to our attention that the following figure on page 1058 was inaccurate:
The correct figure is given below:
Figure derived from a reanalysis of CETC data and reproduced from AR Naylor by permission of The Surgeon [8].
![Figure 3. Strokes prevented per 1000 CEAs at 5 years: effect of female gender and timing from event to CEA relative to degree of stenosis at randomization.Figure derived from a reanalysis of CETC data and reproduced from AR Naylor by permission of The Surgeon [8].](/cms/asset/02867dd6-4ec0-4038-9a14-9beb9035f5fc/ierk_a_11210318_f0002_b.jpg)
The editors of Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy and authors would like to sincerely apologize for any inconvenience or confusion this may have caused our readers.