When is the optimal timing for allogeneic transplantation in the case of MDS patients treated with hypomethylating agents?

Abstract

Although the use of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) has improved the response rates and survival rates in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients, the cure rate is negligible, even for responders to HMA, suggesting the necessity for allogeneic transplantation at some point during HMA therapy prior to overt relapse or progression to acute myelogenous leukemia. However, in practice, deciding on the optimal timing for transplantation is difficult in the case of low/intermediate-1-risk MDS patients under hematologic complete remission with HMA. There is also a remaining question on the role of debulking treatment with the frontline use of HMA in intermediate-2/high-risk MDS patients who are eligible for transplantation. Therefore, our recommendations on the optimal timing of allogeneic transplantation are as follows: for low/intermediate-1-risk MDS patients, start HMA and continue it in responders, then transplantation needs to be performed at the time of a decreasing platelet count before overt relapse or progression to acute myelogenous leukemia. For intermediate-2/high-risk MDS patients, HMA may be indicated as a frontline treatment in all cases, regardless of transplant eligibility, considering its positive role of debulking and lack of negative impact on transplant outcomes. However, HMA therapy has not been approved for the patients eligible for allogeneic transplantation at present. Our suggestions need to be evaluated through a large study in the future.

Keywords::

• allogeneic transplantation
• hypomethylating agents
• myelodysplastic syndrome

View correction statement:

Corrigendum

Authorship

SK Sohn designed and performed this study and wrote the paper; JH Moon contributed to data collection and reviewing the paper.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The author has no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.