17
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Key Paper Evaluation

Chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with poor performance

&
Pages 623-626 | Published online: 10 Jan 2014
 

Abstract

Evaluation of: Morère JF, Bréchot JM, Westeel V et al. Randomized Phase II trial of gefitinib or gemcitabine or docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2 or 3 (IFCT-0301 study). Lung Cancer DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.03.003 (2010) (Epub ahead of print).

Previous studies have recommended single-agent chemotherapy as an important alternative for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with old age or poor performance. The authors of the evaluated article have evaluated three treatment strategies within the Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique (IFCT-0301 study) as a Phase II trial. All strategies started with single-agent chemotherapy in chemotherapy-naive NSCLC patients with performance status (PS) 2 or 3. The three agents used for initial therapy in this study were gefitinib, gemcitabine and docetaxel. All three agents showed similar median progression-free survival values. Docetaxel was associated with higher response rates but also higher rates of adverse events. In subgroup analysis, patients with PS 3 did not benefit from monotherapy. This study suggests that monotherapy is still an option for NSCLC patients with PS 2; but, the study was not powered to favor one agent out of the three. In addition, because the study population did not undergo EGF receptor mutation analysis, it may not reflect the therapeutic impact of EGF receptor inhibitors, which can be tolerable in patients of poor performance.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 362.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.