454
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Focus: Mechanisms of cell dysfunction & injury in NASH - Foreword

Perspectives on cellular dysfunction in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a case of ‘multiorganelle failure’? Proceedings of a virtual workshop on nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

, , &
Pages 135-139 | Published online: 10 Jan 2014
Figure 1. A model of the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Insulin resistance occurs as an early inciting event in the pathogenesis of NASH. It is fully acceptable that, once triggered, the pathogenic cascade of events will proceed independent of the initial offending agent, insulin resistance, accounting for the finding that agents aimed at combating it will not necessarily result in the interruption of ongoing liver damage. This results in NASH from ‘multiorganelle failure’, as described in the proceedings of this special focus issue.

FFA: Free fatty acid; NAFLD: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; ROS: Reactive oxygen species.

Reprinted from Citation[30].

Figure 1. A model of the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.Insulin resistance occurs as an early inciting event in the pathogenesis of NASH. It is fully acceptable that, once triggered, the pathogenic cascade of events will proceed independent of the initial offending agent, insulin resistance, accounting for the finding that agents aimed at combating it will not necessarily result in the interruption of ongoing liver damage. This results in NASH from ‘multiorganelle failure’, as described in the proceedings of this special focus issue.FFA: Free fatty acid; NAFLD: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; ROS: Reactive oxygen species.Reprinted from Citation[30].

Historical perspective

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) will be 60 years old next year: it was first reported in 1952 Citation[1], and what we now allude to as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) was described in 1962 by Thaler Citation[2]. In 1979, Itoh described “five diabetic non-alcoholic women with micronodular cirrhosis” Citation[3]. All aged over 50 years and obese, they displayed a phenotype that was later named NASH for the first time in 1980 by Ludwig Citation[4]. In the following years, NASH was to be defined as ‘diabetic hepatitis’, ‘alcohol-like liver disease in the non-alcoholic’, ‘bright liver syndrome’ and ‘insulin-resistance-associated hepatic iron overload’, which can all be considered synonyms (Box 1)Citation[5–8]. In 1999, Brunt proposed the most pragmatic classification for use in clinical practice Citation[9], and in 2005 Kleiner introduced a semiquantitative scoring system designed to reduce interobserver variability among pathologists Citation[10]. Pioneering studies had already identified mitochondrial uncoupling as a key finding in experimental fatty liver in 1954 Citation[11]. Interestingly, the possibility of inhibiting its development with antioxidants – notably including α-tocopherol, which was proposed as early as 1965 Citation[12] – remains a hotly debated issue Citation[13]. A step forward in the ultrastructural pathology of NASH took place in 1999 when Caldwell first reported on the presence of inclusions of unknown composition in hepatic mitochondria in NASH Citation[14]. This study promoted the pathogenic interpretation of NASH as a disease linked to altered energetic homeostasis, excess reactive oxygen species production and perturbed lipid composition. The demonstration of morphological correlates, whether at the light or ultrastructural level, is essential to refine our understanding of the disease process Citation[15]. Since 2000, research has been shaped by more collective initiatives, featuring joint efforts from private foundations, the American and European Associations for the Study of the Liver, and the publication of the first book on NAFLD in Australia (Box 1)Citation[16–22].

The diagnosis of NASH relies heavily on a clinical perspective, namely the exclusion of competing etiologies of steatogenic liver disease. Recognition of the components of the metabolic syndrome Citation[22] has come to define the prehistological probability of NAFLD/NASH, thus reducing the number of potential liver biopsies. In particular, the detailed understanding of the metabolic derangements associated with NAFLD has led to proposals to rename NAFLD and NASH Citation[23,24].

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is a common disorder consisting of simple steatosis, a relatively benign, nonprogressive condition, and NASH, a disease that infrequently improves spontaneously Citation[25] and confers significant liver-related mortality Citation[26]. However, both conditions are associated with excess cardiovascular mortality Citation[25,26]. Therefore, there are two chief questions to be answered: what is the pathophysiologic underpinning of the inflammatory–fibrotic progression in NASH, and how is fat deposition in the liver connected to compromised vessel integrity and resultant premature cardiovascular mortality?

Preparation & rationale of this special focus issue: a virtual workshop

This special focus issue represents a ‘virtual workshop’, gathering authors from Europe, the USA and Australia. Guest editors (GEs) agreed on a certain number of topics to be developed, and invited distinguished authors to cover them extensively. All submissions underwent peer review. Notably, both the GEs and authors were left blind to reviewers’ identities. In some cases, GEs acted as authors or co-authors themselves.

The overriding emphasis of this compilation was to complete a systematic analysis of organelle dysfunction, both morphologically and molecularly, with the hope that this effort would effectively encapsulate the major factors in the pathophysiology of NASH. To this end, the lessons from common steatogenic conditions such as NAFLD and hepatitis C virus infection may well be interchangeable Citation[27,28]. Chronic viral hepatitis C will tend to improve histologically once the hepatitis C virus is eradicated by successful antiviral regimens. By contrast, NASH will not invariably heal once insulin resistance is treated with insulin sensitizers. Moreover, therapeutic options acting via mechanisms other than insulin sensitization (e.g., vitamin E, presumably as an antioxidant) will prove beneficial in some cases. Taken together, these findings suggest that the pathogenesis of NASH is complex, with insulin resistance serving as an early, upstream factor in the subsequent inflammatory–fibrogenic cascade Citation[29]. This is in full agreement with theories of pathogenesis based on experimental evidence Citation[30].

Genetics & lipidomics

The recent epidemic explosion of NAFLD could directly result from ‘junk food’ consumption Citation[31], but a role for genetics in the development of NAFLD is supported by family clusters Citation[32] and ethnic susceptibility of the disease Citation[33,34]. Until 2004, the study of candidate genes was the only technique available, and very few studies feature multivariate analysis or have been reproduced Citation[35]. In recent years, the genome-wide association study (GWAS) technique has become available. However, the GWAS approach provides a high false-positivity rate, and probably misses rare gene variants Citation[35]. Reduced export capacity of lipids from the hepatocyte into the bloodstream was reported in experimental fatty liver as early as 1968 Citation[36]. Among the various candidate genes, those associated with the function to export lipids from hepatocytes into the bloodstream, such as the ApoB and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) genes, are of acknowledged significance for the development of human NAFLD Citation[37,38]. Therefore, it seems that genetic assessments based on the known pathophysiology of NASH are more likely to be fruitful than random genome-wide assays in establishing meaningful associations and providing direction for therapeutic investigation.

One of the most exciting findings is that a nonsynonymous sequence variation that substitutes methionine for isoleucine at codon 148 in the gene encoding patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing 3 (PNPLA3) is associated with steatosis and aminotransferase values Citation[39]. The gene varies proportionately in populations at risk for NASH, and increases the risk of alcoholic cirrhosis Citation[40]. Although the detailed mechanistic link between the I148M variant and liver disease is unclear, it can be predicted on the grounds of the biological function of PNPLA3. This enzyme is associated with the endoplasmic reticulum and lipid droplets, and catalyzes either triglyceride deposition or hydrolysis Citation[40].

Further to mechanisms regulating steatogenesis, the chemical composition of intrahepatocytic fat is a major determinant of liver injury. Palmitic acid, a saturated fatty acid, is more noxious to hepatocytic cells in vitro than oleic acid, although the latter is more steatogenic than the former Citation[41]. Hepatic and plasma lipidomic analysis will probably provide essential and synthetic information on both genetics and lifestyle. On these grounds, it is a very exciting line of research that is likely to promote our understanding of the steps further to lipid accumulation, namely inflammation and fibrogenesis Citation[42], although to date the field remains nascent.

Inflammation & fibrogenesis

Inflammation and fibrogenesis are closely inter-related phenomena that represent major potential targets in NASH research. Due to adaptations induced by evolutionary pressures to cope with both infections and food shortage, the study of insects and their ‘fat body’ may provide clues as to how deranged metabolic function may turn into inflammation Citation[43,44]. NASH patients will typically display far lower degrees of inflammatory changes than patients with chronic hepatitis C Citation[45], suggesting less profound activation of the immune system. Nevertheless, studies have demonstrated that inflammation is the force driving both the development of NASH and its subsequent evolution to fibrosis–cirrhosis Citation[46] and, thus, is potentially a major therapeutic target in NASH Citation[47].

The production of collagen in the liver results from multiple factors: activation of endogenous fibroblasts, stimulation of bone marrow fibrocytes and ductular reaction by the proinflammatory milieu of secreted adipokines and cytokines, oxidative stress, and lipotoxicity Citation[48]. In addition, Toll-like receptors and nuclear receptors presumably play a role Citation[48]. Inhibition/apoptosis of collagen-producing cells and/or manipulation of the proinflammatory milieu represents another key aim in NASH and all other fibrosing liver diseases.

Impaired energy production

Mitochondrial uncoupling, first identified in the 1950s Citation[11], was later confirmed by functional Citation[49] and ultrastructural evaluation Citation[14]. Moreover, steatosis reduces hepatic blood flow and parenchymal microcirculation Citation[50,51]. Taken together, these findings point to the fatty liver as a ‘weakened’ organ. The significance, adaptive versus causative, of mitochondrial abnormalities still remains elusive Citation[52]. However, irrespective of its origin, mitochondrial dysfunction in NASH contributes to lipid accumulation, oxidative stress and enhanced susceptibility to either necrotic or apoptotic cell death Citation[53,54]. Therefore, any consistent theory on NASH should keep disturbed energetic homeostasis central Citation[53]. For instance, mediated by metabolism of keratins, close relationships link ballooning, Mallory–Denk body (MDB) formation and apoptosis Citation[54]. Hepatocyte apoptosis is a key mechanism for the progression of NAFLD, in which both the extrinsic (induced by saturated fatty acids) and the intrinsic pathways are activated Citation[55]. Serum levels of cytokeratin 18 and soluble Fas (circulating markers of liver cell apoptosis) may assist the clinician in noninvasive diagnosis of NASH Citation[25,55]. Moreover, apoptosis may contribute to ballooning, thus creating a self-perpetuating process that would increase hepatocytes’ susceptibility to further apoptosis Citation[54].

Opposite to necrosis and apoptosis, autophagy is predominantly a cell survival pathway: it involves the channeling of cell organelles to the lysosome for degradation. Therefore, autophagy serves both a catabolic function during limited nutrient availability and allows the removal of malfunctioning subcellular structures. Decreased autophagy in NAFLD may promote the development of steatosis, insulin resistance, the progression to NASH and facilitate the primary liver cancer complication Citation[56]. A decrease in autophagy occurs in aging, which is of interest given the age dependency of NAFLD Citation[57]. Moreover, autophagy is a regulatory pathway of the innate immune system and fibrogenesis Citation[56].

Ballooning: cytoskeleton

Hepatocellular ballooning, a feature required for the diagnosis of NASH, is associated with a substantially increased risk of developing cirrhosis and liver-related mortality. Ballooning, accumulation of microsteatosis and dilation of endoplasmic reticulum result from the rearrangement of the intermediate filament cytoskeleton Citation[58]. Injury to multiple organelles, including fat droplets and endoplasmic reticulum, may contribute to cellular ballooning Citation[59]. Therefore, the presence of ballooned cells probably indicates a more profound dysfunction of the cytoskeleton, spanning from the presence of MDBs, altered locomotion, defective intracellular trafficking or increased mitotic errors Citation[60]. The presence of MDBs is of great diagnostic utility in that it decreases the likelihood of acute viral hepatitis and acute cholestasis Citation[60]. Moreover, they could serve as a model suitable to explore protein aggregation in common neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease Citation[60].

Conclusion

Although much work remains, a clear picture emerges from this special focus issue. NASH can no longer be considered a disease associated with mitochondrial changes alone; rather, virtually all cell organelles appear to be involved, probably owing to a central metabolic defect of impaired energetic homeostasis. This special focus issue demonstrates the fine interplay among altered energetic homeostasis, metabolically induced steatogenesis, lipidomics and lipotoxicity, adipokines, cytokines and oxidative stress. A structured and, as yet, incompletely characterized process linking these mechanisms will eventually result in damage to multiple subcellular constituents, a process that could be termed ‘multiorganelle failure’. Other avenues of investigation include further elucidation of the roles of Toll-like receptors, nuclear receptors, organelle dysfunction and cell death cascades in leading to inflammatory changes and secondary fibrosis. These two processes modulate the differences between an asymptomatic, nonprogressive condition (steatosis) and a fibrosing liver disease conducive to liver- and cardiovascular-related mortality.

Future therapeutic studies should aim at reversing energetic dysfunction and restoring the normal structure and function of cell organelles in NAFLD.

Box 1. Historical overview of research on the disease, including synonyms of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

1952: Zelman reports on the liver in the obese Citation[1].

1954: Dianzani identifies mitochondrial uncoupling in experimental fatty liver Citation[11].

1962: Thaler describes what we now allude to as NASH Citation[2].

1965: Antioxidant use is proposed Citation[12].

1979: Itoh described “five diabetic non-alcoholic women with micronodular cirrhosis” Citation[3].

1980: Ludwig names NASH for the first time Citation[4].

1985: Batman uses the definition “diabetic hepatitis” Citation[5].

1988: Diehl defines NAFLD as “alcohol-like liver disease in the non-alcoholic” Citation[6].

1995: Lonardo reports on “bright liver syndrome”. The associations with gallstones and atherosclerosis are highlighted Citation[7].

1999: Mendler reports on a seemingly novel disease, the “insulin-resistance-associated hepatic iron overload”, probably NAFLD, observed in a population at high risk for hereditary hemochromatosis Citation[8].

1999: Brunt’s histological classification is proposed Citation[9].

1999: Caldwell reports on the intramitochondrial inclusions Citation[14].

2000: Falk Symposium “NASH & ASH” (Den Haag, The Netherlands) Citation[16].

2002: AGA technical review on NAFLD Citation[17].

2003: AASLD single-topic conference Citation[18].

2005: The first book entirely devoted to NAFLD is published in Australia Citation[19].

2005: Kleiner’s semiquantitative histological scoring system Citation[10].

2006: EASL Monothematic Conference (Lisboa, Portugal) Citation[20].

2009: EASL Monothematic Conference (Bologna, Italy) Citation[21].

2010: NAFLD Evidence-Based Guidelines of AISF Citation[22].

Financial & competing interests disclosure

Stephen Caldwell has consulting disclosures for Abbott in March 2010 and research support from Nordic Natural and Wellstat Diagnostics. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Notes

AASLD: American Association for the Study of Liver Disease; AGA: American Gastroenterological Association; AISF: Associazione Italiana per lo Studio del Fegato (Italian Association for the Study of the Liver); ASH: Alcoholic steatohepatitis; EASL: European Association for the Study of the Liver; NAFLD: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

References

  • Zelman S. The liver in obesity. AMA Arch. Intern. Med.90, 141–156 (1952).
  • Thaler H. [The fatty liver and its pathogenetic relation to liver cirrhosis]. Virchows Arch. Pathol. Anat. Physiol. Klin. Med.335, 180–210 (1962).
  • Itoh S, Tsukada Y, Motomura Y, Ichinoe A. Five patients with nonalcoholic diabetic cirrhosis. Acta Hepatogastroenterol. (Stuttg.)26, 90–97 (1979).
  • Ludwig J, Viggiano TR, McGill DB, Oh BJ. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Mayo Clinic experiences with a hitherto unnamed disease. Mayo Clin. Proc.55, 434–438 (1980).
  • Batman PA, Scheuer PJ. Diabetic hepatitis preceding the onset of glucose intolerance. Histopathology9, 237–243 (1985).
  • Diehl AM, Goodman Z, Ishak KG. Alcohollike liver disease in nonalcoholics. A clinical and histologic comparison with alcohol-induced liver injury. Gastroenterology95, 1056–1062 (1988).
  • Lonardo A, Bellini M, Tondelli E et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and the ‘bright liver syndrome’: should a recently expanded clinical entity be further expanded? Am. J. Gastroenterol.90, 2072–2074 (1995).
  • Mendler MH, Turlin B, Moirand R et al. Insulin resistance-associated hepatic iron overload. Gastroenterology117, 1155–1163 (1999).
  • Brunt EM, Janney CG, Di Bisceglie AM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Bacon BR. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions. Am. J. Gastroenterol.94, 2467–2474 (1999).
  • Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M et al.; Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology41, 1313–1321 (2005).
  • Dianzani MU. Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria from fatty livers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta14, 514–532 (1954).
  • Di Luzio NR, Costales F. Inhibition of the ethanol and carbon tetrachloride induced fatty liver by antioxidants. Exp. Mol. Pathol.4, 141–154 (1965).
  • Adinolfi LE, Restivo L. Does vitamin E cure nonalcoholic steatohepatitis? Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.5(2), 147–150 (2011).
  • Caldwell SH, Swerdlow RH, Khan EM et al. Mitochondrial abnormalities in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Hepatol.31, 430–434 (1999).
  • Jayakumar S, Guillot S, Argo C, Redick J, Caldwell S. Ultrastructural findings in human nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.5(2), 141–145 (2011).
  • Falk Symposium 121 Steatohepatitis (NASH and ASH). Leuschner U, James O, Dancygier H (Eds). Kluwier Academics Publishers, Berlin, Germany (2001).
  • Sanyal AJ; American Gastroenterological Association. AGA technical review on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology123, 1705–1725 (2002).
  • Fatty Liver Disease. NASH and Related Disorders. Farrell GC, George J, De La M Hall P, McCullough AJ (Eds). Blackwell Publishing, NJ, USA (2005).
  • Cortez-Pinto H, de Moura MC, Day CP. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: from cell biology to clinical practice. J. Hepatol.44, 197–208 (2006).
  • Ratziu V, Bellentani S, Cortez-Pinto H, Day C, Marchesini G. A position statement on NAFLD/NASH based on the EASL 2009 special conference. J. Hepatol.53, 372–384 (2010).
  • Loria P, Adinolfi LE, Bellentani S et al.; NAFLD Expert Committee of the Associazione Italiana per lo studio del Fegato. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. A decalogue from the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF) Expert Committee. Dig. Liver Dis.42, 272–282 (2010).
  • Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. Metabolic syndrome – a new world-wide definition. A Consensus Statement from the International Diabetes Federation. Diabet. Med.23, 469–480 (2006).
  • Loria P, Lonardo A, Carulli N. Should nonalcoholic fatty liver disease be renamed? Dig. Dis.23, 72–82 (2005).
  • Brunt EM. What’s in a name? Hepatology50, 663–667 (2009).
  • Loomba R, Wesley R, Pucino F, Liang TJ, Kleiner DE, Lavine JE. Placebo in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: insight into natural history and implications for future clinical trials. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.6, 1243–1248 (2008).
  • Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G. Meta-analysis: natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for liver disease severity. Ann. Med. DOI: 10.3109/07853890.2010.518623 (2010) (Epub ahead of print).
  • Lonardo A, Adinolfi LE, Loria P. Mechanisms of hepatitis C virus-induced fatty liver disease. Hot Topics Viral Hepatitis5, 23–28 (2009).
  • Pattullo V, Douglas MW, George J. Organelle dysfunction in hepatitis C virus-associated steatosis: anything to learn from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis? Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.5(2), 265–277 (2011).
  • Lonardo A, Bellentani S, Ratziu V, Loria P. Insulin resistance in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: necessary but not sufficient – death of a dogma from analysis of therapeutic studies? Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.5(2), 279–289 (2011).
  • Arrese M. Burning hepatic fat: therapeutic potential for liver-specific thyromimetics in the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology49, 348–351 (2009).
  • Marchesini G, Ridolfi V, Nepoti V. Hepatotoxicity of fast food? Gut57, 568–570 (2008).
  • Struben VM, Hespenheide EE, Caldwell SH. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and cryptogenic cirrhosis within kindreds. Am. J. Med.108, 9–13 (2000).
  • Caldwell SH, Harris DM, Patrie JT, Hespenheide EE. Is NASH underdiagnosed among African Americans? Am. J. Gastroenterol.97, 1496–1500 (2002).
  • Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R et al. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology40, 1387–1395 (2004).
  • Daly AK, Ballestri S, Carulli L, Loria P, Day CP. Genetic determinants of susceptibility and severity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.5(2), 253–263 (2011).
  • Lombardi B, Pani P, Schlunk FF. Choline-deficiency fatty liver: impaired release of hepatic triglycerides. J. Lipid Res.9, 437–446 (1968).
  • Tarugi P, Lonardo A, Ballarini G et al. Fatty liver in heterozygous hypobetalipoproteinemia caused by a novel truncated form of apolipoprotein B. Gastroenterology111, 1125–1133 (1996).
  • Pereira IVA, Stefano JT, Oliveira CPMS. Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.5(2), 245–251 (2011).
  • Romeo S, Kozlitina J, Xing C et al. Genetic variation in PNPLA3 confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Genet.40, 1461–1465 (2008).
  • Browning JD, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. Patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing and the pathogenesis and progression of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology52, 1189–1192 (2010).
  • Ricchi M, Odoardi MR, Carulli L et al. Differential effect of oleic and palmitic acid on lipid accumulation and apoptosis in cultured hepatocytes. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.24, 830–840 (2009).
  • Bass NM. Lipidomic dissection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: moving beyond foie gras to fat traffic. Hepatology51, 4–7 (2010).
  • Sanyal AJ. Insulin resistance and tissue repair: a ‘fato-logical’ phenomenon. Gastroenterology125, 1886–1889 (2003).
  • Hotamisligil GS. Inflammation and metabolic disorders. Nature444, 860–867 (2006).
  • Lonardo A, Lombardini S, Scaglioni F et al. Hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance: does etiology make a difference? J. Hepatol.44, 190–196 (2006).
  • Argo CK, Northup PG, Al-Osaimi AM, Caldwell SH. Systematic review of risk factors for fibrosis progression in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Hepatol.51, 371–379 (2009).
  • Harmon RC, Tiniakos DG, Argo CK. Inflammation in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.5(2), 189–200 (2011).
  • De Minicis S, Svegliati-Baroni G. Fibrogenesis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.5(2), 179–187 (2011).
  • Cortez-Pinto H, Chatham J, Chacko VP, Arnold C, Rashid A, Diehl AM. Alterations in liver ATP homeostasis in human nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a pilot study. JAMA282, 1659–1664 (1999).
  • Seifalian AM, Piasecki C, Agarwal A, Davidson BR. The effect of graded steatosis on flow in the hepatic parenchymal microcirculation. Transplantation68, 780–784 (1999).
  • Farrell GC, Teoh NC, McCuskey RS. Hepatic microcirculation in fatty liver disease. Anat. Rec. (Hoboken)291, 684–692 (2008).
  • Caldwell SH, de Freitas LA, Park SH et al. Intramitochondrial crystalline inclusions in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology49, 1888–1895 (2009).
  • Serviddio G, Bellanti F, Vendemiale G, Altomare E. Mitochondrial dysfunction in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.5(2), 233–244 (2011).
  • Machado MV, Cortez-Pinto H. Cell death and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: where is ballooning relevant? Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.5(2), 213–222 (2011).
  • Alkhouri N, Carter-Kent C, Feldstein AE. Apoptosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.5(2), 201–212 (2011).
  • Amir M, Czaja MJ. Autophagy in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.5(2), 159–166 (2011).
  • Lonardo A, Loria P. NAFLD and cardiovascular risk: direct evidence for the tale of two ages. Am. J. Gastroenterol.104, 1851–1852 (2009).
  • Lackner C. Hepatocellular ballooning in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: the pathologist’s perspective. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.5(2), 223–231 (2011).
  • Caldwell S, Ikura Y, Dias D et al. Hepatocellular ballooning in NASH. J. Hepatol.53, 719–723 (2010).
  • Molnar A, Haybaeck J, Lackner C, Strnad P. The cytoskeleton in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis – 100 years old but still youthful. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.5(2), 167–177 (2011).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.