578
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Focus Issue: Influenza vaccines - Foreword

Improving influenza vaccines

&
Pages 871-872 | Published online: 09 Jan 2014

It is clear that the immune system is still immature and developing in infants and young children, while its function begins to decline in older adults. Furthermore, immune function is also modulated during pregnancy to facilitate the survival of the developing fetus, a semiallograft. This natural immunosuppression leaves these populations vulnerable to seasonal and pandemic influenza infections and other infectious diseases. In addition, owing to the altered immune status, these populations are also poor responders to vaccinations. Understanding the effect of these physiological conditions on immune responses to infections and vaccinations will enable us to improve vaccines to confer better protection in these target populations.

The recent influenza pandemic of 2009 has highlighted the importance of protecting children and pregnant women against novel viruses. Older adults continue to be the target population for annual influenza vaccination. Understanding the immune response to infection, vaccination or antiviral therapy at the molecular level requires integration of cell biology, immunology, genomics and systems biology approaches so that effective and immunogenic vaccines tailormade for these target populations can be developed. Direct transmission of avian influenza to humans and the recent pandemic that resulted from a swine-origin triple-reassortant virus with gene segments from avian, human and swine influenza viruses highlights the need for multipronged approaches to prevent and control the spread of novel influenza viruses. Enhanced surveillance efforts in monitoring influenza viruses in animals, effective prevention and control measures to contain influenza animals and developing new classes of antiviral agents for humans and nonpharmaceutical intervention efforts need to be considered in parallel with the development of effective public health vaccination strategies.

Antibody against the influenza virus hemagglutinin protein, the primary target of current vaccines, is crucial to prevent infection. However, the roles of T cells, NK cells and cross-reactive, non-neutralizing antibodies by complement-mediated or antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity mechanisms in conferring cross-protection need to be explored and appropriate in vitro assessment assays need to be developed. There is accumulating evidence that antibody responses directed against the stem region of hemagglutinin protein may confer cross-protection, perhaps through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity or complement. Certainly, these observations will lead to the development of vaccine technologies that will boost responses to enhance cross-reactive antibodies, T cells and NK cells. Adjuvanted vaccines have shown much promise in protecting certain target populations by enhancing the magnitude as well as the breadth of antibody responses. Influenza vaccines may need to be developed/formulated differently to cater to the needs of naturally immunosuppressed populations.

Huge investments were made in exploring egg-independent vaccine production technologies for influenza that utilize vaccines derived from mammalian, plant or insect cells, which consist of recombinant proteins, conventional inactivated and split vaccines or virus-like particles. Other novel vaccine technologies include viral or bacterial vectors expressing influenza viral proteins and ligands of Toll-like receptors coupled to influenza viral antigens. Together with new vaccine technologies, novel transdermal and mucosal delivery systems are being explored with promising results both in preclinical and Phase I and II clinical trials. These novel technologies and alternate delivery systems also require the development of appropriate methods for standardization of antigens, well-defined protective correlates and standardization of immunological assessment protocols, as the methods developed for traditional egg-based technologies may not be appropriate for new-generation vaccines.

As guest editors of this special issue of Expert Review of Vaccines, we are pleased to bring an excellent collection of articles from distinguished researchers addressing various aspects of influenza to provide an in-depth coverage with potential solutions. Public health is everyone’s responsibility and the role of nongovernmental organizations and public and private partnerships cannot be underestimated.

Several articles in the issue cover vaccination of special populations, including vaccine safety in children and the elderly Citation[1], a special report on vaccination during pregnancy Citation[2] and an insightful review on the T-cell response in children Citation[3]. T-cell responses are also the focus of another review article that argues in favor of greater research focus on this cell type Citation[4].

An interesting article takes a systems biology approach to understanding the immune response of older adults to seasonal influenza vaccines Citation[5]. Another piece presents virus-like particles as a potential route to a universal influenza vaccine Citation[6]. Rounding off the review section of the issue is a fascinating consideration of pandemic intervention plans Citation[7].

Three opinion pieces in the form of Perspective articles contribute more personal viewpoints on some of the hot topics in influenza vaccinology. An article from PATH highlights their efforts in supporting the technologies to prevent and control influenza in the developing world Citation[8]. A stimulating article discusses ethnographic studies of human influenza quarantine trials Citation[9], and a short piece provides an excellent overview of the prospect of a universal influenza vaccine Citation[10].

In the issue, we also present a selection of Editorial articles that offer brief insights into the aspect of influenza vaccine research Citation[11–13]. Two Key Paper Evaluation articles bring the issue up-to-the-minute with critical reviews of recently published primary work from the field Citation[14,15].

We are confident that these articles will benefit novices as well as vaccinologists, clinicians, and experts in immunology, public health and policy.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

R Rappuoli is a Novartis shareholder and employee of Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

References

  • Rowhani-Rahbar A, Klein NP, Baxter R. Assessing the safety of influenza vaccination in specific populations: children and the elderly. Expert Rev. Vaccines 11(8), 973–984 (2012).
  • Moro PL, Tepper NK, Grohskopf LA, Vellozzi C, Broder K. Safety of seasonal influenza and influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccines in pregnancy. Expert Rev. Vaccines 11(8), 911–921 (2012).
  • Bodewes R, Fraaij PLA, Osterhaus ADME, Rimmelzwaan GF. Pediatric influenza vaccination: understanding the T-cell response. Expert Rev. Vaccines 11(8), 963–971 (2012).
  • Schotsaert M, Saelens X, Leroux-Roels G. Influenza vaccines: T cell responses deserve more attention. Expert Rev. Vaccines 11(8), 949–962 (2012).
  • Lambert ND, Ovsyannikova IG, Pankratz VS, Jacobson RM, Poland GA. Understanding the immune response to seasonal influenza vaccination in older adults: a systems biology approach. Expert Rev. Vaccines 11(8), 985–994 (2012).
  • Kang S-M, Kim M-C, Compans RW. Virus-like particles as universal influenza vaccines. Expert Rev. Vaccines 11(8), 995–1007 (2012).
  • Rebmann T, Zelicoff A. Vaccination against influenza: role and limitations in pandemic intervention plans. Expert Rev. Vaccines 11(8), 1009–1019 (2012).
  • Neuzil KM, Tsvetnitsky V, Nyari LJ, Bright RA, Boslego JW. PATH Influenza Vaccine Project: accelerating the development of new influenza vaccines for low-resource countries. Expert Rev. Vaccines 11(8), 939–947 (2012).
  • Oxford JS, Oxford JR. Clinical, scientific and ethnographic studies of influenza in quarantine. Expert Rev. Vaccines 11(8), 929–937 (2012).
  • Shaw AR. Universal influenza vaccine, the holy grail? Expert Rev. Vaccines 11(8), 923–927 (2012).
  • Gilbert SC. Influenza vaccines and immunopathology. Expert Rev. Vaccines 11(8), 873–875 (2012).
  • Wagner R, Pfleiderer M. Reproducibility of assays for influenza vaccine immunogenicity determination: progress towards consistency. Expert Rev. Vaccines 11(8), 881–883 (2012).
  • Swayne DE. The role of vaccines and vaccination in high pathogenicity avian influenza control and eradication. Expert Rev. Vaccines 11(8), 877–880 (2012).
  • Tang DC. Perspectives on replication-incompetent nasal influenza virus vaccines. Expert Rev. Vaccines 11(8), 907–909 (2012).
  • Hisano M, Yamaguchi K. Usefulness of influenza vaccination during pregnancy to mothers and young infants. Expert Rev. Vaccines 11(8), 903–905 (2012).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.