Comparing the Gonadotoxicity of Multiple Breast Cancer Regimens: Important Understanding for Managing Breast Cancer in Pre-Menopausal Women

Abstract

Over the last several decades, improvements in breast cancer treatment have contributed to increased cure rates for women diagnosed with this malignancy. Consequently, great importance should be paid to the long-term side effects of systemic therapies. For young women (defined as per guideline ≤40 years at diagnosis) who undergo chemotherapy, one of the most impactful side effects on their quality of life is premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) leading to fertility-related problems and the side effects of early menopause. Regimens, type, and doses of chemotherapy, as well as the age of patients and their ovarian reserve at the time of treatment are major risk factors for treatment-induced POI. For these reasons, childbearing desire and preservation of ovarian function and/or fertility should be discussed with all premenopausal patients before planning the treatments. This manuscript summarizes the available fertility preservation techniques in breast cancer patients, the risk of treatment-induced POI with different anticancer treatments, and the possible procedures to prevent it. A special focus is paid to the role of oncofertility counseling, as a central part of the visit in this setting, during which the patient should receive all the information about the potential consequences of the disease and of the proposed treatment on her future life.

Keywords:

• breast cancer
• fertility
• young patient
• oncofertility
• premature ovarian insufficiency
• anti-Mullerian hormone

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common female malignancy worldwide: in 2020, there were 2.261.419 new diagnoses and about 680.000 women who died of this disease.¹ A minority of cases affect the young population (defined as per guideline ≤ 40 years at diagnosis),² corresponding to less than 7% of all newly diagnosed tumors in Western Countries.^3,4 A higher proportion of cases in young patients are reported in less developed countries.⁵

When the diagnosis is prompt and the tumor is detected at an early stage, breast cancer is a curable disease through optimal integration of local and systemic therapies.⁶ The current standard chemotherapy for early breast cancer includes anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens.⁷ For specific subgroups of patients, these regimens are implemented with other compounds. Platinum salts combined with neoadjuvant anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens improve the rate of pathological complete response in triple-negative breast cancer.⁸ This disease subtype could also benefit from immunotherapy, according to recent data.⁹ In HER2-positive disease, targeted therapy in addition to chemotherapy represents the standard of care.^10,11 For hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer, a crucial component of the treatment is represented by adjuvant endocrine therapy for 5–10 years.¹² Three adjuvant endocrine therapy options are now available for premenopausal patients, according to their individual risk of recurrence: tamoxifen alone, the combination of ovarian suppression to tamoxifen, or to an aromatase inhibitor.¹³

In premenopausal women, systemic treatments may cause gonadal damage in several ways. This toxicity can lead to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), fertility-related problems, and the side effects of early menopause.^14,15 Therefore, in this subgroup of patients, oncofertility counseling is a central part of the medical consultation, since it allows the young patient to receive all the information about her risk of developing treatment-related POI, its potential impact on her quality of life, and the strategies available to reduce the burden of this side effect and to preserve fertility. Adequate counseling of the patients and answering all their questions at diagnosis are crucial steps to improve their quality of life before, during, and after active anticancer treatments.¹⁶

Systemic anticancer therapies and their dose as well as the age of patients and their ovarian reserve at the time of treatment are recognized risk factors for POI. Even though POI rates and the mechanisms of gonadotoxicity are relatively known for routinely used chemotherapy drugs, very poor data are now available about the gonadal effects of targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and endocrine therapy. This makes it difficult to perform appropriate oncofertility counseling in women candidates to receive these treatments.^14,15

This manuscript summarizes the available fertility preservation techniques in breast cancer patients, the risk of treatment-induced POI with different anticancer treatments, and the possible procedures to prevent it. A special focus is paid to the role of oncofertility counseling, as a central part of the visit in this setting.

Oncofertility Counselling

Survivorship starts at diagnosis and continues throughout the entire lifespan¹⁷ during which patients can experience the long-term side effects of previous anticancer treatments. For young women, treatment-related POI represents an important concern and should be discussed during the first medical consultation.¹⁸

All the international guidelines strongly recommend the oncofertility counseling at diagnosis with all women diagnosed during their reproductive years, irrespective of their stage at diagnosis, including among women with advanced breast cancer.^14,18,19 This counseling aims to clarify all the possible gonadal effects including POI and infertility as well as to clearly discuss all the available strategies to prevent them.²⁰ In terms of timing, the sooner the patient receives the proper information, the earlier the access to fertility units can be planned for interested patients.

During the counseling, the first step is to assess the patient’s childbearing desire. For young women wishing to have a future family, several fertility preservation strategies can be proposed, being oocyte (or embryo) cryopreservation the first to be discussed.^21,22 The main features of these strategies are summarized in Table 1. Importantly, at a later time if these strategies are not successful or were not pursued at diagnosis, other approaches like oocyte donation or adoption can be considered.¹⁴

Table 1 Strategies for Preservation of Fertility and/or Ovarian Function in Women with Breast Cancer Diagnosed During Their Reproductive Years

	Time Needed Before Systemic Treatments	Recommended Age	Birth Rate	Contraindications
Oocyte/embryo cryopreservation^Citation30,Citation31	> 14 days	Preferably ≤ 40 years	43–62%*^Citation32	Coagulation deficits; high risk of infection; non-compliance with the required treatments and monitoring; urgent need to start anticancer therapies
Ovarian tissue cryopreservation^Citation33	2–3 days	Preferably ≤ 36 years	About 40%^Citation34,Citation35	High surgical or anesthesiologic risks; high risk of ovarian malignant contamination
Medical gonadoprotection^Citation36	~ 7 days	Premenopausal, any age	**	Non-compliance with the treatment

Notes: *Birth rates of oocyte/embryo cryopreservation vary according to the patient’s age and the number of oocytes collected. **This strategy has been studied as a technique to preserve ovarian function and not as a method for fertility preservation; nevertheless, an increased chance of pregnancy has been described.

For premenopausal women older than 40 years who are not usually candidates for fertility preservation strategies as well as for all premenopausal women not interested in future childbearing, preservation of ovarian function should also be discussed to avoid the side effects of treatment-induced POI.²³ Thus, infertility is not the only subject of oncofertility counseling, and the specialists have to give complete information also about the risks of POI and all its negative consequences, such as osteoporosis, higher risk of bone fractures, vaginal dryness, sexual dysfunction, hot flashes, and weight gain.^14,18

Several studies have shown the importance of discussing ovarian function and fertility preservation in young breast cancer patients and their request to have access to the available strategies for reducing the burden of these side effects.^24–26

Expert counseling of reproductive issues and modalities to reduce the potential consequences of POI is associated with higher consciousness about the disease, greater quality of life, and less regret about the decisions taken by the patients.¹⁶ Nevertheless, about 50% of all the patients do not receive the proper information about POI risk linked to the proposed anticancer treatments.^27,28

Health care providers face several challenges during oncofertility counseling.^25,29 For most doctors, the first issue is the lack of familiarity with fertility preservation strategies, due to inadequate knowledge on all the required steps during oncofertility counseling, their costs, and the involved technologies. However, as recommended by guidelines,^14,18 this topic should be part of the education of all Medical Oncologists.

Gonadotoxicity of Breast Cancer Treatments – Patient’s Characteristics

In addition to the proposed therapy, the gonadotoxicity of anticancer treatments in young women with breast cancer strongly depends also on patient-related characteristics (Figure 1). The main individual features of importance are age at the time of treatment, pre-treatment ovarian reserve, and the presence or not of pathogenic variants in the BRCA genes.^14,15

Figure 1 The most important factors affecting the gonadotoxicity risk in women with breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Abbreviations: AMH, anti-Mullerian hormone; GnRHa, gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog.

Age at the Time of Treatment

This is a well-known crucial factor to estimate the risk of treatment-induced gonadotoxicity.^37,38 The younger the patient, the lower the risk of developing POI with the same treatment due to the larger primordial follicle stockpile. So, the same regimen may have a high risk (> 80%) of post-treatment amenorrhea in women older than 40 years, while it may have a very low risk (< 20%) in women younger than 30 years at the beginning of therapy. Previous studies also suggest a longer period of menstrual function recovery in older women (≥ 40 years).³⁹

Pre-Treatment Ovarian Reserve

Ovarian reserve has been traditionally defined as the woman’s reproductive potential, assessed through the quality and quantity of oocytes.⁴⁰ It is influenced by age, genetics, and environmental factors and can be estimated in different ways.⁴¹ One of the easiest methods to perform it is the evaluation of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) serum levels, which is implied in the follicle recruitment and is considered an important marker of ovarian reserve.⁴²

AMH levels help to assess the baseline ovarian reserve and to predict the risk of treatment-induced POI.^43,44 Indeed, it decreases promptly after the start of chemotherapy and remains often undetectable for the whole period of treatment. Moreover, in several cases, AMH concentration continues to be undetectable even after the end of highly gonadotoxic systemic chemotherapy.⁴⁴ Variations in the serum hormone levels through systemic treatments have been found to be similar in women with low, normal, or high levels at baseline.⁴⁵ Note, however, that faster recovery of normal menstrual cyclicity has been observed in patients with high AMH concentration at the beginning and the end of therapies.⁴⁶

Germline Pathogenic Variants in Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes

Hereditary factors, in particular germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA genes, are other important features that may potentially influence the risk of treatment-induced POI.^47–49 Pathogenic variants of BRCA lead to impaired DNA double-strand breaks repair mechanism; this can be associated with the decreased possibility to counteract genotoxic stress and the subsequent potential accelerated loss of ovarian reserve, following the accumulation of double-strand breaks in the oocytes.⁵⁰

Evidence suggests that baseline ovarian reserve and performance of fertility preservation strategies may be impaired in breast cancer patients with germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA genes.⁵¹ Limited evidence is available to counsel these patients on their potential higher risk of treatment-induced POI, with two studies that did not show differences in amenorrhea rates⁵² or AMH levels⁵³ following chemotherapy completion between breast cancer patients with or without germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA genes. Only one study suggested a potential increased reduction in post-treatment AMH levels for BRCA-mutated patients.⁵⁵ This topic remains a burning question in the oncofertility counseling of young breast cancer patients and future research efforts are needed.^14,15

Other Patients’ Characteristics

The impact of other anthropometric and lifestyle factors and the potential role of additional genetic factors on the risk of treatment-induced gonadotoxicity remains to be fully clarified.

Abusief et al analyzed the relationship between chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea and patients’ characteristics in a retrospective cohort of young women with breast cancer.⁵⁵ Results were not conclusive for all the analyzed features; it is interesting to note that body mass index did not affect the chance of amenorrhea; on the contrary the menarche after the age of 13 years was associated with a higher probability of amenorrhea. Also, cigarette smokers could increase the risk, but this relation remains not completely clear.⁵⁵

Genetic variants (eg single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) have been studied for their potential role in influencing the risk of POI.⁵⁶ However, also, in this case, further studies are needed to confirm their role in influencing the risk of treatment-induced POI.

Gonadotoxicity of Breast Cancer Treatments – Chemotherapy

Standard oncological therapies for breast cancer can lead to POI through three main different coexisting mechanisms: by directly damaging ovarian follicular cells (both growing and non-growing follicles), by accelerating follicular activation depleting primordial pool via increased activation,⁵⁷ and by damaging the ovarian stroma also by altering ovarian blood supply.⁵⁸ The majority of the chemotherapy compounds used in routine clinical practice can induce these damages: the type of therapy, its dose, and the duration are crucial factors (Figure 1).

Cyclophosphamide

In early breast cancer, one of the key agents used as (neo)adjuvant treatment with the highest risk of gonadotoxicity is the alkylating agent cyclophosphamide. Regimens including cyclophosphamide have a significantly higher risk of POI compared to those not including it. Indeed, these agents are associated with a possible damage to non-growing primordial follicle pool which makes up the ovarian reserve. Patients treated with such treatment have more than double chances of developing treatment-induced amenorrhea (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.26–4.03, P = 0.006).⁵⁹

Significant risk variations are observed according to patient’s age, dose of cyclophosphamide, regimen, and chosen schedule. More precisely, the highest risk of amenorrhea (> 80%) is linked to cyclophosphamide-based regimens like CMF, CEF, CAF, or TAC for 6 cycles in women older than 40 years; women between 30 and 39 years treated with the same regimens have an intermediate risk of amenorrhea (40–60%), like those older than 40 years treated with AC or EC for 4 cycles. Finally, a lower risk (< 20%) exists for CMF, CEF, CAF, TAC for 6 cycles in patients younger than 30 years and for AC for 4 cycles in women younger than 40 years.⁶⁰

Anthracyclines and Taxanes

Anthracyclines and taxanes are two other cornerstones in the (neo)adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. The former is associated with a significant increase in the risk of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.15–1.70, P = 0.0008); a similar trend has been also observed for the latter (OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.03–1.50, P = 0.02).⁵⁹ AMH levels drop rapidly to undetectable levels in the majority of cases after their administration and generally remain very low even during the follow-up period.⁴⁴ In particular, a long-lasting impact of these compounds on AMH has been observed up to 3 years after diagnosis and treatment.⁵³

To date, in routine clinical practice, (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy consists of sequential treatment with anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide followed by a taxane or the combination of cyclophosphamide plus docetaxel (TC regimen). Women treated with taxanes have an higher rate of menopause than those not exposed to this agent, as observed by Silva et al (OR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30–0.80; P = 0.004)³⁸ and Lambertini et al (OR 1.92, 95% CI, 1.44–2.56; P < 0.001).⁶² Indeed, taxanes following anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide regimens significantly reduce serum AMH levels one year after treatment completion (0.22 vs 0.04 μg/L, P = 0.0006).⁵³ Similar rates of treatment-induced amenorrhea are expected with the combination of cyclophosphamide plus a taxane or the sequential administration of an anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide followed by a taxane (81% and 80% of patients reported cessation of menses after chemotherapy).⁶²

In routine clinical practice, high-risk patients with early breast cancer may receive a dose-dense schedule (ie similar dose as a standard treatment but with a shorter interval between the cycles). This approach does not seem to increase the risk of developing treatment-induced amenorrhea as compared to the same chemotherapy regimen given with a standard schedule (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.80–1.25, P = 0.989).⁶³

Anti-HER2 Agents

Although the use of anti-HER2 therapies has significantly increased in the past few years, with numerous drugs and several indications in different settings, to date, there is limited evidence on their risk of gonadotoxicity and fertility impairment. HER2-directed agents do not seem to have significant ovarian toxicity.⁶⁴ In particular, the use of trastuzumab does not seem to increase the risk of treatment-related amenorrhea.⁶⁵

An unplanned analysis of the ALTTO trial was conducted to evaluate the rate of treatment-related amenorrhea with anti-HER2 therapies. The study population was composed of women with HER2 positive early disease randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy with trastuzumab alone, trastuzumab followed by lapatinib, trastuzumab and lapatinib, or lapatinib alone as adjuvant therapy. The incidence of amenorrhea was 72.6% for trastuzumab monotherapy, 72.1% for the sequential approach, 74.8% in the combination arm, and 74.0% for the lapatinib monotherapy (p = 0.64). The trial design did not include a control arm without anti-HER2 therapy, so it is hard to assess the real effects of these drugs on the risk of post-treatment amenorrhea considering that all patients were also first exposed to chemotherapy. However, a higher incidence of treatment-related amenorrhea was not observed in the dual-blockade arms compared to monotherapy ones. This may suggest the gonadal safety of these anti-HER2 agents.⁶¹

The phase II, single-arm APT trial evaluated the efficacy of paclitaxel combined with trastuzumab for 12 weeks followed by 36 weeks of anti-HER2 antibody monotherapy.⁶⁶ Ruddy et al analyzed its data, focusing on the rate of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea.⁶⁷ Of the 410 patients enrolled, 64 women were in a premenopausal status and eligible for the analysis. These had to answer to menstrual survey every 12–48 weeks for 6 years; median age was 44 and the median duration of the survey was 51 months (time between first cycle and last survey). Most of the patients recovered their normal menstrual cyclicity at the time of the last survey (72%, 95% CI 59–82%), showing a lower incidence of POI with adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab than with anthracyclines-taxanes regimens.

Pertuzumab is another intravenous anti-HER2 antibody, used with trastuzumab also in early settings as both neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy.^68,69 There is a lack of evidence about its possible effects on fertility.¹⁴

Neratinib is an anti-HER2 drug taken orally and used in an adjuvant setting after trastuzumab-based therapy.⁷⁰ Considering the lack of data in this regard, it is hard to assess the real impact of this compound on fertility. Amenorrhea rates in premenopausal patients that had received this treatment were not reported in the registration trial.⁷¹

T-DM1 is an antibody–drug conjugate, which combines a targeted therapy (ie trastuzumab) with a cytotoxic agent (ie DM1, a derivative of maytansine, targeting tubulin).⁷² This agent proved to be highly effective also in the early setting, for patients without pathologic complete response following trastuzumab-based therapy.⁷³ Some data on the potential gonadotoxicity of T-DM1 are derived from the analysis by Ruddy et al within the ATEMPT trial, a study that compared paclitaxel plus trastuzumab versus T-DM1 as an adjuvant therapy for stage I HER2-positive disease.⁷⁴ All the enrolled premenopausal subjects had to complete a menstrual survey at baseline and every 6–12 months, during the 3-year follow up. At 18 months, less than 50% of patients in the control arm had menses in the previous 6 months compared to 75% of women treated with T-DM1 (p = 0.011). All the patients in the experimental arm ≤ 40 years reported menstruation at 1.5-year follow-up. Although these data suggest a potential gonadal safety profile for T-DM1, future studies are needed for a better understanding of its potential gonadotoxicity, especially in women previously exposed to chemotherapy as currently recommended in early settings.

CDK4/6 Inhibitors

This category comprehends palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, largely used in metastatic hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative disease. Recent data have shown the potential efficacy of abemaciclib as adjuvant therapy, for two years in addition to endocrine therapy in high-risk patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer.⁷⁵ Despite 43.5% of patients included in this trial were premenopausal, no data have been reported so far on the incidence of post-treatment amenorrhea (and the follow-up of the trial is too short to assess this outcome). While palbociclib has not shown a beneficial effect in the early setting,⁷⁶ results of the adjuvant ribociclib trial are awaited.

PARP Inhibitors

The pharmacological category of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors is composed of two small molecules used in BRCA-mutated breast cancer patients with advanced disease: olaparib and talazoparib.⁷⁷ Results of the adjuvant olaparib trial in early-stage breast cancer are awaited to potentially open the door to also use this agent as adjuvant therapy following standard chemotherapy.

The only existing data on the gonadotoxicity of PARP inhibitors have been provided in mice. The study conducted by Winship and colleagues evaluated the influence of classical anticancer agents (ie cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, carboplatin, or paclitaxel) administered alone or with olaparib in BRCA wild-type female mice. Primordial follicles were the most affected cellular lines by the combination arm with a dramatic depletion of 36% versus control arm (standard anticancer agents, without PARP inhibitor) (p < 0.05). Other follicle cells, ovulation, and AMH levels showed no consequences. It is interesting to note that, if combined with other agents, olaparib does not seem to exacerbate chemotherapy-induced gonadal damage.⁷⁸

These results represent a first step in the comprehension of the impact of PARP inhibitors on fertility; however, further preclinical and clinical studies are required.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape of different tumors.^79,80

Recently, different trials have focused on the efficacy of ICIs in early breast cancer patients with triple-negative disease. Results from Keynote-522 and IMpassion031 showed the effect of adding an ICI (pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, respectively) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in increasing the rate of pathologic complete responses.⁹ In these studies, reproductive side effects have not been described. The only indirect link to menopausal status is “hot flushes” in IMpassion031: there were 15% any grade hot flushes in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy arm and 10% in the placebo plus chemotherapy arm, without grade 3–4 events.⁹

Assessing how fertility can be impaired by immunotherapy is fundamental since these drugs will be used in early settings for many young patients with different diseases⁸¹ and ICIs can influence almost all the endocrine pathways, including reproductive ones.⁸²

For this reason, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines suggest adopting birth control methods during and for at least 5 months after the end of immunotherapy.⁸³

Given the lack of knowledge in this field, further studies are needed to establish the real incidence of gonadotoxicity and fertility impairment in breast cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.

Endocrine Therapy

Regarding endocrine therapy, the use of tamoxifen does not appear to hurt the ovarian reserve with several studies showing no significant differences in AMH levels between patients receiving or not this treatment after chemotherapy.^43,44,53 However, tamoxifen can cause alterations in the menstrual cycles by significantly increasing the risk of developing amenorrhea following chemotherapy completion (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.28–1.70, P < 0.0001).⁵⁹ However, since tamoxifen stimulates the ovaries, it can cause gonadal alterations.

The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRHa) causes a suspension of the normal menstrual cycle which is reversible in 90% of cases in patients younger than 40 years; menstrual function recovery is not always observed in older patients.⁸⁴

The risk of POI with the administration of GnRH analogs associated with an aromatase inhibitor has not yet been investigated.

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists as a Strategy to Reduce Chemotherapy-Induced Gonadotoxicity

Pharmacological ovarian suppression with GnRHa concomitantly with chemotherapy has been studied for years as a way to reduce the risk of POI.²³ Currently, this is the only medical intervention with proven efficacy in reducing the risk of chemotherapy-induced gonadotoxicity.^14,15

It represents the gold standard in women willing to avoid chemotherapy-induced POI, irrespective of their future desire for pregnancy. Some of its advantages are its non-invasiveness and accessibility: it should be started at least one week before the beginning of chemotherapy and should be continued during all the period of cytotoxic therapy.²³

This strategy seems not only to protect from the risk of POI but also the degree of recovery of the ovarian reserve. In a prospective study by Sinha et al antral follicle count (AFC) has been assessed before and after chemotherapy for breast cancer: in those patients who underwent GnRHa, the AFC recovery was faster and to a higher rate compared to those that did not receive GnRHa.⁸⁵

In the last two decades, several randomized trials evaluated the efficacy of GnRHa use in reducing the risk of POI when administered during chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.²³ Among these studies, the largest have clearly shown that the administration of GnRHa during chemotherapy significantly reduces the risk of chemotherapy-induced POI.^86–88

The meta-analysis by Lambertini et al confirmed the efficacy and the safety of this treatment, merging individual patient-level data from the five major trials (PROMISE-GIM6; POEMS; OPTION; GBG-37; ZORO). The overall population was composed of 872 premenopausal breast cancer patients, randomly assigned to receive GnRHa (436 women) or not (control group, 437 women) during chemotherapy.³⁶ The experimental arm showed POI in 14% of cases, whereas in the control group the incidence was higher (30.9%) (p < 0.001). Concerning pregnancies after chemotherapy, more favorable data have been found in the treated group: 10% of women completed at least a gestation, compared to 5.5% in the control (p = 0.03). In terms of safety, similar DFS and OS were found in the two groups, irrespective of hormone receptor status.

These results are in line with those of a previous meta-analysis, performed in 2015 with abstracted data collected from 12 trials, including 1231 early breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with or without GnRHa.⁸⁹ Overall, POI was higher for patients treated with chemotherapy alone (33.5% versus 18.5%, respectively; p < 0.001). The pregnancy rate was more favorable in patients treated with chemotherapy plus GnRHa (9.2%) than in those who received cytotoxic therapy alone (5.5%).

One of the concerns about the administration of GnRHa during chemotherapy was the fear that GnRHa could antagonize cytotoxic therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive disease⁹⁰ However, no difference in DFS and OS was observed in patients with hormone receptor-positive disease who received or did not receive GnRHa concomitantly with chemotherapy.^89,91 Furthermore, two recent studies (TEXT and SOFT studies) investigating different adjuvant endocrine therapy approaches showed no difference in DFS and OS in women receiving GnRHa concomitantly or sequentially to chemotherapy.⁹²

Over the past years, the use of GnRHa has been highly debated being the lack of evidence about its mechanism of protective effect the main reason to criticize its use.⁹³

However, given all these efficacy and safety data, nowadays international guidelines recommend GnRHa administration as a valid strategy to preserve ovarian function (but not an alternative to cryopreservation strategies for fertility preservation) in premenopausal breast cancer patients that undergo chemotherapy.^14,15,18

Conclusions

With an increased lifespan, many young breast cancer survivors may face the long-term consequences of the side effects of anticancer therapies, including the risk of gonadal damage and fertility impairment.

In the past decades, more attention has been paid to oncofertility and nowadays there is a growing evidence about the risk of POI with the different treatments, the chances of pregnancy after treatment, and the strategies to preserve ovarian function and fertility. However, there are controversial data and sometimes a lack of evidence on the potential effect on patients’ ovarian function and fertility of many new effective anticancer therapies that have entered clinical use in the curative setting or are in late-stage of clinical development. This raises the need to pursue additional research efforts in this area.⁹⁴

With oncofertility counseling being a central part of the first medical consultation, providing a proper estimation of the risk of treatment-induced gonadotoxicity represents a key step to allow young women to make informed decisions on the proposed anticancer therapies as well as on their wish to access the available strategies for ovarian function and/or fertility preservation.

Acknowledgments

Matteo Lambertini acknowledges the Italian Ministry of Health – 5×1000 funds 2017 (no grant number) and the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC; MFAG 2020 ID 24698) for pursuing his research efforts in the field of oncofertility.

Disclosure

Matteo Lambertini acted as consultant for Roche, AstraZeneca, Lilly and Novartis, and received speaker honoraria from Sandoz, Roche, Takeda, Pfizer, Lilly and Novartis outside the submitted work. Marco Tagliamento reports travel and accommodation expenses supported by Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca and Takeda; and activity as a medical writer supported by Novartis and Amgen, outside the submitted work. All the other authors declare no conflicts of interest.