Molluscum contagiosum: an update and review of new perspectives in etiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Abstract

Molluscum contagiosum (MC) is a self-limited infectious dermatosis, frequent in pediatric population, sexually active adults, and immunocompromised individuals. It is caused by molluscum contagiosum virus (MCV) which is a virus of the Poxviridae family. MCV is transmitted mainly by direct contact with infected skin, which can be sexual, non-sexual, or autoinoculation. Clinically, MC presents as firm rounded papules, pink or skin-colored, with a shiny and umbilicated surface. The duration of the lesions is variable, but in most cases, they are self-limited in a period of 6–9 months. The skin lesions may vary in size, shape, and location, which is more frequent in immunosuppressed patients, and could present complications such as eczema and bacterial superinfection. The diagnosis is based on clinical findings. A useful clinical tool is dermoscopy. If the diagnostic doubt persists, confocal microscopy or skin biopsy could be performed. The need for active treatment for MC is controversial; however, there is a consensus that it should be indicated in cases of extensive disease, associated with complications or aesthetic complaints. There are several treatment modalities which include mechanical, chemical, immunomodulatory, and antivirals. The objective of this article is to review the current evidence in etiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management alternatives of MC.

Keywords:

• molluscum contagiosum
• dermoscopy
• confocal microscopy
• eczema molluscorum
• treatment
• molluscum contagiosum virus

Introduction

Molluscum contagiosum (MC) is a self-limited infectious dermatosis, frequent in the pediatric population, sexually active adults, and immunocompromised individuals. It is transmitted mainly by direct contact with infected skin and clinically is characterized by umbilicated pink or skin-colored papules.^1,2 It is a frequent reason for consultation in pediatric dermatology and, given its self-limited nature,³ the decision to treat or not becomes complex and taken on a case-by-case basis. In this article, we performed an extensive review of the available literature on etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, typical and atypical clinical manifestations, complementary diagnostic tools, and possible treatment alternatives of MC.

Search method

The relevant literature was found by searching different databases: PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and the Cochrane library. Also, an extensive review of the bibliography of each of the inlcuded articles was performed. A summary of the key literature is available in Table 1.

Table 1 Key literature of this review

Authors	Title of the article and publication year
Leung et al^Citation1	Molluscum Contagiosum: An Update. 2017.
Gerlero et al^Citation2	Update on the Treatment of Molluscum Contagiosum in children. 2018.
van der Wouden et al^Citation3	Interventions for cutaneous Molluscum Contagiosum. 2017.

Etiology and epidemiology

MC is caused by molluscum contagiosum virus (MCV), a double-strand DNA virus which belongs to the Poxviridae family; humans are MCV only host. MCV has 4 different genotypes: MCV 1, MCV 2, MCV 3, and MCV 4. MCV 1 is the most common genotype (75–96%), followed by MCV 2, while MCV 3 and 4 are extremely infrequent.^1,4,5 A Slovenian study⁴ showed that in children MCV 1 infection is more frequent than in adults, and in adult women, MCV 2 infection is more frequent than MCV 1.

MCV infects the epidermis and replicates in the cytoplasm of cells with a variable incubation period between two and six weeks.⁶ Different studies have been developed to sequence the genome of this virus and determine possible genes involved in the evasion of the host immune response, a hypothesis that arose based on the absence of inflammation observed in histopathological samples of infected skin.^7,8 To date, four viral genes have been identified that code proteins that would alter the activation of the nuclear factor kB (NF-kB): MC159, MC160, MC132, and MC005.^8–11 NF-kB is a nuclear protein complex present in dendritic cells that regulate the transcription of DNA and facilitate the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF, IL-1, IL-6, among others) and activation of innate and acquired immune response.¹² Brady et al^8,11 have seen that MC132 and MC005 proteins would alter the activation of NF-kB by inhibiting pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Added to this, MC132 would bind and stimulate the degradation of the p65 subunit of NF-kB and MC005 would inhibit the activation of the IKK complex (IkB kinase) binding to active NEMO subunit (essential modulator of NF-kB).

MCV is transmitted by direct contact with infected skin, which can be sexual, non-sexual, or by autoinoculation. Additionally, it can be transmitted by contaminated fomites like bath sponges or towels.¹ It has been associated with the use of the swimming pool.⁶

MC occurs worldwide and is more frequent in children but can also affect adolescents and adults. It typically affects children between 2-5 years old, being rare under the age of 1 year. There are no gender differences.¹³ Data on the prevalence of MC is limited. A meta-analysis of cross-sectional surveys among children revealed an overall prevalence of 8.28% (95% CI 5.1–11.5) and showed a higher frequency in geographical areas with warm climates.¹⁴ In the United States, it is estimated that the prevalence in children is less than 5%.¹⁵

Regarding seroprevalence, the findings are variable in different populations. An Australian study¹⁶ using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) revealed an overall seropositivity rate for MCV of 23% in children and adults. Sherwani et al¹⁷ found a seroprevalence of 14.8% in German children and adults between 0 and 40 years, and 30.3% in a population of 30 healthy individuals from the United Kingdom with a mean age of 27 years; in both studies, seroprevalence was determined by ELISA of antibodies against MC084 protein. Watanabe et al¹⁸ found a seroprevalence of 6% in a healthy Japanese population, determined by ELISA of antibodies against an N-terminal truncation of MC133 protein.

In adolescents and adults, MC could occur either as a sexually transmitted disease or in relation to contact sports.¹⁹ It is more common in immunosuppressed patients: In the 1980s, the number of reported cases of MC increased, apparently associated with the onset of the acquired immune deficiency virus (HIV) epidemic.²⁰ It is estimated that in HIV patients the prevalence is close to 20%.²¹ Besides HIV, MC may be associated with iatrogenic immunosuppression or primary immunodeficiencies (eg, DOCK8 immunodeficiency syndrome).²²

Atopic dermatitis (AD) has been proposed as a risk factor for MC. However, studies on this subject are controversial. Some studies have found an increased risk of MC in patients with AD,^23,24 with prevalence rates of AD in patients with MC of up to 62%.^6,25 It has even been postulated an increased risk of MCV infection in patients with AD and filaggrin mutation.²⁶ Other studies have shown no significant differences.²⁷

Clinical manifestations

Patients infected with MCV present firm rounded papules from 2 to 5 mm, pink or skin-colored, with a shiny and umbilicated surface (Figure 1). The lesions may be single, multiple or clustered, and occasionally they may have an erythematous halo or be pediculated. Pruritus may be present.

Figure 1 Firm, rounded, skin-colored papules with a shiny and umbilicated surface.

In children, the main affected areas are sites of exposed skin, such as the trunk, extremities, intertriginous regions, genitals, and face, except the palms and soles.²⁸ The involvement of the oral mucosa is rare.²⁹ In adults, lesions are most frequently located in the lower abdomen, thighs, genitals, and perianal area, most of the cases transmitted by sexual contact. In children, genital lesions are mainly due to autoinoculation and are not pathognomonic of sexual abuse.³⁰

The duration of the lesions is variable, but in most cases, they are self-limiting in a period of 6 to 9 months; however, some cases may persist for more than 3 or 4 years.³ It has described a phenomenon called “beginning of the end” (BOTE) sign which refers to clinical erythema and swelling of an MC skin lesion when the regression phase begins (Figure 2). This phenomenon is likely due to an immune response towards the MC infection rather than a bacterial superinfection.^1,25,31

Figure 2 Swelling and erythema of the “BOTE” sign.

In immunosuppressed patients, such as those infected with HIV, lesions may be extensive, located in atypical sites, greater than 1 cm in diameter (giant MC) or refractory to treatment.^32–34

Patients may develop eczematous plaques around one or more lesions of MC, a phenomenon known as “molluscum dermatitis” (MD) or “eczema molluscorum” (EM) which is more frequent in patients with AD. It is estimated that 9–47% of the patients with MC develop MD.²⁵ It is not clear whether the treatment of MD with topical corticosteroids impacts the resolution of MC lesions.^35,36

MC lesions can also be congenital when transmitted vertically by contact with MCV in the birth canal.^37,38 In this case, lesions are typically located on the scalp and have a circular arrangement.³⁸ Other sites of atypical location,¹ in addition to the oral mucosa, include the palms and soles, the areola/nipple,^39,40 the conjunctiva,⁴¹ lips,⁴² eyelids,⁴³ among others.⁴⁴ Clinical presentation of periocular lesions has been described as erythematous, nodular umbilicated, big/giant, conglomerated, inflamed, or pedunculated.⁴⁵ The periocular presentation has also been associated with conjunctivitis.⁴⁶

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of MC is clinically based on the distinguishing characteristics of the lesions. A useful clinical tool in the diagnosis of MC is dermoscopy,¹ which is a widely available tool that enables to observe structures not seen by the naked eye with a 10X magnification. MC display characteristic findings under the dermatoscope: a central pore or umbilication, polylobular white-to-yellow amorphous structures, and peripheral crown vessels (Figure 3).^47–49 They can also have rosettes when seen under polarized light. Diagnosis is usually straightforward when typical MC findings are seen; however, some irritated or excoriated cases of MC may be indistinguishable from other tumors.⁵⁰ Other emerging diagnostic modalities that may aid in the diagnosis of MC include reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM). Under RCM they appear as round, well-circumscribed lesions, with central round-to-cystic areas filled with bright refractile material.^51,52

Figure 3 Dermatoscopic findings of MC. Red arrows: white-to-yellow polylobular structures. Blue arrows: crown vessels. (Polarized-light dermoscopy, original magnification 10×).

The histopathological study is indicated when the diagnosis is not clear (see differential diagnosis below). The characteristic findings correspond to large intracytoplasmic eosinophil inclusion bodies known as Henderson-Petterson bodies (Figure 4).³⁰

Figure 4 Large intracytoplasmic eosinophil inclusion bodies called Henderson-Petterson bodies. This photo was provided courtesy of Alejandra Villarroel-Pérez, MD. H&E, 10× magnification.

The differential diagnoses include mainly inflammatory, infectious, and neoplastic etiologies; they mainly differ according to the age and immunologic status of the patient (Table 2).¹ In immunosuppressed patients, the main differential diagnosis includes histoplasmosis and cryptococcosis which can be seen as umbilicated papules.⁵³

Table 2 Molluscum contagiosum differential diagnosis

Infections	Verruca vulgaris^Citation88
	Chickenpox^Citation89
	Folliculitis^Citation1
	Condyloma acuminatum^Citation1
Tumors	Syringomas^Citation90
	Steatocystoma multiplex^Citation1,Citation90
	Basal cell carcinoma^Citation91
Miscellaneous	Acne vulgaris^Citation92
	Gianotti-Crosti Syndrome^Citation25
	Milia^Citation1
	Sebaceous hyperplasia^Citation93
	Papular urticaria^Citation1

Treatment

Currently, the need for active treatment in patients with MC is controversial, given the self-limited course of infection, the large number of therapeutic alternatives available, and the lack of evidence to define the best therapy. There is a consensus that treatment should be indicated in patients with extensive disease, secondary complications (bacterial superinfection, molluscum dermatitis, conjunctivitis), or aesthetic complaints.¹ A retrospective study⁵⁴ evaluated the resolution rate of the lesions in treated and untreated MC patients, showing a resolution at 12 months of 45.6% in the treated group and 48.8% in the untreated group. At 18 months, they found a resolution rate of 69.5% and 72.6% in the treated versus the untreated group, respectively. From this cardinal study, it appears that active treatment does not improve the resolution rate when compared to observation alone.

For all patients, general measures are recommended to prevent the spread of MCV.^1–3 It should be advised not to scratch or rub the lesions; besides, patients should not share towels, tub, or bath utensils.

Active treatments can be classified as ¹mechanical, chemical, immunomodulatory, and antiviral.

Mechanical methods

Cryotherapy is an effective treatment. It can be applied with a cotton-tipped swab or by portable sprayers, 1 or 2 cycles of 10 to 20 seconds are typically used.² A prospective, randomized and comparative trial⁵⁵ evaluated the efficacy of cryotherapy in MC treatment. The study demonstrated a complete clearance in 70.7% of the patients at 3 weeks and in 100% of them at 16 weeks. Another study⁵⁶ showed full clearance in 83.3% of 60 patients (average age of 20 years) at 6 weeks. In both, the application of cryotherapy was administered weekly. The disadvantages of cryotherapy are the possibility of blistering, scarring, and post-inflammatory hypo or hyperpigmentation.²

Curettage is also an effective method and involves the physical removal of skin lesions.² One study showed that of 1,879 children, 70% were cured with one session while 26% needed two sessions, with overall satisfaction of 97% in both parents and children.⁵⁷ A randomized, controlled trial⁵⁸ showed a complete clearance with only one curettage session in 80.3% of the patients and without recurrences at 6 months of follow-up. It can be done with a curette, punch biopsy (Figure 5) or with an ear speculum.^59,60 To reduce pain, topical application of EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anesthetics), a combination of 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine, may be required 1 hr before the procedure.^57,61 Curettage can cause pain, bleeding, and scarring.

Figure 5 Mechanical removal (curettage) of a molluscum contagiosum with a punch tool. The punch should be positioned in <30° to the skin surface and a shear movement should be performed to remove the molluscum in its entirety.

After curettage, topical povidone iodine can be applied. This is an antiseptic useful in the treatment of MC based on case reports⁶² and our experience. A systematic review of 2017 showed that povidone-iodine 10% potentiates the effect of 50% salicylic acid, without adverse effects reported.³ For topical povidone iodine, we propose an application scheme of 3 times a day until the resolution of the cutaneous lesions. We use it routinely after use of other treatment modalities.

Another useful mechanical method is pulse dye laser therapy, which due to its costs and limited availability is suggested to be left for refractory cases.^1,63 It is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment, with infrequent adverse effects.⁶³ Cases of successful use in immunosuppressed patients have also been reported.⁶⁴

Chemical methods

Chemical methods destroy skin lesions through the inflammatory response they produce. Cantharidin is a topical agent, an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase, which produces an intraepidermal blister, followed by resolution of the lesion and healing without a scar in some cases.⁶⁵ The efficacy of cantharidin in the treatment of MC is variable, with cure rates varying between 15.4% and 100% among the different studies.^66,67 It is recommended to apply cantharidin 0.7–0.9% at the site of the lesion, with or without occlusion, and to wash with soap and water 2–4 hrs later, each every 2–4 weeks until the resolution of lesions.^2,58,65 In the face and anogenital region it should be used with precaution due to the risk of bacterial superinfection of blisters that form after 24–48 hrs.^2,68

Potassium hydroxide is an alkaline compound that dissolves keratin.² It has been used in concentrations and therapeutic schemes that vary from 5% to 20%, two times a day or every other day for 1 week or until inflammation develops.⁶⁹ A recent study⁷⁰ showed that 10% and 15% potassium hydroxide clear lesions of MC entirely in 58.8% and 64.3% of the patients, respectively. It would be a safe and effective treatment that could be applied by patients, and its effectiveness has been compared with cryotherapy and imiquimod without significant differences.^69,71

Other chemical methods reported are: podophyllotoxin, trichloroacetic acid, salicylic acid, lactic acid, glycolic acid, benzoyl peroxide, and tretinoin.^1,2,62

Immunomodulatory methods

Immunomodulatory methods stimulate the patient’s immune response against the infection. Imiquimod is an immune-stimulatory agent agonist of the toll-like receptor 7 that activates the innate and acquired immune response.² It is a useful alternative in the treatment of MC based on case reports and uncontrolled studies.^31,72 A prospective, randomized trial⁵⁵ compared the efficacy of cryotherapy with 5% imiquimod, demonstrating a complete clearance in 100% of the patients at 16 weeks for cryotherapy versus 92% for imiquimod 5% (difference not statistically significant). Cutaneous adverse effects were more frequent in the cryotherapy group. However, a recent systematic review showed that it is not better than placebo in short-term improvement (3 months) or long-term cure (more than 6 months) and may produce adverse effects at the application site such as pain, blistering, scars and/or pigmentary changes.³ The current evidence positions imiquimod as a controversial therapeutic alternative.⁷³

Other immunomodulatory methods are oral cimetidine, interferon alfa, candidin, and diphencyprone.

Oral cimetidine is an H2 receptor antagonist that would stimulate the delayed hypersensitivity response.² It is a safe and well-tolerated drug, and the recommended dose is 25–40 mg/kg/day. It would be more effective in non-facial lesions.¹

Interferon alfa is a proinflammatory cytokine that is used in the treatment of MC in immunosuppressed patients with severe or refractory disease. It can be administered subcutaneously or intralesionally.^74–76

Candidin is intralesional immunotherapy derived from the purified extract of Candida albicans. It is an alternative in the treatment of MC, being applied purely or diluted at 50% with lidocaine in a dose of 0.2–0.3 mL intralesional every 3 weeks.² A retrospective study evaluating the efficacy of candidin in the treatment of MC showed a complete resolution rate of 55% and a partial resolution of 37.9%, with an overall response rate of 93%.⁷⁷

Diphencyprone is a topical immunomodulator used in multiple skin diseases. Cases of successful treatment with diphencyprone have been reported in immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients.^78,79

Antivirals

Another method used in immunosuppressed patients with extensive or refractory disease is cidofovir, an antiviral drug initially used in cytomegalovirus retinitis in HIV patients. It can be used topically at a concentration of 1–3% or intravenously.^80–82 The major problem with intravenous administration is nephrotoxicity.⁸³

New therapies

New MC treatments include topical sinecatechins,⁸⁴ intralesional 5-fluorouracil,⁸⁵ hyperthermia,⁸⁶ and zoster immune globulin.⁸⁷ Evidence is preliminary to determine the effectiveness of these therapies.

Conclusion

MC is a frequent reason for consultation in dermatology and the decision to treat or not should be considered for each patient, taking into account its self-limited course and benign nature. There are multiple treatment alternatives with variable efficacy; risks and benefits should be balanced and discussed on a patient-by-patient basis. From our point of view, and based on the available evidence, it appears that curettage with or without topical anesthesia, or the application of 0.7% cantharidin, are the most cost-effective alternatives. Currently, a series of investigations are being carried out to determine the effectiveness of the available treatments and find new therapeutic options.

Ethical concerns

The figures presented in this article were taken from patients in our center, not from books or other articles, and the parents authorized their publication in all cases.

Acknowledgment

We would want to thank Alejandra Villarroel-Pérez, MD, for her collaboration with histopathological images of MC.

Disclosure

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare in this work.