Comparison of SOX-10, HMB-45, and Melan-A in Benign Melanocytic Lesions

Abstract

Purpose

Different immunohistochemical stains are used in dermatopathology to stain melanocytes and diagnose benign and malignant melanocytic lesions.

Methods

SOX-10, HMB-45, and Melan-A immunohistochemical stains were used to assess 32 biopsy specimens with a histologic diagnosis of lentigo. The total number of melanocytes stained with each immunohistochemical stain was counted and an average count was obtained from two readings.

Results

Analysis of the data revealed a significant difference in staining melanocytes between these three immunostains (p=0.0010, ANOVA). SOX-10 stained 0.195 more melanocytes than HMB-45 (p=0.0026). Similarly, Melan-A stained 0.195 more melanocytes than HMB-45 (p=0.0011). However, the difference between SOX-10 and Melan-A was not statistically significant (p=0.9810).

Conclusion

SOX-10 and Melan-A immunostaining stain more melanocytes than HMB-45. No significant difference was noted between Melan-A and SOX-10.

Keywords:

• immunohistochemical stains
• melanocytes
• benign melanocytic lesion
• lentigo
• atypical junctional melanocytic hyperplasia

Introduction

Early melanoma in situ can be difficult to distinguish from lentigo senilis, particularly in sun-damaged skin, which can result in a significant delay in diagnosis.^1,2 Efforts to identify additional prognostic biomarkers in melanocytic lesions continue to be a challenge. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining in conjunction with immunohistochemistry has remained the gold standard for dermatopathologists to confirm their diagnoses.³ The choice of immunohistochemical stains may depend on the pathologists’ personal preferences; however, data on comparison between different immunostains are scarce.

Widely used immunohistochemical markers for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions include Sry-related HMG-BOX gene 10 (SOX-10), human melanoma black-45 (HMB-45), and Melan-A/MART-1. These three immunohistochemical stains are used to visualize melanocytes in melanocytic lesions expressed in the epidermis and dermo-epidermal junction. SOX-10 is a nuclear transcription factor involved in the differentiation of neural crest cells to melanocytes.² Its nuclear pattern differentiates itself from the other commonly used melanocytic markers. It has been shown to be both a sensitive and specific marker in staining melanomas.⁴ HMB-45 is a monoclonal cytoplasmic marker of the premelanosome complex, glycoprotein gp100. The HMB-45 stain is less sensitive, but fairly specific for melanocytic differentiation.⁵ Melan-A/MART-1, also known as melanoma antigen, recognized by T cells, is a cytoplasmic protein.⁶ In addition to staining melanocytes, Melan-A has been reported to stain melanophages. The Melan-A immunostain has an equal sensitivity and specificity for melanoma; however, it has been shown to stain melanoma more intensely and may appear to show more epidermal melanocytes than what is actually present.³ Since there has not been a single antigen identified that stains with maximum sensitivity and specificity, immunohistochemical markers are typically used in combination.

Although immunohistochemistry has been the gold standard to distinguish melanocytic lesions, including benign versus malignant, histological diagnosis can be difficult, which has led to an increasing interest in finding a marker that is most beneficial in staining melanocytes. To date, there are no studies comparing the staining patterns of SOX-10, HMB-45, and Melan-A of melanocytes in lentigo senilis or benign melanocytic lesions. The objective of our study is to compare SOX-10, HMB-45, and Melan-A to determine the relative degree of immunohistochemical staining in lentigo senilis.

Methods

Thirty-two biopsy specimens with a histologic diagnosis of lentigo were randomly selected from the database at Pinkus Dermatopathology Lab, Monroe, MI. Lesions were chosen based on a clinical suspicion of lentigo maligna (melanoma in situ) but were histologically lentigo senilis or lentigo with focal melanocytic hyperplasia.

Each tissue section was formalin fixed (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA), embedded in paraffin (Cardinal Health, Dublin, OH), and cut at 4 µm thick. They were mounted onto charged slides and placed in a drying oven for 45 minutes at 60°C. The sections were immunostained with anti-SOX-10 antibody (prediluted RTU, Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA), anti-HMB-45 antibody (pre-diluted RTU, Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL), and anti-Melan-A antibody (pre-diluted RTU, Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL), using an automated Leica Bond-Max Polymer Refine Detection Kit (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL). The total number of melanocytes stained with each immunohistochemical stain was counted by two independent observers (DRM and TH). An average count was obtained from the two independent readings.

ANOVA test was used to analyze the significance of difference between three immunohistochemical stains. A linear mixed effects model was also employed to test the difference in the count of melanocytes. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The study included a total of 32 benign melanocytic lesions from 32 biopsy specimens with lentigo senilis or mild junctional proliferation (Table 1). In all of the cases, the melanocytes stained positive for SOX-10, HMB-45, and Melan-A. Specimens stained more intensely with Melan-A and SOX-10 at the dermo-epidermal junction compared to HMB-45; however, the difference between SOX-10 and Melan-A was not statistically significant (p=0.9810, Figures 1 and 2). The difference in the number of stained melanocytes was highly significant between HMB-45 and SOX-10 (p=0.0031) and between HMB-45 and Melan-A (p=0.0042) based on a pairwise comparison. Using a logarithmic scale, SOX-10 stained 0.195 more melanocytes/mm, or 1.215 times more, than HMB-45 (p=0.0026). Similarly, Melan-A stained 0.195 more melanocytes/mm, or 1.214 times more, than HMB-45 (p=0.0011, Figure 3). Overall, the three markers have a significantly different ability to stain melanocytes (p=0.0010, ANOVA).

Table 1 Clinical Data and Staining Results of Patients with a Diagnosis of Lentigo Senilis or Lentigo with Mild Junctional Proliferation

Case	Age	Sex	Site	Avg No. of Melanocytes Stained with SOX-10	Avg No. of Melanocytes Stained with HMB-45	Avg No. of Melanocytes Stained with Melan-A
1	49	F	L upper arm	27	14.5	20.5
2	66	M	L temple	72	20.5	40.5
3	69	F	L lateral superior chest	24.5	17	33.5
4	52	F	L leg	40.5	47.5	27.5
5	86	F	L medial lower leg	24.5	19.5	26.5
6	33	M	L lateral back	32.5	20.5	24.5
7	56	M	R chest	18.5	10.5	14.5
8	42	F	R superior upper back	19	9.5	17
9	67	F	L proximal medial calf	24.5	18	22.5
10	50	F	L distal pretibial region	33.5	30	47.5
11	50	F	L pretibial region	17.5	6	17
12	42	F	R medial fourth toe	29.5	11	27.5
13	61	F	R anterior upper leg	87.5	49.5	54
14	60	F	Anterior neck sternal notch	7.5	6	10.5
15	56	F	L cheek	15.5	24.5	23
16	59	M	L cheek	30	29.5	50.5
17	65	F	R lateral thoracic	28	13.5	36.5
18	51	F	L anterior proximal thigh	23	24	26
19	52	F	R medial superior chest	59	28.5	26
20	80	F	Upper sternum	11.5	13.5	7.5
21	64	F	L distal posterior upper arm	29	27	34
22	55	F	L chest	11.5	14	18
23	69	M	R distal pretibial region	8.5	10	18
24	69	M	R distal pretibial region	11	12	13.5
25	79	M	R posterior neck	46.5	8.5	34.5
26	70	M	Midline mid chest	16.5	11	22
27	80	M	R anterior shoulder	11	8.5	18
28	60	F	R clavicle	21	11	21.5
29	80	M	L chest near midline	11	5	13
30	65	F	R calf	24.5	21.5	27.5
31	64	F	L distal dorsal forearm	79	35.5	46.5
32	55	F	L superior lateral lower back	84	24.5	48

Figure 1 Mild atypical junctional proliferation. (A) H&E stain, (B) HMB-45 stain, (C) Melan-A stain, (D) SOX-10 stain. More intense staining noted for Melan-A and SOX-10 at the dermo-epidermal junction. Scale bar = 50 µm.

Figure 2 Lentigo with focal junctional melanocytic hyperplasia. (A) H&E stain, (B) HMB-45 stain, (C) Melan-A stain, (D) SOX-10 stain. Melan-A and SOX-10 showed increased staining at the dermo-epidermal junction. Scale bar = 50 µm.

Figure 3 In a logarithmic scale, SOX-10 stained 1.215 times more melanocytes than HMB-45 (p=0.0026) and Melan-A stained 1.214 times more melanocytes than HMB-45 (p=0.0011) with a 95% confidence interval.

Discussion

Immunohistochemistry remains the most common aid used by dermatopathologists to assist in the distinction between benign and malignant melanocytic lesions. The S100 marker has historically been used as a melanocytic marker; however, it is highly sensitive but not specific for melanocytes as it is also expressed in epidermal Langerhans cells. Unfortunately, there still is not a single immunohistochemical marker that can achieve this distinction with certainty.⁷ Often a subtle melanocytic proliferation can be easily missed. In particular, an early melanoma in situ may be difficult to differentiate from a lentigo senilis. Often this may lead to descriptive diagnoses such as “lentigo with junctional melanocytic hyperplasia” or “atypical junctional melanocytic proliferation”. All of the cases studied were submitted to rule out melanoma in situ but showed histologic findings of a lentigo senilis or mild atypical junctional proliferation. No cases showed definitive features of a melanoma such as pagetoid scatter of melanocytes or melanocytic nest formation. SOX-10, HMB-45, and Melan-A are highly specific for melanocytic cell types. However, our findings show that the choice of immunohistochemical stain may result in different sensitivity for melanocytes. In our study, Melan-A and SOX-10 both had a significant increase in staining compared with HMB-45, however, there was no significant difference in staining between Melan-A and SOX-10. As in Figure 1, there was a prominent difference in staining of melanocyte dendrites between Melan-A and SOX-10. Even though there was not a statistical difference in the number of melanocytes stained, it was easier for the investigators to visualize melanocytes stained with SOX-10 compared to Melan-A. This is most obvious in Figure 1, however also visible in Figure 2.

HMB-45 and Melan-A have been previously compared in both benign and malignant melanocytic lesions.^8,9 HMB-45 was found to be more specific, with greater staining at the dermo-epidermal junction, but lacking sensitivity. Moreover, Melan-A showed a diffuse staining of melanocytes in benign melanocytic lesions, being more sensitive overall. Melan-A was also found to stain heavily melanized keratinocytes and melanophages. This finding is consistent with what was seen in our stained biopsy specimens. Although HMB-45 did not stain as many melanocytes as SOX-10 and Melan-A, HMB-45 may be helpful in distinguishing between lentigo senilis and early melanoma in situ. This has been successfully demonstrated with staining of HMB-45 to differentiate pigmented actinic keratosis from lentigo maligna due to the reaction of HMB-45 in lesions with cytologic atypia and confluence of growth.¹⁰

A more recent study directly compared Melan-A and SOX-10 immunostaining.³ It was found that Melan-A stained significantly more melanocytes than SOX-10 in actinic keratoses; however, there was no difference in detecting melanocytic proliferations. Their results also showed that SOX-10 was more specific than Melan-A in identifying epidermal melanocytes on sun-damaged skin.⁴ In our study, we did not find a difference between Melan-A and SOX-10 staining. Some authors argue that melanocytic cells can easily be overlooked in H&E-stained sections and Melan-A should be the primary biomarker. With this in mind, Drabeni et al stained with Melan-A after initially staining with H&E. Their findings resulted in 33% of in situ melanoma cases being reclassified as invasive melanoma.¹¹ In an opposing study, they found an increased number of melanocytes in the epidermis confirmed by a strong positivity for Melan-A in single cells and in small nests located at the dermo-epidermal junction. However, their histopathology showed the presence of a lichenoid dermatitis, not melanoma in situ. These results suggest that immunohistochemical investigations performed with Melan-A alone may lead to confusing and potentially disastrous results in analyzing pigmented lesions.¹²

This is particularly important for dermatologic surgeons and pathologists in distinguishing the subtle features of melanoma in situ in the background of atypical junctional melanocytic hyperplasia. Due to overlapping features of sun-damaged skin, reading the surgical margins after an excision can be challenging as there is often melanocytic hyperplasia with or without an associated pigmented lesion and variability in melanocyte density adjacent to melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers.¹³ Although melanocytic hyperplasia can be expected surrounding a melanoma on chronically sun-damaged skin, the progression of the melanocytic hyperplasia is still unclear.¹⁴ Histologic discrimination of early melanoma in situ from benign melanocytic lesions can be challenging. Immunohistochemical studies of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF), a key component of the signal transduction pathway for the development of and differentiation of melanocytes, showed increased melanocyte density and nuclear diameter in melanoma in situ compared to a benign solar lentigo.^15,16 This demonstrates the importance in using a stain with a high specificity for melanocytes. The lack of specificity of Melan-A immunostaining, as stated previously, may result in false-positive margins for surgical excision of melanoma in situ. In our study, Melan-A did not stain with clear, defined margins, possibly yielding more stained melanocytes than what was actually present. In addition, some authors have proposed that there is a continuum between solar lentigo and lentigo maligna. They have described it as a solar lentigo with melanocytic hyperplasia not extending past the margin of the lesion. Although distinguishing criteria for the diagnosis of melanoma in situ compared to melanocytic hyperplasia has been identified, there is uncertainty as to whether or not a solar lentigo may be a precursor lesion to lentigo maligna.¹⁷ This highlights the important role immunohistochemistry plays in the histopathological identification of benign melanocytic lesions from early malignancy.

Overall, we found a significant increase in staining with Melan-A and SOX-10 at the dermo-epidermal junction, compared to HMB-45. However, no significant difference was noted between Melan-A and SOX-10. A potential limitation to our study is the limited sample size. Although a difference in melanocyte count was not observed between Melan-A and SOX-10, our results show an apparent trend approaching significance. Melan-A or SOX-10 may be superior in staining melanocytes in melanocytic lesions, however SOX-10 may be more specific. Immunohistochemistry itself carries a few obstacles including its small biopsy size with a limited number of melanocytes and its differing sensitivity and specificity of antibodies to differentiate between melanocytes and keratinocytes.¹² Pathologists need to consider the relative sensitivity of the stains utilized when interpreting results of staining in subtle melanocytic proliferations.

In conclusion, immunohistochemical stains are commonly used to quantify melanocytic proliferation, especially in the differential diagnosis of lentigo senilis and early melanoma in situ. Our study shows that the choice of immunohistochemical stain may result in different sensitivity for melanocytic proliferation.

Statement of Ethics

This study was performed in accordance with ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Wayne State University, Detroit, MI. Consent requirement was waived as unidentified archived pathology materials were used in this study.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Funding

There is no funding to report.