Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors: investigational therapies for the treatment of psoriasis

Abstract

Psoriasis is a common inflammatory autoimmune condition in which environmental factors and genetic predisposition contribute to the development of disease in susceptible individuals. Angiogenesis is known to be a key pathogenic feature of psoriasis. Local and systemic elevation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A has been demonstrated in the skin and plasma of patients with psoriasis and is known to correlate with improvement following some traditional psoriasis treatments. A number of VEGF inhibitors are licensed for the treatment of malignancies and eye disease and isolated case reports suggest that some individuals with psoriasis may improve when exposed to these agents. The small number of cases and lack of unified reporting measures makes it difficult to draw generalizations and underline the heterogeneity of psoriasis as a disease entity. Though not yet licensed for the treatment of psoriasis in humans, experimental data supports the potential of VEGF inhibitors to influence relevant aspects of human cell biology (such as endothelial cell differentiation) and to improve animal models of skin disease. Given the multi-factorial nature of psoriasis it is unlikely that VEGF inhibitors will be effective in all patients, however they have the potential to be a valuable addition to the therapeutic arsenal in selected cases. Current VEGF inhibitors in clinical use are associated with a number of potentially serious side effects including hypertension, left ventricular dysfunction, and gastrointestinal perforation. Such risks require careful consideration in psoriasis populations particularly in light of growing concerns linking psoriasis to increased cardiovascular risk.

Keywords:

• psoriasis
• vascular endothelial growth factor
• VEGF
• VEGF inhibitor

Introduction

Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease affecting 1%–3% of the Caucasian population.¹ Patients with psoriasis have a significant degree of associated psychological morbidity² and extra cutaneous manifestations, such as concomitant psoriatic arthritis (in up to 40% of patients)¹ and higher incidence of metabolic syndrome (particularly in those with severe disease).³

Psoriasis vulgaris is the commonest disease subtype and is characterized clinically by the presence of thickened erythematous scaly plaques. The histological features of psoriasis are: (1) a dermal and epidermal inflammatory infiltrate; (2) epidermal hyperplasia; (3) abnormal keratinocyte differentiation; and (4) increased dermal vascularity with tortuous capillary loops.^4,5 Classically, the increased vascularity can be demonstrated clinically by “Auspitz sign” where scraping scale from psoriatic plaques leads to pin-point bleeding.

Originally thought to be a primary disorder of keratinocytes, psoriasis is now recognized as a complex autoimmune disease in which environmental factors and genetic predisposition contribute to the manifestation of the disease in susceptible individuals.⁶

T-cells (particularly T-helper-1 and T-helper-17) are hypothesized to be key players in the initiation and maintenance of psoriasis; however, many other cell types are also important. Endothelial cells, dendritic cells, monocytic cells, neutrophils, and keratinocytes also contribute to the complicated cocktail of chemokines and cytokines found in affected individuals.⁷ Elucidation of these pathogenic pathways has resulted in an expansion of the therapeutic arsenal though to date psoriasis remains incurable.

Research into new therapies continues and seeks to assess different parts of the psoriasis pathway including inhibition of angiogenesis. Angiogenesis is a key feature in psoriatic skin which is associated with local and systemic elevation of angiogenic cytokines including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) which fluctuates in line with disease activity.^8,9 Existing psoriasis treatments such as cyclosporine,¹⁰ acitretin,⁹ fumeric acid esters,^11,12 infliximab,^13,14 and psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA)^15,16 have been shown to inhibit angiogenesis and reduce levels of VEGF as part of their therapeutic effect.

As yet, VEGF inhibitors are not licensed for the management of psoriasis; however, VEGF inhibitors are in widespread use for other conditions including malignant disease^17,18 and age-related macular degeneration.^19,20 There are isolated case reports of significant improvement in psoriasis during use of VEGF inhibitors for other conditions^21–24 and supportive data from animal models.²⁵

This article will examine the therapeutic potential of VEGF inhibitors in psoriasis with reference to emerging therapies and existing agents used in other conditions.

Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs)

Angiogenesis is the formation of new blood vessels from a pre-existing vascular bed and usually occurs during embryogenesis, wound healing, and the endometrial cycle.²⁶ Pathological angiogenesis is a hallmark of tumor formation,²⁷ but also occurs in degenerative eye diseases²⁸ and inflammatory conditions, such as joint disease²⁹ and psoriasis.⁸

VEGFs play a key role in normal and pathological angiogenesis.³⁰ Six family members or subtypes exist: VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGF-E, and placental growth factor (PlGF).³¹ Of these, VEGF-A (initially known as vascular permeability factor) was the first to be discovered and exists as four isoforms (VEGF-A121, VEGF-A165, VEGF-A189, VEGF-A206)³² generated by variable splicing of the VEGF-A gene. VEGF-A is found intracellularly and secreted systemically³⁰ promoting monocyte activation and chemotaxis,³³ controlling endothelial cell differentiation and increasing vascular permeability.³⁴ VEGF-165 is the most common isoform and the most important for angiogenesis.³⁵

VEGFs interact with cell membrane receptors (VEGFRs) to activate intracellular tyrosine kinases.³⁴ VEGFRs exist as three subtypes (VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and VEGFR-3) and consist of seven extracellular immunoglobulin-like domains and an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain. VEGF-A has a high affinity for VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 through which it mediates its biological effects.³⁶

In humans, heterozygous and homozygous defects in VEGF-A alleles are fatal.³⁷ The VEGF-A gene is highly polymorphic^38,39 with some polymorphisms (eg, rs2010963 and rs833061) being associated with early onset psoriasis. The VEGF-A gene is in close proximity to PSORS1 (a gene strongly associated with psoriasis hereditability) on chromosome 6p21, however, no linkage disequilibrium between the two has been observed suggesting that they are inherited independently.⁴⁰

VEGF-A in psoriasis

In the skin, VEGF-A is predominantly secreted by keratino-cytes. Patients with psoriasis have higher levels of VEGF-A secretion in both affected and non-affected skin with affected skin showing significantly higher levels that fluctuate in line with disease activity.⁴¹ Plasma levels of VEGF-A are also elevated in patients with psoriasis and fluctuate with disease activity.^9,42 High plasma levels of VEGF-A are associated with early onset psoriasis (onset before the age of 40 years) and psoriatic arthritis.⁴³

In 2003, Xia et al²⁵ noted the development of inflammatory skin lesions in otherwise healthy transgenic VEGF mice. The skin changes were clinically and histologically similar to human psoriasis – including demonstration of the Koebner phenomenon – and were associated with high levels of epidermal, dermal and circulating VEGF. Introduction of a VEGF antagonist led to resolution of the psoriasiform eruption.²⁵

In humans, the use of some traditional psoriasis therapies has been associated with reduction of VEGF-A expression. Andrys et al found that use of topical coal tar in combination with ultraviolet B (UVB; Goeckerman therapy) in patients with psoriasis led to significant clinical improvement and reduced plasma levels of VEGF-A.⁴²

These findings are in keeping with in vitro studies, which demonstrate that photochemotherapy with PUVA suppresses VEGF expression, inhibits angiogenesis, and induces apoptosis of human endothelial cells¹⁵ and in vivo studies that showed reduced plasma levels of VEGF-A following PUVA therapy.¹⁶

However, the relationship between VEGF levels, phototherapy, and therapeutic effect in psoriasis is by no means clear as treatment with narrow-band (NB)-UVB and retinoid (re)-PUVA has been shown to lead to higher levels of VEGF-A than at baseline despite clinical improvement.¹⁶

These seemingly contradictory findings may be explained by increased epidermal proliferation following UVB exposure and individual response to systemic retinoids.

Skin thickening via epidermal hyperplasia is a well-recognized consequence of UV exposure⁴⁴ and irradiation of normal skin with UVB results in an upregulation of VEGF-A.⁴⁵ Bielenburg et al demonstrated that exposure of C3H/HeN mice to a one-off dose of UVB resulted in epidermal hyperplasia and new vessel formation. They found that the proliferating keratinocytes were producing angiogenic cytokines resulting in increased cutaneous angiogenesis.⁴⁶ It is likely that a similar process occurs in irradiated skin of patients undergoing UVB therapy, but that in many patients the balance is still in favor of a beneficial therapeutic effect via other mechanisms.

In the case of re-PUVA, all-trans retinoic acid is reported to have a genotype-dependent inhibitory effect on keratinocyte production of VEGF-A, while also having a genotype-independent stimulatory effect on peripheral blood mononuclear cells which could be used to predict clinical response to acitretin.⁹ Akman et al hypothesized that the seemingly paradoxical increase in VEGF-A levels following re-PUVA therapy could be a rebound phenomenon secondary to exposure to a systemic retinoid where peripheral blood mononuclear cells had been stimulated to produce higher levels of VEGF-A.¹⁶

Though their exact mechanism of action remains unknown, fumeric acid esters have been shown to inhibit angiogenesis,¹¹ impair endothelial cell function, and suppress expression of VEGFR-2.¹² It has been postulated that in addition to their direct anti-angiogenic properties, their anti-psoriatic effects relate to inhibition of response to circulating VEGF-A.⁴⁷

Cyclosporin A has also been shown to inhibit in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis via inhibition of cyclooxygenase (Cox)-2.¹⁰ The gene for Cox-2 is induced by VEGF-A, but also differentially regulated by tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α).⁴⁸ TNF-α upregulates VEGFR-2 expression and has been shown to stimulate angiogenesis, enhance VEGF-mediated endothelial cell migration, and enhance wound healing.⁴⁸

TNF-α levels are elevated in psoriasis and play an important part in T-cell proliferation and disease pathogenesis.⁴⁹ Treatment with the anti-TNF-α agent infliximab improves skin and joint disease⁵⁰ and reduces VEGF expression in dermal and synovial tissue with corresponding reductions in tissue vascularity.^13,14

Current VEGF inhibitors

As discussed above, many existing psoriasis treatments influence the production or function of VEGF-A. Though as yet there is no agent specifically targeting the VEGF pathway in psoriasis, VEGF inhibitors have been used for the treatment of other conditions, particularly in cancer therapy⁵¹ and eye disease.⁵²

Existing VEGF inhibitors target the VEGF pathway in various ways including: (1) direct inhibition of VEGF protein (anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies; bevacizumab and ranibizumab); (2) prevention of VEGF receptor binding (VEGF receptor antagonists; alfibercept/VEGF-Trap and pegaptanib); and (3) inhibition of VEGF receptor function through inhibition of tyrosine kinase (tyrosine kinase inhibitors [TKIs]; sunitinib, sorafenib, vandetanib, and pazopanib).

Many new anti-angiogenic therapies are under investigation. These include: ramucirumab, cediranib, nintedanib (BIBF 1120), pazopanib, brivanib, ABT-869, axitinib, ABT-751, and NPI-2358.⁵³

It is beyond the scope of this article to review all existing and developing anti-angiogenic drugs in detail; however, examples of different classes of agent are given and particular mention is made of existing agents which have been reported to effect psoriasis. Potential therapies for psoriasis are discussed below under “Emerging therapies in psoriasis”.

Anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies

Bevacizumab

Bevacizumab (Avastin™; Genentech/Roche, South San Francisco, CA, USA) is a recombinant, humanized VEGF-A neutralizing, monoclonal antibody derived from mouse anti-VEGF antibodies.⁵⁴ It was the first anti-angiogenic agent licensed for use in oncology and was licensed by the USFood and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2004 as first-line treatment of metastatic colon cancer.

Bevacizumab is also licensed for the second-line treatment of metastatic colon or rectal cancer,⁵⁵ metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma,⁵⁶ recurrent glioblastoma multiforme,⁵⁵ and metastatic renal cell carcinoma.⁵⁷

Though bevacizumab was initially thought to show promise in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, the FDA withdrew its license after large, randomized Phase III trials failed to show any survival benefit.⁵¹ Bevacizumab is being investigated in a number of other tumor groups including ovarian cancer where Phase III trials are underway.⁵⁸

Off-license indications for bevacizumab include various ocular conditions (eg, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, radiation retinopathy, neovascular glaucoma, corneal neovascularization, and ocular oncology) with delivery by intravitreal, subconjunctival, intracameral, and intracorneal routes.⁵⁹

Ranibizumab

Ranibizumab (Lucentis™; Genentech) is a monoclonal antibody fragment derived from bevacizumab specifically developed for use in age-related macular degeneration.⁶⁰ It binds VEGF-A receptors with enhanced affinity and inhibits vasculogenesis.⁶⁰ It is licensed by the FDA for neovascular macular degeneration, macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion, and diabetic retinopathy.⁵⁹

VEGF receptor antagonists/fusion proteins

Aflibercept

Aflibercept (V-Trap; Eylea™; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY, USA) is a fusion protein with binding domains for native VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2. It acts as a decoy receptor irreversibly binding to circulating VEGF-A, VEGF-B, and placental growth factors with significantly higher affinity than bevacizumab.⁶¹ It is licensed for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration and is delivered by intravitreal injection.⁶² In comparison with bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib, Aflibercept has a longer duration of action requiring less frequent administration.

Applications under investigation in oncology include treatment of: metastatic colorectal cancer,⁶³ lung adenocarcinoma,⁵³ inoperable melanoma,⁶⁴ metastatic urothelial tumors,⁶⁵ ovarian cancer,⁶⁶ and recurrent malignant glioma.⁶⁷

Use of Aflibercept in transgenic mice with psoriasis-like lesions led to significant clinical and histological improvement with normalization of the rete ridges and cytoarchitecture, reduced parakeratosis, and vascular hyperplasia. Infiltration of the epidermis by CD8+ lymphocytes was reversed and staining for markers of aberrant epidermal differentiation and vascular inflammation (keratin-6 and E-selectin) was significantly reduced.²⁵

Pegaptanib

Pegaptanib sodium (Macugen™; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Melville, NY, USA) is a PEGylated single strand nucleic acid that binds the VEGF165 receptor. It is licensed by the FDA for the treatment of neovascular macular degeneration. It has also been shown to be of benefit in diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion.⁶⁸

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)

Kinases are enzymes that exert their biological functions by transferring a phosphate group from high energy donor molecules (such as adenosine triphosphate [ATP]) by phosphorylation resulting in functional changes in target proteins including transcription factors. There are hundreds of human kinases including around 30 tyrosine kinases subdivided into receptor tyrosine kinases and cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases.⁶⁹

TKIs are small molecules which can pass through the plasma membrane and interfere with intracellular tyrosine kinase activity such as those of the VEGFRs.⁷⁰ They not only inhibit VEGFRs, but also act on other kinase receptors, such as those for epidermal growth factor inducing a host of biological effects in addition to inhibition of angiogenesis.⁷¹

TKIs can be divided into three groups: type I TKIs competitively inhibit binding of ATP in the active conformation of the kinase (eg, sunitinib [Sutent™; Pfizer, New York, NY, USA]); type II TKIs indirectly compete with ATP by binding to the inactive conformation of the kinase (eg, sorafenib [Nexavar™; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany]); type III are “covalent inhibitors” that covalently bind cysteines to specific sites on the kinase (eg, vandetanib [Capreslsa™; AstraZeneca, London, UK]).⁷²

TKIs are licensed mainly for the treatment of malignancy, but their use in inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis⁷³ and psoriasis⁷⁴ is being investigated.

Sunitinib

Sunitinib was approved for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor in 2007.⁷⁵ It inhibits VEGF kinases and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), KIT, and FLT3 receptor tyrosine kinases.⁷⁶ Application to other types of malignant disease including pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor⁷⁷ and uveal melanoma⁷⁸ are underway.

Sorafenib

Sorafenib is licensed by the FDA for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma⁷⁹ and inoperable liver carcinoma.⁸⁰ Other uses in oncology continue to be explored including application to the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer⁸¹ and hematological malignancies.⁸² It is an oral multikinase inhibitor which targets not only VEGFRs, but also other kinases including extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) and serine/threonine-protein kinase (RAF) kinase.⁸³

Efficacy, safety and tolerability

The most common side effects of systemic administration of bevacizumab are hypertension (36% of patients) and proteinuria (21%–64% of patients).⁸⁴ In cancer patients, an increased risk of hemorrhagic (including gastrointestinal perforation), thrombotic events, and delayed wound healing have also been noted.⁸⁵

In the management of ocular disease, intravitreal bevacizumab is associated with reductions in systemic VEGF-A levels for up to one month after administration. No effect on systemic levels of VEGF-A has been shown after administration of ranibizumab or pegaptanib.⁸⁶ Intravitreal injections of bevacizumab have been associated with acute blood pressure elevation in 0.59% of patients,⁸⁷ but are not associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, bleeding, or death.⁸⁸ Intraocular ranibizumab has been associated with an increased risk of stroke and non-ocular bleeding.⁸⁹ Both agents are associated with ocular adverse events including uveitis, retinal tears, retinal detachment, lens damage, and vitreous haemorrhage.⁹⁰

The most commonly observed side effects of Aflibercept therapy in cancer patients include hypertension, fatigue proteinuria, pulmonary hemorrhage, and lymphopenia.⁶³

Anti-VEGF mediated hypertension is believed to result from downregulation of nitric oxide synthase, but several other potential pathways (including downregulation of nitric oxide, increased endothelial cell apoptosis, and increased erythropoietin synthesis) may be implicated.⁹¹

The most common adverse events were similar with sorafenib and sunitinib and included diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, desquamating skin rash, alopecia, fatigue, and hypertension.^92,93 These adverse events usually presented early in treatment and are generally of mild to moderate severity.^92,94

Concern has been raised that TKI, including sorafenib and sunitinib, may be associated with serious adverse cardiovascular effects such as reduced left ventricular function, congestive cardiac failure, and hypertension.^95–98 Some patients have required intensive intervention including admission to intensive care and/or coronary angiography, pacemaker insertion, and heart surgery.⁹⁹ Recent phase open-label studies in patients with a variety of advanced solid tumors failed to confirm any significant risk of such events;¹⁰⁰ however, numbers are small and the situation remains under review.

Existing VEGF antagonists and psoriasis

Improvement in psoriasis in patients being treated for malignancy with VEGF inhibitors has been reported for bevacizumab,²¹ sunitinib,²⁴ and sorafenib (Table 1).²³ These cases are outlined below:

Table 1 Licensed vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors reported to affect coexisting psoriasis during treatment of malignancy

Year	Reference	Author	Drug	Mechanism of action	Indication for treatment	Preceding duration of psoriasis (years)	Effect of treatment on coexisting psoriasis	Duration of effect
2007	22	Keshtgapour et al	Sunitinib (SU-011248)	Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor	Metastatic renal cell carcinoma	20	“Virtual clearance”	Throughout treatment with cyclical exacerbations
2009	21	Akman et al	Bevacizumab	Anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody	Metastatic colon carcinoma	40	Reduction in PASI from 16.8 to 1.4	At least 3 months (duration of follow-up)
2010	23	Fournier et al	Sorafenib	Multikinase inhibitor	Metastatic renal clear cell carcinoma	56	Clearance of longstanding plaques	4 months until change of treatment
2010	24	Narayanan et al	Sunitinib	Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor	Metastatic renal cell carcinoma	5	“Significant improvement”	3.5 years; ongoing therapy with cyclical exacerbations

Note: Copyright © 2011, Informa. Adapted with permission from Crawshaw AA, Griffiths CEM, Young HS. Investigational VEGF antagonists for psoriasis. Expert Opin Invest Drugs. 2012; 21:33–43.¹¹⁴

Abbreviations: PASI, psoriasis area and severity index; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Case 1: bevacizumab

Akman et al²¹ reported the case of a 60-year-old man with metastatic colon cancer and a 40-year history of extensive psoriasis affecting 40% of his body surface area (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] 16.8). Following detection of systemic metastases the patient was commenced on systemic therapy with bevacizumab, irinotecan, 5-fuorouracil, and leucovorin. Forty-five days after commencing treatment his psoriasis had significantly improved (PASI 1.4) and his tumor burden had stabilized. Treatment was continued and no relapse of his psoriasis was seen during the 3-month follow-up.

Cases 2 and 3: sunitinib

Keshtgarpour et al²² reported the first case of sunitinib-associated improvement in co-existing psoriasis during Phase III clinical trials comparing sunitinib to interferon-α (IFN-α). A male patient with metastatic renal carcinoma and a 20-year history of psoriasis was randomized to receive IFN-α. Treatment was continued for 6 months during which time his psoriasis increased in severity forming large confluent plaques across his torso. IFN-α was discontinued and sunitinib commenced 4 weeks later. Introduction of sunitinib was associated with virtual clearance of his psoriasis. During subsequent cycles of sunitinib treatment, exacerbation of psoriasis was noted in the 2 weeks between treatments with progressive improvement during each 4-week sunitinib cycle.

The second case of sunitinib-associated improvement in psoriasis was reported in 2010 by Narayanan et al.²⁴ The second patient was a 60-year old man with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and a 5-year history of psoriasis. Within 2 weeks of starting sunitinib the patient reported improvement in his psoriasis. As with the first case, cyclical exacerbation was noted during the 2 weeks between treatment cycles. Sustained improvement in his psoriasis continued during the further 3.5 years of sunitinib treatment.

Case 4: sorafenib

Fournier et al described a 78-year-old man with a 56-year history of psoriasis who was commenced on sorafenib for metastatic renal clear cell carcinoma (hypernephroma).²³ Prior to treatment, the patient had suffered from a recalcitrant plaque of psoriasis on the posterior mid-thorax measuring 8 cm by 6 cm. Within 3 weeks of commencing sorafenib, the patient reported a reduction in size of this plaque with complete clearance after 1-month of treatment.

After 4 months of sorafenib, the patient was entirely clear of psoriasis. Unfortunately his hypernephroma became resistant to treatment and sorafenib was discontinued. Within 1-month of ceasing treatment, the psoriatic plaques returned. Interestingly, the patient was subsequently com­menced on sunitinib with no reported improvement in his skin disease.

Comments on case reports

From the cases above it is not possible to directly attribute the clinical improvement in psoriasis with the VEGF inhibi­tor used for treatment of their malignancy. Stresses, such as systemic illness, are known to be an exacerbating factor in psoriasis.¹⁰¹ Removal of such stressors can be associated with improvement of psoriasis¹⁰² and so it may be that treatment of the underlying malignancy contributed to the improvement in skin disease.

Contrary to this theory is that in three of the four cases the clinical course of psoriasis had been stable prior to com­mencement of the VEGF inhibitor. In the case reported by Keshtgarpour et al, IFN-α is known to exacerbate psoriasis¹⁰³ and could account for the variability in that patient’s skin disease prior to sunitinib therapy. In this case, the significant improvement seen with sorafenib, but not with sunitinib, underlines the heterogeneity of psoriasis as a disease entity. It also suggests that different individuals with psoriasis can display variable responses to tyrosine kinase blockade.

Improvement in psoriasis with VEGF inhibitors is in keeping with our understanding of the role of VEGF in the pathogenesis of psoriasis; however, given the frequency with which VEGF inhibitors are used in oncology one might expect a greater number of cases to have been reported. Isolated reports detailing improvement in psoriasis with other TKIs which do not specifically target VEGFRs (such as lapatinib [Tykerb/Tyverb™; GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK]¹⁰⁴ and imatinib [Glivec™; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland])¹⁰⁵ are also available, but are counter balanced by reports of cutaneous exacerbations of psoriasis with other TKIs.¹⁰⁶

More research to characterize the nature and frequency of such effects is needed together with a more uniform method for characterizing the degree of baseline skin involvement and degree of improvement.

Emerging therapies in psoriasis

Investigational VEGF inhibitors for psoriasis mirror those of existing therapies consisting of monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, and TKIs (Table 2). None of these agents are currently licensed for treatment of psoriasis, but evidence for potential therapeutic effect is discussed below.

Table 2 Preclinical murine studies investigating possible vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors

Refereence	Author	Agent	Mechanism of action	Method of administration	Principal findings in treated mice
25	Xia et al (2003)	VEGF-Trap	Fusion protein (decoy receptor)	Subcutaneous injection	Improved clinical appearance, normalization of histological features including ↓ parakeratosis, ↓ vascularity and ↓ epidermal markers (eg, K6)
110	Kunstfeld et al (2004)	MF-I and DC 101	Rat anti-VEGFR-1 mAb and anti VEGFR-2 mAb	Intra-peritoneal injection	↓ skin inflammation, ↓ edema, and ↓ lymphatic vessel enlargement
74	Haiin et al (2008)	NVP-BAW2881	Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor	Oral or topical	Both formulations effective oral > topical, improved clinical appearance, ↓ number and size of blood vessels, normalization of histological features including ↓ leucocyte infiltration
109	Schonthaler et al (2009)	G6-3I	Anti-VEGF mAb	Subcutaneous injection	Improved clinical appearance, normalization of histological features including ↓ epidermal thickness, ↓ vascularity, and ↓ leucocyte infiltration
112	Jung etal (201 1)	Valpha	Chimeric fusion protein (anti-TNF and anti-VEGF decoy receptor)	Subcutaneous injection	↓ epidermal hyperplasia, ↓ blood vessel area, and ↓ lymphatic vessel area

Note: ↓ represents a decrease. Copyright © 201 I, Informa. Adapted with permission from Crawshaw AA, Griffiths CEM, Young HS. Investigational VEGF antagonists for psoriasis. Expert Opin Invest Drugs. 2012; 2 1:33–43.¹¹⁴

Abbreviations: mAb, monoclonal antibody; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR, VEGF receptor.

Monoclonal antibodies: G6-31, MF-1 and DCIOI

G6-31 is a next generation synthetic monoclonal antibody derived from a phage library that inhibits murine and human VEGF-A with significantly higher affinity than bevacizumab.¹⁰⁷ In vivo studies using a genetic mouse model of chronic, psoriasis-like skin inflammation with double knockout of the JunB and c-Jun alleles¹⁰⁸ was used to investigate the efficacy of G6-31 in reversing clinical and histological skin changes. Histological manifestations of skin disease included: hyperkeratosis, prominent rete ridges, thickening of the epidermis, parakeratosis, subepidermal vascularization, epidermal microabscess formation, and epidermal infiltration by neutrophils and T-cells similar to those in human psoriasis.¹⁰⁹

Eight days of systemic administration of G6-31 led to near complete resolution of skin inflammation, scaling, and edema in five out of twelve mice and moderate improvement in a further six mice. Clinical improvement was mirrored by histological normalization, reduced keratinocyte proliferation, and reduced epidermal thickness.¹⁰⁹

Vascular abnormalities were also reduced with the treated mice showing reduced size of blood and lymphatic vessels and a reduced number of blood vessels. Macrophage and lymphocyte infiltration was inhibited by G6-31 administration and accompanied by reduced levels of cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-23 and TNF-α. Ribonucleic acid (RNA) expression of VEGF-A, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 was also significantly reduced in the treatment group.¹⁰⁹

MF-1 and DC 101 are monoclonal rat antibodies that bind the extracellular domains of mouse VEGFR1 and VEGFR2, respectively¹¹⁰¹¹¹ DC101 was originally developed in 1998 as a “proof of concept” tool for investigating the potential of inhibition of angiogenesis in oncology. DC 101 does not cross react with human VEGFR2 receptors, but can be used to generate synthetic antibodies with in vitro activity against human endothelial cells.¹¹¹

Combined treatment with intra-peritoneal injections of MF-1 and DC101 inhibited experimentally induced skin inflammation in wild-type mice. Treated mice showed reduced skin inflammation, edema, and lymphatic vessel enlargement in comparison to the placebo group. Skin infiltration by CC11b+ macrophages was also significantly reduced in the dual-treatment and single treatment MF-1 groups.¹¹¹

Fusion proteins: Valpha

Valpha is a chimeric fusion protein designed to act as a decoy receptor and inhibit both TNF-α and VEGF-A. It contains the VEGF-A-binding domain of VEGFR1, the TNF-α-binding domain of TNF receptor 2 (TNFR2) and the Fc domain of human immunoglobulin G1 (IG1).

Valpha has not been tested in humans, however in vitro studies confirmed that Valpha simultaneously binds both TNF-α and VEGF-A with reduced induction of cultured lymphatic endothelial cells and reduced migration of cultured blood endothelial cells.¹¹²

A 2-week in vivo study using VEGF-A transgenic mice showed a significant reduction in epidermal hyperplasia, blood vessel area, and lymphatic vessel area in comparison to controls treated with either the Fc domain, etanercept (Enbrel™; Wyeth, Madison, NJ, USA) or Aflibercept.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: NVP-BAW2881

NVP-BAW2881 targets the tyrosine kinase domain of murine, porcine, and human VEGFR2. It can be administered both orally and topically, but has not been tested in humans.⁷⁴

In vitro studies demonstrated that NVP-BAW2881 inhibited proliferation, migration, and tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and lymphatic endothelial cells.⁷⁴

In vivo studies in VEGF-A transgenic mice showed that oral and topical administration of NVP-BAW2881 strongly reduced psoriasis-like inflammation in ear skin. Histologically, skin lesions in treated mice showed reduced infiltration by leukocytes, reduced epidermal hyperproliferation, normalization of epidermal keratinocyte differentiation, and fewer vascular abnormalities. Vessels in treated mice were smaller in size and fewer in number. In comparison to control mice, treated mice showed significant improvement in ear swelling, skin inflammation, lymph node enlargement, and skin erythema. Though both modes of administration were effective, systemic administration of NVP-BAW2881 was more potent than topical administration.⁷⁴

Topical NVP-BAW2881 also effectively reduced VEGF-A-induced vascular permeability in the skin of mice and domestic pigs.⁷⁴

Discussion

Given the widespread use of VEGF inhibitors in oncology and ophthalmology, the very small number of reported incidences of improvement in psoriasis may indicate that existing agents are not targeting the appropriate elements of the angiogenesis pathway in psoriasis. It is also possible that more subtle improvements in mild/moderate psoriasis have gone unnoticed by non-dermatologists.

It is of interest that in animal models dual inhibition of VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 (either with combined G6-31 and DC101 or with Aflibercept) achieved clinically relevant results in affected mice. However, caution is needed in interpreting the results from murine models since neither transgenic VEGF-A mice nor double knockout of the JunB and c-Jun mice wholly replicate human psoriasis. It is unsurprising that models that specifically feature upregulation of VEGF as a cause of psoriasis-like inflammatory skin disease may react more impressively to antagonism of this pathway than human skin disease.

New antibodies derived from phage libraries are likely to have less cross-species cross-reactivity than previous antibodies (such as bevacizumab) which are derived from immunizing mice with human VEGF-A. This may aid the translation of research from preclinical investigation into clinical practice. Engineered antibodies, such as the G6 family, display higher affinity for VEGF-A and can bind more securely to VEGFRs overcoming the effects of any in vivo mutations of the VEGF gene and potentially improving efficacy.

It is to be noted that VEGF inhibitors in clinical use are associated with a number of potentially serious side effects including hypertension, left ventricular dysfunction, and gastrointestinal perforation. Such risks require careful consideration in psoriasis populations particularly in light of growing concerns linking psoriasis to increased cardiovascular risk.

In ocular diseases, genetic markers predictive of response to anti-VEGF therapy have been identified¹¹³ and it is to be hoped that such pharmacogenetic markers will be found in psoriasis in order to identify patients who could benefit from VEGF-targeted therapies and maximize effectiveness and safety.

Conclusion

Though abnormal angiogenesis mediated through VEGFs is a key element in the development of psoriasis, it is a very heterogeneous condition in which many other cytokines and chemokines also play vital roles in disease onset and maintenance.

Given the variety and complexity of the underlying genetic and environmental factors contributing to the pathogenesis of psoriasis, it is unlikely that VEGF antagonism will become an effective approach for therapy in all patients. However, existing data suggests that there is potential for the development of effective agents to act via inhibition of VEGF-A.

A number of exciting avenues for potential treatments are being explored. Of these, TKIs that could be administered topically could have a significant safety (and potentially cost) advantage compared to systemic administration. Further, the use of engineered decoy receptors (like Valpha) to target both VEGF-A and TNF-α provide the potential for dual therapy using only one molecule. Concerns regarding potentially severe side effects associated with use of VEGF inhibitors needs to be carefully addressed in the psoriasis population.

Disclosure

HSY has acted as a consultant or speaker for Abbott, Biogen-Idec, Galderma, Janssen-Cilag, Leo-Pharma, Novartis, Schering-Plough, Stiefel, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Wyeth/ Pfizer. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.