Resveratrol-procyanidin blend: nutraceutical and antiaging efficacy evaluated in a placebocontrolled, double-blind study

Abstract

Background

Skin is constantly exposed to pro-oxidant environmental stress from several sources, including air pollutants, ultraviolet solar light, and chemical oxidants. Reactive oxygen species have been implicated in age-related skin disorders. Dietary bioactive antioxidant compounds, such as polyphenols, have beneficial effects on skin health. The advantage of a nutritional administration route is that blood delivers nutraceutical bioactive compounds continuously to all skin compartments, ie, the epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous fat. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the topical and systemic effects of a dietary supplement containing resveratrol and procyanidin on age-related alterations to the skin, the skin antioxidant pool, and systemic oxidative stress levels.

Methods

An instrumental study was performed in 50 subjects (25 treated with supplements and 25 with placebo) to identify clinical features induced by chronoaging or photoaging. Product efficacy was evaluated after 60 days of treatment in terms of in vivo and in situ skin hydration, elasticity, and skin roughness levels, systemic oxidative stress levels by plasmatic derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites and oxyadsorbent tests, and extent of the skin antioxidant pool.

Results

After 60 days of treatment, values for systemic oxidative stress, plasmatic antioxidant capacity, and skin antioxidant power had increased significantly. Additionally, skin moisturization and elasticity had improved, while skin roughness and depth of wrinkles had diminished. Intensity of age spots had significantly decreased, as evidenced by improvement in the individual typological angle.

Conclusion

Nutraceutical and pharmacological intervention with a supplement characterized by a specific blend of resveratrol and procyanidin may be a promising strategy to support treatments for the reduction of skin wrinkling, as well as reducing systemic and skin oxidative stress.

Keywords:

• antiaging
• nutraceuticals
• procyanidin
• resveratrol supplementation
• skin

Introduction

Antioxidants are a very large category of substances, because many chemical entities may exert a direct or indirect antioxidant activity. A dietary antioxidant is a food substance that significantly reduces the adverse effects of reactive oxygen species and/or reactive nitrogen species on normal human physiological functioning.¹ Human skin is continuously exposed to internal and external influences that may alter its condition and functioning. As a consequence, the skin may undergo alterations that, in turn, lead to chronoaging, photoaging, inflammation, and immune dysfunction, and all these processes are mediated by reactive oxygen species. Reactive oxygen species are generated constantly in the skin, and are rapidly neutralized both by nonenzymatic (vitamins C and E, A provitamins, eg, beta-carotene) and by antioxidant enzymatic activity (Zn/Cu and Mn superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidases, and catalase). The combined functioning of these systems and substances maintains a good antioxidant balance.^2,3

In recent years, various polyphenols that occur naturally in plant foods, including fruit, vegetables, nuts, seeds, flowers, and bark, have gained considerable attention as a means to neutralize reactive oxygen species.⁴ Resveratrol,^5,6 green tea,^7,8 curcumin,⁹ ginger,^10,11 and diets rich in bioactive compounds such as vitamins C and E, beta-carotene, lycopene, Zn, and Se, afford protection against the development of skin cancer, inflammation, chronoaging, and photoaging in humans.^12–15 Over the past decade, resveratrol (3,5,40-trihydroxystilbene), a polyphenol found in grapes (Vitis vinifera) and in a variety of berries, peanuts, and medicinal plants, such as Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum), has received widespread attention as a preventive agent against numerous diseases. The few human clinical trials that are available have described resveratrol in terms of safety and bioavailability. Despite the apparent interest in resveratrol as a skin antiaging compound, the literature on this issue is at a nascent stage. A few in vitro studies indicate that resveratrol protects normal human fibroblasts from the damaging effects of hydrogen peroxide in a dose-dependent manner,¹⁶ possibly by binding of specific receptors in the epidermis.¹⁷

Clinical data on the usefulness of topical formulations containing resveratrol¹⁸ are available but limited. Polyphenols, such as procyanidin, anthocyanidin, and ellagic acid, are associated with a beneficial effect on the skin.^19,20 However, it is still to be established what the exact mechanism of action is, ie, whether this action takes place directly via an increase in skin polyphenol content or indirectly through a systemic effect on the vascular system. The goal of the current study was to determine whether chronic nutraceutical treatment with a supplement composed of resveratrol, procyanidin, ellagic acid, selenium, and other phenols in smaller quantities is able to improve systemic and skin antioxidant capacity and promote skin antiaging effects by improving hydration, elasticity, and skin roughness.

Materials and methods

All procedures were approved by an independent ethical committee for nonpharmacological research. Each subject recruited for the study was fully informed and treated in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in Tokyo, 2004).

Subjects and study design

The study enrolled 50 healthy males and females aged 35–65 years, all of whom showed clinical signs of skin aging (wrinkles, dull complexion, brown spots). Table 1 reports the study inclusion criteria. Each qualifying subject was then randomized to a study group (active or placebo). The test product or matching placebo were taken as one capsule per day for 60 days. Food intake was monitored day by day using a food diary. All the samples used for skin tests were applied to the facial skin. The product tested was a commercial dietary supplement named Revidox^® (GMC Pharma, Milan, Actafarma Laboratorios, Madrid).

Table 1 Inclusion criteria

Healthy female (70%) and male (30%) subjects

Age 35–65 years (50% aged 35–50 years and 50% aged 51–65 years)

Caucasian race

Dull complexion

Body mass index in the optimal (20–25) range for both male and female subjects

Cutaneous dyschromia/brown spots (present in at least 60% of participants)

Subjects who have not participated in similar studies in the 2 months prior to the current study

Absence of skin diseases

Undertaking not to change their normal daily routine

Commitment not to use products having activity comparable with that of the product to be tested during the study period

Commitment not to use face creams during the study period

Promise not to change eating habits during the study period

Agreeable to signing an informed consent form

One capsule of supplement contains 133 mg grape (V. vinifera) dried fruit extract from a patented production process (which in turn contains 8 mg transresveratrol), 14.63 mg procyanidins, 0.67 mg anthocyanosides, 0.4 mg flavonoids, 1.3 mg other stilbenes, 125 mg pomegranate (Punica granatum) dried fruit extract (which in turn contains 3.75 mg procyanidins), 8.75 mg punicalagin-ellagic acid, 50 μg selenium, 26 mg silicon dioxide, and 45 mg maltodextrin. Placebo was formulated as follows: 266 mg dehydrated dibasic calcium phosphate, 18 mg pigment red iron oxide (E 172), 4 mg magnesium stearate, 4 mg amorphous precipitated silica, and 77 mg activated charcoal.

Antioxidant evaluation

Plasmatic (derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites [d-ROMs] and oxyadsorbent assay) and skin antioxidant (ferric-reducing ability of plasma assay) tests were performed. After enrollment, venous blood and skin samples were collected. Blood samples were collected after an overnight fast and abstinence from cigarette smoking. Plasma was then isolated at room temperature and, after centrifugation (2000 × g, 20 minutes at 25°C), was kept frozen at −80°C until analysis. Skin samples were collected using Corneofix^® (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany) foils. After collection, skin samples were kept frozen at −80°C until analysis. d-ROMs levels in plasma were assessed using a commercially available method (Diacron, Grosseto, Italy)²¹ in accordance with the supplier’s instructions. Normal test values range between 250 and 300 UCARR (Carratelli units), where 1 UCARR corresponds to 0.8 mg/L H₂O₂. Values > 300 UCARR indicate oxidative stress. The plasmatic “barrier to oxidation” was assessed using a commercially available oxyadsorbent test (Diacron)²² in accordance with the supplier’s instructions. Normal test values are >350 mmol/L. Values < 350 mmol/L indicate oxidative stress deriving from a decrease in antioxidant defenses. The antioxidant power of the skin was assessed on the third and fourth skin strips (Corneofix after discarding the first and second layers). Briefly, 0.4 mL of ferric-reducing ability of plasma working solution (300 mmol/L pH 3.6 acetate buffer, 10 mmol/L 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine in 40 mmol/L HCl, and 20 mmol/L FeCl₃ × 6 H₂O in distilled water)²³ was added to 12-multiwell plates, each of which contained two strips of Corneofix (sandwich system). After 30 minutes of incubation at 37°C, the supernatant was collected and transferred to a 1 cm light path cuvette, and absorbance was read at 550 nm. An aqueous solution of known Fe(II) concentration was used for calibration (in the range of 50–1000 μmol/L). Dermatological testing was performed after an acclimatization period of at least 15 minutes in a room with controlled temperature (22°C ± 2°C) and humidity (50% ± 10%).

Skin moisturization

The corneometer CM 825 (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH) was used to measure skin moisturization.²⁴ Measurements were taken at five different sites on the cheek. The arithmetic mean for each volunteer and time point was calculated. Measurements of skin hydration were performed in accordance with the recommendations of the European Group for Efficacy Measurements on Cosmetics and Other Topical Products.²⁵

Skin elasticity

The Cutometer MPA580, equipped with a 2 mm measuring probe (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH) was used to measure skin elasticity.²⁶

Skin surface

The skin surface was quantitatively assessed using a Primos 3D (GF Messtechnik GmbH, Berlin, Germany) equipped with a stereotactic device (Canfield Imaging System, Fairfield, NJ). The Primos 3D is a noncontact in vivo skin measurement device based on structured light projection.²⁷ In conjunction with comprehensive three-dimensional measurement and evaluation software, the sensor enables evaluation of skin surface properties (ie, wrinkle depth, roughness). Skin roughness (Rz, ISO 4287, DIN 4768) and wrinkle depth were analyzed using the Primos 3D software. Skin damage results in a higher roughness value.^28,29

Brown spot intensity

The brown spot intensity was assessed using a spectrophotometer/colorimeter (CM-700D, Konica- Minolta, Tokyo, Japan). L* and b* values were measured and interpolated with a mathematical formula that allows calculation of the individual typological angle.³⁰

Data analysis

Statistical analysis for differences between treatment times was conducted using the two-way Student’s t-test, and one-way analysis of variance was used for differences between groups. A difference was considered to be statistically significant at P < 0.05. A study power analysis was performed.

Results

Fifty healthy females and males (comprising 70% and 30% of the cohort, respectively) completed the study. In both the treatment and placebo groups, each subject was evaluated at baseline and at the end of the 60-day treatment period. Throughout the study, the subjects undertook periodic self-assessment on a normal diet. After 60 days of treatment, systemic oxidative stress had decreased significantly, and the d-ROMs value had changed from medium oxidative stress (Carratelli scale) to normal oxidative stress (P = 0.001). Furthermore, the plasmatic derivative metabolites of hydroperoxide value had reduced significantly (P = 0.001) in comparison with that in the placebo group (Figure 1A). Antioxidant capacity (oxyadsorbent test, plasmatic barrier to oxidation) at the end of the study period had improved to normal (P = 0.001), and improvement in the treated group was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (P = 0.001, Figure 1B). The antioxidant power of the skin improved in the treated group after 60 days of treatment (P = 0.001), and levels of skin antioxidants were significantly higher than in the placebo group (P = 0.001, Figure 2). In the treated group, skin moisturization improved, with dry skin achieving a moisturized condition (P = 0.001), while placebo subjects did not show improved moisturization, and remained significantly less moisturized (P = 0.001, Figure 3A) than the treated group. Skin elasticity improved in the treated group (P = 0.001) but deteriorated slightly but significantly in the placebo group (P = 0.05, Figure 3B). Skin roughness diminished significantly (P = 0.01) in the treated group, as did wrinkle depth (P = 0.01), but these parameters were significantly worse (P = 0.01) in the placebo group (Figure 4A and B). Finally, the intensity of age spots in the treated group diminished significantly (individual typological angle grade, P = 0.01) and to a significantly greater extent than in the placebo group (P = 0.01, Figure 5).

Figure 1 Antioxidant evaluation. (A) Derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites test (Carratelli units). (B) Oxyadsorbent test (mmol HClO/L) both as a function of time in days (dd).

Notes: Data are reported as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Intergroup statistical analysis (active versus placebo) is reported inside the bars of the histogram. The lines report the intragroup statistical analysis (T60 vs T0). Statistical analysis is marked with (*) in increasing numbers depending on significance.
Abbreviation: d-ROMs, derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites test.

Figure 2 Skin Antioxidant capacity: FRAP test- (μmol Fe²⁺/L) as a function of time in days (dd).

Notes: Data are reported as mean ± SEM. Intergroup statistical analysis (active vs placebo) is reported inside the bars of the histogram. The lines report the intragroup statistical analysis (T60 vs T0). Statistical analysis is marked with (*) in increasing numbers depending on significance.
Abbreviation: FRAP test, ferric-reducing ability of plasma test.

Figure 3 Skin antiaging effect. (A) Skin moisturization (corneometric units). (B) Skin elasticity (R2 parameter) – (Ua/Uf ratio) both as a function of time in days (dd).

Notes: Data are reported as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Intergroup statistical analysis (active versus placebo) is reported inside the bars of the histogram. The lines report the intragroup statistical analysis (T60 vs T0). Statistical analysis is marked with (*) in increasing numbers depending on significance.

Figure 4 Skin surface (μm). (A) Skin roughness. (B) Wrinkle depth, both as a function of time in days (dd).

Notes: Data are reported as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Intergroup statistical analysis (active versus placebo) is reported inside the bars of the histogram. The lines report the intragroup statistical analysis (T60 vs T0). Statistical analysis is marked with (*) in increasing numbers depending on significance.

Figure 5 Intensity of brown spot: ITA° - grades (°) as a function of time in days (dd).

Notes: Data are reported as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Intergroup statistical analysis (active versus placebo) is reported inside the bars of the histogram. The lines report the intragroup statistical analysis (T60 vs T0). Statistical analysis is marked with (*) in increasing numbers depending on significance.

Discussion

Bioactive food compounds (nutrients and phytochemicals) at pharmacological doses are emerging as a therapy to modulate the complex sequence of metabolic changes associated with skin and systemic aging. This “nutraceutical” treatment can efficiently modulate the oxidative and inflammatory imbalances that occur in chronic aging.^31,32 However, food sources are complex, with varying combinations of compounds inducing similarly varying capacity to enhance or reduce bioavailability and/or activity.^31,33 Therefore, the benefits of dietary constituents may differ if the same bioactive substances are present in nutraceutical formulations at pharmacological doses. In the case of the skin, the classical route of antioxidant administration is topical application.

Another means by which to deliver antioxidants to the skin is oral administration via the diet and dietary supplements.³⁴ An increase in cellular antioxidants in the skin is observed after oral administration of antioxidant supplements, whereby antioxidants cross the intestinal barrier and reach the circulation, after which they are distributed to various tissues, in particular to the subcutaneous adipose tissue, dermis, epidermis and sebum in the skin.

The multiple mechanisms of action of resveratrol may be related to its health benefits.³⁵ Like most polyphenols, this phytochemical has intrinsic antioxidant capacity, but it also induces expression of a number of antioxidant enzymes. Further, it interacts with a large number of receptors and kinases, including sirtuin 1 and adenosine monophosphate- activated protein kinase, both of which influence the regulation of metabolism in multiple tissues.^36,37 Accordingly, it is difficult to decipher the precise contribution of each mechanism to an overall multiple effect on health.³⁸

Two recent and important clinical studies of resveratrol have shown that different effects are obtained with different doses of resveratrol; specifically, at lower doses, it is very important to mix this compound with other flavonoids. However, to date, no clinical study has shed light on the effects of resveratrol in the field of dermatological antiaging.^39,40 Our study provides the first clinical proof of the antiaging effects of a chronic nutraceutical treatment that combines resveratrol and procyanidins. Hitherto, attempts to reveal and understand the skin-repairing effects of resveratrol were cosmeceutically oriented.⁴¹ Although the bioavailability of resveratrol in particular and of polyphenols in general is low, treatment with this nutraceutical supplement for 60 days improved parameters of oxidative stress by reducing systemic peroxidized metabolites and by improving the plasma antioxidant barrier.

The current range of nutraceutical dosages of resveratrol (20–500 mg per capsule) is probably disproportionate. Dietary intake is 6–8 mg daily, and recent clinical data show that resveratrol may possess bioactivity at μg doses, when provided as part of a synergistic combination of phytochemicals in foods and supplements. Accordingly, the use of supplements that bring the dose into a medium to low range may have specific effects on the aging process.⁴² In addition, our study is the first to demonstrate that, as well as improving systemic oxidative stress, antioxidant nutraceutical treatment also enhances antioxidant capacity in the stratum corneum of the skin. We used the withdrawal technique for the skin stratum corneum, as has already been described for the assessment of antioxidant enzymes and adapted to the evaluation of reducing antioxidant capacity in skin samples.^43,44 Wrinkle formation occurs because of accumulated forms of skin damage, including matrix destruction and skin inflammation. In aging skin, there are various activated matrix metalloproteinases that lead to abnormal matrix degradation and to accumulation of nonfunctional matrix components in the dermal and epidermal compartments.⁴⁵ Recently, foods rich in flavonoids and ellagic acid have been shown to reduce the action of metalloproteinases and to improve the appearance of wrinkles.⁴⁶ Finally, our study shows that chronic treatment with a nutraceutical supplement containing resveratrol, procyanidin, and ellagic acid for 60 days significantly improved all parameters related to skin roughness.

Acknowledgment

Thanks are due to GMC Pharma, Milan, and Actafarma Laboratorios, Madrid, for providing the sample formulation tested in this study. The authors are also grateful to all the volunteers who made this work possible.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.