144
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Melanoma risk perception and prevention behavior among African-Americans: the minority melanoma paradox

, , &
Pages 423-429 | Published online: 05 Aug 2015

Abstract

Introduction

Melanoma is the most deadly type of skin cancer with 75% of all skin cancer deaths within the US attributed to it. Risk factors for melanoma include ultraviolet exposure, genetic predisposition, and phenotypic characteristics (eg, fair skin and blond hair). Whites have a 27-fold higher incidence of melanoma than African-Americans (AA), but the 5-year survival is 17.8% lower for AA than Whites. It is reported continuously that AA have more advanced melanomas at diagnosis, and overall lower survival rates. This minority melanoma paradox is not well understood or studied.

Objective

To explore further, the possible explanations for the difference in melanoma severity and survival in AA within the US.

Methods

Qualitative review of the literature.

Results

Lack of minority-targeted public education campaigns, low self-risk perception, low self-skin examinations, intrinsic virulence, vitamin D differences, and physician mistrust may play a role in the melanoma survival disparity among AA.

Conclusion

Increases in public awareness of melanoma risk among AA through physician and media-guided education, higher index of suspicion among individuals and physicians, and policy changes can help to improve early detection and close the melanoma disparity gap in the future.

Introduction

Melanoma is the deadliest form of all skin cancers and is one of the leading cancer diagnoses in the US. Its annual incidence has been rising steadily at a rate of 2.3% since 1975 for all races within the US.Citation1 Light-skinned individuals are physiologically at a higher risk for melanoma than their dark-skinned counterparts.Citation2 Thus, much of the medical literature, current research, and public health efforts have targeted the Caucasian population as the gold standard for the development of prevention and treatment guidelines. Nevertheless, studies report that when African-Americans (AA) do develop melanoma, they tend to have more advanced tumors and poorer survival rates than Whites.Citation2Citation6 The phenomenon of lower incidence but higher mortality among AA melanoma patients is herein described as the melanoma paradox.

High rates of advanced melanoma among AA have been attributed to a number of individual and societal factors leading to a disparity in secondary prevention. Few studies address how cultural differences and historical discrimination may influence melanoma awareness, and preventive behaviors among this group. This review focuses on describing the melanoma paradox by focusing on the current data on cutaneous melanoma among AA within the US, the epidemiologic differences in melanoma severity by race, and possible attributable factors to the growing paradox of melanoma within minorities – lower incidence, but higher deaths.

Definition of AA within the US

The US AA population is a diverse, heterogeneous group with origins spanning the US, and various African and Afro-Caribbean countries. Due to racial admixing,Citation7 this population also has European and Native American ancestry.Citation8 Based on the latest US census data, AA comprise the second most populous racial minority group representing 13.6% of the US population.Citation9 This population group is expected to grow at a 7% rate per year. As the Fitzpatrick Skin Type Classification scale was developed based on White patient data, its validity within the AA population has been questioned as it often overestimates the prevalence of skin type Fitzpatrick IV among AA.Citation10 Thus, due to the heterogeneity of the AA group, their skin may be categorized as varying between Fitzpatrick III and VI.

Melanoma risk factors

Melanoma is a skin cancer derived from the pigment-producing melanocytes. Melanoma risk factors include both environmental and genetic factors. Intermittent ultraviolet (UV) exposure is a major cause of melanoma. History of childhood blistering sunburns, used as a surrogate measurement for intermittent sun exposure, is a significant independent risk factor for melanoma development.Citation11 People with light skin pigment, denoted by the Fitzpatrick skin types I and II, have significantly increased tendency to sunburn and this is associated with increased melanoma risk.Citation12,Citation13 However, if melanin was solely sufficient for melanoma protection, a perfect negative linear slope would exist in a graphical depiction of melanoma incidence and skin color. Thus, secondary risk factors for melanoma among non-Whites continue to be elucidated, as UV exposure is believed to play a smaller role in melanoma development in these groups.Citation14,Citation15

The quantity (more than 100 for adults and 50 for children) and quality (atypical or dysplastic) of nevi is a strong melanoma risk factor, as some melanomas arise from moles.Citation16 Whites have the highest median number of nevi, followed by Hispanics, Asians, and Blacks.Citation16 Studies propose that more than 90% of AA have at least one nevus, and they are predominantly acral.Citation17 A retrospective review of 462 adults seen within the US outpatient dermatology clinic setting reported that palmar or plantar nevi were most common in AA (3.4% vs 0.6% in whites) and the prevalence of these nevi directly increased with pigmentation degree (P<0.001).Citation18 Family history of a first-degree relative with melanoma doubles the melanoma risk; however, this may be attributed to similar genetic predisposition, environmental sun exposure, and skin characteristics (pigment, number of nevi, and sunburn predication).Citation19

Genetic mutations within the cyclin-dependent inhibitor 2A tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 9p21 accounts for 40% of hereditary melanoma and a known mutation carries a 76% chance of developing melanoma.Citation20 Mutations in the BRAF gene have been reported in 66% of melanomas.Citation21 Interestingly, genetic mutations tend to favor certain locations for melanoma. BRAF-mutated tumors tend to occur on skin subject to high intermittent sun exposure, whereas mutations in the tyrosine kinase receptor KIT are associated with melanomas from acral and mucosal sites.Citation22

The melanoma paradox

Incidence

Overall, the current reported lifetime incidence of cutaneous melanoma is 2.05% among US Caucasians and 0.09% among AA.Citation1 According to Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) population-based data from 1992 to 2011, the average annual percentage change of invasive cutaneous melanoma for non-Hispanic AA males and females was 0.6%, whereas for Caucasian males and females it was 1.5% and 1.8%, respectively.Citation1 Overall, the incidence of invasive cutaneous melanoma for all races and sexes has decreased between 2010 and 2011 (24.02 vs 23.21 per 100,000).Citation1 However, when the age-adjusted incidence is stratified by race, AA experienced a much smaller decline in incidence (1.04–1.03 per 100,000) as compared to Whites (29.18–27.79 per 100,000).Citation1 Additionally, AA females showed an increase in age-adjusted incidence of cutaneous melanoma from 0.97 to 1.08 per 100,000 between 2010 and 2011.Citation1 Overall, the White-to-AA incidence ratio for melanoma for both sexes in 2011 was 27.79:1.03 (per 100,000).Citation1

Survival

Overall mortality rates for cutaneous melanoma among all races and sexes within the US have stabilized to 2.69 per 100,000 (age adjusted) in 2011.Citation1 However, the age-adjusted mortality in AA females has risen from 0.35 to 0.41 between 2009 and 2011.Citation1 The 5-year relative survival from cutaneous melanoma among Whites between 2004 and 2010 was 92.9% for both sexes, whereas for AA (both sexes) it was 75.1%.Citation1 This difference is most evident among White and Black males for which the 5-year relative survival between 2004 and 2010 was 91% vs 64.9%.Citation1 When the cutaneous melanoma is stratified by stage, AA continue to have poorer survival: for localized tumors, between 2004 and 2010, the survival for Whites of both sexes was 98%, whereas for AA it was 91%, and for regional metastasizing tumors 62.6% vs 56.4%, respectively.

This survival trend is evident in other regionally based literature. A retrospective review of 36 AA patients treated between 1981 and 2000 in Washington, DC, found that the 5-year survival was 58.8% for AA as compared to 84.8% in Whites.Citation4 Moreover, studies report that AA have more advanced tumors at presentation than Whites.Citation4,Citation23 The 5-year review from the Washington, DC, showed a mean Breslow depth on presentation of 2.75 mm for AA and 1.16 mm for Whites.Citation4 The 5-year review of patients in Miami-Dade County showed that non-Hispanic Whites had the highest percentage of in situ (Clark’s level I or stage 0) tumors while non-Hispanic Blacks had the lowest – 27% vs 10%, respectively.Citation24 Distant-metastasizing melanoma (Clark’s level V or stage IV) diagnoses were more prevalent among minority patients than Caucasian patients – 31% vs 9%, respectively.Citation24 Studies show that predilection for advanced tumors also exists in Africans, with a mean reported Breslow depth on initial presentation of 6.15 mm.Citation25

Thus, despite lower incidence rates and protective aspects of darker pigmentation, studies ranging from 1982 to 2013 consistently report that AA have higher rates of more advanced melanomas and lower overall survivals.Citation2,Citation4Citation6,Citation23,Citation26Citation31

Location of melanoma

Melanomas in AA groups commonly occur on non-sun-exposed skin where there is less pigment, and thus, less melanin to protect the melanocytes from the mutagenic UV radiation. Out of all of the melanomas in AA, 60%–75% arise on the palms, soles, mucous membranes, and subungual regions, otherwise known as acral surfaces.Citation32 In the retrospective review of 36 AA treated in Washington, DC, the most common location for a primary tumor was the foot (38.9%).Citation4 These patterns are consistent with those seen in African countries. A retrospective review of dermatologic malignancies within South Nigeria reported five cases of melanoma, and all of them being on the foot.Citation33 An analysis of 844 South African patients found that one third was plantar.Citation34,Citation35 Additionally, the 1979 review showed that Blacks from Africa had a similar incidence of acral melanoma as those from the US despite varying shoe-wearing habits,Citation36 suggesting a common secondary risk factor other than UV exposure.

Overall, acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is the most common histologic type among Blacks, both within the US and in Africa.Citation4,Citation25,Citation26,Citation28,Citation34,Citation37Citation39 A study analyzed SEER data from 1986 to 2005 and found 1,413 confirmed ALMs; AA had the greatest proportion of ALMs (36%) and ALMs had the lowest 5- and 10-year survival rates than all cutaneous melanoma types combined (80.3% and 67.5% vs 91.3% and 87.5%, respectively).Citation39 Within the study, authors reported the 5- and 10-year melanoma-specific survival rates for ALMs with results showing that the highest survival rates were in non-Hispanic Whites (82.6% and 69.4%), intermediate in AA (77.2% and 71.5%), and lowest in Hispanic Whites (72.8% and 57.3%). These differences, however, were not statistically significant when controlled for tumor thickness or stage, and was consistent with other studies.Citation39

Mucosal melanomas do not present with such differences between AA and Whites. Overall, the White:Black incidence ratio for vulvar and vaginas melanomas was found to be 3.14:1 and 1.02:1, respectively.Citation40 The overall incidence ratio of mucosal melanomas of White:Black is 2.2–2.3:1.Citation40 However, uveal melanoma also greatly differs between Whites and AA – an analysis of cases reported by SEER between 1992 and 2000 shows that the age-adjusted incidence ratio of White:Black was 18:1.Citation41

Barriers to health

Societal, individual, and historical factors contribute to the melanoma paradox among AA within the US.

Societal barriers

Careful full-body skin examinations performed by skilled physicians on a regular (usually yearly) basis and routine self-examinations can improve the chances of early detection, and ultimately eradication of melanoma.Citation42,Citation43 Multiple studies have shown that minorities report having significantly less physician performed full-body skin examinations.Citation3,Citation44Citation46 Moreover, minorities were found to have significantly less ability to recognize a worrisome mole on self-examination.Citation3 Suboptimal screening for melanoma among minorities, both through physician and self-examination, has led to the unequal morbidity and mortality burdens seen with melanoma outcomes. Moreover, current US Preventive Services Task Force still does not recommend screening full-body skin examination (self or professional) because it concluded that the evidence for its benefits are inconclusive.Citation47 This lapse in public health education policy has allowed gaps in melanoma awareness, diagnosis, and treatment.

Self-perception of melanoma risk among minorities is low.Citation48 Public education efforts targeting skin cancer have focused on the high-incidence White populations, developing an unspoken misperception that since minorities are not targeted, they must not be at risk. Robinson et al showed that minorities were surprised to learn that melanoma was not only a type of skin cancer but also they were at risk for it.Citation49 Moreover, less health care access among minorities has led to less physician-driven education on skin cancer awareness, self-examination instruction, and risky behavior avoidance.

Individual barriers

Education, through public infrastructure, physician counseling, and media, plays a role in patients’ awareness of melanoma risk, signs, and screening tools. AA have higher high-school dropout rates than Whites, and overall they are more likely to attend high-poverty schools.Citation50 Lack of a strong educational foundation contributes to diminished health literacy leading to difficulties in understanding physicians, inabilities to ask necessary questions, take control of one’s own health, and ultimately, poorer health outcomes.Citation51 This can contribute to the melanoma paradox as possibly a lack of health education may preclude some AA from clearly assessing their risk of melanoma, and understanding the importance of regular medical check-ups.Citation48 AA have double the unemployment rates to those of Whites with the US.Citation52

Socioeconomic status can greatly affect ability to pay for and access care; moreover, it often affects the quality of care as well. Findings from the 2011 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report indicate significant differences in quality and access to care among minorities as compared to Whites.Citation9 Blacks under the age of 65 were significantly less likely to have health insurance.Citation9 Moreover, the percentage of Blacks with a specific source of ongoing medical care (such as a primary care physician) was lower than for Whites.Citation9 Blacks have reported worse access to medical care than Whites.Citation9 Also, as racial and ethnic minorities are more likely than Whites to be poor, overall poor people had worse access to care than high-income people.Citation9 Thus, access and quality of medical care differs among minorities and may contribute to the melanoma disparity.

AA may have a predisposition for developing more aggressive, acral and mucosal melanomas. Melanomas in these sights may be intrinsically more aggressive leading to a primary presentation at a more advanced stage.Citation4,Citation6,Citation25 Furthermore, when studies compared Blacks with Whites who had a melanoma of the same stage, and received medical treatment, survival was still shorter for Blacks possibly suggesting that the tumor growth in minorities is somehow intrinsically more virulent and aggressive.Citation6 Moreover, the melanoma lesions within subungual, mucosal, and palmar areas on darker pigmented individuals can be very difficult to diagnose. Melanoma can mimic normal skin variations such as longitudinal melanonychia, and hyperpigmented macules and thus, be missed.Citation53 Furthermore, as certain genetic mutations favor acral sites for melanoma growth, minorities may have a genetic predisposition for these tumors. More research is necessary to elucidate the etiologic importance of genes in the minority melanoma pathogenesis.

Historical barriers

Historical medical discrimination and mistreatment of minorities have led to widespread medical mistrust, perceived discrimination, and avoidance of health management and treatment among minorities. Negative historical events tracing to the days of slavery up to the 21st century have led to the growth of health care mistrust among AA. During slavery, bodies of deceased Black slaves were used as subjects of medical experimentation and anatomic dissection, without the individual’s or his/her family’s consent.Citation54 This continued even after the Civil War with grave robbing of bodies to feed medical school anatomy laboratories.Citation55 Moreover, experimentation on living slaves was performed for drug treatments of heatstroke, and to perfect surgeries of vesicovaginal fistulas.Citation56,Citation57 However, the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male (1932–1972) continues to be reported as a central event in the development of AA distrust of the medical system.Citation58 Despite major regulation of research and health care targeting patient beneficence, autonomy, and justice, the mistrust of the medical community persists, especially among AA.Citation59 Perceived racism in health care is also an important determinant of health care utilization.Citation59 Via multiple focus groups, Collins et al showed that AA may anticipate unfair medical treatment and thus, avoid it.Citation60 Health care mistrust often leads to hesitation and delays in diagnosis and treatment of various conditions including cancer; moreover, it limits adherence to physician recommendations.Citation59 Although there are no specific studies examining the relationship of physician mistrust on melanoma survival and prevention adherence, the knowledge attained through other studies in other medical fields may be applied to dermatology. Thus, dermatologists must be aware of the historical and cultural issues of their AA patients. Lack of physician cultural competency may lead to poor rapport, mistrust, and lack of adherence to skin cancer prevention guidelines.

Role of vitamin D

Vitamin D is known to have anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effect on melanocytes and keratinocytes. In vitro studies of vitamin D found that it inhibits melanoma growth via regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis.Citation61,Citation62 These functions are supported by the finding of vitamin D receptors within keratinocytes and melanocytes.Citation63 Much literature has found supportive evidence for protective effects of vitamin D within various cancersCitation64,Citation65 and specifically melanoma.Citation66Citation68 A case–control study of northern Italian patients found an inverse relationship between dietary vitamin D and melanoma risk.Citation69 A meta-analysis of 20 articles, which included 1,420 cases of cutaneous melanoma, found an inverse association between vitamin D blood levels and melanoma thickness.Citation70

AA have been reported to have lower mean serum vitamin D levels,Citation71 and higher prevalence of hypovitaminosis D than Whites.Citation72 This may be explained in that AA are biologically less efficient at producing vitamin D from UV radiation and have been found to have less vitamin D from dietary intake.Citation73,Citation74 Thus, this difference in vitamin D production and levels may play a role in the melanoma disparity between AA and Whites.

Discussion

Melanoma is one of the leading cancers worldwide. Although AA have a much lower incidence of cutaneous melanoma than Whites, they tend to develop more advanced tumors and ultimately have lower survival statistics. This disparity, herein termed the melanoma paradox, is an important reality in the field of melanoma and its causes are multifactorial.

Differences in education, socioeconomic status, access to and quality of care, lack of public health efforts promoting awareness and screening, general mistrust of the medical establishment, and lack of self-perception of risk contribute to the growing disparity in melanoma outcomes among minorities as compared to Whites. As ALMs are the most common melanoma type among AA, further larger studies evaluating the role of this melanoma subtype on cancer aggressiveness and patient overall survival are necessary.

Fortunately, greater awareness of this issue can prompt both individual and societal change. Primary prevention of melanoma, including reducing the number of new tumors through genetic screening and targeted treatments, decreases in UV exposure, and maintenance of a healthy immune system is a possible option for the long-term improvement in health. However, more practical approaches available now for at-risk patients involve secondary prevention methods, which include early diagnosis and treatment. Studies show that equal numbers of skin cancer patients utilize media and their physicians for health information.Citation75 Thus, incorporating television, social media, and public billboard campaigns to increase the awareness for melanoma risk among minorities can be utilized as part of a larger public health campaign. Moreover, in order to lobby the US Preventive Services Task Force to promote screening as a beneficial tool to prevent skin cancer, further research must be done with focuses on minorities as important groups within skin cancer. With the establishment of the Affordable Care Act in the US, limitations to health care access will be diminished, thus allowing for a greater cohort of AA and other minorities to receive regular specialty care.

Conclusion

Overall, earlier diagnosis of melanoma among minorities is the main point of intervention, which can help to improve survival. Dermatologists and patients must assist in improving early diagnosis by maintaining a high index of suspicion despite statistical and individual perceptions of risk. Specifically, more extensive self- and physician-skin examinations focusing on the palms, soles, subungual areas, and the mucosa may be needed for AA in order to diagnose acral melanomas early. Through encouragement of individual education on skin cancer risk and detection, increased skin examination and risk perception, and the incorporation of discussions on culturally relevant barriers into the medical conversation, the melanoma paradox can begin to be concurred and, ultimately, overcome.

Acknowledgments

The project described was supported partially by the National Institutes of Health, Grant TL1 RR031979, and by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number K08CA155035, and the Melanoma Research Alliance. The authors are also grateful to Timothy Dattels for his generous support. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • HowladerNNooneAMKrapchoMSEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2011Bethesda (MD)National Cancer Institute2014 Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/, based on November 2013 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2014Accessed April 1, 2015
  • WuXCEideMJKingJRacial and ethnic variations in incidence and survival of cutaneous melanoma in the United States, 1999–2006J Am Acad Dermatol2011655 Suppl 1S26S3722018064
  • KortaDZSaggarVWuTPSanchezMRacial differences in skin cancer awareness and surveillance practices at a public hospital dermatology clinicJ Am Acad Dermatol201470231231724332312
  • ByrdKMWilsonDCHoylerSSPeckGLAdvanced presentation of melanoma in African AmericansJ Am Acad Dermatol20045012124 discussion 142–14314699360
  • ReintgenDSMcCartyKMJrCoxESeiglerHFMalignant melanoma in black American and white American populations. A comparative reviewJAMA198224815185618597120604
  • BellowsCFBelafskyPFortgangISBeechDJMelanoma in African-Americans: trends in biological behavior and clinical characteristics over two decadesJ Surg Oncol2001781101611519062
  • ShriverMDParraEJDiosSSkin pigmentation, biogeographical ancestry and admixture mappingHum Genet2003112438739912579416
  • ShooBAKashani-SabetMMelanoma arising in African-, Asian-, Latino- and Native-American populationsSemin Cutan Med Surg20092829610219608060
  • Disparities in Healthcare Quality among Racial and Ethnic Groups. Selected Findings from the 2011 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities ReportsFact Sheet. AHRQ Publication 12-0006-1-EF92012Rockville (MD)Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality2012 Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nhqrdr11/nhqrdrminority11.htmAccessed May 10, 2014
  • PichonLCLandrineHCorralIHaoYMayerJAHoersterKDMeasuring skin cancer risk in African Americans: is the Fitzpatrick Skin Type Classification Scale culturally sensitive?Ethn Dis201020217417920503899
  • ElwoodJMJopsonJMelanoma and sun exposure: an overview of published studiesInt J Cancer19977321982039335442
  • VeierodMBWeiderpassEThörnMA prospective study of pigmentation, sun exposure, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in womenJ Natl Cancer Inst200395201530153814559875
  • Titus-ErnstoffLPerryAESpencerSKGibsonJJColeBFErnstoffMSPigmentary characteristics and moles in relation to melanoma riskInt J Cancer2005116114414915761869
  • ElderDESkin cancer. Melanoma and other specific nonmelanoma skin cancersCancer1995751 Suppl2452568000999
  • ArmstrongBKKrickerAHow much melanoma is caused by sun exposure?Melanoma Res1993363954018161879
  • CraneLAMokrohiskySTDellavalleRPMelanocytic nevus development in Colorado children born in 1998: a longitudinal studyArch Dermatol2009145214815619221259
  • ColemanWP3rdGatelyLE3rdKrementzABReedRJKrementzETNevi, lentigines, and melanomas in blacksArch Dermatol198011655485517377786
  • PalickaGARhodesARAcral melanocytic nevi: prevalence and distribution of gross morphologic features in white and black adultsArch Dermatol2010146101085109420956637
  • NiendorfKBTsaoHCutaneous melanoma: family screening and genetic testingDermatol Ther20061911816405564
  • BishopDTDemenaisFGoldsteinAMGeographical variation in the penetrance of CDKN2A mutations for melanomaJ Natl Cancer Inst2002941289490312072543
  • DaviesHBignellGRCoxCMutations of the BRAF gene in human cancerNature2002417689294995412068308
  • CurtinJABusamKPinkelDBastianBCSomatic activation of KIT in distinct subtypes of melanomaJ Clin Oncol200624264340434616908931
  • HuSParkerDFThomasAGKirsnerRSAdvanced presentation of melanoma in African Americans: the Miami-Dade County experienceJ Am Acad Dermatol20045161031103215583613
  • HuSSoza-VentoRMParkerDFKirsnerRSComparison of stage at diagnosis of melanoma among Hispanic, black, and white patients in Miami-Dade County, FloridaArch Dermatol2006142670470816785372
  • HudsonDAKrigeJEMelanoma in black South AfricansJ Am Coll Surg1995180165718000657
  • CormierJNXingYDingMEthnic differences among patients with cutaneous melanomaArch Intern Med2006166171907191417000949
  • HuSSoza-VentoRMParkerDFKirsnerRSComparison of stage at diagnosis of melanoma among Hispanic, black, and white patients in Miami-Dade County, FloridaArch Dermatol2006142670470816785372
  • CressRDHollyEAIncidence of cutaneous melanoma among non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics, Asians, and blacks: an analysis of California cancer registry data, 1988–1993Cancer Causes Control1997822462529134249
  • FeunLGRaubWAJrDuncanRCMelanoma in a southeastern Hispanic populationCancer Detect Prev19941821451528025897
  • BlackWCGoldhahnRTJrWigginsCMelanoma within a southwestern Hispanic populationArch Dermatol198712310133113343662565
  • HuSParmetYAllenGDisparity in melanoma: a trend analysis of melanoma incidence and stage at diagnosis among whites, Hispanics, and blacks in FloridaArch Dermatol2009145121369137420026844
  • GlosterHMJrNealKSkin cancer in skin of colorJ Am Acad Dermatol2006555741760 quiz 761–74417052479
  • AsuquoMENgimOUgareGOmotosoJEbugheGMajor dermatologic malignancies encountered in a teaching hospital surgical department in South NigeriaAm J Clin Dermatol20089638338718973404
  • SwanMCHudsonDAMalignant melanoma in South Africans of mixed ancestry: a retrospective analysisMelanoma Res200313441541912883369
  • MilesAWallerJHiomSSwanstonDSunSmart? Skin cancer knowledge and preventive behaviour in a British population representative sampleHealth Educ Res200520557958515644381
  • CrombieIKRacial differences in melanoma incidenceBr J Cancer1979402185193475965
  • SutherlandCMMatherFJMuchmoreJHCarterDReedRJKrementzETAcral lentiginous melanomaAm J Surg1993166164678328633
  • NagoreEPeredaCBotella-EstradaRRequenaCGuillenCAcral lentiginous melanoma presents distinct clinical profile with high cancer susceptibilityCancer Causes Control200920111511918758972
  • BradfordPTGoldsteinAMMcMasterMLTuckerMAAcral lentiginous melanoma: incidence and survival patterns in the United States, 1986–2005Arch Dermatol200914542743419380664
  • HuDNYuGPMcCormickSAPopulation-based incidence of vulvar and vaginal melanoma in various races and ethnic groups with comparisons to other site-specific melanomasMelanoma Res201020215315820147857
  • HuDNYuGPMcCormickSASchneiderSFingerPTPopulation-based incidence of uveal melanoma in various races and ethnic groupsAm J Ophthalmol2005140461261716226513
  • FriedmanRJRigelDSKopfAWEarly detection of malignant melanoma: the role of physician examination and self-examination of the skinCA Cancer J Clin19853513015110.3322/canjclin.35.3.1303921200
  • AitkenJFElwoodMBaadePDYoulPEnglishDClinical whole-body skin examination reduces the incidence of thick melanomasInt J Cancer2010126245045819609948
  • GellerACKohHKMillerDRClappRWMercerMBLewRAUse of health services before the diagnosis of melanoma: implications for early detection and screeningJ Gen Intern Med1992721541571487762
  • CoupsEJStapletonJLHudsonSVMedina-ForresterAGoydosJSNatale-PereiraASkin cancer screening among Hispanic adults in the United States: results from the 2010 national health interview surveyArch Dermatol2012148786186322801634
  • AndreevaVACockburnMGCutaneous melanoma and other skin cancer screening among Hispanics in the United States: a review of the evidence, disparities, and need for expanding the intervention and research agendasArch Dermatol2011147674374521690545
  • US Preventive Services Task ForceScreening for Skin Cancer, Topic PageRockville (MD)US Preventive Services Task Force2009 Available from: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsskca.htmAccessed April 1, 2015
  • PollittRASwetterSMJohnsonTMPatilPGellerACExamining the pathways linking lower socioeconomic status and advanced melanomaCancer2012118164004401322179775
  • RobinsonJKJoshiKMOrtizSKunduRVMelanoma knowledge, perception, and awareness in ethnic minorities in Chicago: recommendations regarding educationPsychooncology201120331332020878831
  • National Center for Education StatisticsEducation Longitudinal Study of 2002Washington (DC)National Center for Education Statistics2002 Available from: http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/els2002/bibliography.aspAccessed April 1, 2015
  • BerkmanNDSheridanSLDonahueKEHalpernDJCrottyKLow health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic reviewAnn Intern Med201115529710721768583
  • RodgersWMUnderstanding the Black and White earnings gap: why do African Americans continue to earn less despite dramatic gains in education?The American Prospect2008 Available from: http://prospect.org/article/understanding-black-white-earnings-gapAccessed June 29, 2015
  • RahmanZTaylorSCMalignant melanoma in African AmericansCutis200167540340611381857
  • SavittTLThe use of blacks for medical experimentation and demonstration in the Old SouthJ South Hist48198233134811645888
  • HumphreyDCDissection and discrimination: the social origins of cadavers in America, 1760–1915Bull N Y Acad Med4919738198274582559
  • BoneyFNDoctor Thomas Hamilton: two views of a gentleman of the Old SouthPhylon28196728829219588597
  • SimsJMThe Story of My LifeNew YorkAppleton1889236237
  • GambleVNUnder the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health careAm J Public Health19978711177317789366634
  • HammondWPPsychosocial correlates of medical mistrust among African American menAm J Community Psychol2010451–28710620077134
  • CollinsTCClarkJAPetersenLAKressinNRRacial differences in how patients perceive physician communication regarding cardiac testingMed Care2002401 SupplI27I3411789628
  • EvansSRHoughtonAMSchumakerLVitamin D receptor and growth inhibition by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in human malignant melanoma cell linesJ Surg Res19966111271338769954
  • OsborneJEHutchinsonPEVitamin D and systemic cancer: is this relevant to malignant melanoma?Br J Dermatol2002147219721312174089
  • TangJYFuTLauCOhDHBikleDDAsgariMMVitamin D in cutaneous carcinogenesis: part IIJ Am Acad Dermatol2012675817.e1817.e11 quiz 827–82823062904
  • DavisCDVitamin D and cancer: current dilemmas and future research needsAm J Clin Nutr2008882565S569S18689403
  • GrantWBPeirisANDifferences in vitamin D status may account for unexplained disparities in cancer survival rates between African and white AmericansDermatoendocrinol201242859422928063
  • WeinstockMAMosesAMSkin cancer meets vitamin D: the way forward for dermatology and public healthJ Am Acad Dermatol200961472072419751885
  • EganKMVitamin D and melanomaAnn Epidemiol200919745546119282200
  • GodarDELandryRJLucasADIncreased UVA exposures and decreased cutaneous vitamin D(3) levels may be responsible for the increasing incidence of melanomaMed Hypotheses200972443444319155143
  • VincetiMMalagoliCFiorentiniCInverse association between dietary vitamin D and risk of cutaneous melanoma in a northern Italy populationNutr Cancer201163450651321541899
  • CainiSBoniolMTostiGVitamin D and melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer risk and prognosis: a comprehensive review and meta-analysisEur J Cancer201450152649265825087185
  • GindeAALiuMCCamargoCAJrDemographic differences and trends of vitamin D insufficiency in the US population, 1988–2004Arch Intern Med2009169662663219307527
  • EganKMSignorelloLBMunroHMHargreavesMKHollisBWBlotWJVitamin D insufficiency among African-Americans in the southeastern United States: implications for cancer disparities (United States)Cancer Causes Control200819552753518219582
  • HarrisSSVitamin D and African AmericansJ Nutr200613641126112916549493
  • Nesby-O’DellSScanlonKSCogswellMEHypovitaminosis D prevalence and determinants among African American and white women of reproductive age: third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994Am J Clin Nutr200276118719212081833
  • GoldenbergANguyenBTJiangSIKnowledge, understanding, and use of preventive strategies against nonmelanoma skin cancer in healthy and immunosuppressed individuals undergoing Mohs surgeryDermatol Surg20144029310024354730