174
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in the Greek general population: prevalence and risk factors

, , &
Pages 143-149 | Published online: 21 Jun 2016

Abstract

Background and aims

Population-based data regarding the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Greece are very poor. This study estimated the prevalence of GERD symptoms and their risk factors in the Greek adult population.

Methods

A self-administered questionnaire was answered by a randomly selected population of 340 subjects. The question regarding “heartburn, chest pain, indigestion, or stomach acid coming up” as included in the Reflux Symptom Index was used for prevalence assessment.

Results

The monthly prevalence of GERD symptoms was found to be 52.0% in the Greek general population, with no statistically significant difference between the two sexes (P>0.05). The age group of 65–79 years showed a higher prevalence rate of GERD. Symptom severity was found to be mild (59.3%) or moderate (27.1%). The number of cigarettes smoked daily (but not smoking duration) as well as the number of alcoholic drinks consumed daily (but not the duration of alcohol drinking) were found to be related to GERD symptoms. No reported concomitant disease or medication was found to be related with GERD symptoms.

Conclusion

The prevalence of GERD symptoms in the Greek general population was found to be 52.0%. Tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking but not concomitant disease or medications were found to be related with GERD symptoms.

Introduction

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent, chronic, and relapsing gastrointestinal disorder in which gastric contents reflux into the esophagus. There is a lack of consensus as to the definition of GERD. The Montreal definition of GERD published in 2006 is the most acceptable one and defines GERD as “troublesome symptoms (including heartburn, acid regurgitation, and epigastric pain) and complications”.Citation1

The range of GERD prevalence is estimated to be 18.1%–27.8% in North America, 8.8%–25.9% in Europe, 2.5%–7.8% in East Asia, 8.7%–33.1% in the Middle East, 11.6% in Australia, and 23.0% in South America.Citation1 The prevalence of symptoms of GERD in the general population ranges from 26% to 60%.Citation2Citation6 It seems that the prevalence of GERD in Western communities has increased in recent decades.Citation7,Citation8

Contrary to what is observed in most European countries, data concerning the prevalence of GERD in the Greek population are very poor as there is only one study regarding the prevalence of upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms in the Greek urban general population.Citation9

The diagnosis of GERD is made using a combination of symptom presentations, objective testing with endoscopy, ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, and response to antisecretory therapy. Classic symptoms of burning in the chest, with sour or bitter taste, and acid regurgitation have been shown to correctly identify GERD with a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 94%.Citation10

Symptom questionnaires are based on symptoms reported by the patient, and these symptoms can be formally assessed using validated questionnaires. Among different symptoms, heartburn and regurgitation are the most reliable for making a presumptive GERD diagnosis. Symptom-based questionnaires are the most widely used method for detecting the GERD prevalence, especially in large-scale epidemiologic studies.

Several questionnaires for GERD diagnosis have been developed and validated. These include the Reflux Disease Questionnaire,Citation11 the frequency scale for symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease,Citation12 and the Re-Quest Questionnaire.Citation13 Symptom evaluation is also useful for assessing treatment efficacy.

The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) introduced by Belafsky et alCitation14 is a self-administered nine-item questionnaire designed to assess various symptoms related to laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Each item is rated on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (severe problem), with a maximum total score of 45, indicating the most severe symptoms. A key question of the RSI regards the experience of “heartburn, chest pain, indigestion, or stomach acid coming up” during the previous month. These are the main symptoms included in all questionnaires developed for the diagnosis of GERD.Citation14Citation16 In addition, RSI can give information not only about the prevalence of the included items in the questionnaire but also about their severity.

Since the introduction of RSI, many studies have been conducted mainly to detect LPR prevalence or to monitor LPR therapy, but no further analysis of the prevalence of each item included in the questionnaire has been presented.

The primary aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of GERD symptoms in the general adult Greek population using the question regarding “heartburn, chest pain, indigestion, or stomach acid coming up” included in the RSI, and to detect risk factors associated with GERD symptoms. The present study is the first that assesses the prevalence of GERD symptoms based on the presence of symptoms included in the RSI during the last month.

Materials and methods

The study was carried out in the general Greek population during the period from September to November 2013.

A random sample (n=1,000) of adults living in Athens (500 people) and in rural Greek areas (500 people) was initially approached through an “alert” telephone conversation. During the communication, the scope of the study was explained, and permission to send the questionnaire to the subjects’ address was verbally obtained. The random selection of the participants was made through the telephone catalog for Athens city, and telephone catalogs of randomly selected rural areas using a table of random numbers generated for the study. Five different investigators performed the calls 10 days before sending the questionnaire. Of the 1,000 subjects approached, 450 agreed to participate and provided their personal details (name and address). Only one person per family was required to fill in the questionnaire. In the envelope that was sent to the participants, a more detailed explanation for the scope of the study, detailed instructions for filling out the questionnaires, an informed consent form, and a prepaid envelope were included, so that subjects could easily send back the filled-in questionnaire as well as the signed informed consent at no cost for them. Three hundred and fifty individuals returned the questionnaires (189 or 54% from the Athens area, and 161 or 46% from rural areas).

Data related to GERD symptoms were gathered through a questionnaire in which information about demographic data of the participants, concomitant diseases, concurrent medication, as well as the RSI questions were included. The RSI questionnaire has been translated into Greek and has been validated in the Greek population.Citation15

Inclusion criterion for our study was subjects’ aged ≥18 years, because the main scope of our study was to assess the prevalence of GERD symptoms in the general adult population. Subjects with preexisting gastroesophageal reflux and those taking antireflux medications were also included in the study.

Exclusion criteria for participation in the study were patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal malignancies and peptic or duodenal ulcers.

For the purpose of this study, the prevalence of GERD symptoms was based on the participants’ response to the question regarding “heartburn, chest pain, indigestion, or stomach acid coming up” during last month.

The study protocol was approved by the Scientific Committee and Review Board of Athens Speech Language and Swallowing Institute and conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki (6th revision, 2008) as reflected in a priori approval by the institution’s human research committee.

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to inclusion in the study.

Statistical methodology

Statistical tests were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 20 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data for the subset of the population with GERD symptoms. Chi-square tests were used to compare the distribution of categorical variables among patients with GERD symptoms compared to those without. Student’s t-test was used to compare continuous variables between patients with GERD symptoms and the rest of the population. A P-value of <0.05 was used to determine statistical significance.

Variables of the analysis were as follows: demographic parameters, smoking and drinking habits, health background (concomitant diseases), concomitant medication, and the RSI.

Results

Four hundred and fifty randomly selected subjects accepted the invitation to participate in the study. Three hundred and fifty subjects (response rate 77.8%) returned the completed questionnaire. In ten of 350 returned questionnaires, critical information, such as sex and age, were lacking, so finally 340 (183 male and 157 female) questionnaires were appropriate for statistical analysis.

The mean age of participants was 46.86 (SD±14.54 years). Most participants belonged to the age group of 35–49 years (131 subjects), whereas the age groups of older than 80 years and younger than 20 years were poorly represented (three subjects older than 80 years and two subjects younger than 20 years). Participants’ age and sex are presented in .

Table 1 Participant’s age and sex

One hundred and seventy-seven subjects or 52.0% of the participants reported GERD-attributed symptoms (heartburn, chest pain, indigestion, or stomach acid coming up). One hundred and three were male (58.2%) and 74 were female (41.8%), and there was no statistically significant difference in reporting GERD symptoms between the two sexes (P=0.086). Also, there was no statistically significant difference in GERD symptoms reporting between urban and rural dwellers (P=0.094).

GERD symptoms were more frequently reported in the age group of 65–79 years (64.4%) followed by the age group of 50–64 years (56.8%) ().

Table 2 Distribution of gastroesophageal symptoms (heartburn, chest pain, indigestion, or stomach acid coming up) according to age group

The severity of GERD symptoms was similarly distributed between the two sexes ().

Table 3 Severity of gastroesophageal symptoms (heartburn, chest pain, indigestion, or stomach acid coming up) according to sex

One hundred and five subjects (59.3%) of 177 with GERD symptoms reported mild symptoms (severity scores 1 and 2), 48 subjects or 27.1% reported moderate symptoms (severity score 3), and 24 subjects or 13.5% reported severe symptoms (severity score 4 and 5) ().

Table 4 Severity of symptoms (heartburn, chest pain, indigestion, or stomach acid coming up) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

One hundred and seventy-four (51.2%) of the total participants were tobacco smokers, with a mean number of cigarettes smoked daily of 20.5 and mean duration of smoking 18.23 (SD ±8.6) years for males and 17.02 (SD ±8.0) years for females, with no statistically significant difference between the two sexes (Student’s t-test >0.05).

One hundred and one subjects (29.7%) consumed alcohol (68.3% male and 31.7% female). Mean daily alcohol consumption was 2.43 (SD ±1.62) units for males and 2.17 (SD ±1.32) units for females, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two sexes (Student’s t-test >0.05). The most commonly reported alcoholic drinks were wine (30 subjects), followed by beer (21 subjects), and whisky (18 subjects).

One hundred and forty-two (41.8%) of the participants reported one or more diseases. The reported diseases are presented in and belonged to the following categories: cardiovascular, 50 (35.2%); gastrointestinal, 25 (17.6%); musculoskeletal, 15 (10.6%); respiratory, 10 (7.0%); thyroidopathy, 9 (6.3%); anemia, 3 (2.1%); and other diseases, 30 (21.1%).

Table 5 Concomitant diseases

One hundred and thirty-seven (40.3%) of the participants reported taking one or more medications for the concomitant diseases. The reported medications were of the following classes: antihypertensive, 43 (31.4%); anticholesterol, 19 (13.9%); antiulcerant, 19 (13.9%); antidiabetic, 11 (8.0%); antiasthmatic or antichronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 11 (8.0%); antihypothyroidism, 9 (6.6%); antiosteoporotics, 7 (5.1%); and other, 18 (13.1%).

From 177 subjects with GERD symptoms, 102 or 58.6% were smokers. Chi-square analysis showed a statistical significant correlation between smoking and GERD symptoms (102 [58.6%] smokers vs 72 [41.4%] nonsmokers) (P-value <0.05). According to the logistic regression analysis, the number of smoking cigarettes but not the duration of smoking was found to be related to GERD symptoms. Statistically significant difference was found between male and female smokers and GERD symptoms when demographic characteristics were taken into consideration in the logistic model, indicating that male smokers tend to experience GERD symptoms more often than female smokers.

From 177 subjects with GERD symptoms, 64 or 36.2% were alcohol drinkers. Chi-square analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between alcohol consumption and GERD symptoms (P-value <0.05). Also applying the similar univariate logistic regression analysis as with smoking, the number of daily consumed drinks but not the duration of drinking was found to be related to GERD symptoms.

Statistical analysis did not bring up any correlation between GERD symptoms and concurrent diseases or GERD symptoms and concurrent medication (chi-square tests >0.05). These results have to be interpreted with skepticism because the aim of the study was not to investigate the correlation between GERD symptoms and concurrent diseases or concurrent medication, and in this regard, the sample size or even the method used was perhaps not appropriate.

Discussion

GERD is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal disorders. GERD has an adverse impact on patient’s quality of life and also is the most important predisposing factor for Barrett’s esophagus and intestinal metaplasia of esophageal mucosa that predisposes to adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.Citation16Citation20 In addition to the risk of cancer, GERD is well recognized to be associated with some upper respiratory diseases that also contribute adversely to the quality of life. Therefore, there is need for an early diagnosis of GERD to protect patients from the above-mentioned serious complications of GERD.

The prevalence of GERD varies among different geographical areas and among investigators even in the same geographical area. The big difference in the reported GERD prevalence is mainly attributed to the differences in the methods used by each investigator as well as to the absence of a generally adopted definition of GERD.

pH monitoring with pH probe is currently the best method for detection of gastroesophageal reflux. However, because pH electrodes are able to measure only acid reflux, and not measure nonacid reflux episodes, the multichannel intraluminal electrical impedance is considered by many investigators as the gold standard for the diagnosis of GERD.Citation21

Intraluminal electrical impedance and 24-hour pH monitoring, being invasive and costly methods, cannot be used for large-scale epidemiological studies. On the other hand, if classic symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation dominate a patient’s history, these symptoms can be used to establish the diagnosis of GERD with sufficiently high specificity, although sensitivity remains low compared with 24-hour pH monitoring.

In the Montreal definition of GERD, symptoms are the most important component on which GERD diagnosis is based. This is the reason symptom-based questionnaires are used in most epidemiologic studies aiming to assess the prevalence of the disease in the general population.

A large number and a wide variety of questionnaires have been developed for the assessment of GERD, with many differences in characteristics, design, and purposes. The majority of questionnaires are used for the assessment of GERD symptoms with a variety in esophageal and extraesophageal symptoms. Bolier et alCitation22 in a systematic literature review analyzed 65 questionnaires used for assessment of GERD symptoms, response to treatment, diagnosis, and quality of life. He concluded that no one covers all aspects related to GERD and that a suitable questionnaire has to be chosen to satisfy each investigator’s specific purposes.Citation22

For the purpose of our study, the term “heartburn, chest pain, indigestion, or stomach acid coming up” was used to assess the prevalence of GERD symptoms. We chose the RSI questionnaire as it has not been used, until now, by any other investigator and has not been tested to see if works as GERD diagnostic tool. It is our intention, in a future study, to compare diagnostic validity of RSI questionnaire with other established in clinical practice questionnaires.

In our study, the monthly prevalence of GERD symptoms was found to be 52.0% in the general Greek population. This prevalence seems to be within the broad range (26%–60%) of GERD prevalence that has been reported also by other investigators.Citation2Citation6 There were no big differences in the assessment of GERD prevalence between questionnaire and endoscopy-based studies. Three population-based, endoscopy studies have been published. The Kalixanda study from Sweden (n=1,000)Citation23 in which the prevalence of any troublesome GERD symptom during the past 3 months was 40.0%, the Loiano–Monghidoro study from Italy (n=1,033)Citation24 in which the prevalence of GERD symptoms was 44.3%, and the SILC study from People’s Republic of China (n=1,029)Citation25 in which the prevalence of GERD symptoms was 4.7%.

The high prevalence of GERD symptoms found in our study could be attributed to the longer period (1 month) set for symptoms reporting by the participants of the study compared to the weekly period that most of the other studies usually use. Another reason could be the inclusion of chest pain and indigestion symptoms in RSI questionnaire. Although these two symptoms are related to GERD, their specificity and sensitivity are much lower compared with heartburn and regurgitation.

No statistically significant difference was found in the prevalence of GERD symptoms as well as in GERD symptoms severity between the two sexes. Reports of the association between GERD symptoms and sex have yielded conflicting results, with some suggesting the prevalence is greater in men,Citation26Citation28 some suggesting it is greater in women,Citation29 and others reporting no difference between the sexes.Citation30Citation32

According to our findings, GERD symptoms were reported more frequently in the age group of 65- to 79-year-old participants. In the literature, the association of GERD symptoms with age is not clear as there are conflicting results in published studies. Some reports have suggested that GERD symptoms are associated with age,Citation27Citation29,Citation32,Citation33 but others have suggested no association.Citation30,Citation31 Advancing age seems to be associated with the risk of GERD complications.

The severity of GERD symptoms in the majority of patients was found to be mild (59.3%) or moderate (27.1%).

No statistically significant difference was found in GERD symptom reporting between urban and rural dwellers. Data regarding association of GERD symptoms and individuals living in urban or rural areas are poor and conflicting. Some investigators have found that individuals living in a rural area had a higher risk of GERD than those living in an urban area,Citation34,Citation35 but the reverse has also been found.Citation36 Pan et alCitation37 found that GERD was more common in rural than in urban areas in Beijing but that the reverse was true in Shanghai.

In our study, a statistically significant association was found between GERD symptoms and the number of cigarettes smoked daily but not with smoking duration. Smoking has strong evidence to be associated with GERD, as multiple studies have demonstrated a positive association between tobacco smoking and GERD symptoms,Citation32,Citation33,Citation38,Citation39 but, on the other hand, studies of smoking cessation have not demonstrated a benefit on GERD symptoms.Citation40

A statistically significant relationship was also found between GERD symptoms and the number of alcoholic drinks consumed daily, but not with the duration of alcohol drinking. Data on the effect of alcohol consumption on GERD symptoms are also conflicting. Alcohol consumption has been inversely associated with GERD symptoms in some studies,Citation32,Citation38,Citation39 but physiologic studies indicate that alcohol consumption actually worsens esophageal acid exposure.Citation40

We must stress that most of the published studies investigated the relationship between GERD symptoms and tobacco smoking or alcoholic drinks consumption to assess the relation as lifestyle habits, and they did not perform further analysis on the daily number of smoking cigarettes or the daily number of alcoholic drinks consumed.

No statistically significant relationship was found between GERD symptoms and concurrent diseases or concomitant medication. The lack of such a relationship in our study can be attributed to the inclusion of a small number of participants with concurrent diseases or concomitant medication. GERD has been associated with respiratory diseases, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, and sleep apnea.Citation41Citation43

The current study has certain limitations, the main one being the lack of RSI validation as a questionnaire for GERD diagnosis. The used diagnostic question regarding “heartburn, chest pain, indigestion, or stomach acid coming up” may be a very simple way to diagnose the existence of GERD; although these symptoms are included almost in all questionnaire-based epidemiological studies related to GERD diagnosis, its specificity and sensitivity have not been tested. It is also well known that “indigestion” cannot be strictly related to GERD and that it is more appropriately associated to functional dyspepsia. Further discussion is necessary to acquire common specifications for GERD diagnostic criteria that would be used in the future for epidemiologic studies to accomplish comparable findings.

Since, in this study, the smokers were also alcohol drinkers, it is not clear whether smoking and alcohol consumption are each a predisposing factor for GERD symptoms, or if the combination of these two factors correlates with GERD. Further studies comparing prevalence of GERD symptoms among nonalcohol drinking tobacco smokers or nonsmoking alcohol drinkers could target this question.

Conclusion

The prevalence of GERD symptoms based on the participant responses to the question “heartburn, chest pain, indigestion, or stomach acid coming up” was found to be 52.0% in the general Greek adult population. Sex was found not to be related with the prevalence of GERD symptoms or symptoms severity. GERD symptoms are more frequent in older people. The number of cigarettes smoked daily as well as the number of alcoholic drinks consumed daily was found to be related with GERD symptoms. If we consider that GERD is a risk factor for the development of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma, conditions that are increasing in Western populations, the early diagnosis of GERD could contribute in the prevention of such serious diseases.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • VakilNvan ZantenSVKahrilasPGlobal Consensus GroupThe Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensusAm J Gastroenterol20061011900192016928254
  • Diaz-RubioMMoreno-Elola-OlasoCReyESymptoms of gastro-esophageal reflux: prevalence, severity, duration and associated factors in a Spanish populationAliment Pharmacol Ther2004199510514687171
  • HaqueMWyethJWStaceNHPrevalence, severity and associated features of gastro-oesophageal reflux and dyspepsia: a population-based studyN Z Med J200011317818110917077
  • LouisEDeLoozeDDeprezPHeartburn in Belgium: prevalence, impact on daily life, and utilization of medical resourcesEur J Gastroenterol Hepatol20021427928411953693
  • EisenGThe epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: what we know and what we need to knowAm J Gastroenterol200196S16S1811510763
  • JonesRLikerHRDucrottéPRelationship between symptoms, subjective well-being and medication use in gastro-esophageal reflux diseaseInt J Clin Pract2007611301130717590216
  • El-SeragHSweetSWinchesterCUpdate on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic reviewGut20146387188023853213
  • AxonATPersonal view: to treat or not to treat? Helicobacter pylori and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease – an alternative hypothesisAliment Pharmacol Ther20041925326114984371
  • PapatheodoridisGVKaramanolisDGPrevalence and impact of upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms in the Greek urban general populationScand J Gastroenterol20054041242116028435
  • HeidelbaughJVan HarrisonRMcQuillanMGastroesophageal Reflux Disease. UMHS GERD GuidelineAnn Arbor, MIUniversity of Michigan2013 Available from: www.med.umich.edu/1info/FHP/practiceguides/gerd/gerd.12.pdfAccessed December 2014
  • DentJVakilNJonesRAccuracy of the diagnosis of GORD by questionnaire, physicians and a trial of proton pump inhibitor treatment: the Diamond StudyGut20105971472120551454
  • KusanoMShimoyamaYSugimotoSDevelopment and evaluation of FSSG: frequency scale for the symptoms of GERDJ Gastroenterol20043988889115565409
  • RubinGUebelPBrimo-HayekAValidation of a brief symptom questionnaire (ReQuest in Practice) for patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux diseaseAliment Pharmacol Ther20082784685118266995
  • BelafskyPCPostmaGNKoufmanJAValidity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI)J Voice20021627427712150380
  • PrintzaAKyrgidisAOikonomidouEAssessing laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms with the reflux symptom index: validation and prevalence in the Greek populationOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg201114597498021987653
  • LagergrenJBergstromRLindgrenASymptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinomaN Engl J Med199934082583110080844
  • FarrowDCVaughanTLSweeneyCGastroesophageal reflux disease, use of H2 receptor antagonists, and risk of esophageal and gastric cancerCancer Causes Control20001123123810782657
  • WuAHTsengCCBernsteinLHiatal hernia, reflux symptoms, body size, and risk of esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomaCancer20039894094812942560
  • AndersonLAWatsonRGMurphySJRisk factors for Barrett’s oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: results from the FINBAR studyWorld J Gastroenterol2007131585159417461453
  • WhitemanDCSadeghiSPandeyaNCombined effects of obesity, acid reflux and smoking on the risk of adenocarcinomas of the oesophagusGut20085717318017932103
  • ZentilinPDulbeccoPSavarinoECombined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH-metry: a novel technique to improve detection of gastro-esophageal reflux. Literature reviewDig Liver Dis20043656556915460839
  • BolierEKessingBSmoutABredenoordASystematic review: questionnaires for assessment of gastroesophageal reflux diseaseDis Esophagus20152810512024344627
  • RonkainenJAroPStorskrubbTHigh prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and esophagitis with or without symptoms in the general adult Swedish population: a Kalixanda study reportScand J Gastroenterol20054027528515932168
  • ZagariRMFuccioLWallanderMAGastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms, oesophagitis and Barrett’s oesophagus in the general population: the Loiano-Monghidoro studyGut2008571354135918424568
  • ZouDHeJMaXEpidemiology of symptom-defined gastroesophageal reflux disease and reflux esophagitis: the systematic investigation of gastrointestinal diseases in China (SILC)Scand J Gastroenterol20114613314120955088
  • Ness-JensenELindamALagergrenJChanges in prevalence, incidence and spontaneous loss of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: a prospective population-based cohort study, the HUNT studyGut2012611390139722190483
  • LiYMDuJZhangHEpidemiological investigation in outpatients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux from the Department of Medicine in Zhejiang Province, east ChinaJ Gastroenterol Hepatol20082328328917645475
  • WongBCKinoshitaYISystematic review on epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in AsiaClin Gastroenterol Hepatol2006439840716616342
  • YamagishiHKoikeTOharaSPrevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in a large unselected general population in JapanWorld J Gastroenterol2008141358136418322948
  • LockeGRIIITalleyNJFettSLPrevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, MinnesotaGastroenterology1997112144814569136821
  • NouraieMRazjouyanHAssadyMEpidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in Tehran, Iran: a population-based telephone surveyArch Iran Med20071028929417604463
  • NoconMLabenzJWillichSNLifestyle factors and symptoms of gastrooesophageal reflux: a population-based studyAliment Pharmacol Ther20062316917416393294
  • El-SeragHHillCJonesRSystematic review: the epidemiology of gastro-esophageal reflux disease in primary care, using the UK general practice databaseAliment Pharmacol Ther20092947048019035977
  • HeJMaXZhaoYA population-based survey of the epidemiology of symptom-defined gastroesophageal reflux disease: the Systematic Investigation of Gastrointestinal Diseases in ChinaBMC Gastroenterol2010109420707933
  • WangJHLuoJYDongLEpidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a general population-based study in Xi’an of Northwest ChinaWorld J Gastroenterol2004101647165115162542
  • ShahaMPerveenIAlamgirMJPrevalence and risk factors for gastro-esophageal reflux disease in the North-Eastern part of BangladeshBangladesh Med Res Counc Bull20123810811323540187
  • PanGXuGKeMEpidemiological study of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease in China: Beijing and ShanghaiChin J Dig Dis2000128
  • ZhengZNordenstedtHPedersenNLLifestyle factors and risk for symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux in monozygotic twinsGastroenterology2007132879517241862
  • NilssonMJohnsenRYeWLifestyle related risk factors in the aetiology of gastro-oesophageal refluxGut2004531730173515542505
  • KaltenbachTCrockettSGersonLBAre lifestyle measures effective in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease? An evidence-based approachArch Intern Med200616696597116682569
  • HavemannBDHendersonCAEl-SeragHBThe association between gastrooesophageal reflux disease and asthma: a systematic reviewGut2007561654166417682001
  • MartinezCHHanMKContribution of the environment and comor-bidities to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypesMed Clin North Am20129671372722793940
  • KarkosPDLeongSCBentonJReflux and sleeping disorders: a systematic reviewJ Laryngol Otol200912337237419250596