Upper limit of the normal range for thyrotropin-stimulating hormone is higher with increasing age

View correction statement:

Upper limit of the normal range for thyrotropin-stimulating hormone is higher with increasing age [Corrigendum]

To the editor

The assertion that aging is associated with a decreasing concentration of thyrotropin- stimulating hormone (TSH) in healthy elderly humans¹ appears to be at odds with the observation that “TSH distribution shifts towards higher concentrations with age.”² The latter conclusion was based on a study that analyzed the age-specific distribution of serum TSH in 14,376 disease-free subjects with negative thyroid antibody tests. In that study, the percentage of TSH measurements in the 2.5–4.5 mIU/L range progressively increased with age from approximately 6.5% in the 20–29-year age group to 23.9% in the 80 years and older age group. Likewise, the percentage of TSH measurements in the >4.5 mIU/L category progressively increased from 2.0% in the 20–29-year age group to 12% in the 80 years and older age group.

According to the authors of the study, a corollary of these findings is that “the currently accepted high prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism in older people, based on the current upper limit of the reference range, 4.5 mIU/L, may be an overestimate.”² Extreme longevity also appears to be associated with an increase in TSH levels, at least in Ashkenazi Jews.³ In the latter study, TSH levels were compared in 232 Ashkenazi subjects of median age 97.7 years versus their younger, unrelated counterparts, consisting of 95 females of median age 69.7 years and 95 males of median age 72.3 years. All subjects were free of thyroid disease and also free of acute or debilitating medical conditions. The principal finding was that serum TSH was significantly (P < 0.001) higher in the older age group (consisting of 232 subjects) than in their younger counterparts (consisting of 190 subjects) in spite of the fact that the serum thyroxine levels were similar. Further analysis revealed that the percentage of subjects with TSH > 2.5 mIU/L was 35.2% in the older subjects versus 15.4% in the younger subjects.³

Disclosure

The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.

Authors’ responseCorrespondence: Isabela M Bensenor, University Hospital, Av Lineu Prestes 2565, 3° Andar, Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, CEP 05508-000, Brazil, Tel [phone], Fax [phone], Email [email protected]

We welcome these comments from Dr Jolobe. An increase in thyrotropin-stimulating hormone (TSH) with aging has been shown in several population-based studies, including the Whickham survey,^1,2 the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey,³ and in a Framingham Heart Study cohort.⁴ Our text was clear about the increase in TSH levels with aging observed in these large epidemiologic studies.⁵ However, other cross-sectional studies compared thyroid function in older subjects including centenarians with young controls.^6–8 Some of these studies did not show higher TSH levels in centenarians compared with young older people and young controls.^6,7 Mazzoccoli et al carried out a study in 15 healthy, young, middle-aged subjects (aged 36–55 years) and 15 healthy elderly subjects (aged 67–79 years). Serum levels of thyrotropin-releasing hormone, TSH, and free thyroxine (T4) were measured in samples collected every four hours for 24 hours. Elderly subjects had lower TSH levels, but there was no statistically significant difference in TRH and serum free thyroxine levels between young, middle-aged, and elderly subjects.⁸ In general, these studies have been done in a small number of individuals, and have restricted the analyses to healthy subjects. One possible explanation for a mild decrease in TSH levels in some older people could be increased sensitivity to physiologic negative feedback by thyroxine.^8,9 As our text stated, the low serum concentrations of TSH result in a decline in serum total and free T3 levels, but the reduction in both T4 secretion and peripheral T4 degradation results in no change in serum total and free T4 concentrations. Although Dr Jolobe’s letter suggests putative conflicting results, this is unlikely,¹⁰ because the data presented in the review refer to studies with different designs that have to be interpreted in the proper context.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.