Adrenal incidentaloma: a case of carcinoma

Abstract

Adrenal incidentaloma (AI) is a term applied to an accidentally discovered adrenal mass on imaging performed for reasons unrelated to adrenal pathology. The widespread application of abdominal imaging procedure has resulted in an increased frequency of clinically silent adrenal masses. Although most AIs are nonfunctioning benign adenomas, a multidisciplinary approach with biochemical and radiological evaluation is needed to characterize these lesions and identify patients who are at high risk for hormonal or malignant evolution. Herein, we describe a case of a 69-year-old man with a pain at the base of right chest. On the basis of clinical evaluation, biochemical analysis, as well as imaging procedures, a diagnosis of right adrenocortical carcinoma was made. The patient underwent medical treatment.

Keywords:

• adrenal incidentaloma
• adrenal mass
• adrenocortical carcinoma

Introduction

The widespread use of imaging, particularly computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), during diagnostic testing or treatment for many clinical conditions, has resulted in the identification of previously unsuspected adrenal lesions defined as adrenal incidentalomas (AIs).^1,2 The assessment of AIs is aimed at deciding whether or not the tumor should be surgically removed,³ adrenalectomy being indicated in hormonal hypersecretory states (such as pheocromocytoma) and in potentially malignant lesions.⁴

Adrenal cortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and heterogeneous malignancy with incompletely understood pathogenesis and poor prognosis.⁵ ACC can be functional or nonfunctional with regard to hormone synthesis and clinical features.

We report the case of a 69-year-old man who was investigated for chest pain, with a right adrenal carcinoma identified by total body CT-scan and adrenal scintigraphy.

Case report

A 69-year-old male was admitted to the Geriatric Unit of Catanzaro Hospital due to the onset of chest pain since few days, without other symptoms. Clinical examination and review of systems as well as family medical history were unremarkable. On clinical examination we found only a mild hepatomegaly and a reduction of vesicular murmur. In the past medical history, he reported a moderate increase of systolic and diastolic blood pressure which was controlled by weight reduction, salt restriction, and pharmacological therapy (ramipril plus hydrochlorothiazide 5/25 mg one tablet/day). In the present admission, blood pressure was 140/80 mmHg and heart rate 110 beats per min (bpm); patient’s body mass index was 36.36 Kg/m². Chest X-ray was negative and electrocardiogram (ECG) recorded a sinus tachycardia. Biochemical analyses were normal (Table 1) as well as hormonal evaluation (Table 2). We found only high levels of fibrinogen (697 mg/dL), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; 758 U/L), α₂-globulins (8.2%) (Table 1).

Table 1 Biochemical evaluation

		NV
RBC	4.2 × 10^6/mm^3	4.15–4.9 × 10^6/mm^3
MCH	30 pg/cell	28–33 pg/cell
MCHC	34 g/dL	32–36 g/dL
MCV	88 μm^3	86–98 μm^3
HCT	44%	42%–52%
Hemoglobin	15 g/dL	13–18 g/dL
WBC	4.5 × 10^3/mm^3	4.3–10.8 × 10^3/mm^3
N	50%	45%–75%
L	20%	16%–45%
M	5%	4%–10%
E	2%	0%–7%
B	1%	0%–2%
Albumin	50%	50%–60%
α1-globulins	5%	4.2%–7.2%
α2-globulins	8.2%	6–7.8%
β-globulins	11%	9.3%–15%
γ-globulins	15%	13%–23%
AST	20 U/L	0–35 U/L
ALT	24 U/L	0–35 U/L
Total bilirubin	1 mg/dL	0.3–1.0 mg/dL
Direct	0.3 mg/dL	0.1–0.3 mg/dL
Indirect	0.7 mg/dL	0.2–0.7 mg/dL
Glycemia	110 mg/dL	70–115 mg/dL
Cholesterol	220 mg/dL	220–239 mg/dL
LDL	110 mg/dL	<130 mg/dL
HDL	60 mg/dL	>50 mg/dL
Iron	80 μg/d	50–150 μg/d
Creatinine	1 mg/dL	0.8–1.2 mg/dL
BUN	15 mg/dL	10–20 mg/dL
Uric acid	6 mg/dL	2.5–8.0 mg/dL
Fibrinogen	697 mg/dL	200–450 mg/dL
Sodium	140 mEq/L	135–145 mEq/L
Potassium	4 mEq/L	3.5–5.0 mEq/L
Calcium	9 mg/dL	9–10.5 mg/dL
LDH	758 U/L	100–190 U/L

Abbreviations: RBC, red blood cells; MCH, mean corpuscolar hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscolar hemoglobin concentration; MCV, mean corpuscolar volume; HCT, hematocrit; WBC, white blood cells; N, neutrophils; L, lymphocytes; M, monocytes; e, eosinophils; B, basophils; AST, aspartate tranaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase; LDL, low density lipoproteins; HDL, high density lipoproteins; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; NV, normal values.

Table 2 Endocrine work-up

		NV
Cortisol	164.3 ng/mL	50–250 ng/mL
Renin	2 ng/mL/h	0.3–3.0 ng/ml/h
Aldosteron	10 μg/dL	5–19 μg/dL
ACTH	16 pg/mL	0–46 pg/mL
Epinephrine	35 μg/d	<50 μg/d
Norepinephrine	60 μg/dL	15–80 μg/dL
Overnight dexamethasone suppressor test	3 μg/dL	<5 μg/dL

Abbreviations: ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone (corticotropin); NV, normal values.

Following an abdominal ultrasound imaging (US), a 10-cm right adrenal lesion was identified (Figures 1 and 2). For this reason the patient underwent a total body CT-scan that revealed a 10-cm round, dense, heterogeneous enhancing lesion with irregular margins and inhomogeneous contrast enhancement of solid component after intravenous (iv) contrast medium. Local invasion (right liver lobe, renal hilus, and right diaphragm) and tumor extension into the inferior vena cava, as well as a tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava and in the pulmonary arteries, were found. After 5 and 7 days, adrenal scintigraphy with iodocholesterol analogs showed a discordant pattern with absence of radiotracer uptake by the adrenal mass.

Figure 1 Abdominal computed tomography shows a 10-cm right adrenal lesion.

Figure 2 Abdominal computed tomography shows a 10-cm right adrenal lesion.

On the basis of these findings a diagnosis of “right adrenocortical carcinoma hormonally inactive” was made. Due to the invasive nature of the tumor we chose to put the patient on single agent mitotane.

Discussion

Incidentally discovered adrenal masses are found more frequently, so that all clinicians need to be aware of their etiology since each case needs to be treated individually. Patient age, general conditions, and tumor extension have to be taken into account; they may suggest avoiding combination therapy with other cytotoxic drugs and surgical treatment.

The true prevalence of AIs is unknown. Much of the information quoted is derived from autopsy series, in which the prevalence of undiagnosed adrenal masses ranges from 1.4% to 3%–6%.⁶ These results resemble those emerging from imaging studies, in fact, the prevalence of AIs in daily radiological practice is up to 5% of CT examination performed for various reasons.⁷

However, the prevalence of incidentally discovered adrenal masses increases with age, accounting for less than 1% in patients aged younger than 30 years, approximately 7% between the fifth and the seventh decades, and showing peak incidence in the sixth decade.⁸

AI is not a single pathological entity. A recent study⁹ on the prevalence of incidental adrenal mass confirmed histologically, shows that adenomas and myelolipomas are the most common lesions, whereas adrenocortical carcinoma is about 0.1%.

ACC is a rare malignancy (incidence 1–2 per million people) and radiologic prevalence is clearly related to the size of the tumor, accounting for 2% of tumors that are 4 cm or less, 6% of tumors that are 4.1 to 6 cm, and 25% of tumors that are greater than 6 cm.¹⁰ Clinical presentation is heterogeneous and prognosis is variable but generally poor,¹¹ in fact, overall, this neoplasia accounts for 0.02% to 0.2% of all cancer-related deaths, with a median survival of 18 months.

Women are more often affected than men (ratio 1:5);¹² this gender difference could be partly explained by the higher rate of diagnostic abdominal procedures recommended for women than men. The age distribution has two peaks: the first in childhood and the second in the fourth and fifth decade.¹³

Pathogenesis was incompletely understood, mutation at the 17p13 locus, including the p53 tumor suppressor gene, is observed in about 25% of cases;¹⁴ furthermore, alterations of the 11p15 locus, leading to IGF-II overexpression are frequently observed¹⁵ compared to adenomas or normal adrenal cortex.

Patients present hormonal excess (virilization in women and gynecomastia and testis atrophy in men),¹⁶ Cushing’s syndrome, or local effect mass in hormonally inactive ACC (nausea, vomiting, abdominal and back pain).¹⁷

Biochemical screening for tumor hypersecretion as well as imaging evaluation is mandatory in all adrenocortical carcinomas to define the most correct approach. In fact, in stages I–II (localized or locally invasive tumor) complete tumor removal offers the best chance for cure by far,¹⁶ in particular a complete resection.¹⁸ In ACC sized more than 10 cm or with invasion of adjacent organs, local recurrence after surgery occurs in 40% of patients.¹⁹

Our patient had an advanced tumor and diagnosis was belated due to the absence of hormonal excess symptoms. Considering our patient’s age, general conditions (hypertension, sinus tachycardia, obesity), invasivity and prognosis of the neoplasm, and the possibility of intraoperative complications, even after the negativity of biochemical work up (Table 2), we considered a medical therapy with mitotane.

Although adrenalectomy is the method of choice for the management of patients with ACC, being also compatible with a complete tumor resection in the presence of a tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava,²⁰ medical treatment should be considered as an alternative to adrenalectomy in elderly patients, in those unwilling to undergo surgery, and in patients with comorbid conditions that preclude surgery.²¹ In fact, while the presence of tumor thrombus may necessitate cardiac bypass technique, the prognosis of ACC still remains poor even after surgery with an overall five-year survival rate ranging between 16% and 38% in different series.²² Moreover, survival is clearly related to the extent of disease.²³

Mitotane is the only adrenal-specific agent available for treatment of ACC, it exerts a specific cytotoxic effect on adrenocortical cells producing focal degeneration. In the first study on the efficacy of this therapy by Lim and colleagues,²⁴ seven of 18 patients with ACC showed significant tumor regression; even more favorable was the report by Lubitz and colleagues,²⁵ which described tumor regression in 61% of patients. A recent clinical review by Allolio and colleagues⁵ that analyzed the efficacy of mitotane treatment in advanced ACC, concluded that mitotane leads to an objective tumor regression in about 25% of cases.

Although a complete response (or even cure) in patients with advanced ACC is extremely rare, long-term survival has been reported;²⁶ in fact our patient is alive and in good clinical conditions six months after surgery.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.