332
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

The potential carcinogenic risk of tanning beds: clinical guidelines and patient safety advice

&
Pages 277-282 | Published online: 30 Sep 2022

Abstract

Introduction

In 2009, the WHO listed ultraviolet (UV) radiation as a group 1 carcinogen. In spite of this, each year, millions of people tan indoor in Western countries. The aim of this review is to summarize evidence of tanning bed carcinogenesis and to present guidelines for use of tanning beds and patient safety advice.

Methods

A narrative review of the literature was conducted based on both PubMed and Medline searches and on literature review of the retrieved papers.

Results

Use of indoor tanning beds represents a significant and avoidable risk factor for the development of both melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers. Frequent tanners are more often adolescent females. Tanning beds have additional potential adverse effects such as burns, solar skin damage, infection, and possibly also addictive behavior.

Discussion

The effort in preventing UV light-induced carcinogenesis should currently be aimed at developing new strategies for public health information. Tanning beds are one preventable source of UV radiation. In the majority of people solar UV radiation continues to be the major factor and therefore anti-tanning campaigns must always include sunbathers.

Introduction

Nowadays, a pale yet healthy skin is not always considered desirable and beautiful, particularly not by young Caucasian women.Citation1Citation5 This desire to acquire a tan for cosmetic purposes has led to the development of a large indoor tanning industry, particularly in Western countries, and in the US alone, an estimated 30 million people tan indoors annually.Citation6,Citation7 The use of tanning beds/sunbeds continues to increase in popularity,Citation6,Citation8 which is of particular concern due to the carcinogenic potential of the ultraviolet (UV) light emitted by tanning beds. UV light is electromagnetic radiation with a wavelength shorter than that of visible light in the range 10–400 nm. UV light is divided into three categories: UVA (400–320 nm), UVB (320–280 nm), and UVC (280–100 nm). The UV light emitted in tanning beds is mainly UVA (around 95%–99%) and UVB (around 1%–5%).Citation6,Citation9 The primary source of UV radiation in majority of the population continues to be solar UV radiation, but there is, as may be intuitively suspected, a high correlation between tanning bed use and sunbathing. Disentangling the two risk factors would allow a more targeted approach to reducing UV exposure in the population and should be a major issue for anyone genuinely concerned with public health. This review is however focused on carcinogenic and other effects on the skin caused by tanning bed UV radiation and how to advise patients about indoor tanning.

To further complicate the issue, studies have suggested that it is not even the tan itself that promotes tanning as ardent tanners display addictive behavior.Citation10,Citation11 It has also been suggested that the source of addiction is chemical and amenable to pharmacologic intervention.Citation12 Consequently, knowledge of the adverse effects of tanning is not enough to modify behavior.Citation13

Methods

A narrative review of the literature was conducted based on both systematic PubMed and Medline searches in spring 2010 using the following MESH terms and words: tanning bed, sunbed, indoor tanning, nonmelanoma skin cancer, cutaneous malignant melanoma, burns, UV radiation, and related terms, and a review of the references of retrieved papers was done.

UV carcinogenesis

Experimental studies clearly demonstrate the potential carcinogenic effect of both UVA and UVB,Citation14Citation17 though experimental studies which failed to identify UVA as a risk factor of melanoma were also found.Citation18 This understanding of UV-induced carcinogenesis forms a cornerstone of current efforts to curb the surge of skin cancer.

Tanning beds and skin cancer

Tanning bed lamps that produce higher levels of UVB to mimic the solar spectrum and speed the tanning process are popular.Citation6 Indoor tanning beds can be found in private homes, fitness clubs, recreational facilities, and beauty salons.Citation19 A large English survey from 2010 found that approximately a quarter of children (11–17 years) had used a tanning bed device at home and that 25% had used tanning beds unsupervised in tanning salons or gym centers.Citation20 In 2000, there were 2.8 million cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 10 million cases of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), 200,000 cases of malignant melanoma (MM), and 65,000 melanoma-associated deaths worldwide.Citation21 UV radiation exposure is the predominant environmental risk factor for melanoma.Citation22 A substantial and growing body of evidence indicates that UV radiation emitted by the lamps used in tanning beds may damage the skin leading to premature agingCitation23Citation27 and lead to an increased risk of developing both nonmelanoma skin cancerCitation6,Citation28Citation32 and cutaneous MM.Citation4,Citation22,Citation33Citation42 This is in good agreement with the classification of UV radiation as a group 1 carcinogen (carcinogenic to humans) by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2009.Citation43 In a population-based case-control study from 2002, the overall use of tanning devices was associated with the odds ratios (OR) of 2.5 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7–3.8) for SCC and 1.5 (95% CI: 1.1–2.1) for BCC. Adjustment for history of sunburns, sunbathing, and sun exposure did not affect the results.Citation28 A previous study did not show this correlation; however, this study had no quantitative measure of UV exposure, and the study subjects had a low prevalence of tanning bed use.Citation44 A similar population-based case-control study from 2000 evaluated the association between tanning bed use and MM. A significantly elevated OR for developing MM after regular exposure to tanning beds was found when adjusted for hair color, raised nevi, skin type, and number of sunburns; OR was 1.8 (95% CI: 1.2–2.7). The OR was higher in individuals younger than age 36 years (adjusted OR: 8.1; 95% CI: 1.3–49.5 for regular versus never use).Citation34 In a large Scandinavian study, use of tanning beds more than once per month was associated with a statistically significant 55% increase in MM risk.Citation45 The Australian Melanoma Family Study, a multicenter, population-based, case-control family study, showed in 604 cases diagnosed between ages 18 and 39 years and 479 controls the OR for melanoma associated with ever use of sunbed was 1.41 (95% CI: 1.01–1.96) and 2.01 (95% CI: 1.22–3.31), respectively, for more than 10 lifetime sessions. Among those who had ever used a sunbed and were diagnosed between 18 and 29 years of age, three-quarters (76%) of melanomas were attributable to sunbed use.Citation46 First exposure to sunbeds before 35 years of age significantly increased the risk of melanoma, based on seven informative studies (summary relative risk (RR) 1.75; 95% CI: 1.35–2.26).Citation41 In this large systematic review based on 19 informative studies, ever use of tanning beds was also positively associated with melanoma (summary RR, 1.15; 95% CI: 1.00–1.31), although there was no consistent evidence of a dose-response relationship. Not all studies demonstrated an increased risk of MM in tanning bed users. Three studies demonstrated increased RR for SCC. These studies did not support an association with BCC. The limited evidence for a positive association between indoor tanning and BCC can be ascribed to the inability to account for total dose of UV radiation to the skin in these studies. Based on the above figures, it is of some concern that around 50% of girls aged 15–17 used tanning beds regularly in some areas in the UK.Citation20 It is however complicated to separate the carcinogenic effects of solar and artificial UV radiation as most tanning bed users with skin cancer are also frequent sunbathers, have more sun-sensitive skin, and have had more painful sunburns than nonusers.Citation28 To adjust for sun exposure, confirm dose-response relationship, and examine the different tanning devices and risk of melanoma, a recent population-based case-control study was performed in Minnesota. More than 1000 MM cases and a similar control group were included, and 62.9% of cases and 51.1% of controls had tanned indoors (adjusted OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.42–2.14). Melanoma risk was pronounced among users of UVB-enhanced (adjusted OR: 2.86; 95% CI: 2.03–4.03) and primarily UVA-emitting devices (adjusted OR: 4.44; 95% CI: 2.45–8.02). Risk increased with use: years (P < 0.006), hours (P < 0.0001), or sessions (P = 0.0002). The study did not include BCC and SCC lesions.Citation47 In a study of 106,366 women with complete follow-up through 2005, 412 MM cases were diagnosed. MM risk increased significantly with the number of sunburns and bathing vacations in the first three age decades and solarium use at ages 30–39 and 40–49 years (RR for solarium use ≥1 time/month 1.49 (95% CI: 1.11–2.00) and 1.61 (95% CI: 1.10–2.35)), respectively. Risk of melanoma associated with sunburns, bathing vacations, and solarium use increased with accumulating exposure across additional decades of life.Citation48 Within the limitations of current study design and UV dosimetry, it would therefore appear that a substantial case can be made suggesting that any use of tanning beds constitute an independent and significant factor in the development of primarily MM and SCC.

Regulating tanning bed use is apparently easier to do than controlling sun exposure. Hence, controlling tanning bed use does not suffice in preventing UV-induced skin cancer, and accordingly, the incidence of MM started to increase decades prior to the increasing popularity of tanning beds since the 1970s.Citation49

Other side effects of tanning beds

Burns

The acute burn damage caused by tanning beds can be serious and has been described in at least one UK center.Citation50 Though not frequent, it is in itself alarming as even a serious burn in a tanning bed apparently does not lead to greater caution or interruption of tanning bed use among some users.Citation51 Primarily, the malfunction of tanning facilities leading to excess UV light and serious burns does however identify a lack of attention, not only in the users but also in the companies responsible for the provision and maintenance of the equipment. Citation52 It has been suggested that a significant proportion of the providers do not adhere to British or European standards for UV radiation, and that 4 out of 5 tanning beds exceeded the limit specified in these standards.Citation9 Furthermore, there has been a significant increase in UV radiation from tanning beds since 1988.Citation9

Bacteria

Tanning beds host a substantial microbial flora. A study investigated the microbiological environment of the tanning salons by obtaining cultures from the tanning beds in 10 top-rated tanning salons in New York City to determine the sanitary status of the tanning beds. Several skin pathogenic cultures were found: Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida (5/10), Bacillus spp. (5/10), Klebsiella pneumonia (4/10), Enterococcus sp. (3/10), Staphylococcus aureus (3/10), and Enterobacter cloacae (2/10).Citation53 This is of some concern for tanning bed users with, for example, atopic dermatitis or other skin barrier defects.

Vitamin D issues

Tanning bed proponents cite the health benefits of vitamin D to support indoor tanning, including concerns that reduced vitamin D levels or certain vitamin D receptor polymorphisms may be associated with increased incidence of various cancers, including melanoma. Health benefits of vitamin D can be fully dissociated from the UV exposure risks with oral vitamin D supplementation or from adding vitamin D-rich foods to the diet, although optimal levels remain to be established.Citation11

Cultural differences

To aim anti-tanning bed campaigns efficiently, the groups that use tanning facilities must be describedCitation1 and the awareness of the health hazard of tanning beds in the different groups must be described.Citation54 It seems that the general tendency in several countries such as the UK,Citation20,Citation55 France,Citation39,Citation56 Italy,Citation51 Sweden,Citation57,Citation58 Germany,Citation59 Belgium,Citation56 The Netherlands,Citation39 Denmark,Citation30,Citation60 Chile,Citation61 Australia,Citation2,Citation8 Canada,Citation62 New Zealand,Citation8,Citation63 and the USCitation3,Citation19,Citation64Citation69 is that tanning beds are used primarily by young Caucasian middle- to lower-class adolescents, mainly female, and mainly for cosmetic purposes. In a large US study, tanning bed use increased from 7% among 14-year-old girls to 16% by age 15, and more than doubled again by age 17 to 35%.Citation3 A systematic review of tanning bed users describe the typical sunbed user as female, between 17 and 30 years old, who tends to live a comparatively unhealthy lifestyle: users smoke cigarettes and drink alcohol more frequently and eat less healthy food than nonusers. Users are characterized by a lack of knowledge about health risks of UV light and are prompted by the frequent use of sunbeds by friends or family members and the experience of positive emotions and relaxation by indoor tanning.Citation1 A German study revealed the worrying misconception that tanning is healthy. Frequent tanners reported that they believed that artificial UV radiation had a healthy effect on the skin compared to natural UV radiation.Citation59 In a study of health-care workers in the UK, the frequency of using tanning beds was found to be negatively correlated with the age of respondents and the existence of family experience with skin cancer, and strongly associated with the opinion that it is safer to use a sunbed than sunbathing outdoors, female gender, and smoking.Citation55 Another study also showed that smoking was a strong predictor for tanning bed use among females.Citation70 This raises an important issue about targeting information at this group of young women who are combining two well-known carcinogens. Furthermore, youth tanning attitudes, parental indoor tanning use, and parents’ permission is strongly associated with youth use of indoor tanning,Citation71 and therefore campaigns should also change the parental attitude toward tanning.

Addiction to tanning

In epidemiological studies of tanning bed users, it has been shown that it is not always the tan per se that promotes the tanning seeking behavior – it is also the warmth of the sunbed and a general sense of well-being.Citation10 Accordingly, if tanners crave heat, they could potentially exchange tanning with a sauna. The tanning habits of sauna users have never been described to the best of our knowledge. However, saunas are particularly popular in less sunny places. If tanning bed use were primarily aimed at obtaining a tan, however, sunless tanning products would provide an excellent solution. A small study did demonstrate that sunless tanners deliberately spent less time in the sun to tan.Citation72 However, another study raised the possibility that sunless tanning products did not decrease rates of sunburning or use of tanning beds.Citation64 Thus, substitution may not be a viable path to behavior modification if the substitute addiction is not independent of the primary harmful addiction, but the two are associated, for example, cannabis and alcohol.Citation73

Clinical guidelines

As long as tanning beds are available to the public, there is a need for guidelines and/or legislation to reduce the risks associated with their use. WHO encourages governments to formulate and enforce effective laws governing the use of tanning beds. In 2003, WHO published a brochure entitled ‘Artificial tanning beds: risks and guidance’ providing advice to the public, operators of tanning bed facilities, and member states on how tanning beds could be managed to protect public health.Citation21 WHO recommended a restriction of use of tanning beds by persons under 18 years as well as banning of unsupervised facilities. WHO recommendations are consistent with those of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP)Citation74 and the European Society for Skin Cancer Prevention (EUROSKIN).Citation75 In its 2003 publication, ICNIRP recommends against the use of UV-emitting appliances for tanning or other nonmedical purposes.

Patient advice

Skin cancer poses a major public health concern, and tanning remains the most modifiable risk factor in its etiology. Primary prevention behaviors against excessive UV radiation include applying sunscreen before exposure, reapplying sunscreen every 1½–2 hours or after swimming or sweating, dressing in protective clothing, using shade, limiting exposure during peak sun hours, and avoiding artificial sources of UV radiation such as tanning beds. Secondary prevention behaviors include screening and early detection in combination with education on the primary prevention measures.Citation76 ICNIRP suggest that the following groups are at particularly high risk of incurring adverse health effects from UV light and therefore should be particularly counseled against the use of cosmetic tanning appliances: people who have skin phototypes I or II, children (ie, less than 18 years of age), people who have large numbers of nevi, persons who tend to freckle, individuals who have a history of frequent childhood sunburn, people who have pre-malignant or malignant skin lesions, people who have sun-damaged skin, those who are wearing cosmetics that may enhance sensitivity to UV exposure, and persons taking photosensitizing medications. Importantly, sunscreen is often used inadequately and may induce a false sense of safety in the sun or tanning bed, and it has been shown that people using sunscreen with high sun protection factor (SPF) do not burn less than those using lower SPF as sunscreen abuse may extend sun exposure duration thus allowing sun exposure behaviors that would not be possible otherwise.Citation77 Consequently, patients must be instructed on the proper use of sunscreen.

Discussion

An increasing body of evidence supports the theory that UV light emitted by tanning beds is not only a potential carcinogen, but a clinically significant risk factor in the development of MM, SCC, and maybe BCC. Thus, the effort in preventing UV light-induced carcinogenesis is shifting from demonstrating a causative relationship between using tanning beds and developing skin cancer to the question of how to develop new strategies for public information and warning on the potential carcinogenic effect of tanning beds. The use of tanning devices by a substantial minority of young people is a worrying trend in terms of a likely increased incidence of MM and nonmelanoma cancers in the future.Citation33

Since most tanning bed users are young middle- and lower-class adolescents and women, the anti-cancer anti-tanning bed campaigns must be primarily directed at these users. It does, however, appear prudent to formulate the information so that it reaches both tanning beds users and sunbathers, as these are often the same group.Citation5,Citation54,Citation76

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • SchneiderSKramerHWho uses sunbeds? A systematic literature review of risk groups in developed countriesJ Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol20106246:639648 Epub 2009 Dec 8.20015180
  • O’RiordanDLFieldAEGellerACFrequent tanning bed use, weight concerns, and other health risk behaviors in adolescent females (United States)Cancer Causes Control200617567968616633915
  • GellerACColditzGOliveriaSUse of sunscreen, sunburning rates, and tanning bed use among more than 10,000 US children and adolescentsPediatrics200210961009101412042536
  • DiffeyBSunbeds, beauty and melanomaBr J Dermatol2007157221521617650174
  • AutierPPerspectives in melanoma prevention: the case of sunbedsEur J Cancer200440162367237615519507
  • LevineJASoraceMSpencerJSiegelDMThe indoor UV tanning industry: a review of skin cancer risk, health benefit claims, and regulationJ Am Acad Dermatol20055361038104416310065
  • HoersterKDGarrowRLMayerJADensity of indoor tanning facilities in 116 large US. citiesAm J Prev Med200936324324619215849
  • JopsonJAReederAIAn audit of Yellow Pages telephone directory listings of indoor tanning facilities and services in New Zealand, 1992–2006Aust N Z J Public Health200832437237718782403
  • OliverHFergusonJMoseleyHQuantitative risk assessment of sunbeds: impact of new high power lampsBr J Dermatol2007157235035617650177
  • NolanBVFeldmanSRUltraviolet tanning addictionDermatol Clin2009272109112v19254653
  • WooDKEideMJTanning beds, skin cancer, and vitamin D: an examination of the scientific evidence and public health implicationsDermatol Ther2010231617120136909
  • KaurMLiguoriALangWRappSRFleischerABJrFeldmanSRInduction of withdrawal-like symptoms in a small randomized, controlled trial of opioid blockade in frequent tannersJ Am Acad Dermatol200654470971116546596
  • JemecGBPrimary prevention of malignant melanoma: to know may not be enoughJ Am Acad Dermatol1993285 Pt 17998008347197
  • MatsumuraYAnanthaswamyHNShort-term and long-term cellular and molecular events following UV irradiation of skin: implications for molecular medicineExpert Rev Mol Med200242612214585163
  • Molho-PessachVLotemMUltraviolet radiation and cutaneous carcinogenesisCurr Probl Dermatol200735142717641487
  • Kulesz-MartinMLagowskiJFeiSMelanocyte and keratinocyte carcinogenesis: p53 family protein activities and intersecting mRNA expression profilesJ Investig Dermatol Symp Proc2005102142152
  • de GruijlFRp53 mutations as a marker of skin cancer risk: comparison of UVA and UVB effectsExp Dermatol200211Suppl 1373912444958
  • MitchellDLFernandezAANairnRSUltraviolet A does not induce melanomas in a Xiphophorus hybrid fish modelProc Natl Acad Sci U S A2010107209329933420439744
  • RobinsonJKKimJRosenbaumSOrtizSIndoor tanning knowledge, attitudes, and behavior among young adults from 1988–2007Arch Dermatol2008144448448818427042
  • ThomsonCSWoolnoughSWickendenMHiomSTwelvesCJSunbed use in children aged 11–17 in England: face to face quota sampling surveys in the National Prevalence Study and Six Cities StudyBMJ2010340c877 doi: 10.1136/bmj.c87720299396
  • WHOArtificial tanning sunbeds: risks and guidance http://www.who.int/uv/publications/en/sunbeds.pdf
  • TuckerMAMelanoma epidemiologyHematol Oncol Clin North Am2009233383395vii19464592
  • KoehlerMJPrellerAKindlerNIntrinsic, solar and sunbedinduced skin aging measured in vivo by multiphoton laser tomography and biophysical methodsSkin Res Technol200915335736319624433
  • GilchrestBAEllerMSYaarMTelomere-mediated effects on melanogenesis and skin agingJ Investig Dermatol Symp Proc20091412531
  • GallagherRPLeeTKAdverse effects of ultraviolet radiation: a brief reviewProg Biophys Mol Biol200692111913116580054
  • CoxNHActinic keratosis induced by a sunbedBMJ199430869349779788173409
  • SalisburyJRWilliamsHdu VivierAWTanning-bed lentigines: ultrastructural and histopathologic featuresJ Am Acad Dermatol1989214 Pt 16896932808785
  • KaragasMRStannardVAMottLASlatteryMJSpencerSKWeinstockMAUse of tanning devices and risk of basal cell and squamous cell skin cancersJ Natl Cancer Inst200294322422611830612
  • IbrahimSFBrownMDTanning and cutaneous malignancyDermatol Surg200834446047418248469
  • FaurschouAWulfHCEcological analysis of the relation between sunbeds and skin cancerPhotodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed200723412012517598864
  • BoydASShyrYKingLEJrBasal cell carcinoma in young women: an evaluation of the association of tanning bed use and smokingJ Am Acad Dermatol200246570670912004311
  • AbdullaFRFeldmanSRWillifordPMKrowchukDKaurMTanning and skin cancerPediatr Dermatol200522650151216354251
  • YoungARTanning devices–fast track to skin cancer?Pigment Cell Res20041712914717839
  • WesterdahlJIngvarCMasbackAJonssonNOlssonHRisk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in relation to use of sunbeds: further evidence for UV-A carcinogenicityBr J Cancer20008291593159910789730
  • TingWSchultzKCacNNPetersonMWallingHWTanning bed exposure increases the risk of malignant melanomaInt J Dermatol200746121253125718173518
  • SchulmanJMFisherDEIndoor ultraviolet tanning and skin cancer: health risks and opportunitiesCurr Opin Oncol200921214414919532016
  • CoelhoSGHearingVJUVA tanning is involved in the increased incidence of skin cancers in fair-skinned young womenPigment Cell Melanoma Res2010231576319968819
  • BatailleVWinnettASasieniPNewton BishopJACuzickJExposure to the sun and sunbeds and the risk of cutaneous melanoma in the UK: a case-control studyEur J Cancer200440342943514746862
  • BatailleVBoniolMde VriesEA multicentre epidemiological study on sunbed use and cutaneous melanoma in EuropeEur J Cancer200541142141214916125927
  • AutierPCutaneous malignant melanoma: facts about sunbeds and sunscreenExpert Rev Anticancer Ther20055582183316221052
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer Working Group on artificial ultraviolet (UV) light and skin cancerThe association of use of sunbeds with cutaneous malignant melanoma and other skin cancers: a systematic reviewInt J Cancer200712051116112217131335
  • GallagherRPSpinelliJJLeeTKTanning beds, sunlamps, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanomaCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev200514356256615767329
  • International Agency for Research on CancerIARC classification of carcinogens http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bookshelf/br.fcgi?book=cmed6&part=A6679
  • BajdikCDGallagherRPAstrakianakisGHillGBFinchamSMcLeanDINon-solar ultraviolet radiation and the risk of basal and squamous cell skin cancerBr J Cancer19967312161216148664139
  • VeierodMBWeiderpassEThornMA prospective study of pigmentation, sun exposure, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in womenJ Natl Cancer Inst200395201530153814559875
  • CustAEArmstrongBKGoumasCSunbed use during adolescence and early adulthood is associated with increased risk of early-onset melanomaInt J Cancer2010728 Epub ahead of print.
  • LazovichDVogelRIBerwickMWeinstockMAAndersonKEWarshawEMIndoor tanning and risk of melanoma: a case-control study in a highly exposed populationCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev20101961557156820507845
  • VeierodMBAdamiHOLundEArmstrongBKWeiderpassESun and solarium exposure and melanoma risk: effects of age, pigmentary characteristics, and neviCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev201019111112020056629
  • MacKieRMIncidence, risk factors and prevention of melanomaEur J Cancer199834Suppl 3S3S69849401
  • Hemington-GorseSJSlatteryMADrewPJBurns related to sunbed useBurns201036692092320171016
  • MonfrecolaGFabbrociniGPosteraroGPiniDWhat do young people think about the dangers of sunbathing, skin cancer and sunbeds? A questionnaire survey among ItaliansPhotodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed2000161151810721859
  • EltiganiEMatthewsRNAn unusual cause of sunbed burnsBurns199420187888148088
  • RussakJERigelDSTanning bed hygiene: microbes found on tanning beds present a potential health riskJ Am Acad Dermatol201062115515720082899
  • MogensenMKampSJemecGBRelevant public information about malignant melanomaUgeskr Laeger2007169761617319044
  • AmirZWrightAKernohanEEHartGAttitudes, beliefs and behaviour regarding the use of sunbeds amongst healthcare workers in BradfordEur J Cancer Care (Engl)200092767911261014
  • AutierPDoreJFLejeuneFCutaneous malignant melanoma and exposure to sunlamps or sunbeds: an EORTC multicenter case-control study in Belgium, France and Germany. EORTC Melanoma Cooperative GroupInt J Cancer19945868098137927872
  • BoldemanCBranstromRDalHTanning habits and sunburn in a Swedish population age 13–50 yearsEur J Cancer200137182441244811720841
  • BranstromRUllenHBrandbergYAttitudes, subjective norms and perception of behavioural control as predictors of sun-related behaviour in Swedish adultsPrev Med200439599299915475034
  • BornerFUSchutzHWiedemannPA population-based survey on tanning bed use in GermanyBMC Dermatol20099619619281
  • KosterBThorgaardCClemmensenIHPhilipASunbed use in the Danish population in 2007: a cross-sectional studyPrev Med200948328829019154755
  • SalomoneCMajersonDMolgoMde Santa MaríaMLRomeroWTanning salons in Santiago, Chile: the knowledge of the staff in charge and the quality of information provided to potential clients before and after a new regulatory lawPhotodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed2009252868919292784
  • RhaindsMde GuireLClaveauJA population-based survey on the use of artificial tanning devices in the Province of Quebec, CanadaJ Am Acad Dermatol199940457257610188676
  • DouglassHMMcGeeRWilliamsSSun behaviour and perceptions of risk for melanoma among 21-year-old New ZealandersAust N Z J Public Health19972133293349270162
  • BrooksKBrooksDDajaniZUse of artificial tanning products among young adultsJ Am Acad Dermatol20065461060106616713463
  • MooreJZelenDHafeezIGantiAKBealJPottiARisk-awareness of cutaneous malignancies among rural populationsMed Oncol200320436937414716033
  • DemkoCABorawskiEAdebanneSMCooperKDStangeKCUse of indoor tanning facilities by white adolescents in the United StatesArch Pediatr Adolesc Med2003157985486012963589
  • GreeneKBrinnLSMessages influencing college women’s tanning bed use: statistical versus narrative evidence format and a self-assessment to increase perceived susceptibilityJ Health Commun20038544346114530147
  • OliphantJAForsterJLMcBrideCMThe use of commercial tanning facilities by suburban Minnesota adolescentsAm J Public Health19948434764788129071
  • HeckmanCJCoupsEJManneSLPrevalence and correlates of indoor tanning among US adultsJ Am Acad Dermatol200858576978018328594
  • BoldemanCJanssonBDalHUllénHSunbed use among Swedish adolescents in the 1990s: a decline with an unchanged relationship to health risk behaviorsScand J Public Health200331323323712850979
  • CokkinidesVWeinstockMLazovichDWardEThunMIndoor tanning use among adolescents in the US, 1998 to 2004Cancer2009115119019819085965
  • SheehanDJLesherJLJrThe effect of sunless tanning on behavior in the sun: a pilot studySouth Med J200598121192119516440919
  • ReimanACannabis as a substitute for alcohol and other drugsHarm Reduct J200963519958538
  • Health issues of ultraviolet tanning appliances used for cosmetic purposesHealth Phys200384111912712498524
  • GreinertRMcKinlayABreitbartEWThe European Society of Skin Cancer Prevention – EUROSKIN: towards the promotion and harmonization of skin cancer prevention in Europe. RecommendationsEur J Cancer Prev200110215716211330457
  • CummingsSRTrippMKHerrmannNBApproaches to the prevention and control of skin cancerCancer Metastasis Rev1997163–43093279433642
  • AutierPSunscreen abuse for intentional sun exposureBr J Dermatol2009161Suppl 3404519775356