Systemic and pulmonary inflammation is independent of skeletal muscle changes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Abstract

Background

Nutritional depletion is an important manifestation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which has been related to systemic inflammation. It remains unclear to what degree airway inflammation contributes to the presence or progression of nutritional depletion.

Objectives

To determine whether airway inflammation and lung bacterial colonization are related to nutritional status or predict progressive weight loss and muscle atrophy in patients with COPD.

Methods

Body composition using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, indices of airway inflammation, and bacterial colonization were measured in 234 COPD patients. Systemic inflammation was assessed from serum C reactive protein (CRP) and circulating total and differential leukocyte counts. Nutritional depletion was defined as a body mass index (BMI) less than 21 kg/m² and/or fat-free mass index (FFMI) less than 15 or 17 kg/m² in women and men, respectively. FFMI was calculated as the fat-free mass (FFM) corrected for body surface area. Measurements were repeated in 94 patients after a median 16-month follow-up. Regression analysis was used to assess the relationships of weight change and FFM change with indices of bacterial colonization and airway and systemic inflammation.

Results

Nutritional depletion occurred in 37% of patients. Lung function was worsened in patients with nutritional depletion compared to those without (forced expiratory volume in 1 second 1.17 L versus 1.41 L, mean difference 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.38, P<0.01). There were no differences in airway inflammation and bacterial colonization in patients with and without nutritional depletion. At baseline, BMI correlated positively with serum CRP (r_s=0.14, P=0.04). Change in weight and change in FFM over time could not be predicted from baseline patient characteristics.

Conclusion

Nutritional depletion and progressive muscle atrophy are not related to airway inflammation or bacterial colonization. Overspill of pulmonary inflammation is not a key driver of muscle atrophy in COPD.

Keywords:

• muscle atrophy
• fat-free mass
• dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)
• airway inflammation
• bacteria

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide.¹ Systemic manifestations of COPD include weight loss, which is an independent predictor of mortality and morbidity.^2–5 Nutritional depletion in the context of COPD can be defined as reduced body mass index (BMI) and/or reduction in fat-free mass index (FFMI); muscle atrophy has been identified as the most important component of nutritional depletion, often occurring in the presence of a preserved body mass index.² Muscle atrophy and weight loss in COPD has been associated with an increase in systemic inflammation, measured by tumor necrosis factor-alpha,^6,7 although elevated body mass in COPD has also been associated with increased systemic inflammation.⁸ The inflammatory stimuli driving the systemic manifestations of COPD are uncertain,^6–9 and it is unclear whether nutritional depletion is related to pulmonary inflammation or bacterial overgrowth in the airways.

We hypothesized that in patients with COPD, nutritional depletion, defined as a low BMI and/or low FFMI, is related to airway inflammation and that accelerated weight loss is associated with increased inflammatory parameters.

Methods

Study design

This was a prospective cohort study performed at Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK, between November 2006 and October 2012. Study design, inclusion, and exclusion criteria have been described previously.^10,11 Patients aged over 40 with a physician diagnosis of COPD were recruited from hospital clinics and from local advertising. COPD was defined according to the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease criteria (GOLD),¹² and all subjects demonstrated airflow obstruction with a postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁)/forced vital capacity ratio of less than 0.7. The study was approved by the Leicestershire, Northamptonshire, and Rutland ethics committee. All patients gave informed written consent.

Methods

At study entry, baseline demographics were collected, including smoking history and exacerbation frequency in the previous year. Full lung function and reversibility testing was performed according to American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society standards.¹³ Disease specific health status was assessed using the Chronic Respiratory Disease questionnaire (McMasters University, Hamilton, Canada).¹⁴ Spontaneous or induced sputum was collected and processed to measure differential cell counts, bacterial culture, colony forming units, and total bacterial load measured by the abundance of 16S ribosomal unit encoding genes.^10,15–17

Venous blood was taken to measure peripheral blood differential cell counts and serum C reactive protein (CRP). Body composition was assessed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA, Lunar Prodigy, GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK).¹⁸ Fat-free mass (FFM) was calculated from the sum of lean mass and bone mineral content and normalized for body surface area to derive the FFMI. Muscle atrophy was defined as FFMI less than 15 kg/m² and 17 kg/m² in women and men, respectively, as per previous definitions.¹⁹

Patients were also classified as underweight if the BMI was less than 21 kg/m², normal weight if the BMI was between 21 and 25 kg/m², overweight if the BMI was greater or equal to 25 but less than 30 kg/m², and obese if the BMI was found to be equal or greater than 30 kg/m.^20–22 The threshold of 21 kg/m², below which patients were classified as underweight, was chosen because mortality has been shown to be increased below this value in COPD populations.^21,22 In this study, nutritional depletion was defined as the presence of a low BMI and/or low FFMI.

Repeated measures of body composition, airway inflammation, pulmonary function, and health status were available in 94 patients. Patients were divided into three groups according to their change in weight over the study period: significant weight loss (greater than 5% of the total body weight), minimal weight change (less than 5% weight loss and less than 5% weight gain of total body weight), and weight gain (greater than 5% of the total body weight).

Statistical analysis was performed using PRISM version 6 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA) and SPSS version 20 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Parametric data were expressed as mean [standard error of the mean (SEM)] and nonparametric data were expressed as median (interquartile range). Log transformed data were presented as geometric mean [95% confidence interval (CI)]. Correlation of indices was measured using the Pearson correlation (r) or Spearman rank correlation (r_s) coefficients for parametric and nonparametric data. For comparison of unpaired parametric or nonparametric groups, the Student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney test were used. For comparison of three or more groups, the one-way analysis of variance and Kruskal–Wallis test were used for parametric and nonparametric data. The chi-squared test (χ²) was used to compare proportions. Changes in DEXA measurements between baseline and follow-up were assessed using the paired t-test and Wilcoxon matched pairs for parametric and nonparametric data, respectively. No adjustments for multiple comparisons were made. Multiple regression was used to assess the relationship of the dependent variables change in weight and change in FFM (Δ weight, Δ FFM) with explanatory (independent) variables. The independent baseline variables inputted into the regression analysis were i) FEV₁% predicted, ii) exacerbation frequency, iii) sputum neutrophil%, and iv) CRP. Smoking status was also entered as a binary variable, as smoking cessation has been shown to be an independent predictor of FFM gain using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).⁴ Collinearity diagnostics determined that the model showed no violation and the residuals observed normality. A P-value of <0.05 was taken as the threshold of significance for all statistical testing.

Results

Two hundred and thirty-four patients (156 men) entered the study for a baseline visit. Of these patients, 5% were categorized as GOLD I, 45% were GOLD II, 37% were GOLD III, and 13% were GOLD IV. BMI classification identified that 11% were underweight, 29% were normal weight, 34% were overweight, and 27% were obese. Nutritional depletion was present in 86 (37%) patients; 20 patients had both a low BMI and low FFMI, six had a low BMI and a normal FFMI, and 60 had a normal BMI and low FFMI (Figure 1). Patients with nutritional depletion had worsened lung function and elevated peripheral blood neutrophil counts. The clinical characteristics of depleted and nondepleted patients are shown in Table 1. There were no significant correlations between BMI, FFMI, and markers of airway inflammation or airway colonization at baseline. BMI correlated weakly with serum CRP (r_s=0.14, P=0.04; Figure 2). In patients with nutritional depletion, there were no differences in airway or systemic inflammation in those with low or normal BMI or low or normal FFMI.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients divided into groups according to presence or absence of nutritional depletion

	Nutritional depletion (n=86)	No nutritional depletion (n=148)	P-value
Men, n (%)	53 (62)	103 (70)	0.25
Age, years*	69 (47–85)	68 (43–88)	0.35
Current smokers, n (%)	30 (35)	44 (30)	0.47
Ex-smokers, n (%)	55 (64)	102 (69)	0.47
Pack-year history†	48 (31–62)	44 (31–58)	0.24
Exacerbations in preceding year*	3 (1–10)	3 (1–12)	0.51
Weight (kg)*	63.4 (38.9–84.9)	83.2 (53.5–121.1)	<0.01
BMI (kg/m^2)*	22.7 (16.0–32.3)	29.5 (21.6–51.3)	<0.01
FFM, kg*	42.8 (29.3–55.9)	52.8 (33.6–80.0)	<0.01
FFMI (kg/m^2)*	15.2 (12.9–18.1)	18.6 (15.1–28.3)	<0.01
FEV1 (L)‡	1.17 (0.05)	1.41 (0.05)	<0.01
FEV1 % predicted‡	47 (2)	54 (2)	<0.01
FEV1/FVC (%)‡	49 (1)	53 (1)	0.02
RV (% predicted)	142 (5)	135 (4)	0.26
TLC (% predicted)	108 (2)	108 (3)	0.98
DLCO (% predicted)	46 (2)	62 (2)	<0.01
CRQ total (units)	3.99 (0.12)	4.16 (0.09)	0.26
Blood white cell count, ×10^9/L§	8.6 (8.0–9.1)	7.7 (7.4–8.1)	<0.01
Blood neutrophils, ×10^9/L§	5.7 (5.3–6.1)	4.8 (4.6–5.1)	<0.01
Blood eosinophils, ×10^9/L§	0.21 (0.18–0.24)	0.22 (0.20–0.24)	0.54
CRP, mg/L†	3 (3–9)	3 (3–11)	0.58
Sputum total cell count, ×10^6 cells/g§	3.9 (2.8–5.3)	3.0 (2.4–3.7)	0.19
Sputum neutrophils (%)	71 (3)	65 (2)	0.16
Sputum neutrophil count, ×10^6 cells/g§	2.6 (1.7–3.8)	1.7 (1.3–2.3)	0.11
Sputum eosinophils (%)§	1.2 (0.9–1.7)	1.1 (0.9–1.4)	0.62
Sputum culture positive for pathogen, %	38	29	0.33
Colony-forming units ×10^7/mL sputum§	1.4 (0.7–2.6)	1.3(0.8–1.9)	0.83
Bacterial 16S genome copies ×10^8/mL	2.3 (1.1–4.6)	2.6 (1.6–4.1)	0.77

Notes: Data expressed as mean (SEM) unless otherwise stated.

* Mean (range);

† median (interquartile range);

‡ postbronchodilator;

§ geometric mean (95% confidence interval). Pathogens included Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nutritional depletion defined as BMI <21 kg/m² and/or FFMI <15 or <17 kg/m² in women and men, respectively.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CRP, C reactive protein; CRQ, Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire; DLCO, total lung carbon monoxide transfer factor; FEV₁, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FFM, fat-free mass; FFMI, fat-free mass index; FVC, forced vital capacity; RV, residual volume; TLC, total lung capacity; SEM, standard error of the mean.

Figure 1 Body composition of patients within cohort; low BMI defined as BMI <21 kg/m², and low FFMI defined as <15 or <17 kg/m² in females and males, respectively.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; FFMI, fat-free mass index.

Figure 2 Correlation graph between BMI and CRP.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CRP, C reactive protein.

Longitudinal observations

In 94 patients (64 men) with repeated DEXA scans with a median follow-up of 16 months, men, but not women, had a small but significant reduction in FFM (men: change in FFM 0.7 kg, 95% CI 0.2 to 1.1, P=0.01; women: 0.1 kg, 95% CI −0.5 to 0.7, P=0.73), Significant weight loss of greater than 5% of the total body weight occurred in 15 (16%) patients; 17 (18%) demonstrated significant weight gain. The clinical characteristics according to weight change classifications are shown in Table 2. Baseline blood neutrophil count correlated with gain in FFM over the study period (r=0.22, P=0.04). There were no differences in lung function decline over time in patients that lost, gained, or did not change their weight during the study. Multiple regression analyses showed that neither change in weight nor change in FFM could be predicted from baseline variables (Table 3).

Table 2 Patients followed up (n=94)

	Weight loss >5% (n=15)	Minimal weight loss/gain <5% (n=62)	Weight gain >5% (n=17)	P-value
Weight change over study, kg*	−6.1 (0.6)	−0.2 (0.3)	5.3 (0.6)	<0.01
Weight change over study, %*	−8.9 (0.8)	−0.2 (0.4)	7.8 (0.8)	<0.01
Male, n (%)	9 (60%)	46 (74%)	10 (59%)	0.34
Age, years†	66 (43 to 85)	69 (48 to 84)	66 (46 to 77)	0.23
Pack-year history‡	35 (21 to 51)	40 (26 to 51)	47 (37 to 59)	0.32
Δ exacerbation frequency between baseline and follow-up*	−0.5 (−2.4 to 1.4)	−0.9 (−1.6 to 0.2)	−2.0 (−3.8 to −0.3)	0.29
Δ FEV1 (L)*	−0.07 (−0.19 to 0.05)	−0.15 (−0.22 to −0.09)	−0.02 (−0.18 to 0.13)	0.15
Δ FEV1 (% predicted)*	−3 (−8 to 2)	−5 (−8 to −3)	0 (−6 to 6)	0.13
Δ DLCO (% predicted)*	−2 (−7 to 2)	0 (−2 to 3)	9 (2 to 17)	<0.01
Δ RV (% predicted)*	8 (−11 to 28)	7 (−2 to 17)	−4 (−21 to 14)	0.50
Δ blood white cell count, ×10^9/L*	0.6 (−0.3 to 1.5)	0.0 (−0.5 to 0.5)	−1.2 (−2.5 to 0.2)	0.04
Δ blood neutrophils, ×10^9/L*	0.6 (−0.3 to 1.5)	0.1 (−0.4 to 0.7)	−1.0 (−2.1 to 0.2)	0.06
Δ blood eosinophils, ×10^9/L*	−0.03 (−0.09 to 0.03)	0.00 (−0.04 to 0.05)	0.01 (−0.10 to 0.12)	0.79
Δ CRP, mg/L*	−5 (−11 to 1)	0 (−4 to 3)	3 (−4 to 3)	0.34
Δ sputum total cell count, ×10^6 cells/g*	−3.5 (−8.8 to 1.9)	0.1 (−3.5 to 3.7)	1.3 (−5.0 to 7.6)	0.58
Δ sputum neutrophils (%)*	10.6 (−3.5 to 24.7)	−2.7 (−12.3 to 6.9)	11.9 (1.6 to 22.2)	0.15
Δ sputum eosinophils (%)*	−4.4 (−13.0 to 4.1)	0.4 (−0.7 to 1.5)	−5.4 (−11.1 to 0.4)	0.02

Notes: Data expressed as mean (SEM) unless otherwise stated.

* Mean (95% CI);

† mean (range);

‡ median (interquartile range).

Abbreviations: Δ, change between baseline and follow-up measure; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C reactive protein; DLCO, total lung carbon monoxide diffusing capacity; FEV₁, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; RV, residual volume; SEM, standard error of the mean.

Table 3 Beta coefficients and P-values for baseline variables used in multivariate model identifying predictors of weight and fat-free mass loss over study period

	Beta coefficient	P-value
Predictors of weight loss over study period (R^2=0.11, P=0.11)
FEV1 % predicted	−0.04	0.70
Exacerbation frequency over previous 12 months	0.21	0.07
Sputum neutrophil %	−0.02	0.90
Serum C reactive protein	0.09	0.43
Smoking status	0.22	0.05
Predictors of fat-free mass loss over study period (R^2=0.07, P=0.25)
FEV1 % predicted	0.08	0.46
Exacerbation frequency over previous 12 months	0.16	0.17
Sputum neutrophil %	0.00	1.00
Serum C reactive protein	0.20	0.08
Smoking status	0.14	0.89

Abbreviation: FEV₁, forced expiratory volume in 1 second.

Of patients with a significant gain in body weight (>5%, n=17), only one patient changed group from the nutritionally deplete to the no nutritional depletion group between baseline and follow-up assessment. One patient had significant weight gain, but actually changed from the no nutritional depletion to the nutritionally deplete group due to a drop in their FFMI below the threshold for nutritional depletion classification. Of patients with a significant loss of body weight (>5%, n=15), no patient changed nutritional classification group between baseline and follow-up.

Thirty-three patients died during the study. Patients that died were older at baseline (mean ± SEM age 73±1 versus 68±1 years, P<0.01) and had reduced gas transfer (mean ± SEM DLCO% 41±3 versus 58±2, P<0.01). There was no significant difference in FFMI (mean ± SEM FFMI 17.4±0.4 versus 17.4±0.2 kg/m², P=0.90) or BMI (mean ± SEM BMI 25.6±0.9 versus 27.3±0.4 kg/m², P=0.08), in those that died compared to those that survived. There were also no significant differences in exacerbation frequency, pulmonary, or systemic inflammation in those that died compared to those that survived.

Discussion

We have shown that systemic and pulmonary inflammation is independent of skeletal muscle changes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Furthermore, loss of skeletal muscle was not associated with accelerated airway inflammation or lung function decline.

Several previous studies have explored relationships between body composition and systemic inflammation in COPD, but data exploring relationships between airway inflammation and body composition are scarce.²³ To our knowledge, this is the first cross-sectional and longitudinal study to explore relationships between airway bacterial load and body composition in COPD. While data from the ECLIPSE study have shown that the subgroup of COPD patients with persistent systemic inflammation has an elevated BMI and FFMI,²⁴ measurements of airway colonization and their potential significance were not performed. Two small studies have produced conflicting results for associations between airway bacterial colonization and body composition in other respiratory diseases; increased colonization rates have been observed in obese patients with resectable lung carcinoma,²⁵ whereas body composition differences have not been observed between asthmatics with and without bacterial colonization.²⁶ While it remains debated whether systemic inflammation in COPD is the result of pulmonary overspill, our findings so far would suggest that there is pulmonary and systemic inflammatory independence.²⁷ Moreover, this would be in keeping with the more recent concepts that muscle mass loss in COPD is due to deconditioning, exacerbations, and hypoxia.^28,29 It may be that the role of inflammation in muscle mass loss is more closely linked to infective exacerbations, an aspect that is beyond the scope of this study.

Previous COPD studies have found that skeletal muscle depletion prevalence ranges between 10% and 40%,^3,30,31 which is consistent with our findings. We could not demonstrate any relationship between gas transfer rate of decline and weight loss, but this may reflect the short follow-up period in our study. In a study by Hopkinson et al, functional residual capacity, maintenance prednisolone, and continued smoking were identified as independent predictors of FFM decline.⁴ In our study, we could not identify clinical predictors of muscle loss, although smoking status had a trend to independence, similar to the findings by Hopkinson et al.⁴ The contrast in observations may reflect body composition differences employed using bioelectrical impedance and DEXA imaging.

One limitation in this study was that our follow-up period was relatively short. Nevertheless, our longitudinal observations are the largest set in a COPD population using DEXA analysis for measurement of body composition and skeletal muscle. Another limitation is that potential confounding factors including physical activity and metabolic syndrome features were not measured. Physical activity has been shown to be an independent predictor of CRP, IL-6, and fibrinogen in COPD,³² and we accept that further longitudinal studies investigating skeletal muscle loss and systemic and airway inflammation should include detailed analysis of physical activity and muscle strength.

In our study, nutritional depletion was associated with elevated peripheral leukocyte and neutrophil counts. Our observations may reflect corticosteroid use, or overspill of systemic inflammation into muscle; however, whether there is a link between systemic and muscle inflammation remains unclear. It is interesting to note, however, that although neutrophil infiltration has been observed in the vastus lateralis muscle of COPD patients,^33,34 muscle cytokine levels are not consistently elevated.^35–37 In this study we also demonstrated that CRP positively correlated with BMI. In population studies CRP has been shown to be predictive of weight gain,³⁸ and it has been postulated that obesity is a proinflammatory state leading to increased circulating levels of IL-6 and CRP³⁹ which may explain our findings. Furthermore, conflicting data exist regarding systemic inflammation and body composition in COPD, with some authors finding increased and others decreased systemic inflammation in COPD patients with muscle depletion.^8,40,41

Conclusion

Nutritional depletion and progressive muscle atrophy are not related to airway inflammation, further suggesting that overspill of pulmonary inflammation is not a key driver of nutritional depletion in COPD.

Author contributions

SM, VM, MP, HP, and KH were involved in data collection and interpretation. BLB, MRB, MCS, IDP, and CEB were involved in the design of the study, data collection, and interpretation. MB was involved in the study design, volunteer recruitment, data collection, data interpretation, data analysis, and had full access to the data and is responsible for the integrity of the data and final decision to submit. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript and have approved the final version for submission.

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by the Medical Research Council (UK) and the COPD MAP (MRC/ABPI) Inflammation and Immunology Initiative. This report is independent research arising from a postdoctoral fellowship held by MB supported by the National Institute for Health Research and a senior fellowship held by CEB supported by the Wellcome Trust. This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health. The research was performed in laboratories part funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF 05567). The authors would like to thank the volunteers for taking part and Mrs B Hargadon, Mrs M Shelley, Mrs Sarah Terry, and Miss Amisha Singapuri for their assistance in volunteer characterization.

Disclosure

IDP has received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis. CEB has received grant support and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Roche, and GlaxoSmithKline. MB has received travel support from Almirall, Boerhinger Ingelheim, and GlaxoSmithKline. The other authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.