The Correlation Between C-Peptide and Severity of Peripheral Atherosclerosis in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Abstract

Background

One of the major issues affecting global health is Diabetes mellitus (DM), not only in terms of the disease itself but also its complications. Macrovascular complications are both common and serious, affecting many patients. This study aimed to assess fasting C-peptide levels and correlate them with the severity of the peripheral arterial disease complicating type 2 DM (T2DM).

Patients and Methods

This study included 200 participants who were categorized into two groups: Group I (n=100, patients with T2DM complicated by femoropopliteal arterial atherosclerosis) and Group II (n=100, healthy age- and sex-matched individuals serving as controls). Fasting C-peptide levels were estimated using an immunochemiluminometric assay.

Results

Fasting C-peptide levels were significantly higher in Group I than in the control group. Fasting C-peptide levels were positively correlated with the severity of atherosclerosis. In addition, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that fasting C-peptide levels served as a specific and sensitive marker for detecting the severity of this disease.

Conclusion

Fasting C-peptide levels can be used as a sensitive and specific indicator of the severity of femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis that complicates T2DM.

Keywords:

• diabetes mellitus
• femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis
• fasting C-peptide

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycaemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. The majority of diabetic cases (90–95%) fall under the category of type 2 DM (T2DM), which includes patients with insulin resistance (IR) and typically a deficiency of relative insulin.¹

In Egypt, the prevalence of T2DM is approximately 15.6% among individuals aged 20 to 79, which has a profound negative effect on ability to work, functioning, and productivity as well as morbidity and mortality rates.^2,3

Vascular involvement is a key pathological feature of diabetes, which leads to both microvascular and macrovascular consequences, including peripheral arterial diseases (PAD), and affecting almost 15% of the ischemic Egyptian patients.^4,5 The pathophysiological processes of both microvascular and macrovascular complications include the overproduction of endothelial growth factors and the accumulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme. In addition, dysfunction of smooth muscle cells, mediators of chronic inflammation, impaired fibrinolysis, enhanced platelet aggregation and impaired vasodilator response play as important factors in the pathogenesis of macrovascular complications of T2DM.⁶

Prospective human studies have shown a strong association between glycaemic control levels and diabetes-related complications.^7,8 Given the inefficiency of standard therapeutic methods for hyperglycaemic control in preventing diabetic vasculopathy, alternative treatment techniques are needed for efficient control of both hyperglycaemia and diabetes-related complications.^9,10

Insulin secretion is accompanied by the release of a small peptide known as C-peptide, which helps ensure the proper folding of proinsulin. In clinical practice, C-peptide is frequently employed as a biomarker for the diagnosis of diabetes.^11,12 Plasma C-peptide levels are an indirect measure of the reserve of insulin secretion.¹³ Hyperinsulinemia in T2DM patients can result in the development of microangiopathies associated with atherosclerosis.^14,15

Previous studies have found an association between C-peptide and cardiovascular diseases.^16,17 Elevated levels of C-peptide may increase the risk of atherosclerosis and cardiac complications.^18,19

However, the findings of previous studies on the association between type 2 diabetic vascular problems and serum C-peptide levels are contradictory.^20–22

Therefore, here we aimed to evaluate the level of C-peptide in femoropopliteal atherosclerosis among patients with T2DM and investigate whether C-peptide levels could serve as a predictive factor for the severity of arteriosclerosis in T2DM.

Patients and Methods

Selection of Participants

A total of 200 participants were selected for this case–control study from Al-Zahraa University Hospital and divided into two groups: Group I (n=100) had T2DM complicated with femoropopliteal arterial atherosclerosis, and Group II (n=100) included sex- and age-matched apparently healthy controls.

Calculation of Sample Size

The G* Power program was used to calculate the sample size. Considering an equal number of cases and controls, 80% power, and 0.05 errors, the required sample size was 87 for each group. For a better analysis, we added 20 participants to each group.

Inclusion Criteria

This study included adult patients older than 18 years of age who were diagnosed with DM according to the American Diabetes Association’s (ADA) diagnostic criteria. All selected patients were on oral hypoglycaemic therapy. The duration of diabetes was >5 and <10 years. Patients with femoropopliteal lesions, with or without infra-popliteal lesions, were selected. The lesion was diagnosed using duplex ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) angiography. Disease severity was estimated using the Fontaine score (I, IIA, and IIB), Rutherford classification (1, 2 and 3), and Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus classification (TASC II) of femoropopliteal lesions (A, B, C, and D) associated with or without (TASC IIA) infra-popliteal lesion classification.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with type 1 DM, T2DM with any other complications or comorbidities, steroid or insulin therapy, aortic lesions, infra-popliteal lesions TASC II (B, C, D), Rutherford (4, 5.6) and Fontaine score (III and IV) were excluded from the study.

Ethical Considerations

This study was conducted in accordance with the World Medical Association Helsinki Declaration guidelines for studies involving human subjects. The study was approved by Al-Azhar University Review Board, Cairo, Egypt (study code 1537, September 28, 2022), and the patients signed an informed consent form.

Assessment and Procedures

All participants underwent thorough clinical and radiological examinations, detailed history-taking, and the following tests:

1. Routine laboratory tests such as biochemical analyses of fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose (PPBG), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and lipid profiles were performed using the Cobas c311 system (Germany).

2. Fasting and 2 hours postprandial C-peptide levels were estimated using an automated immunoassay analyser (ADVIA Centaur XP, Siemens, Germany) and immunochemiluminometric assays.

Statistical Analysis

The 20th version of SPSS (IBM Corp., version 20.0. Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Categorical variables are summarized as frequencies and percentages, and quantitative variables are expressed as means, standard deviations, and ranges. For comparison between groups, chi-square test for categorical variables, and Student’s t-test or ANOVA test for quantitative variables were used. Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation tests were used to investigate the strength of the association between the quantitative and qualitative variables. In addition, we used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to assess the diagnostic and predictive values of serum fasting C-peptide levels for diabetic-related complications. Youden’s index J (J= sensitivity + specificity-1) was used to choose the ideal and the most appropriate cut-off value. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

This study included 200 participants: Group I (n=100, patients with T2DM complicated by femoropopliteal arterial atherosclerosis) and Group II (n=100, age- and sex-matched healthy controls). The age and sex of the involved participants are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Participant’s Age and Sex

		Group I (n=100)		Group II (n=100)		p-value
		Mean ± SD	Range	Mean ± SD	Range
Age (years)		50.6 ± 13.56	19–72	46.66 ± 13.79	20–70	0.072
		Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage
Sex	Male	37	37%	40	40%	0.38
	Female	63	63%	60	60%

Comparison of Group I and Group II Laboratory Parameters (Table 2)

When comparing Group I to the control group, there was a significant increase in FBG, PPBG, fasting C-peptide, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) levels (p=0.000). High-density lipoprotein (HDL) and postprandial C-peptide, on the other hand, did not significantly differ between Group I and Group II.

Table 2 Comparison of Laboratory Parameters Between Group I and Group II

	Group I (n=100)		Group II (n=100)		p-value
	Mean ± SD	Range	Mean ± SD	Range
FBG (mg/dL)	114 ± 11.62	90–130	87.36 ± 8.12	70–104	0.000
PPBG (mg/dL)	157 ± 13.10	135–180	117.06 ± 6.92	100–132	0.000
Fasting C-peptide (ng/mL)	3.44 ± 0.89	1.5–5.5	2.42 ± 0.95	1.1–4.16	0.000
Postprandial C-peptide (ng/mL)	5.34 ± 2.42	1.8–9.9	5.53 ± 2.06	2.8–9.7	0.540
Hb A1c (%)	8.31 ± 1.99	4.9–13.5	4.45 ± 0.74	2.5–5.6	0.000
Cholesterol (mg/dL)	215.51 ± 45.72	160–320	164.82 ± 20.45	128–199	0.000
Triglycerides (mg/dL)	155.47 ± 41.89	100–298	91.23 ± 26.11	55–155	0.000
HDL (mg/dL)	51.89 ± 7.52	40–65	51.03 ± 6.57	40–66	0.390
LDL (mg/dL)	131.61 ± 42.77	71–241	94.90 ± 22.57	53–143	0.000
VLDL (mg/dL)	31.12 ± 8.45	20–60	18.67 ± 4.86	11–31	0.000

Abbreviations: FBG, fasting blood glucose; PPBG, postprandial blood glucose; Hb A1c, glycated hemoglobin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein; SD, standard deviation.

Association Between Fasting C-Peptide Levels and Severity Scores of Femoropopliteal Arteriosclerosis (Table 3)

According to the Fontaine score, there was a highly significant increase in fasting C-peptide levels in patients with a IIB score compared to those with an IIA score (p=0.000).

Table 3 Association Between Severity Scores of Femoropopliteal Arteriosclerosis Complications in T2DM and Fasting C-Peptide Levels

Severity Scores		Group I (n=100)				p-value
		Number	Percentage	Fasting C-Peptide
				Mean ± SD	Range
Fontaine score	IIA	65	65	3.02 ± 0.74	(1.5–5.5)	0.000
	IIB	35	35	4.32 ± 0.40	(3.6–5.2)
Rutherford classification	1	65	65	3.02 ± 0.74	(1.5–5.5)	0.000
	2	26	26	4.13 ± 0.24	(3.6–4.56)
	3	9	9	4.87 ± 0.20	(4.60–5.20)
	p1 =0.000	p2 =0.000		p3 =0.008
TASC II femoropopliteal classification	A	17	17	2.61 ± 0.60	(1.5–4.13)	0.000
	B	28	28	2.81 ± 0.66	(1.77–5.10)
	C	20	20	3.65 ± 0.54	(3–5.50)
	D	26	26	4.13 ± 0.24	(3.60–4.56)
	D & A infra-popliteal arteriosclerosis	9	9	4.87 ± 0.20	(1.5–5.5)
	p4=0.278	p5=0.000	p6=0.000	p7=0.000	p8=0.000
	p9=0.000	p10=0.000	p11=0.01	p12=0.000	p13=0.002

Notes: p1: p-value between stage 1 and 2 Rutherford classification. p2: p-value between stage 1 and 3 Rutherford classification. p3: p-value between stage 2 and 3 Rutherford classification. p4: p-value between stage A and B TASC II femoropopliteal classification. p5: p-value between stage A and C TASC II femoropopliteal classification. p6: p-value between stage A and D TASC II femoropopliteal classification. p7: p-value between stages A and D TASC II femoropopliteal associated with TASC II (A) infra-popliteal classification. p8: p-value between stage B and C TASC II femoropopliteal classification. p9: p-value between stage B and D TASC II femoropopliteal classification. p10: p-value between stages B and D TASC II femoropopliteal associated with TASC II (A) infra-popliteal classification. p11: p-value between stage C and D TASC II femoropopliteal classification. p12: p-value between stages C and D TASC II femoropopliteal associated with TASC II (A) infra-popliteal classification. p13: p-value between stages D and D TASC II femoropopliteal associated with TASC II (A) infra-popliteal classification.

Abbreviations: TASC, Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus; SD, standard deviation.

Furthermore, there was a highly significant increase in fasting C-peptide levels with increasing stage. The lowest levels were found in patients classified as score 1 according to the Rutherford classification and those in group A in the TASC II femoropopliteal classification. Conversely, the highest levels were observed in patients as score 3 according to the Rutherford classification and those in group D in the TASC II femoropopliteal classification, particularly when associated with the group A in the TASC II infra-popliteal lesion classification.

Association Between Fasting C-Peptide Levels and the Femoropopliteal Arteriosclerosis Severity Scores

There was a highly significant positive correlation between fasting C-peptide levels and all analysed severity scores: the Fontaine score, Rutherford classification, and TASC classification (r=0.738, p=0.000; r=0.758, p=0.000; and r=0.842, p=0.000, respectively).

Association Between Fasting C-Peptide Levels and Other Laboratory Parameters

There was a significant positive correlation between fasting C-peptide levels and the following parameters: postprandial C-peptide, cholesterol, TG, LDL, and VLDL levels (r=0.246, p=0.014; r=0.59, p=0.000; r=0.301, p=0.002; r=0.545, p=0.000; and r=0.298, p=0.003, respectively). In contrast, there was a significant negative correlation between fasting C-peptide levels and glycated haemoglobin levels (r=−0.434, p=0.000).

ROC Curve for the Discriminative Power of Fasting C-Peptide Levels Between T2DM Cases and the Control Group (Table 4 and Figure 1)

ROC curve revealed that fasting C-peptide had a fair diagnostic value (area under the curve = 0.773) to discriminate cases from the control group at a cut-off point of 2.75 ng/mL with 80% sensitivity and 66% specificity.

Table 4 Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve for the Discriminative Power of Fasting C-Peptide Levels Between T2DM Cases and the Control Group

Fasting C-Peptide	Area Under the Curve	p-value	95% Confidence Interval (Lower Bound)	95% Confidence Interval (Upper Bound)	Cut-Off value	Sensitivity %	Specificity %
	0.773	0.000	0.708	0.837	2.75	80	66

Figure 1 ROC curve for the discriminative power of fasting C-peptide levels between type 2 diabetes mellitus cases and the control group.

ROC Curve for the Discriminative Power of Fasting C-Peptide Levels Between Early and Late Stages of Atherosclerosis (Table 5 and Figure 2)

ROC curve showed that fasting C-peptide levels can discriminate stage 1 Rutherford classification or stage IIA Fontaine score from other stages with a cut-off of 3.85 ng/mL with 94.3% sensitivity and 90.1% specificity (excellent value as area under the curve = 0.94).

Table 5 Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve for the Discriminative Power of Fasting C-Peptide Levels Between Early- and Late-Stage Atherosclerosis

Fasting C-Peptide	Area Under the Curve	p-value	95% Confidence Interval (Lower Bound)	95% Confidence Interval (Upper Bound)	Cut-Off value	Sensitivity %	Specificity %
	0.946	0.000	0.900	0.993	3.85	94.3	90.1

Figure 2 ROC curve for the discriminative power of fasting C-peptide levels between early and late stages of femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis.

Discussion

C-peptide was initially regarded as an inactive by-product of proinsulin; however, it was later discovered to be an active product with many physiological functions.²³ Indeed, C-peptide significantly contributes to the development of atherosclerosis in T2DM. Following its deposition in the blood vessel wall, it exerts a chemotactic effect on inflammatory cells such as macrophages and some types of T-lymphocytes, thereby initiating atherosclerosis.²⁴

In this study, we aimed to assess the fasting C-peptide levels in individuals with T2DM complicated by PAD and determine whether it holds predictive value for the severity of this complication.

Our study found a significant increase in fasting C-peptide levels in patients with T2DM complicated by femoropopliteal arterial atherosclerosis. In addition, fasting C-peptide levels were positively correlated with the severity scores of this complication. Furthermore, analysis of the ROC curve revealed a fair diagnostic value of fasting C-peptide in T2DM complicated by PAD, with 80% sensitivity and 66% specificity, as well as a notable value in predicting the severity of the disease, with 97.5% sensitivity and 81.5% specificity.

Some studies have examined the association between fasting C-peptide levels and cardio-vascular complications and shown that increased C-peptide levels are related to cardiovascular disorders complicating T2DM.^25–27

Klim et al showed a correlation between C-peptide levels and the intima-media thickness of the carotid artery and cardio-vascular markers and concluded that it served as a surrogate marker for subclinical atherosclerosis in cardio-vascular diseases among patients with T2DM.²⁵ They attributed that to the important role of C-peptide in the regulation of endothelial function, smooth muscle proliferation, cell growth and immune response.

Wang et al suggested that increased C-peptide levels were correlated to a higher risk of coronary artery disease in individuals with T2DM independent of other risk factors such as smoking, hypertension and dyslipidemia.²⁶

Yan et al proposed that, in the context of macrovascular complications in T2DM, C-peptide levels play a bidirectional role, being beneficial at low levels and harmful at high levels. They also stated that the C-peptide levels and its association with cardiovascular risk may be influenced by the disease duration, the stage and the treatment of the disease. So, they suggested further studies to overcome these limitations.²⁷

To the best of our knowledge, few studies have discussed the correlation between C-peptide levels and peripheral vascular atherosclerosis complicating type 2 DM, and they have not discussed the correlation with the severity of this complication.

Sari and Balci found that the level of C-peptide increases with macrovascular but not microvascular complications of T2DM (coronary artery disease, autonomic neuropathy, and PAD). These results may be related to different responses to insulin of the macrovascular and microvascular tissues.²¹

Further, Thippeswamy et al found that fasting C-peptide levels were higher in macrovascular disorders (including PAD) complicating T2DM than those with microvascular complications.²⁸

Previous studies discussed the theoretical relevant roles of C-peptide in microvascular and macrovascular complications and the exact mechanism and response of C-peptide in both vascular complications are still unclear and controversial.^12,27 Future studies are recommended to detect the pathophysiological differences in microvascular and macrovascular complications that are affected by the level of C-peptide.

One of the limitations of this study is that we only included patients with diabetes complicated by femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis, but we did not study the relationship between the level of fasting C-peptide and other arterial complications, such as the aorto-iliac, carotid artery, and infra-popliteal arterial diseases. Future studies are required to assess the relationship between fasting C-peptide levels and T2DM complicated by other arteriosclerosis diseases. Another limitation of the study is the limited sample size, so other studies are recommended to confirm our findings.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our findings indicate that fasting C-peptide levels are increased in T2DM complicated by femoropopliteal arterial atherosclerosis, making it a specific and sensitive marker for assessing the severity of femoropopliteal PAD in this population.

We recommend incorporating the measurement of fasting C-peptide levels as a routine investigation and follow-up for patients with type 2 DM complicated by femoropopliteal PAD to help assess the severity of arteriosclerosis. In addition, controlling fasting C-peptide levels may contribute to the management of femoropopliteal arterial diseases that complicate type 2 DM.

Abbreviations

DM, diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; ROC curve, receiver operating characteristic curve; IR, insulin resistance; PAD, peripheral arterial disease; ADA, American Diabetes Association; TASC classification, Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus classification; FBG, fasting blood glucose; PPBG, post-prandial blood glucose; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; TG, triglycerides; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all participants in this study.