72
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
LETTER

Risk Factors and Prediction Nomogram of Cognitive Frailty with Diabetes in the Elderly [Letter]

, &
Pages 3899-3900 | Received 15 Nov 2023, Accepted 27 Nov 2023, Published online: 30 Nov 2023

Dear editor

The article with the title “Risk Factors and Prediction Nomogram of Cognitive Frailty with Diabetes in the Elderly” caught our attention because it produces a nomogram prediction model that can be used to predict cognitive frailty in elderly diabetic patients. This nomogram involves six factors (age, albumin levels, calf circumference, intellectual activity, depressive state, and duration of diabetes), which were obtained from the results of analysis. In the initial stage of analysis there were 12 significant risk factors for cognitive frailty, but in the final stage there were only 6 significant factors, namely age, albumin levels, calf circumference, intellectual activity, depressive state, and duration of diabetes. Meanwhile, factors that are not significant include walking assistance, self-care ability, BMI, hemoglobin, creatinine, and grip strength.Citation1 Is it true that these last six factors have no effect on cognitive frailty? Could these factors have an indirect effect?

Researchers used a logistic regression test to analyze the significance of cognitive frailty risk factors, so that indirect effects could not be detected, because this test assumes that all factors have a direct effect. If we suspect that one of the factors, for example self-care ability, has an indirect effect, then we have to go through an intermediate variable, for example depressive state. So first self-care ability affects depressive states and then depressive states affect cognitive frailty.Citation2

Therefore, we recommend that further analysis be carried out to prove the existence of indirect effects from the 12 factors. In this case, the method that can be used is path-analysis. Because researchers use nominal scale data, one program that can be used is Smart-PLS.Citation3–5 We hope that the results of this advanced analysis will provide more accurate information for improving predictive models in the future.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this communication.

References

  • Deng Y, Li N, Wang Y, Xiong C, Zou X. Risk factors and prediction nomogram of cognitive frailty with diabetes in the elderly. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023;16:3175–3185. doi:10.2147/DMSO.S426315
  • Buis ML. Direct and indirect effects in a logit model. Stata J Winter. 2010;10(1):11–29.
  • Nugroho HSW, Acob JRU, Martiningsih W. Healthcare worker’s mental health during the epidemic peak of covid-19 [Letter]. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:333–334. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S309309
  • Nugroho HSW, Suparji S, Martiningsih W, Suiraoka IP, Acob JRU, Sillehu S. A response to “effect of integrated pictorial handbook education and counseling on improving anemia status, knowledge, food intake, and iron tablet compliance among anemic pregnant women in Indonesia: a quasi-experimental study” [Letter]. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:141–142. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S247401
  • Susatia B, Martiningsih W, Nugroho HSW. A response to “prevalence and associated factors of musculoskeletal disorders among cleaners working at Mekelle University, Ethiopia”. J Pain Res. 2020;13:2707–2708. doi:10.2147/JPR.S281683