Prognostic Roles of Phosphofructokinase Platelet in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Correlation with Immune Infiltration

Abstract

Background

Abnormal expression of phosphofructokinase platelet (PFKP) has been reported in various cancer types. However, the role of PFKP in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains unclear.

Methods

In this study, the PFKP expression levels in various cancers were systemically described by integrating multiple kinds of publicly available databases. The relationship between PFKP expression and clinical prognosis of ccRCC patients was analyzed based on the TCGA database. Furthermore, PFKP-related genes and the top 10 hub genes were identified. The enrichment analysis, PPI network, and the relationship between PFKP and tumor-infiltrating immune cells were conducted to explore why PFKP was associated with clinical outcomes in ccRCC patients.

Results

PFKP was significantly highly expressed in kidney cancer, especially in ccRCC. Moreover, patients with low expression of PFKP were correlated with poor 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS) (P < 0.05). Low PFKP expression was a risk factor associated with decreased OS in subgroups including males, females, grade 3–4, and stage III–IV (all P < 0.05). GO and KEGG enrichment analyses showed that 10 hub genes were mainly enriched in the tumor immune response. Finally, PFKP expression level was highly correlated with the infiltration of B cell, CD8⁺ T cell, CD4⁺ T cell, macrophage, neutrophil, and dendritic cell.

Conclusion

In short, our findings suggested that PFKP is highly expressed in ccRCC significantly and facilitated tumor immune response which in turn associated with a good prognosis.

Keywords:

• phosphofructokinase platelet
• clear cell renal cell carcinoma
• prognosis
• biological function enrichment analyses
• tumor immune infiltrating cells

Introduction

Worldwide, kidney cancer accounts for about 2.2% of new cancer cases and 1.8% of oncological causes of death.¹ According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer statistics in 2018, more than 403,262 new cases are diagnosed worldwide annually, with more than 175,098 deaths.² Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for approximately 80–90% of kidney cancer.³ Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) originates from renal proximal tubule epithelial cells, which is the commonest histological subtype of RCC.⁴

Despite impressive advances in imaging techniques, diagnosis, and treatment, many issues are still to be solved in RCC. On the one hand, metastasis occurs in approximately 20–30% RCC cases of pT1b-pT2 stage within 1–2 years after surgery,⁵ but only high-risk localized RCC patients may benefit from the postoperative adjuvant approach, including cytokine therapy, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. On the other hand, only a small number of locally advanced RCC patients could benefit from extended lymphadenectomy. Hence, accurate prediction of disease outcomes and early selection of appropriate treatment options in ccRCC patients are critical to improving prognosis.

Cancer cells obtain energy mainly through the Warburg effect,⁶ which describes that cancer cells increase glycolysis, lactic acid fermentation, and synthesize macromolecular precursors to support cell proliferation even in excessive oxygen.⁷ Phosphofructokinase platelet (PFKP) is one of three subtypes of phosphofructokinase-1 (PFK-1), including phosphofructokinase muscle and phosphofructokinase liver. As a rate-controlling enzyme in essential glycolytic reaction, PFKP changes its conformation and catalyzes the phosphorylation of fructose-6-phosphate to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate.⁸

Recently, it has been reported that PFKP is highly expressed in different types of tumors, including oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and lung cancer.^9,10 The upregulation of PFKP is associated with the pathological differentiation and lymph node metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Furthermore, it is necessary for starvation-mediated autophagy, glycolysis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition.⁹ PFKP regulates lung cancer cell proliferation by adjusting the glycolysis level, which has a tight connection with tumor size and patient prognosis.¹⁰ Wang et al¹¹ found that the PFKP was required for cell proliferation in kidney cancer, and the suppression of PFKP resulted in the reduction of ccRCC growth in vivo. However, Wang et al¹² revealed that low expression of PFKP was correlated with a poor outcome in ccRCC patients. Thus, the role of PFKP in RCC is still unclear, and it is necessary to evaluate whether PFKP is a prognostic indicator for RCC patients.

In this paper, we integrated multiple kinds of publicly available databases and found that the PFKP expression was highly expressed in ccRCC but associated with a good prognosis. Then, the PFKP-related genes and hub genes, which were mainly enriched in metabolism and immune response, were identified. Besides, the PFKP expression level was positively correlated with the abundance of six types of tumor immune infiltrating cells (TIICs). Overall, our research might provide a new perspective on the relationship between PFKP and ccRCC.

Materials and Methods

Data Collection

Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) microarray series (GSE17895, GSE36895, GSE40435, GSE46699, GSE53757, GSE68417, GSE71963) containing ccRCC and normal samples were downloaded from the GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) of National Center for Biotechnology Information. Details of the GEO series and platforms were summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Details of the GEO Series Included in This Analysis

GEO Series	Tumor	Non-Tumor	Platform
GSE17895	138	22	Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array
GSE36895	29	23	[HG-U133_Plus_2] Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array
GSE40435	101	101	Illumina HumanHT-12 V4.0 expression beadchip
GSE46699	67	63	[HG-U133_Plus_2] Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array
GSE53757	75	72	[HG-U133_Plus_2] Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array
GSE68417	29	20	[HuGene-1_0-st] Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST Array
GSE71963	32	16	Agilent-014850 Whole Human Genome Microarray 4x44K G4112F

Abbreviation: GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus.

All of the publicly available The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) level 3 gene expression data of ccRCC samples were obtained from the TCGA website (https://cancergenome.nih.gov/), which comprised 541 tumor samples and 70 normal samples.

Identifying PFKP Expression Through Bioinformatics Analysis

The analysis and visualization of PFKP expression in different cancers were confirmed using publicly available databases, including the Oncomine database (https://www.oncomine.org/), Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) database (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/), Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) (https://portals.broadinstitute.org/ccle), and Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database (https://www.proteinatlas.org/). The threshold of the Oncomine database was set with p-value ≤ 1E-3, fold change ≥ 2, and the top 10% gene rank.

Raw microarray files (.CEL files) of ccRCC patients from the GEO dataset were normalized and log2-transformed using Robust Multichip Analysis algorithm by the “affy” package in R (version 4.0.2).¹³ Differential expression of PFKP between tumor and normal samples from the GEO database was performed using the R “Limma” package.¹⁴ And the data from TCGA were compared by the “edgeR” package.¹⁵

A meta-analysis of 7 datasets containing PFKP mRNA expression data was performed in the Oncomine database with a threshold of p-value ≤ 1E-4, fold change ≥ 2, and top 10% gene rank to illustrate comparisons between ccRCC and normal tissues. Detailed data were downloaded and visualized using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software Inc., the United States).

A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Survival Analysis

GEPIA database was used to analyze the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of ccRCC, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (cRCC), and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) patients based on the PFKP expression levels. The median cutoff value was used to divide the samples into high and low expression groups. The HR and the 95% confidence interval were also included in the survival plot. Curves of OS in ccRCC were generated from the Kaplan-Meier Plotter website¹⁶ (https://kmplot.com/analysis/), which split patients (n=530) by auto-selecting the best cutoff.

The ccRCC patients’ clinical data were extracted using the UCSC Xena project (https://xena.ucsc.edu)¹⁷ from TCGA. The exclusion criteria including (i) unavailable survival information and (ii) unavailable subgroup data. After deleting some missing data, the PFKP median expression level was taken as the cutoff point and classified the patient into low expression and high expression groups. Then, we analyzed the correlation between PFKP expression levels with survival rates and clinical pathological characteristics in different subgroups using GraphPad Prism 8.

Identification of PFKP-Related Genes

As mentioned above, the data from TCGA were compared by the “edgeR” package¹⁵ to screen for differential expression genes (DEGs). The P < 0.05 and |logFC| > 1 were chosen as cut-off threshold. The Spearman coefficients of the DEGs and PFKP were calculated. DEGs with P < 0.05 were defined as PFKP-related genes and used for further analysis.

GO/KEGG/PPI Biological Function Enrichment Analyses

The DAVID (version 6.8) online tool (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) was applied for the Gene Ontology (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses of PFKP-related genes. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The GO analysis included biological process, cellular component, and molecular function, which were ascending ranked according to their FDR value, and the top 5 terms of each aspect were selected for the main figure By the same token, the top 10 terms were selected in KEGG.

STRING (http://string-db.org)¹⁸ was performed to predict the known and unknown protein interaction relationships of PFKP-related genes setting the medium confidence at 0.400 as a minimum required interaction score. The protein-protein interaction (PPI) pairs were downloaded and imported into the Cytoscape¹⁹ software (version 3.7.2) to generate a PPI network. And the plug-in cytohubba²⁰ (version 0.1) of Cytoscape was used to identify the top 10 hub genes ranked by “Degree”.

Immune Infiltrates Analysis

The abundance of TIICs, including B cell, CD8⁺ T cell, CD4⁺ T cell, macrophage, neutrophil, and dendritic cell in ccRCC were evaluated based on PFKP expression data via the Tumor Immune Estimation Resource platform (https://cistrome.shinyapps.io/timer/).²¹

Results

Expression of PFKP in Different Cancers

To identify PFKP expression levels in various human cancers, we used several publicly available databases to compare it between tumor and normal samples (Figure 1). PFKP was significantly highly expressed in kidney cancer, leukemia, lung cancer, lymphoma, and sarcoma (Figure 1A), especially in ccRCC (Figure 1B). CCLE is an RNA-seq dataset that contains more than 1,400 cell lines and 136,488 unique data sets. It was shown that the PFKP mRNA expression level of the kidney was highest in all kinds of cell lines (Figure 1C). Immunohistochemistry staining from the HPA database also confirmed that PFKP expression of kidney adenocarcinomas was higher than normal tissues (Figure 1D). In general, PFKP was highly expressed in renal carcinoma.

Figure 1 Comparing PFKP expression between tumor and normal samples in various cancers. (A) Oncomine database with a threshold of p-value ≤ 1E-3, fold change ≥ 2, and rank top 10% genes. (B) GEPIA database. (C) PFKP mRNA expression level in kinds of cell lines from RNA-seq datasets (CCLE). (D) Representative images of immunohistochemistry staining of PFKP from the HPA database. Scale bar 200 μm. The first two pictures are normal kidney tissue, and the last two are kidney adenocarcinomas. Patient ID is 1933, 3229, 3225, 3061, respectively.

Abbreviations: GEPIA, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis; CCLE, cancer cell line encyclopedia; HPA, Human Protein Atlas; KIRC, kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (equivalent to ccRCC); KICH, kidney chromophobe (equivalent to chromophobe renal cell carcinoma); KIRP, kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma (equivalent to papillary renal cell carcinoma).

Effect of PFKP on the Survival Rate of Renal Carcinoma Patients

Based on the above findings, we focused on the role of PFKP in renal carcinoma and investigated its effect on survival in patients with different types. Validation was performed in GEPIA and Kaplan-Meier Plotter databases, respectively (Figure 2). The results showed that high expression of PFKP in ccRCC patients was considerably associated with favorable OS (P = 9.8E-5, Figure 2A; P = 0.00021, Figure 2C) and DFS (P = 0.0065, Figure 2B). Meanwhile, there was no effect of PFKP expression level on OS and DFS in cRCC (Figure S1A and B) and pRCC (Figure S1C and D) patients.

Figure 2 Relationship between PFKP expression levels and patient survival in ccRCC. Kaplan-Meier OS curve (A) and DFS curve (B) were shown in GEPIA; The patients were grouped by PFKP media cutoff. Curves of OS (C) were generated from the Kaplan-Meier Plotter website; The patients grouped by PFKP auto-select the best cutoff.

Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; GEPIA, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis.

Expression of PFKP in ccRCC

Microarray series data in the GEO and TCGA database were downloaded to explore the differential expression of PFKP in normal renal and ccRCC tissues. And we found that the expression of PFKP in tumor samples was significantly higher than normal samples (all P < 0.0001, Figure 3).

Figure 3 Differential mRNA expression of PFKP between tumor and normal samples in ccRCC patients were determined with the use of the Mann–Whitney test based on the data of the GEO database, including GSE17895 (A), GSE36895 (B), GSE40435 (C), GSE46699 (D), GSE53757 (E), GSE68417 (F), GSE71963 (G) and the TCGA database (H). ****P < 0.0001.

Abbreviations: ccRCC, kidney renal clear cell carcinoma; GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.

To verify the above results, we performed a meta-analysis of PFKP expression in 7 analyses in the Oncomine database (Figure 4A). Compared with normal renal tissues, the expression of PFKP in ccRCC tissues was significantly highly expressed in the Beroukhim Renal study (P < 0.0001, Figure 4B), Cutcliffe Renal study (P < 0.05. Figure 4C), Gumz Renal study (P < 0.0001, Figure 4D), Jones Renal study (P < 0.0001, Figure 4E), Lenburg Renal study (P < 0.0001, Figure 4F), and Yusenko Renal study (P < 0.001, Figure 4G).

Figure 4 Comparison of PFKP expression levels in the Oncomine database. A meta-analysis of PFKP mRNA expression between normal and ccRCC samples in 7 analyses (A). PFKP mRNA expression levels in Beroukhim Renal (B), Cutcliffe Renal (C), Gumz Renal (D), Jones Renal (E), Lenburg Renal (F), and Yusenko Renal (G). In the Beroukhim Renal study, Hereditary Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (n=32) and Non-Hereditary Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (n=27) were all regarded as tumors. *P < 0.05. ***P < 0.001. ****P < 0.0001.

Association Between PFKP and Survival Rate with Different Clinical Characteristics of ccRCC Patients

We further analyzed the relationship between PFKP expression level and survival rate of ccRCC patients from TCGA. The results revealed that low expression of PFKP in tumor tissues was significantly associated with poor 5-year (P = 0.0011, Figure 5A) and 10-year (P = 0.0004, Figure 5B) OS in ccRCC patients. We also performed survival analyses in different subgroups. As shown in Figure 5, low expression of PFKP was a risk factor for reduced males (P = 0.0054, Figure 5C) and females OS (P = 0.0276, Figure 5D). Moreover, lower PFKP levels considerably contributed to worse OS in ccRCC patients with grade 3–4 (P = 0.0018, Figure 5F) and stage III–IV (P = 0.0206, Figure 5H), while no significant differences were observed in grade 1–2 (P = 0.5213, Figure 5E) and stage I–II (P = 0.5572, Figure 5G).

Figure 5 Subgroup comparison of ccRCC patients’ OS between high and low PFKP groups in the TCGA database. 5-year (A) and 10-year (B), gender (C and D), different grades (E and F), and stage (G and H). The patients were grouped by PFKP media cutoff.

Abbreviations: ccRCC, kidney renal clear cell carcinoma; OS, overall survival; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.

As shown in Table 2, the Grade was higher in the PFKP low group (60.5% vs 47.5%, P = 0.003), whilst the tumor stage, metastasis stage, and stage were more serious (P = 0.009, P = 0.030, P = 0.034, respectively). However, the expression levels of PFKP were not affected by age and gender (all P > 0.05).

Table 2 Characteristics of ccRCC Patients Between PFKP High and Low Groups

Variables (%)	Low(n=263)	High(n=263)	P value
Age(years)	60.4(32–86)	60.4(26–88)	0.727
≤ 60	134(51.0)	130(49.4)
> 60	129(49.0)	133(50.6)
Gender
Female	87(33.1)	96(36.5)	0.410
Male	176(66.9)	167(63.5)
Grade
G1-G2	102(39.5)	137(52.5)	0.003
G3-G4	156(60.5)	124(47.5)
Tumor stage
T1	116(44.1)	151(57.4)	0.009
T2	34(12.9)	35(13.3)
T3	106(40.3)	73(27.8)
T4	7(2.7)	4(1.5)
Metastasis Stage
M0	197(74.9)	221(84.0)	0.030
M1	49(18.6)	29(11.1)
MX	17(6.5)	13(4.9)
Stage
I	169 (46.9)	149(56.9)	0.034
II	36(10.0)	29(11.1)
III	90(25.0)	54(20.5)
IV	65(18.1)	30(11.4)

Abbreviations: ccRCC, kidney renal clear cell carcinoma; PFKP, phosphofructokinase platelet.

Enrichment Analysis and PPI Network

GO analysis results indicated that PFKP-related genes were significantly enriched in the cellular defense response, proteolysis, and cell-cell signaling in terms of biological process; In terms of cellular component, genes were mainly associated with the extracellular region, integral component of plasma membrane, and extracellular space. Further, in terms of molecular function, genes were enriched in heparin-binding, inorganic anion exchanger activity, and anion antiporter activity (Figure 6A, Table S1). Additionally, the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showed that the PFKP-related genes are mainly associated with metabolism and immunity response, such as drug metabolism-cytochrome P450 and complement and coagulation cascades (Figure 6B, Table S2). The PPI network of PFKP-related genes was constructed (Figure S2), and the top 10 hub genes were identified using Cytoscape (Figure 7A). We found that CRR5, CRR8, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL13, and XCL1 were positively correlated with PFKP, whereas KNG1, GNB3, AOX1, and FABP1 were negatively correlated with PFKP.

Figure 6 GO (A) and KEGG (B) biological function enrichment analyses of PFKP related genes. Red lines indicate the top 5 terms of the cellular component, blue lines indicate the top 5 terms of the biological process, and green lines indicate the top 5 terms of the molecular function in GO analyses. The top 10 terms were selected in KEGG.

Abbreviations: GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

Figure 7 (A) Hub genes were identified in the PPI network. (B) GO and KEGG biological function enrichment analyses of hub genes.

Abbreviations: PPI, protein-protein interaction; GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

Next, the GO/KEGG enrichment analyses of the 10 hub genes were further analyzed. As shown in Table 3, hub genes were significantly enriched in immunity and inflammatory response, including chemokine signaling pathway and G-protein coupled receptor signaling pathway (Figure 7B).

Table 3 Enrichment Analysis of the 10 Hub Genes

Category	Term	Description	Count	FDR	P value
KEGG	hsa04062	Chemokine signaling pathway	7	2.49E-05	2.83E-08
KEGG	hsa04060	Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction	6	0.00521	5.92E-06
BP	GO:0070098	Chemokine-mediated signaling pathway	6	1.69E-07	1.46E-10
BP	GO:0006954	Inflammatory response	6	7.73E-04	6.67E-07
BP	GO:0007186	G-protein coupled receptor signaling pathway	7	0.00196	1.69E-06
BP	GO:0007267	Cell-cell signaling	5	0.007029	6.07E-06
BP	GO:0006935	Chemotaxis	4	0.03525	3.04E-05
BP	GO:0002690	Positive regulation of leukocyte chemotaxis	3	0.045036	3.89E-05
BP	GO:0007204	Positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentration	4	0.046659	4.03E-05
MF	GO:0008009	Chemokine activity	4	0.001828	1.91E-06
MF	GO:0048248	CXCR3 chemokine receptor binding CXCR3	3	0.002421	2.52E-06

Abbreviations: KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; BP, biological process; MF, molecular function; CXCR3, chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 3.

The Correlation Analysis Between PFKP and TIICs

The enrichment analysis showed that the PFKP-related genes were closely related to immune response, so we further analyzed the relationship between PFKP and tumor-infiltrating immune cells using the Tumor Immune Estimation Resource database. It was interesting to note that the highest correlations were found between PFKP and B cell (r = 0.228, P = 8.36E-07), CD8⁺ T cell (r = 0.098, P = 3.96E-02), CD4⁺ T cell (r = 0.15, P = 1.24E-03), macrophage (r = 0.147, P = 1.83E-03), neutrophil (r = 0.182, P = 8.64E-05), and dendritic cell (r = 0.16, P = 6.28E-04) infiltrates (Figure 8). These results suggested that PFKP might influence the development of ccRCC by influencing the immune microenvironment other than just metabolism.

Figure 8 The correlation between PFKP expression levels and abundance of tumor immune infiltrating cells.

Abbreviation: KIRC, kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (equivalent to ccRCC).

Discussion

RCC is characterized by reprogramming of energetic metabolism. The metabolic flux through glycolysis is partitioned,^22–24 and mitochondrial bioenergetics and oxidative phosphorylation are impaired, as well as lipid metabolism.^25,26 In particular, it has been shown that in ccRCC, Complex I is inhibited by NADH dehydrogenase 1 alpha subcomplex 4-like 2 (NDUFA4L2), a HIF-1 target gene encoding for a regulatory protein that attenuates mitochondrial oxygen consumption.²⁶ The most common and malignant histological subtype of RCC is ccRCC, which is insensitive to radiotherapy and has high rates of local invasion, metastasis, and acquired chemoresistance.^27,28 In addition, RCC is one of the most immune-infiltrated tumors.^29,30 Emerging evidence suggests that the activation of specific metabolic pathways regulates angiogenesis and inflammatory signatures.³¹ Features of the tumor microenvironment heavily affect disease biology and may affect responses to systemic therapy. Previous studies have revealed that PFKP, as a rate-controlling enzyme in essential glycolytic reaction, is associated with cancer incidence and progression, and is expressed at a high level in different types of cancer such as OSCC and lung cancer.^9,10 Sanders et al found that genes involved in glycolysis and lactic acid synthesis were overexpressed, including PFKP in ccRCC.³² Simon et al also found that hexokinase 1, PFKP, and solute carrier family 2 member 1 were highly expressed in the case of ccRCC primary culture.³³ Consistent with those previous studies, our study showed that PFKP expression was significantly high in kidney cancer, especially in ccRCC, which was identified by several publicly available databases.

Traditionally, as a rate-controlling enzyme in essential glycolytic reaction, PFKP was considered to play an essential role in tumor migration and metastasis.^34,35 Shen et al¹⁰ found that PFKP regulated the level of glycolysis in lung cancer and was associated with tumor size, proliferation, and patient prognosis. PFKP also has been demonstrated to increase the risk of poor prognosis in breast cancer patients³⁶ and promote the malignant proliferation of OSCC.⁹ Meanwhile, it was noteworthy that the high expression of PFKP was considerably associated with a good prognosis in ccRCC patients. And the grade was higher in the PFKP low group, while the tumor stage, metastasis stage, and stage were also more severe. In contrast, there are some different views. The amplification and upregulation of PFK family genes only meant that the patients were likely to have a history of noninvasive bladder cancer and were not associated with survival or disease relapse.³⁷ Wang et al also revealed that low expression of PFKP was correlated with a poor outcome in ccRCC patients.¹² Anyway, we confirmed that PFKP played an essential role in ccRCC patients and affected prognosis.

To explore the mechanism of PFKP affecting the prognosis of ccRCC patients, we identified the PFKP-related genes and further screened 10 hub genes. The GO/KEGG analysis proved that those genes were mainly enriched in metabolism, immune and inflammatory response. The hub genes that were positively correlated with PFKP, including CRR5, CRR8, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL13, and XCL1, were associated with T cell extravasation, specific T cell activity of intratumoral,³⁸ recruiting effector T cell,^39–41 B cell adhesion, and lymphotoxin synthesis,⁴² and recruitment of dendritic cell.⁴³ The 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase, isoform 3, as another critical enzyme for endothelial glycolysis, may promote angiogenesis by regulating CD163⁺ tumor-associated macrophages infiltration in OSCC.⁴⁴ Thence, we speculated that PFKP was associated with anti-tumor immune cell infiltration, which had never been observed in previous studies and even influenced the prognosis of ccRCC patients.

Thus, we further carried out immune infiltrate analysis. As expected, the PFKP was highly correlated with the infiltration of B cell, CD8⁺ T cell, CD4⁺ T cell, macrophage, neutrophil, and dendritic cell. For the T cell-dependent treatments, the common denominator for tumor microenvironment disruption and subsequent therapeutic fulfillment hinges on the effective trafficking of anti-tumor-directed immune effector CD8⁺ or CD4⁺ T cell to cancer cells via the microvasculature.^38,45 CD3/CD28 stimulation of human naive CD4⁺ T cells induced the expression of PFKP.⁴⁶ To fulfill the bioenergetic and biosynthetic demand of proliferation, T cell reprogramed their metabolic pathways by upregulating glycolytic enzymes.⁴⁷ This also partly explained that high expression of PFKP was associated with better OS in ccRCC patients.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study showed that PFKP was highly expressed in ccRCC. And the high expression level of PFKP may induce anti-tumor immune cell infiltration contributing to a better prognosis of ccRCC patients. However, further experiments were needed to explore how high PFKP expression improves outcomes in ccRCC patients, which was not consistent with other studies in other types of cancer.^10,12,36 In any case, we provided a newly exciting insight into understanding the role of PFKP in ccRCC.

Abbreviations

CCLE, Cancer cell line encyclopedia; ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma; cRCC, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma; DEGs, differential expression genes; DFS, disease-free survival; GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus; GEPIA, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis; GO, Gene Ontology; HPA, Human Protein Atlas; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; OS, overall survival; OSCC, oral squamous cell carcinoma; PFKP, phosphofructokinase platelet; PPI, protein-protein interaction; pRCC, papillary renal cell carcinoma; RCC, Renal cell carcinoma; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; TIICs, tumor immune infiltrating cells.

Data Sharing Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. The data can be found in the GEO, TCGA, Oncomine, GEPIA, CCLE, HPA databases, Kaplan-Meier Plotter website, and Tumor Immune Estimation Resource platform.

Ethics Approval and Informed Consent

Several gene expression data and clinical characteristics of patients were publicly available. Therefore, there was no requirement for ethics committee approval.

Author Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; took part in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreed to submit to the current journal; gave final approval of the version to be published; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Funding

This study in the authors’ laboratory was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81970648) and International Cooperation Project of the Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province (Nos. 20180101162JC and 20190701049GH).