An Expert Panel Statement on the Beneficial Effects of Human Milk Oligosaccharides (HMOs) in Early Life and Potential Utility of HMO-Supplemented Infant Formula in Cow’s Milk Protein Allergy

Abstract

This review by pediatric gastroenterology and allergy-immunology experts aimed to address the biological roles of human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) and the potential utility of HMOs in prevention of allergy with particular emphasis on cow^’s milk protein allergy (CMPA). The participating experts consider HMOs amongst the most critical bioactive components of human milk, which act as antimicrobials and antivirals by preventing pathogen adhesion to epithelial cells, as intestinal epithelial cell modulators by enhancing maturation of intestinal mucosa and intestinal epithelial barrier function, as prebiotics by promoting healthy microbiota composition and as immunomodulators by modulating immune cells indirectly and directly. Accordingly, the participating experts consider the proposed link between HMOs and prevention of allergy to be primarily based on the impact of HMO on gut microbiota, intestinal mucosal barrier, immunomodulation and immune maturation. Along with the lower risk of respiratory and gastrointestinal infections, HMO-supplemented formulas seem to be promising alternatives in the management of CMPA. Nonetheless, the effects of individual as well as complex mixtures of HMO in terms of clear clinical and immunological effects and tolerance development need to be further explored to fully realize the immunomodulatory mechanisms and the potential for HMOs in prevention of allergic diseases and CMPA.

Keywords:

• human milk oligosaccharides
• gut microbiota
• intestinal mucosal barrier
• infant formula
• immune tolerance
• cow’s milk protein allergy

Introduction

The nutritional composition and the non-nutritive bioactive content of human milk are unique for survival and healthy development of the human infant.¹ Accordingly, infant feeding is recommended to include exclusive breastfeeding during the first six months of life along with continued breastfeeding for 1 to 2 years of life with complementary feeding.¹

Although infant formula milk is an alternative for infant nutrition when human milk is not available, the formula-fed versus exclusively breastfed infants are considered to be more vulnerable to infectious and immune diseases.²

Human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) are the third-most abundant solid component in maternal milk following the lipids and lactose.^3–5 HMOs are associated with certain physiological functions and clinical benefits such as the modulation of microbiota composition, modulation of gut epithelial cell responses and immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects.^3–5 In this regard, HMOs have become the focus of current scientific research, given that they offer further optimization of infant nutrition by reducing the compositional difference between human milk and infant formula, as a key support to immune development in early life.^6–10

Nonetheless, while the technological advances enabled the addition of up to 5 oligosaccharides structurally identical to HMOs in infant formula, the oligosaccharides composition from infant formula remains very different from human milk, both in diversity and concentration.^7,11

There is an emerging evidence in humans in favor of the role of infant gut microbiome in food sensitization/allergy.^12,13 Given the benefits of HMOs in terms of early intestinal microbiome development and gastrointestinal and systemic immune modulatory functions,^5,6,14–16 supplementation of infant formula with HMOs has been considered a promising strategy in non-exclusively breastfed infants including those with cow’s milk protein allergy (CMPA).^9,17

Although based on scarce amount of literature data in infants, HMO-supplemented infant formula was reported to be a safe and tolerable supplementation with several positive effects.^7,9,17 Amongst these are the increased amount of bifidobacteria and short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production, likelihood of reduction in respiratory tract infections and provision of an accepted hypoallergenicity criteria, when added to existing extensively hydrolyzed (eHF) or amino acid-based (AAF) formula in CMPA.^7,9,17

Therefore, this review by a panel of pediatric gastroenterology and allergy-immunology experts aimed to address the biological roles of HMOs in terms of early gut microbiota development and gastrointestinal and systemic immunomodulatory properties and the potential utility of HMOs in prevention of allergy with particular emphasis on infants and children with CMPA.

Methods

The present expert panel consisting of pediatric gastroenterology and pediatric allergy-immunology specialists who are members of the Turkish Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the Turkish National Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Society met to develop consensus opinion on the biological roles and potential utility of HMOs in infants and children with CMPA. The participating experts (professors, also international speakers and national influencers), who had at least 15 years of experience in pediatric gastroenterology and pediatric allergy-immunology were invited after being recommended by the presidents of the Turkish Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the Turkish National Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Society. The panel performed a broad non-structured literature search to reveal the potential studies and agreed on the studies to be included in the review. The panel critically analyzed the evidence-based published literature regarding biological roles and efficacy of HMOs in breastfed infants according to HMO composition as well as the clinical trials with use of HMO-supplemented infant formula in prevention of allergy and CMPA in particular. Based on the available scientific evidence and the experts’ clinical opinion, this consensus document comprehensively addresses HMOs in terms of a) overview of human milk bioactive components, b) structure and biological roles of HMOs, c) advantages of HMO-supplemented infant formula, and d) rationale and potential benefits of using HMO-supplemented infant formula in prevention of allergy with special emphasis on infants and children with CMPA.

HMOs: one of the most important bioactive components of human milk

The functional or bioactive components of human milk, the elements affecting the biological processes or substrates and ultimately the health, have increasingly been recognized as factors responsible for the short- and long-term benefits of human milk feeding.^18,19 These functional components involve a large group of several compounds such as protein (lactoferrin), carbohydrates (especially HMOs), fats (polyunsaturated fatty acids), immunoglobulins, hormones, vitamins, nucleotides, minerals, prebiotics, probiotics, transporters, antioxidants and antimicrobial factors.¹⁸

T-helper (Th) cell population is still biased towards the Th2 phenotype (humoral immunity) rather than Th1/Th17 phenotype (cellular immunity) at birth.^20–22 Human milk provides protection during this vulnerable period via bioactive components that stimulate healthy intestinal microbial diversity (Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus species), prevent pathogenic infection, promote intestinal development and mucosal barrier function, facilitate immune tolerance and directly support the further development of the immune system (Figure 1).^{5,8,10,15,23–25}

Figure 1 Human milk bioactive components in relation to provision of healthy neonatal microbial colonization, fine-tuning of inflammatory processes and immune defense and maturation in early life.

The physical barriers and the crosstalk between mucosal epithelial cells and underlying immune cells are considered to play a crucial role in the first-line defense in early life.^8,22,26,27 Hence, the gastrointestinal tract, as a functional barrier preventing pathogenic invasion and an immune-modulator providing active elements of the lymphoid cell line, is considered to be of utmost importance to the neonatal immunity.^21,22

The breastfeeding as a nutrient source in early life and particularly the non-digestible HMOs amongst the diverse bioactive components in human milk are considered critical for healthy neonatal microbial colonization, fine-tuning of inflammatory processes and immune defense and maturation in the first years of life (Figure 1).^8,10,22

The incidence as well as severity of several infectious diseases (ie, bacteremia, diarrhea, otitis media, respiratory and urinary tract infections, necrotizing enterocolitis) and immune system disorders (ie, inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], allergy, asthma, type 1 diabetes) is considered to be lower in breastfed infants vs formula-fed infants.^{2,7,10,18,28–30}

Human milk, during the time of complementary food introduction, is considered likely to prevent celiac disease or allergy through interactions between dietary antigens, human milk components and gut associated lymphoid tissue (GALT).^31–34

Structure and biological roles of HMOs

Human milk is a complex matrix and a living tissue consisting of 87% water, 3.8% lipid, 1.0% protein and 7% lactose, while HMOs (1–1.5%) represent the third largest component of human milk, after lactose and lipids.^5,7,11,35,36

HMOs are a unique mixture of structurally diverse indigestible carbohydrates present in the human milk.^7,10,19,37 The concentration and composition of HMOs is subjected to inter-individual variation, depending on the genetic predisposition and geographical origin of mothers as well as on the gestational age at delivery (higher concentrations but lower levels of fucosylated HMOs in preterm vs term milk), stage of lactation (colostrum: 20–25 g/L; mature milk: 5–20 g/L) and maternal nutrition.^{7,8,10,11,22,38,39}

The changes in HMOs from secretor mothers during the course of lactation was reported to include a decrease in total, fucosylated, sialylated, non-fucosylated neutral HMO concentrations over time, an increase in the percentage of fucosylation and a decrease in the percentage of sialylation, while non-fucosylated neutrals are considered to remain stable over time.⁴⁰ Hence, HMOs do not decrease in concentration uniformly across lactation, with change in individual HMO concentrations during lactation and predominance of different HMOs in each stage.^40,41

2′-fucosyllactose (2ʹ-FL) is the most abundant HMO, accounting for about 20–40% of total HMO concentration in colostrum, whereas 6ʹ-sialyllactose (6ʹ-SL) is the dominant form of sialylated HMO at the early stages of lactation, followed by 3ʹ-sialyllactose (3ʹ-SL) in late lactation.⁴⁰ HMOs are considered to be stable over one-week during early lactation, while most HMOs decline as lactation progresses, except for 3ʹ-FL and 3’-SL which are consistently higher at 6 months and 12 months of lactation.^40–43

Indeed, the efforts to enhance the quality of infant formulas aim not only to mimic the composition of human milk in every respect (ie, adapting the composition of bioactive compounds besides the concentration of macronutrients and micronutrients) to make it as similar as possible to human milk but also to achieve physiological effects as in breastfed infants.¹⁸ Hence, whether the HMO supplementation ultimately improves infant formula milk in a way that mimics the documented benefits of human milk remain to be further investigated.^42,44

Structure of HMOs

Of at least 200 unique HMOs identified in human milk, more than 100 were structurally defined.^38,45,46 HMOs consist of monosaccharides and monosaccharide derivatives with a lactose, polylactosamine or lacto-N-biose core, while a further modification through differently linked fucose or sialic acids to the molecule enables structural diversity and resistance against enzymatic digestion.²²

The basic HMO structure is fucosylated or nonfucosylated and/or sialylated, resulting in neutral, neutral N-containing and acidic HMO subtypes (Figure 2).^5,7,47,48

Figure 2 Human milk oligosaccharide structural subtypes.

Abbreviation: HMO, human milk oligosaccharide.

The neutral HMOs comprise > 75% of the total HMOs in the human milk, while the most abundant HMO is the 2′-FL (2.7 g/L, range, 1.88–4.9 g/L).^7,39 2′-FL, a glucose, galactose, and fucose based trisaccharide, constitutes almost 30% of the total HMOs in secretor mothers (Figure 2).^7,39

HMO profile of human milk is dependent largely on the individual maternal genetic disposition.⁸ Hence, the complex HMO composition is genetically determined by the activity of the secretor (Se) fucosyltransferase 2 gene encoding α1-2-fucosyltransferase (FUT2) and the Lewis (Le) gene encoding α1-3/4-fucosyltransferase (FUT3), and is regulated by glycosyl-transferases within the mammary gland.^5,31,34,49

• Based on Se locus, women are categorized into secretors (those with functional FUT2 enzyme and with 2′-FL, LNFP I and other α1-2-fucosylated HMOs in milk) and non-secretors (those lack a functional FUT2 enzyme and with no α1-2-fucosylated HMOs in milk).^7,47,50,51

• Based on Le locus, women are categorized into Le-positive women (express FUT3, milk contain specific α1-4-fucosylated HMOs such as LNFP II) and Le-negative women (lacks FUT3 activity and specific α1-4-fucosylated HMOs in milk).^7,47,50,51

• Hence, based on the expression of FUT2 and FUT3, the human milk is classified as: Le-positive secretors (Le+Se+), Le-negative secretors (Le-Se+), Le-positive nonsecretors (Le+Se-), and Le-negative nonsecretors (Le-Se–) (Figure 3).^7,47,50,51

Figure 3 Human milk oligosaccharide profile according to genetic background.

Abbreviations: HMO, human milk oligosaccharide; 2′-FL, 2′-fucosyllactose; LNFP, lacto-N-fucopentaose.

Overall, 79% of mothers in European and North American populations have the active gene for FUT2 (secretors), while 21% of mothers lack the functional FUT2 enzyme (non-secretors) and produce milk without 2′FL and LNFP I.^7,37–39,47 Notably, the delayed bifidobacteria colonization and altered microbiota-related metabolic activity and increased risk for diarrheal diseases have been reported in infants fed by non-secretor mothers.^10,13,52,53 Nonetheless, it should be noted that HMOs differ in terms of individual structures and related effects, emphasizing the importance of balanced complex mixture.³¹

Biological roles of HMOs

HMOs have several functions, including selectively enriching gut bacteria and thereby promoting healthy microbiota composition, preventing pathogen adhesion to epithelial cells, enhancing maturation of intestinal mucosa and intestinal epithelial barrier function, modulating immune cells, pathogen recognition receptors as well as signaling pathways related to maturation of lymphoid tissue, influencing cytokine and chemokine networks that regulate Th1/Th2 lymphocyte balance and preventing infection and supporting immunity (Figure 4).^6,8,10,15,22

Figure 4 Biological roles of human milk oligosaccharide (HMOs).

Notes: Adapted from Bode L. Human milk oligosaccharides: every baby needs a sugar mama. Glycobiology. 2012;22(9):1147–1162, by permission of Oxford University Press.¹¹.

Abbreviation: HMO, human milk oligosaccharide.

Immunomodulation is one of the most outstanding functions of HMOs, including the indirect modulation of immune responses via changes in infant gut microbiota composition, and the direct effect on immune cells at a systemic level, after reaching the blood circulation (Figure 4).^{22,46,47,54,55}

Following gastrointestinal absorption, up to 1% of HMOS become available in systemic circulation at a level (ranging 10 to 100 mg/mL) being sufficient for interaction with cell receptors.^46,47,54

Therefore, HMOs are considered to have multiple beneficial effects in a breast-fed infant:¹¹

• As prebiotics they are metabolic substrates for beneficial bacteria enabling a growth advantage for them over potential pathogens;

• As antiadhesive antimicrobials they act as soluble glycan receptor decoys preventing the pathogen-intestinal mucosa contact;

• By directly affecting intestinal epithelial cells and modulate their gene expression, resulting in modifications in the cell surface glycans and other cellular responses;

• By modulating lymphocyte cytokine production, increasing the likelihood of a a more balanced Th1/Th2 response;

• By reducing selectin-mediated interactions between immune cells and decreasing the leukocyte rolling on activated endothelial cells, decreasing the likelihood of mucosal leukocyte infiltration and activation.

HMOs as antimicrobials and antivirals

HMOs mimic the glycans on the gut epithelia that acts as surface pathogen receptors (virus, bacteria, toxins and/or eukaryotes) and they prevent gut epithelial adhesion and biofilm formation through competitive interaction with pathogens.^8,31,47,56 In addition to acting as soluble decoy receptors and blocking the attachment of viral pathogens to the epithelial cells, HMOs can also indirectly prevent viral adhesion through binding to the epithelial surface causing a structural change in the receptor.⁵⁷ Accordingly, antimicrobial and antiviral effects of HMOs depend on blockade of pathogen access via pathogen or epithelial surface receptor binding to prevent their replication and subsequent infection.⁸ In addition, they are more advantageous than pathogens in terms of being fermented by commensal bacteria (ie, Bifidobacteria) which promote their growth while pathogens experience growth suppression.^8,31

Notably, in addition to serving as prebiotics, HMOs possess bacteriostatic and antimicrobial properties against Streptococcus agalactiae and Gram-negative aerobe Acinetobacter baumannii as well as antibiofilm properties against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).^57,58 HMOs were reported to inhibit Campylobacter colonization and to reveal protection against pneumococcal pneumonia in animal studies.^59,60 The studies in infants revealed that they offer protection against infectious diarrhea, necrotizing enterocolitis, and can directly inhibit the growth of group B streptococcus (GBS), a leading cause of invasive bacterial infection in newborns.^61–64 Moreover, HMOs are suggested to potentiate the actions of aminoglycosides, anti-folates, macrolides, lincosamides, and tetracyclines against GBS, S. aureus and A. baumannii.^57,65 Hence, prophylactic and therapeutic use of HMOs is also possible in immune compromised infants as well as in those at high risk of infection.¹⁰

HMOs as intestinal epithelial cell modulators

HMOs, through interaction with glycans on the epithelial or dendritic cell surface, promote gut maturation and contribute to the barrier integrity via increased growth of Bifidobacterium.^8,66 HMOs can also directly affect the intestinal cell response by suppressing the cell growth and by stimulating the differentiation and apoptosis, required for a proper intestinal barrier function.^7,67

In fact, besides their impact on microbes and their roles as decoy receptor for pathogens, HMOs can also directly alter epithelial cell gene expression and thus alter the binding ability of certain pathogens to the cell surfaces via changing the expression of cell surface glycocalyx.^3,6,68 In addition, HMOs induce production of SCFAs important for gut health such as butyric acid and propionate which can stimulate mucin release, mucosal blood flow and intestinal epithelial cell maturation through their interaction with the host epithelium.^8,69–71 These functions are considerably important in early neonatal life given that intestinal health and barrier function are the first line of defense in innate immunity.⁷²

HMOs as prebiotics and effectors of the microbiota composition

Since infants lack glycoside hydrolases and intestinal membrane transporters, the majority of HMOs reach the colon undigested and are utilized by certain microbes influencing the gut microbiota.^6,73 Hence, HMOs are “prebiotics” that selectively induce the growth of beneficial (probiotic) organisms such as Bifidobacterium, a dominant species in the intestine of breast-fed infants.^6,19,73 Bifidobacteria have the ability to utilize HMOs through specifically expressed glycoside hydrolases and therefore considered to be co-evolved with HMOs.⁶

Accordingly, for breast-fed infants, bifidobacteria can preferentially colonize the infant GI tract by the third month of life.⁷⁴ HMOs also play a role in improved epithelial barrier function by inducing the B. infantis growth in the infant gut, which is responsible for production of peptides that normalize intestinal permeability.^10,74,75 Indeed, a highly selective, prebiotic effect of HMOs has been reported in shaping the gut microbiota in the first weeks of life with a decrease in fecal HMOs via a shift in fecal bacterial population from the non-HMO-consuming microbes (Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcaceae) to HMO-consuming bacteria (Bacteroidaceae and Bifidobacteriaceae).⁷⁴

In this regard, HMOs are considered to play a key role in healthy development of gut-microbiota, and thus the intestinal wall barrier and immune functions.^6,76 Given the impact of maternal secretor status on the infant gut bifidobacterial community, the combination of HMOs with specific bacteria has been suggested likely to modulate gut immunity and gut integrity.^31,52

HMOs as immunomodulators and potential inducers of immune maturation

The gut barrier involves a mucus layer, epithelium, the resident microbiota, and resident or recruited immune cells, whereas the immune responses are immature in newborns as based primarily on a Th2 type response rather than a Th1 type immune response along with a relative lack of immunological memory.^6,77

HMOs are considered to affect expression of several cytokines including IL-8, IL-1β, colony-stimulating factor 2 (CSF2), platelet factor 4 (PF4) and IL-17C. They also influence the expression of certain chemokines including CXCL1,2,3,6, CX3CL1, CCL5 and CCL20 as well as that of cell surface receptors including intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), intercellular adhesion molecule-2 (ICAM-2), interferon γ receptor 1 (IFNGR1), and IL-10 receptor a (IL10RA).⁵ In this way, HMOs can modulate the intrinsic expression of cell trafficking-related inflammatory markers, the lymphoid tissue-related signaling pathways and the cytokine and chemokine networks responsible for Th1/Th2 lymphocyte balance (Figure 4).^8,10,15,78

HMOs are considered to target expression of receptors involved in pathogen recognition, such as toll-like receptors (TLRs), to interact with dendritic cells (DCs) in close proximity to the intestinal epithelial barrier that leads to T cell differentiation and/or T cell/B cell interaction and to show systemic effects by interaction of neutrophils, lymphocytes and monocytes with endothelial cells that affects immune cell populations and secretion of cytokines.^8,10,78

In fact, DCs are considered to play a cardinal role in the regulation and development of innate and adaptive immune responses during infections and inflammatory diseases and one sub-population, so-called tolerogenic DC (tDC), results in a reduced inflammatory cytokine production (ie, IL-4, IL-12, IL-6, and TNF-α) but an elevated regulatory cytokine production (ie, TGF-β IL-10 and IL-27).⁷⁸

Overall, interactions with these chemokines, cytokines, and cell surface receptors are considered to enable subsequent immunomodulation and immune maturation through development of a balanced and efficient immune response and thus a lesser risk of infections and allergic diseases.^5,8,10,78

Accordingly, HMOs play a role in the maturation of the infant immune system both at the gut barrier level through effects on microbiota, gene expression and intestinal epithelial cell maturation as well as by exerting direct immune modulating effects after being absorbed intact into the systemic circulation.^10,22,46,79 Notably, nearly 70% of gastrointestinal immune cells may associate directly with HMOs consumed by infants, while the first few weeks of life represent a key window of immune development with a circulatory peak of innate immune cells during this period.⁸⁰

HMO-supplemented infant formula

Milk oligosaccharides in human milk present at a higher concentration and a greater structural diversity and degree of fucosylation than those in cow’s milk and infant formulae.¹⁰ HMOs are unique for human milk and not found in the same composition and diversity in animal milk (Figure 5).^11,81

Figure 5 Composition of human milk, formula (Similac^® infant formula, Abbott nutrition) and cow’s milk. Data from Bode L.¹¹

Despite the well-known benefits of HMOs, it has only recently become technically feasible to produce HMOs identical to human milk HMOs.⁹ Accordingly, cow-milk derived infant formulas have been supplemented with affordable non-digestible carbohydrates (non-HMOs) such as fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) and galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) to enable some of the HMO functions.⁸²

The recent availability of synthesized 2′-FL, structurally identical to the 2′-FL in human milk, is important in this regard, enabling the availability of HMOs in some commercial infant formulas.⁶⁶ Currently, two types of HMOs are used as add-on to the infant formula including a fucosylated HMO, 2′FL, and a neutral, non-fucosylated HMO, LNnT.^9,47,83 HMO-supplemented infant formulae are considered to be safe and beneficial for human infants along with increased availability of commercially produced HMOs.^17,79,84

2′-FL is the most abundant HMO in the milk of most lactating women with extensive data on the potential systemic effects.⁸⁰ Preclinical data indicate 2′-FL to have multiple functions via prebiotic, anti-infective, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties and to reduce the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis.⁸⁰ Observational studies revealed the association of 2′-FL HMOs with bifidobacteria dominated early gut microbiota in breastfed infants.^52,85,86

Albeit the amount of data available on HMO supplementation in infant formula from clinical trials in infants is still limited,⁴ clinical data showed the supplementation of infant formula with 2′-FL to be safe and well-tolerated.^{17,79,84,87,88} Moreover, 2′-FL is considered to show similar absorption and excretion characteristics with 2′-FL in human milk⁸⁴ and is associated with similar immune benefits with the breastfed reference group, and fewer respiratory infections.⁷⁹

In a past study with 420 healthy term infants by Marriage et al,⁸⁴ authors reported no significant differences between groups of infant formulas added with GOS/L (2.4 g), 2′-FL (0.2 g) + GOS/L (2.2 g) or 1 g 2′-FL (1 g) + GOS/L (1.4 g) and the breast-fed reference group in terms of data on weight, length, and head circumference. All formulas were well tolerated along with similar 2′-FL relative absorption and excretion between infants fed with 2′-FL containing formulas and the breast-fed infants.⁸⁴

Further analysis of 201 healthy term infants from the cohort from Marriage et al,⁸⁴ by Goehring et al,⁷⁹ revealed the circulating cytokines concentrations in infants fed with the 2′-FL containing formulas to differ from the concentrations in infants fed with GOS containing formulas but not from the concentrations in breast-fed infants.⁷⁹

In a study by Puccio et al¹⁷ in healthy infants randomized to a cow’s milk-based infant formula (control, n = 87) or the same formula with 1.0 g/L 2ʹfucosyllactose (2ʹFL) and 0.5 g/L lacto-N-neotetraose (LNnT) (test, n = 88), the authors reported that weight gain through 4 months, digestive symptoms and behavioral patterns were similar in both groups, except for softer stool and fewer nighttime wake-ups in the test group at 2 months. Infants receiving test (vs control) had significantly fewer parental reports of bronchitis through 4 (2.3% vs 12.6%), 6 (6.8% vs 21.8%), and 12 months (10.2% vs 27.6%), lower respiratory tract infection (adverse event cluster) through 12 months (19.3% vs 34.5%), lower rate of antipyretics use through 4 months (15.9% vs 29.9%) and antibiotics use through 6 (34.1% vs 49.4%) and 12 months (42.0% vs 60.9%).¹⁷

In a real-world study by Roman et al⁸⁷ on growth and tolerance in three groups of infants (n=159) including a healthy, exclusively breastfed infants, an exclusively formula-fed group who received a milk-based formula with 2ʹ FL (1g/L) and LNnT (0.5g/L), and a group mixed fed with both formula and human milk for 8 weeks, the authors reported that mean z-scores for growth and gastrointestinal tolerance were similar between all groups and incidence of AEs was low overall, and comparable across groups.⁸⁷ Hence, the authors concluded that the growth and tolerance outcomes of a HMO-supplemented infant formula were similar to data from randomized clinical trials, supporting the effectiveness of this early feeding option.⁸⁷

In a prospective, randomized, multi-center, double-blinded, controlled tolerance study by Kajzer et al⁸⁸ in 131 healthy term infants assigned to control formula without oligosaccharides (n=30), formula with 0.2 g 2‘-FL/L + 2 g scFOS/L (n=35) and breast-fed reference group (n=36), the authors noted that 2′-FL and scFOS containing formula was safe and well tolerated with no significant differences among the three groups at 35 days of age in terms of stool consistency, formula intake, anthropometric measures, and percent feedings with spit-up/vomit associated with feeding.⁸⁸

Overall, 2′-FL supplementation of infant formula has been considered to be safe and tolerable approach along with absorption and excretion efficiency similar to 2′-FL in human milk.⁸⁰ The 2′-FL supplementation has also been considered to offer additional advantages such as immune benefits, improved tolerance and lower risk of respiratory infections.⁸⁰ Addition of 0.2 g 2′-FL/L to the infant formula supports immune and gut health and brings it closer to human milk not only compositionally but also functionally.⁸⁰

Utility of HMO-supplemented infant formula in prevention of allergy

Rationale behind the proposed link between HMOs and prevention of allergy

Exclusive breastfeeding has a potential to reduce the development of several diseases such as asthma, allergies, IBD, and type 1 diabetes,¹⁵ while the “secretor type” related complex mixtures of HMOs are also considered likely to have a critical role in lowering the risk of allergic disease experienced by breast-fed infants later in life.^31,89

HMOs are suggested to improve gut epithelial integrity, apoptosis, and intestinal permeability and to have indirect and direct immunomodulatory properties.^6,15 The immune modulating properties of HMOs, including interaction with dendritic cells and reduced antigen–antibody complex-induced chemokine release, are considered of critical importance for CMPA in terms of attenuation of allergic symptoms as well as promotion of tolerance development.^9,78,90,91

The proposed link between HMOs, tolerance induction and prevention of allergy is primarily based on the certain effects of HMOs on gut microbiota, intestinal mucosal barrier and immunomodulation.^8,92 These include the prebiotic effects, effects related to pathogen binding, enhanced epithelial barrier integrity and local and systemic modification of immune responses via SCFAs produced during HMOs fermentation, stimulation of mucus production and epithelial tight junction integrity to support the physical barrier between the intestinal epithelium and the gut content, the direct interaction with mucosal immune system (ie, modulation of the response of DCs, protective mucosal immune development) and finally the immunomodulatory role beyond the gastrointestinal tract via entering systemic circulation through transportation over the intestinal epithelium (Figure 6).⁹²

Figure 6 Potential roles of human milk oligosaccharide in enhanced tolerance induction and prevention of allergic diseases.

Notes: (1) Prebiotic effects and pathogen binding, enhanced epithelial barrier integrity and local and systemic modification of immune responses via SCFAs produced during HMOs fermentation. (2) Mucus production and epithelial tight junction integrity to support the physical barrier between the intestinal epithelium and the gut content. (3) Direct interaction with mucosal immune system (modulation of the response of DCs, protective mucosal immune development). (4) Immunomodulatory role beyond the gastrointestinal tract via entering systemic circulation through transportation over the intestinal epithelium. Adapted from Zuurveld M, van Witzenburg NP, Garssen J, et al. Immunomodulation by Human Milk Oligosaccharides: The Potential Role in Prevention of Allergic Diseases. Front Immunol. 2020;11:801.⁹².

Abbreviation: HMO, human milk oligosaccharide.

Gut microbiota, barrier integrity and prevention of allergy

The composition and function of gut microbiota early in life is considered important in the development of food allergy.^93,94 Reduced gut microbial diversity and dysbiosis during early life is considered a risk factor for immune-mediated diseases, such as allergy and asthma, through modulation of balance between effector or tolerant responses (activities of Th1 and Th2 cells) that leads to induction of a Th2-skewed immune response, with enhanced IgE responses to food antigens, and/or a defect in mounting proper regulatory T-cell responses.⁹⁵

Hence, the manipulation of the microbiota of the infant during pregnancy or after birth, when there is significant immune-plasticity has been suggested to have an impact on allergy prevention.⁹⁵ HMO-dependent increase in the growth of Bifidobacterium induces healthy gut microbiota development and contributes to the barrier integrity, while the direct effects of HMOs on the intestinal cell response (ie, reducing the cell growth, inducing differentiation and apoptosis, stimulating SCFA production) are also important for intestinal epithelial cell maturation and a proper intestinal barrier function.^{7,8,66,67,69–71}

Notably, the infants who are exclusively breastfed by secretor mothers vs those breastfed by non-secretor mothers were reported to have a more rapid establishment of a bifidobacteria-predominant microbiota as well as lesser likelihood of diarrhea development.^7,61 The stool bacterial profile in infants fed by a formula supplemented with 2′-FL and LNnT was reported to be more similar to that of the breastfed infants rather than those fed by a formula not supplemented with prebiotics.^7,17 The amount of 2-FL in human milk was reported to inversely correlate with the incidence of Campylobacter diarrhea and the severity of infection with E. coli in infants,^53,96 while besides their effects on gut bacteria, HMOs have also been reported to affect viral pathogens (ie, norovirus, rotavirus and HIV).⁹⁷

HMOs are suggested to decrease the risk of preterm mortality and morbidity via their modulatory effects on the gut microbiome to protect against infections (ie, necrotizing enterocolitis, candidiasis) and several immune-related diseases,^6,7,98 while recent studies have also suggested a possible association between HMOs and atopic dermatitis, milk allergy or allergic sensitization in the infant.^13,89,99,100

Although the exact mechanism behind the association of microbiota composition with allergy development remains unknown, a protective role for SCFA has been suggested in asthma, arthritis, and colitis models as well as in allergic airway inflammation.⁹³

Immunomodulation, immune maturation and allergy prevention

Although many studies regarding the composition of HMOs have been published, there are few publications on the immune-modulatory effects of individual HMOs.^5,84,101 Although anti-inflammatory and immune regulatory potential of HMOs has been suggested, the exact mechanism underlying the effect of the specific HMOs on the risk for allergy development remains unknown.^5,84,101 Nonetheless, proposed mechanisms underlying immunomodulatory properties of HMOs include the pathogen decoy capacity, the prebiotic effect, the modulatory effect on the SCFA production and thus improved barrier integrity and the direct immune modulatory functions.³¹

The use of HMOs has been considered to reduce the levels of cytokine proteins including monocyte chemoattractant protein 1/2, IL-8, IL-6 and IL-1β, whereas to increase the level of cytokines associated with tissue repair and homeostasis.¹⁵ The HMO-mediated induction of tDCs with ability to modulate T‐cell responses is considered likely to be a potential target for prevention and treatment of autoimmune diabetes and allergic diseases early in life.^78,102

Accordingly, superiority of HMOs over non-human prebiotic oligosaccharides was indicated in systemic and gastrointestinal immunomodulation.^7,103 The plasma concentration of inflammatory cytokines was reported to be significantly lower in the breastfed infants and infants fed with 2′-FL-supplemented formula when compared to those fed with GOS-supplemented formula.⁷⁹

The impact of 2′-FL on reduction of food allergy related symptoms was suggested to occur via induction of interleukin-10+ T-regulatory cells and indirect stabilization of mast cells in a mouse model.⁹¹ Moreover, cord blood T-cells exposed to sialylated HMOs were reported to increase the number of interferon-γ-producing CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ lymphocytes and interleukin-13 (IL-13)-producing CD3+CD8+ lymphocytes.¹⁰⁴ Sialylated HMOs were also reported to reduce IL-4 production in a subset of lymphocytes from adult patients with peanut allergy, indicating that certain sialylated HMOs may contribute to allergy prevention.⁵⁵ Acidic HMOs were also reported to induce IFN-gamma and IL-10 in human cord blood T cells, and to decrease IL-4 production in allergen-specific T cells.⁵⁵ Supplementation of 2′-FL alone was reported to lower levels of TNFa, IL-1a, IL-1b, and IL-6, resembling those identified in breast fed infants.⁷⁹

Hence, HMOs are considered to promote a shift in T-cell response toward a more balanced Th1/Th2-cytokine production and low-level immunity,¹¹ while inflammatory cytokine expression patterns of infants fed with HMO-supplemented formula and exclusively breastfed infants are considered to be similar.⁵

In a study of 266 infants followed for 5 years, infants born to secretor mothers were reported to have lower incidence of IgE-mediated eczema at 2 years, while authors also noted that 2′-FL was significantly associated with a lower incidence of any (acute or delayed) allergic disease in infants born with C-section.⁸⁹ In addition, 2-year-old children who were born through C-section and fed on an infant formula supplemented with 2′-FL were reported to have a lower risk of developing IgE-associated allergies compared to those fed unsupplemented formula.¹⁰⁵

In a past study in the LIFE Child cohort, authors suggested possible indirect influences of allergic sensitization in the mother (based on IgE level) on HMO in human milk (indirectly via TGF beta2 and IgA) along with a dependency between human milk IgA and specific HMOs (6’SL in particular).¹⁰⁰

Nonetheless, it remains unclear whether specific HMO are more protective against allergy than other components,¹⁰⁰ while in a recent study overall HMO profiles were reported to differ significantly between sensitized vs non-sensitized infants, whereas no positive or negative association was noted between sensitization and individual or total HMO.⁹⁹

The exact role of the diverse HMO structures in inducing microbiome and immune development and providing protection against infections also remains unclarified.⁸ Indeed, the onset of IgE-associated allergic manifestations has recently been suggested to be linked to FUT2-dependent oligosaccharide composition in human milk among infants with a high hereditary risk for allergies and those born by C-section.^31,89

Owing to growing evidence on the composition and effects of HMOs and the progress in biotechnology in the last years, there is increased availability of infant formulas comprising HMOs added to the complex mixture of prebiotic oligosaccharides.³¹ However, available studies regarding the impact of HMOs on infection and immune function are limited⁹³ and most have focused on safety rather than on anti-infective or immunomodulatory profile.^84,106 Hence, further clinical studies are needed to determine the full potential of HMOs within the early life immune development in order to clarify which HMO to be added to infant formula and the optimal strategies for concentration, composition and combination to prevent and treat allergy development in early and later life.^8,31,78,93

Potential utility of HMO-supplemented formula in infants and children with CMPA

The IgE-mediated acute allergic reactions (wheezing, urticaria, vomiting, and anaphylaxis), non-IgE-mediated reactions, or mixed immune reactions can induce food allergy, while cow’s milk and eggs are the most common food allergens in childhood food allergy.^107–112

Overall, the management of CMPA is based on three intervention strategies including primary prevention of initial IgE sensitization, secondary prevention of the triggering of allergic reactions in IgE-sensitized children and tertiary prevention to reduce the expression of end-organ allergic disease in case of known food allergy via avoidance of allergic food and induction of tolerance.^{110,113–116}

Although the benefits of human milk has consistently been reported in several areas (ie decreased risk of infections, overweightness and diabetes and increased cognitive functions), there is conflicting evidence regarding its role in the prevention of allergy.^95,117

Past studies, mainly focused on IgE mediated CMPA, indicated that the incidence of CMPA in the first year of life is significantly lower in exclusively breastfed infants than in those fed by cow’s milk based infant formula with intact protein (<0.5 vs 2–7.5%).⁹⁵ Hence, it has been suggested that modifying human milk composition by selected interventions may enable more suitable human milk with the capacity to combat allergy epidemics in addition to infectious disease in offspring.^95,118

HMOs are considered likely to modulate the susceptibility to both IgE and non-IgE mediated allergy in this regard, by affecting the immune development, gut inflammation and microbiota of the offspring, through indirect (prebiotics for gut microbiota) and direct systemic immunomodulatory effects (reduced antigen-antibody complex-induced chemokine release, improved Th1/Th2 balance).^90,119,120

The likelihood of HMO to attenuate allergic symptoms has been reported in a mouse CMPA model study,⁹¹ while preclinical experiments indicated that HMOs are likely to induce tolerance development via interaction with human dendritic cells.⁷⁸

In a past study in breastfed infants with and without CMPA, the authors reported that all mothers with an infant with delayed-onset CMPA were reported to be secretors (active FUT2, milk containing 2ʹFL and LNFP I), whereas those with an infant with immediate-type (IgE-mediated) CMPA were non-secretor (FUT2 negative) mothers.¹³

Data from the first hypoallergenicity study by Nowak-Wegrzyn et al related to use of an HMO-supplemented eHF in CMPA have confirmed the hypoallergenicity of the HMO-supplemented eHF and indicated the presence of the comparable levels of 2′FL and LNnT in the eHF and in the human milk.⁹

Authors also noted that while HMO are manufactured by bio-fermentation from lactose, there is no risk of residual milk allergen contamination due to removal of potential residual proteins via several purification steps.⁹ In fact, given that highly purified lactose is another microbiome-modifying substrate, authors also have hypothesized that the concomitant presence of lactose and HMO in the eHF may offer beneficial synergistic effects to the infants with CMPA in terms of developing gut microbiome and immune system.^9,121,122 Hence, authors suggested the supplementation of eHF with 2′FL to be a safe strategy in the management CMPA, not increasing the risk of clinical reactions compared to the non-HMO control formula.⁹

Nonetheless, the potential utility of HMO-supplemented formula in the management of CMPA still needs further exploration, particularly in terms of their potential to accelerate tolerance development or to reduce the frequency of infections in infants and children with CMPA.^15,123

Conclusions

This review by pediatric gastroenterology and allergy-immunology experts emphasize the marked contribution of HMOs to the beneficial effects of human milk in early life in terms of provision of healthy neonatal microbial colonization, fine-tuning of inflammatory processes and immune defense and maturation. The participating experts consider HMOs amongst the most critical bioactive components of human milk, given that they act as antimicrobials and antivirals by preventing pathogen adhesion to epithelial cells, as intestinal epithelial cell modulators by enhancing maturation of intestinal mucosa and intestinal epithelial barrier function, as prebiotics and effectors of the gut microbiota by selectively enriching gut bacteria and thereby promoting healthy microbiota composition and as immunomodulators by modulating immune cells indirectly via changing the infant gut microbiota composition, and directly via affecting immune cells on a systemic level. The potential advantages of HMO-supplemented formula over GOS and FOS supplemented formulas are considered to be ability of HMOs to form the preferred substrate for bifidobacteria and suppress potential gut pathogens, to positively influence gut epithelial integrity, apoptosis, and intestinal permeability and to have indirect and direct immunomodulatory properties.

The participating experts emphasize that reduced gut microbial diversity and dysbiosis during early life as well as induction of a Th2-skewed immune response are considered a risk factor for immune-mediated diseases, such as allergy and asthma in early life. Accordingly, given the marked impact of HMOs on development of healthy gut microbiota and indirect (pathogen decoy capacity, the prebiotic effect, the stimulatory effects on SCFA production and tDCs) and direct anti-inflammatory and immune modulatory functions that promote a shift in T-cell response toward a more balanced Th1/Th2-cytokine production, the participating experts consider the proposed link between HMOs and prevention of allergy to be primarily based on the effects of HMO on gut microbiota, intestinal mucosal barrier and immunomodulation.

The increased availability of HMO from commercial sources as well as accumulating evidence on safety and tolerability of HMO-supplemented formulas seem important given that they seem to be promising alternatives in the management of infants and children with CMPA due to beneficial effects on gut microbiota, intestinal mucosal barrier and immunomodulation as well as anti-inflammatory and anti-infective properties. Accordingly, representing the most critical bioactive component of human milk, responsible for gastrointestinal and immune benefits, HMO-supplemented formulas seem to have potential for provision of infants with CMPA with a formula that brings the similar health benefits with the human milk. Nonetheless, the effects of individual as well as complex mixtures of HMO in relation to well-defined clinical and immune outcomes and tolerance development needs to be further explored to fully realize the immunomodulatory mechanisms and the potential for HMO in prevention of allergic disease development and in the management of CMPA. This review is an expert panel summary report addressing the biological roles of HMOs and their beneficial effects in early life with special emphasis on CMPA to increase awareness about CMPA and to achieve a consensus amongst the different specialties in the CMPA patient care via panel discussions regarding the unmet needs and controversial topics. Hence, focusing on not only the overall beneficial effects of HMOs in early life but also specifically addressing the utility of HMO-supplemented formula in the management of CMPA and in the development of tolerance in the early life with potential long-term positive impacts, this paper provides the opinion and perspectives of the medical community and may help to inform the design of future HMO studies. The expert panel suggests the long-term effects of different HMOs on development of tolerance in early life, their effects on gut microbiota, intestinal mucosal barrier, immunomodulation and immune maturation are the relevant clinical aspects to address when investigating the role of HMOs in prevention of allergy and in reducing the severity of allergy.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Cagla Ayhan, MD and Prof. Sule Oktay, MD, PhD from KAPPA Consultancy Training Research Ltd, Istanbul who provided editorial support funded by Abbott Nutrition Turkey.

Disclosure

Bulent Enis Sekerel reports speaker fees from Abbott, Abdi Ibrahim, and Sandoz, outside the submitted work. Aydan Kansu reports speaker fees from Abbott, outside the submitted work. The authors declare that they have no other conflicts of interest in this work. 

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by Abbott Nutrition Turkey which played a role in organization of expert panel meeting and compensation for editorial support. Abbott Nutrition Turkey had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.