97
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Emerging role of rasburicase in the management of increased plasma uric acid levels in patients with hematologic malignancies

, &
Pages 1-6 | Published online: 04 Feb 2011

Abstract

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is defined as a group of metabolic derangements that result from the massive and abrupt release of cellular components into the bloodstream after rapid lysis of tumor cells. Breakdown of released materials leads to a number of electrolyte abnormalities, including elevated uric acid concentrations in the blood (hyperuricemia), which carries potentially serious consequences. The diagnosis, prevention, and management of TLS is complicated by variability in definitions, differences in risk factors based on patient- and tumor-specific characteristics, and practitioner preferences in terms of pharmaceutical management strategies. The best prevention and management option for a particular patient depends on the patient’s baseline risk for TLS development, the severity of symptoms in the event of TLS development, practical management considerations, and financial implications of treatment.

Epidemiology

The incidence of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) varies with the type of tumor, but TLS occurs most frequentlyCitation1 in patients with hematologic malignancies such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (5%–26%), acute myelogenous leukemia (3%–17%), Burkitt’s lymphoma (27%), and high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (other than Burkitt’s type; up to 42%).Citation1Citation5 TLS is observed most commonly after the initiation of cytotoxic treatments, cytolytic antibodies, and radiation therapies, but it can also occur spontaneously before antitumor therapy is administered.Citation3 Malignancies with characteristics such as a rapid proliferative rate, a large tumor burden, and high sensitivity to chemotherapy increase the risk for TLS.Citation1,Citation2 Other patient-specific characteristics associated with increased risk for developing TLS include pre-existing hyperuricemia, renal dysfunction, and hypovolemia.Citation1

Etiology and pathophysiology

The metabolic disturbances that occur with TLS are due primarily to the release of intracellular metabolites such as nucleic acids, proteins, peptides, phosphate, and potassium during cell lysis.Citation1,Citation2 The release of these metabolites in large amounts overloads the renal system, leading to hyperkalemia, hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia (as a downstream effect of hyperphosphatemia), uremia, acidosis, and hyperuricemia.Citation1,Citation2

Hyperuricemia and its associated complications are the most frequently recognized manifestations of TLS and can lead to many other clinical consequences.Citation2 Increases in serum uric acid concentrations result from the release and subsequent breakdown of purine-containing nucleic acids from cells. Purine catabolism is a multistep process by which adenine and guanine are broken down and eventually excreted. The enzyme xanthine oxidase converts hypoxanthine to xanthine in the pathway for adenine catabolism; it also converts xanthine to uric acid in the adenine and guanine catabolism pathways. In most organisms, uric acid is degraded further to allantoin through the action of urate oxidase.Citation6 However, in humans, apes, and some other primates, urate oxidase has been rendered nonfunctional through mutations during evolution.Citation6 This lack of functional urate oxidase leads to baseline concentrations of uric acid that are high, relative to those in other mammals.Citation6 Under normal circumstances, uric acid concentrations can be maintained at acceptable levels by renal excretion. However, when excretion cannot keep up with production and the concentration of uric acid rises, it may become insoluble and form crystals. Crystallization of uric acid in the renal tubules can cause renal insufficiency that may progress to acute renal failure.Citation1

Patient presentation

Clinical signs of TLS may include a wide range of symptoms, from mild (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, lethargy, edema) to very serious and life threatening (cardiac dysrhythmias, congestive heart failure, tetany, syncope, seizure, and sudden death).Citation1,Citation3 Although the set of metabolic abnormalities that constitute TLS generally has been long established, systematic classification has been attempted only recently. In 2004, Cairo and BishopCitation3 proposed dividing the diagnosis of TLS into the subcategories of laboratory TLS and clinical TLS, based in part on earlier work by Hande and Garrow.Citation4 The diagnosis of laboratory TLS is based solely on the occurrence of electrolyte and metabolic abnormalities, whereas clinical TLS includes the same abnormalities, but also takes into account the physical manifestations and consequences of active TLS. These Cairo–Bishop definitions, which have application to both pediatric and adult patients, were integrated into the latest guidelines for the prevention and treatment of TLS, which were published in June 2008.Citation1

Common staging systems

Most of the complications of TLS can be avoided through appropriate preventive measures or readily managed if recognized early; otherwise, serious and fatal consequences may occur. Therefore, it is important for clinicians to be cognizant of strategies to identify patients who are at risk before initiating chemotherapy.Citation1,Citation2 A grading systemCitation3 based on the presence or absence of clinical and laboratory criteria has been developed for TLS to aid in the stratification of patients according to risk and to help identify appropriate prophylaxis and treatment for patients at risk for or with established TLS.Citation1,Citation2 Currently, this grading system is being prospectively evaluated in pediatric patients being treated with chemoimmunotherapy and rasburicase for newly diagnosed advanced B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (as per the Children’s Oncology Group Study ANHL01P1).Citation3,Citation7 More recently, a risk evaluation model has been proposed by Cairo et al that incorporates risk factors from prior models (eg, tumor type and extent and bulk of disease) as well as risk factors not previously addressed in earlier stratification schemes (eg, age, pre-existing renal dysfunction, and renal involvement).Citation8 Fundamental approaches to the successful prevention and management of TLS include awareness of potential causes, identification and close monitoring of patients at high risk, implementation and optimal use of appropriate prophylactic measures, vigilant monitoring of laboratory and electrolyte levels, watching for signs and symptoms of TLS in patients at risk, and initiation of more active treatments when necessary. Early recognition and treatment for metabolic abnormalities, with the help of the grading system, can usually prevent the severe and life-threatening consequences that may occur with TLS (see ).Citation1,Citation2

Table 1 TLS Risk assessment and recommended therapy

Treatment

Management strategies for TLS include continuation of preventive measures (ie, hydration, allopurinol use), correction of fluid overload or dehydration, and treatment for electrolyte, laboratory, and acid-based abnormalities. Pharmacologic agents used to treat patients with TLS-related hyperuricemia include allopurinol, uricozyme, and rasburicase.

Hydration and fluid management

Vigorous hydration and diuresis are essential for the prevention and management of TLS. Generally, patients are hydrated with approximately 3 L/m2/d of fluid (or 0.2 L/kg/d if the patient weighs ≤10 kg); urine output should be maintained at ≥100 mL/m2/h (or ≥3 mL/kg/h if the patient weighs ≤10 kg).Citation3 Hydration and enhanced urine flow aid in the excretion of uric acid and phosphate by increasing intravascular volume, renal blood flow, and glomerular filtration rate. Diuretics may be used to maintain adequate urine output if sufficient diuresis is not achieved with intravenous hydration alone. However, the use of diuretics is contraindicated in the setting of hypovolemia or obstructive uropathy. In the past, sodium bicarbonate was used commonly to alkalinize the urine to improve the solubility of uric acid and promote its excretion. On the other hand, alkalinization does little to increase the solubility of xanthine and hypoxanthine. Alkalinization is no longer recommended, because of equivocal evidence of efficacy and potential complications, including induction of inadvertent metabolic alkalosis and obstructive uropathies caused by precipitation of calcium phosphate and xanthine crystals in the renal tubules.Citation1,Citation2, Citation9Citation11

Inhibition of uric acid production

Allopurinol, a potent xanthine oxidase inhibitor, blocks conversion of the purine metabolites hypoxanthine and xanthine to uric acid. Allopurinol has been shown to be effective in reducing serum uric acid concentrationsCitation12Citation14 and the incidence of uric acid-related obstructive uropathyCitation14 in patients who are at risk for developing TLS. By reducing formation of uric acid, allopurinol decreases the incidence of obstructive uropathy caused by crystallization of uric acid. Although allopurinol is effective in preventing de novo formation of uric acid, it does not reduce the amount of uric acid already present. Therefore, it can be used concurrently with rasburicase and should be initiated prophylactically 0.5–3 days before administration of cytotoxic therapy. Allopurinol is available in both oral and intravenous dosage forms. The recommended daily dose is 300 mg (pediatric oral dose: 50–100 mg/m2 every 8 hours [maximum dose 300 mg/m2/d] or 10 mg/kg/d divided every 8 hours [maximum dose 800 mg/d]; pediatric intravenous dose: 200–400 mg/m2/d in 1–3 divided doses [maximum dose 600 mg/d]), but dosage adjustments must be made in patients with glomerular filtration rate <50 mL/min.Citation1,Citation3 Allopurinol is well tolerated but may be associated with nausea, diarrhea, and rash.Citation9 Allopurinol also may interfere with the metabolism of 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine, requiring that these medications be administered at reduced doses. Until recently, allopurinol had been the only xanthine oxidase inhibitor available. However in February 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved febuxostat for the chronic management of hyperuricemia in patients with gout. However, no data currently exist on its efficacy in the management of hyperuricemia-related TLS.

Enzymatic removal of uric acid

Because allopurinol is effective only in preventing further formation of uric acid, an alternative option for the treatment of hyperuricemia is to promote the breakdown of uric acid to a more soluble form.Citation2 Uricozyme, a nonrecombinant preparation of urate oxidase enzyme, facilitates the conversion of uric acid to allantoin, which is 5–10 times more soluble in urine than uric acid is.Citation1 Urate oxidase enzyme is not present in humansCitation6 and is therefore isolated from the fungus Aspergillus flavus.Citation1 Rasburicase is a recombinant, highly purified urate oxidase enzyme approved in 2002 by the FDA for the initial management of hyperuricemia in pediatric patients with leukemia, lymphoma, and solid tumor malignancies who are receiving chemotherapy that is expected to result in TLS and hyperuricemia. In 2009, the indications for rasburicase were expanded to include adult patients with the same clinical scenarios as those described in children. In Europe, rasburicase is indicated for use in children and adults with hematologic malignancy.

Rasburicase has been shown to be effective and safe in reducing hyperuricemia in patients who are at risk for development of TLS.Citation15Citation17 Rasburicase is generally well tolerated; in a study of 1069 patients, only 44 (4%) reported an adverse reaction that was judged to be related to rasburicase.Citation23 Mild adverse events include, fever, nausea, vomiting, constipation, and abdominal pain. In rare instances, rasburicase treatment can cause serious adverse reactions, including anaphylaxis, hemolysis, methemoglobinemia, sepsis, and rash. It is contraindicated in patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. In contrast to allopurinol, rasburicase doses do not need to be adjusted in patients with renal impairment; therefore, it may be given without dose adjustment to patients with renal insufficiency. Per drug interactions, rasburicase does not interfere with activity of the cytochrome P450 system and should not alter drug metabolism by those enzymes.

Rasburicase may interfere with the accurate measurement of plasma uric acid concentrations because it continues to degrade uric acid in blood samples after they have been drawn from patients. Therefore, blood samples should be drawn in chilled heparin tubes and kept on ice, starting immediately after collection. All uric acid assays should be completed within 4 hours. The half-life of rasburicase is approximately 16–21 hours, depending on the dose;Citation1 after appropriate sample collection, uric acid concentrations should be monitored closely for 3–4 days after the final dose of rasburicase is administered during a given course of treatment. If these assay procedures are not followed, uric acid assay concentrations may appear erroneously low, which could prompt premature discontinuation of rasburicase therapy with a consequent rebound in uric acid levels and return of the risk potential for TLS for the patient.

The dosage of rasburicase recommended by the FDA is 0.2 mg/kg once daily in 50 mL of normal saline solution, given as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes for up to 5 days.Citation1 This recommended dosage, recently modified from the original suggested dosage range of 0.15–0.2 mg/kg daily for 5 days, was based on clinical studies that led to approval of rasburicase for its current indication. Subsequently, data from several other studies have shown that rasburicase can be clinically effective when administered at lower doses and for shorter durations.Citation1,Citation2

Various studies have used weight-based rasburicase dosing with a duration that could be varied according to the judgment of the investigator. In a compassionate-use study in 1069 patients (996 patients were evaluable for efficacy, of which 658 were children and 338 were adults), a median of three doses (range 1–14 doses) of rasburicase were given per patient with a median treatment duration of 3 days (range 1–12 days); 99% of patients showed a positive response to treatment.Citation18 In another study in 100 adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who were at risk for developing TLS, including 11 patients who presented with elevated uric acid concentration before chemotherapy, those who received rasburicase 0.2 mg/kg/d for ≥3 days experienced rapid and dramatic decreases in uric acid levels.Citation18 In a retrospective, single-center study of six adults and two children with hematologic malignancies and uric acid concentrations ≥8 mg/dL (≥473 μmol/L), patients received only a single dose of rasburicase of about 0.15 mg/kg based on actual weight if they were not obese, and based on an adjusted weight if they were obese.Citation20 This single dose of rasburicase was effective in lowering uric acid concentrations and maintaining those concentrations within normal limits for the next 96 hours in this small study.Citation20 Although four patients had impaired renal function at baseline, two of whom met criteria for TLS, no patient required hemodialysis.Citation20 However, in two other studies, a substantial percentage of patients (5 of 13 [38%] and 27 of 40 [68%]) required multiple doses of rasburicase to successfully treat hyperuricemia.Citation21,Citation22 Moreover, Wang et al (n = 45) found that the median number of required doses of rasburicase (given at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg) was three in children and four in adults.Citation23 Finally, a case study on one obese patient suggested that a single-dose strategy based on ideal body weight may be as effective as one based on actual body weight.Citation24

Several small studies have explored the use of fixed instead of weight-adjusted doses in adult and pediatric patients, including the use of lower than recommended doses and of fewer than recommended administrations. In a study of 11 adult patients with hematologic malignancies, McDonnell et al reported that 6 mg of rasburicase was effective in lowering uric acid concentrations in 10 of 11 patients.Citation25 However, in one morbidly obese patient who weighed 259 kg, the uric acid concentration decreased only from 17.4 mg/dL (1030 μmol/L) to 15.4 mg/dL (911 μmol/L) after the first dose, and a second dose of 12 mg (0.05 mg/kg) was necessary to reduce the uric acid concentration to 1.4 mg/dL (83 μmol/L).Citation25 Similarly, Hutcherson et al reported that 1 of 11 patients who received a single dose of rasburicase 6 mg experienced inadequate uric acid reduction and required a second 6 mg dose.Citation26 Reeves et al prospectively compared the efficacy of a fixed 7.5 mg dose of rasburicase and weight-based dosing at 0.15 mg/kg in 40 adult patients. Normalization of uric acid concentrations was achieved with both treatments and followed a similar time course.Citation27 An even lower dose (3 mg) was studied by Trifilio et al in 43 adult patients; uric acid normalization was achieved after 48 hours, but six patients (14%) required a second dose (rasburicase 3 mg or 1.5 mg) 24 hours after administration of the first 3 mg dose to resolve hyperuricemia completely.Citation28 Lee et al reported rapid normalization of serum uric acid concentrations as a result of single administration of a fixed dose of rasburicase 4.5 mg in three children (aged 4–13 years) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Weight-based doses of rasburicase ranged from 0.08 to 0.26 mg/kg.Citation29

At least some of the off-label treatment approaches using reduced doses or less frequent than recommended administration of rasburicase appeared to be motivated in part by the desire to minimize the substantial costs associated with rasburicase therapy.Citation25Citation29 Based on its current average sales price, a single 6 mg dose of rasburicase would cost about US$1990,Citation29 which is much less than the approximately US$21,000 cost of the FDA-approved regimen (5 days at 0.15 mg/kg, based on an average total body weight of 85 kg). Further investigation is warranted to determine the efficacy of single-dose rasburicase for the prevention or treatment of hyperuricemia associated with TLS. However, because the cost of extended hospitalization and of hemodialysis in patients with hematologic malignancies who develop renal impairment have been shown to total up to US$52,000 (2002),Citation30 even administration of the full course of rasburicase in appropriately selected patients may result in substantial cost savings. In the interim, expert practice requires administration of the number of doses necessary to maintain plasma uric acid concentration within a clinically acceptable range. Actual values are not defined in the guidelines.Citation1

The development of rasburicase may have reduced the incidence and severity of TLS and its associated complications in patients receiving cytolytic therapy for hematologic malignancies. However, no data on outcomes (eg, acute kidney injury, renal failure, hemodialysis, death) have been published since this agent was developed. Future studies are needed to examine clinical outcomes with the use of rasburicase in the prevention and treatment of hyperuricemia associated with TLS in adult and pediatric hematology and oncology patients. Pharmacoeconomic studies are also warranted to determine the optimal and most cost-effective dosing strategy for rasburicase use.

Summary

TLS is a dangerous complication of chemotherapeutic intervention that is most common in patients with hematologic malignancies. Preventive measures should be used to reduce the incidence of TLS in patients who are at risk. If TLS-associated hyperuricemia develops despite preventive efforts, rasburicase treatment is an effective, well-tolerated method for returning uric acid concentrations to acceptable levels. Rasburicase has a special role in therapy for patients at high risk for TLS, such as those with acute lymphocytic leukemia and highly aggressive lymphomas, especially if the tumor burden is high. Administration of a reduced number or quantity of rasburicase, whether given as weight-based or flat doses, may help to prevent TLS complications without incurring the cost of the recommended 5-day treatment course.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • CoiffierBAltmanAPuiCHYounesACairoMSGuidelines for the management of pediatric and adult tumor lysis syndrome: an evidence-based reviewJ Clin Oncol2008262767277818509186
  • HochbergJCairoMSTumor lysis syndrome: current perspectiveHaematologica20089391318166779
  • CairoMSBishopMTumour lysis syndrome: new therapeutic strategies and classificationBr J Haematol200412731115384972
  • HandeKRGarrowGCAcute tumor lysis syndrome in patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphomaAm J Med1993941331398430709
  • WossmannWSchrappeMMeyerUZimmermannMReiterAIncidence of tumor lysis syndrome in children with advanced stage Brukitt’s lymphoma/leukemia before and after introduction of prophylactic use of urate oxidaseAnn Hematol20038216016512634948
  • OdaMSattaYTakenakaOTakahataNLoss of urate oxidase activity in hominoids and its evolutionary implicationsMol Biol Evol20021964065311961098
  • GoldmanSLynchJHarrisonLPreliminary results of the addition of rasburicase to the reduction cycle and rituximab to the induction and consolidation cycles of FAB group C chemotherapy in children and adolescents with advanced stage (bone marrow ± CNS) mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL): a Children’s Oncology Group reportBlood2009114104
  • CairoMSCoiffierBReiterAYounesARecommendations for the evaluation of risk and prophylaxis of tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) in adults and children with malignant diseases: an expert TLS panel consensusBr J Haematol201014957858620331465
  • Ten HarkelADJKist-van HoltheJEvan WeelMvan der VorstMMJAlkalinization and the tumor lysis syndromeMed Pediatr Oncol19983127289607427
  • ChantadaGLSackmann-MurielFAlkalinization and tumor lysis syndromeMed Pediatr Oncol1999321569950210
  • Van den BergHReintsemaAMRenal tubular damage in rasburicase: risks of alkalinisationAnn Oncol20041517517614679140
  • DeContiRCCalabresiPUse of allopurinol for prevention and control of hyperuricemia in patients with neoplastic diseaseN Engl J Med19662744814865904287
  • KrakoffIHMeyerRLPrevention of hyperuricemia in leukemia and lymphoma: use of allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitorJAMA19651931614297704
  • SmalleyRVGuaspariAHaase-StatzSAndersonSACederbergDHohnekerJAAllopurinol: intravenous use for prevention and treatment of hyperuricemiaJ Clin Oncol2000181758176310764437
  • Allopurinol [prescribing information]Corona, CAWatson Laboratories, Inc2006
  • Uloric [prescribing information]Deerfield, ILTakeda Pharmaceuticals US2009
  • Elitek [prescribing information]Bridgewater, NJsanofi-aventis US2010
  • Data on file. Bridgewater, NJ: sanofi-aventis US.
  • Fasturtec [summary of product characteristics]London, UKEuropean Medicines Agency2008
  • GoldmanSCHolcenbergJSFinklesteinJZA randomized comparison between rasburicase and allopurinol in children with lymphoma or leukemia at high risk for tumor lysisBlood2001972998300311342423
  • PuiCHMahmoudHHWileyJMRecombinant urate oxidase for the prophylaxis or treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with leukemia or lymphomaJ Clin Oncol20011969770411157020
  • CoiffierBMounierNBolognaSEfficacy and safety of rasburicase (recombinant urate oxidase) for the prevention and treatment of hyperuricemia during induction chemotherapy of aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results of the GRAAL1 (Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte Trial on Rasburicase Activity in Adult Lymphoma) studyJ Clin Oncol2003214402440614581437
  • JehaSKantarjianHIrwinDEfficacy and safety of rasburicase, a recombinant urate oxidase (Elitek), in the management of malignancy-associated hyperuricemia in pediatric and adult patients: final results of a multicenter compassionate use trialLeukemia200519343815510203
  • LiuCYSims-McCallumRPSchifferCAA single dose of rasburicase is sufficient for the treatment of hyperuricemia in patients receiving chemotherapyLeuk Res20052946346515725482
  • HoVQWetzsteinGAPattersonSGBradburyRAbbreviated rasburicase dosing for the prevention and treatment of hyperuricemia in adults at risk for tumor lysis syndromeSupport Cancer Ther2006317818218632493
  • HunterHMRuleSAJRasburicase is effective in the prophylaxis of tumour lysis syndrome when used over a short duration in patients with haematological malignancyBr J Haematol2005129Suppl 142
  • WangLYShihLYChangHRecombinant urate oxidase (rasburicase) for the prevention and treatment of tumor lysis syndrome in patients with hematologic malignanciesActa Haematol2006115353816424647
  • ArnoldTMReuterJPDelmanBSShanholtzCBUse of single-dose rasburicase in an obese femaleAnn Pharmacother2004381428143115292497
  • McDonnellAMLenzKLFrei-LahrDAHayslipJHallPDSingle-dose rasburicase 6 mg in the management of tumor lysis syndrome in adultsPharmacotherapy20062680681216716134
  • HutchersonDAGammonDCBhattMSFaneufMReduced-dose rasburicase in the treatment of adults with hyperuricemia associated with malignancyPharmacotherapy20062624224716466328
  • ReevesDJBestulDJEvaluation of a single fixed dose of rasburicase 7.5 mg for the treatment of hyperuricemia in adults with cancerPharmacotherapy20082868569018503395
  • TrifilioSGordonLSinghalSReduced-dose rasburicase (recombinant xanthine oxidase) in adult cancer patients with hyperuricemiaBone Marrow Transplant200637997100116708061
  • LeeACLiCHSoKTChanRTreatment of impending tumor lysis with single-dose rasburicaseAnn Pharmacother2003371614161714565793
  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services2009 Average Sales Price Drug Pricing Files. Available from: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/ama/license.asp?file=/McrPartBDrugAvgSalesPrice/downloads/April_2009_ASP_Pricing_File_by_HCPCS.zip. Accessed Mar 23 2009.
  • BellTCandrilliSIrishWMorrisEGoldmanSCCairoMSAcute renal failure (ARF) with or without dialysis (D) is associated with a significant increase in mean length of stay (LOS) and total costs (TC) in patients hospitalized with acute leukemia (AL) and/or lymphoma (L)Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol200322 (Abstr 2195).