4,607
Views
81
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Enhancing adult therapeutic interpersonal relationships in the acute health care setting: an integrative review

, , &
Pages 537-546 | Published online: 14 Oct 2016

Abstract

Therapeutic interpersonal relationships are the primary component of all health care interactions that facilitate the development of positive clinician–patient experiences. Therapeutic interpersonal relationships have the capacity to transform and enrich the patients’ experiences. Consequently, with an increasing necessity to focus on patient-centered care, it is imperative for health care professionals to therapeutically engage with patients to improve health-related outcomes. Studies were identified through an electronic search, using the PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsycINFO databases of peer-reviewed research, limited to the English language with search terms developed to reflect therapeutic interpersonal relationships between health care professionals and patients in the acute care setting. This study found that therapeutic listening, responding to patient emotions and unmet needs, and patient centeredness were key characteristics of strategies for improving therapeutic interpersonal relationships.

Introduction

A therapeutic interpersonal relationship can be defined as one which is perceived by patients to encompass caring, and supportive nonjudgmental behavior, embedded in a safe environment during an often stressful period.Citation1 These relationships can last for a brief moment in time or continue for extended periods.Citation2 Typically, this type of relationship displays warmth, friendliness, genuine interest, empathy, and the wish to facilitate and support.Citation3 Consequently, therapeutic interpersonal relationships engender a climate for interactions that facilitate effective communication.Citation4 Therapeutic interpersonal relationships between health care professionals and patients are associated with improvements in patient satisfaction, adherence to treatment, quality of life, levels of anxiety and depression, and decreased health care costs.Citation4Citation6 Conversely, increased psychological distress and feelings of dehumanization are associated with negative clinician–patient relationships.Citation4

In the health care literature, numerous terms have been used to describe this type of relationship, including helping relationships, purposeful relationships, nurse–client relationships, and therapeutic alliances. For the purpose of this review, they have been grouped under the term “therapeutic interpersonal relationship” as they all relate to a focused relationship between the health professional and the patient directed at achieving the best patient outcome. The concept is also interrelated with that of patient-centered care. Patient-centered care (also known as person-centered or patient- and family-centered care) describes a standard of care that ensures the patient and their family are at the center of care delivery.Citation7 Patient-centered care requires health care professionals to have the ability to form therapeutic interpersonal relationships that elicit patients’ true wishes and recognize and respond to both their needs and emotional concerns.Citation8

Although therapeutic interpersonal relationships are widely acknowledged as being central to a constructive clinician–patient experience,Citation9 achieving them in the acute care setting is extremely challenging.Citation10,Citation11 One of the main barriers is the fact that patient care in this setting is heavily grounded in a task-centered approach.Citation12 McQueenCitation13 argues that “if we are to realize the full benefits of therapeutic interpersonal relationships, then strategies to enhance them in the acute care setting are required”. Therefore, the aim of this review is to identify strategies to enhance therapeutic interpersonal relationships between patients and health care professionals in the acute care setting.

Methods

Integrative review process

An integrative review is a research strategy involving the review, synthesis, and critique of extant literature.Citation14 Integrative reviews allow a comprehensive understanding of what is known and, therefore, has the capacity to identify gaps in existing knowledge.Citation15,Citation16 Compared to a systematic review, integrative reviews generate new insights about a phenomenon, allow the inclusion of diverse methodologies and differing levels of data, and have the ability to inform future research trajectories.Citation15,Citation17 The framework driving this integrative review was based on Whittemore and Knafl’sCitation15 five stages encompassing problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data synthesis, and presentation.

Literature search

A systematic search was conducted of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Psy-cINFO. Boolean connectors AND, OR, and NOT were used to construct a search strategy using search terms that included doctor - patient relations*, nurse-patient relations*, person centered care, therapeutic relationship*, therapeutic alliance, therapeutic communit*, interpersonal caring, patient centered care, hospital*, experienc* and encounter*. In addition, the reference lists of potential papers retrieved were examined to identify any further material that met the inclusion criteria. Both versions of British and American spellings were used to construct the search strategy as to reflect a systematic and comprehensive approach.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The search criteria incorporated original peer-reviewed research and literature that explored or investigated strategies pertaining to the development/enhancement of positive therapeutic interpersonal relationships between health care professionals and adult patients in the acute care setting. The concept of therapeutic interpersonal relationships is not confined to any specific time period or type of peer-reviewed publication, and so no limitations were placed on these parameters to ensure a broad and diverse scope of knowledge. It is recognized that the family is a significant component of a patients’ psychosocial well-being;Citation18 however, literature that centered on the carer or family was excluded as the focus of this review was the health care professional–patient relationship. Papers that focused on pediatrics and adolescence were also excluded as this review focused on adult patient–staff interaction. In addition, papers involving student cohorts were also excluded as were papers that reported solely on satisfaction surveys.

Data evaluation

The search strategy initially identified 900 papers after removal of duplicates (). The authors (RK and KW) independently identified 37 potential papers for inclusion based on titles and abstracts. The authors (RK, KW, and JD) independently appraised the 37 identified papers based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Disagreements that arose were resolved by debate and consensus. Thirty studies were subsequently excluded, leaving a total of seven. The reference lists of the included studies were reviewed, which eventuated in the identification of three additional studies for inclusion with ten studies included in this integrative review.

Figure 1 Decision trail of included studies.

Abbreviation: CINAHL, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.
Figure 1 Decision trail of included studies.

Data extraction and synthesis

Initially, data from the ten studies were extracted and tabled accordingly: author, year, and country of origin, purpose, sample population, and significant findings/outcomes ( provides an abridged version of these). The findings were then integrated using a constant comparison method. Extracted data (qualitative and quantitative) were compared item by item, and similar data were categorized and grouped together into recurring themes. This approach to data analysis is used in integrative reviews because it is compatible with the use of varied data from diverse methodologies.Citation15

Table 1 Summary of included studies

Results

Study characteristics

Ten papers meeting the inclusion criteria were selected. These studies were conducted across seven countries, including Australia,Citation19Citation21 the UK,Citation22 Canada,Citation23 the USA,Citation24Citation26 Denmark,Citation27 and the Netherlands.Citation8 Papers predominately emanated from either AustraliaCitation19Citation21 or the USA.Citation24Citation26 The acute settings encompassed a broad area of health care including mental health, surgical, medical, trauma, gerontology, and oncology. Study participants primarily included patients, physicians, and nurses. Seven of the ten studies derived from a qualitative methodology with semi-structured interviews, and thematic analysis was the most frequently used data collection and analysis method. Two studiesCitation8,Citation25 employed mixed methods including questionnaires, observations, and interviews; and one studyCitation19 had a qualitative design with a pre- and postintervention questionnaire.

The strategies for therapeutic interpersonal relationships that emerged from the included studies were themed under the headings: “Therapeutic listening”; “Responding to patients’ emotions and unmet needs”; and “Patient centeredness and therapeutic engagement”. All three themes were interlinked and contributed to therapeutic interpersonal relationships ().

Figure 2 Conceptual map of the relationships between the key strategies of therapeutic interpersonal relationships.

Figure 2 Conceptual map of the relationships between the key strategies of therapeutic interpersonal relationships.

Therapeutic listening

In the course of an interpretative descriptive study of patients’ perspectives on improving patient-centered approaches to care delivery by physicians, Jagosh et alCitation23 interviewed 58 patients from various backgrounds and with diverse care needs. During this study, it became apparent that physician listening was a recurring theme. Jagosh et alCitation23 make the point that although listening is a skill emphasized in medical school curricula, there have been few studies that explore this from the patient’s perspective. In addition, much of the focus on listening has been with the intent of improving diagnostic accuracy. Although this theme was present in Jagosh et al’sCitation23 study, two additional themes emerged: listening as an instrument to create and maintain good doctor–patient relationships and listening as a healing and therapeutic agent.

In the theme listening as a healing and therapeutic agent, listening was seen by patients as creating the conditions to promote healing and recovery:

Because if you listen to the patient and give the patient respect, what you are actually doing is helping that person take responsibility for their own health … they are also in control of the healing process and are involved somehow …Citation23

Within the theme of listening as an instrument to create and maintain therapeutic interpersonal relationships, patients believed that listening helped physicians engage with their values and strengthen the therapeutic alliance:

The doctor needs to listen to you and to speak to you and it’s surprising, sometimes you can overcome some of your problems ….Citation23

Jagosh et alCitation23 conclude that listening can be an interpretive activity that contributes to a richer interpersonal dialogue, which can forge new understandings and meanings, especially in emotionally charged situations.

The development of the therapeutic interpersonal alliance relies on the use of high-quality communication skills. Nørgaard et alCitation27 sought to investigate whether adult orthopedic patients’ evaluation of the quality of care improved after staff had undergone a communication skills training course. The course employed the Calgary-Cambridge Observation Guide in patient-centered communication as well as exercises in attentive listening, pausing, and summarizing. Participants were also involved in videotaped role play of simulated communication scenarios and follow-up sessions. Satisfaction of over 3,000 patients was assessed pre- and postintervention using the Interpersonal Skills Rating Scale. The study demonstrated statistically significant increases in patient satisfaction scores concerning the quality of information, continuity of information, and quality of care provided by health professionals after attending the 3-day course.

Responding to patients’ emotions and unmet needs

Adams et alCitation24 study explored physicians’ responses to patients’ verbal expression of negative emotion to identify how different types of responses influence further communication. They state that although empathy is a key element of good patient–physician communication, physicians seldom respond with empathy to patients’ expression of negative emotions. Adams et alCitation24 recorded 79 patient encounters with 27 physicians and examined physicians’ responses to patient expression of negative emotion that either focused the discussion away from the emotion, toward the emotion, or that did neither (neutral). The effect the response had on further communication was then examined.

Adams et alCitation24 found that physicians’ responses that focused the discussion away from the negative emotion had the effect of distancing the physician and patient from each other and creating an antagonistic relationship. Neutral responses led to elicitation of the patient’s perspective and clarification of the goals of care. Toward responses tended to lead to the provision of emotional support, increased agreement about treatment, and facilitated the physician and patient alliance.

Similarly, a study by Zandbelt et alCitation8 established that patient satisfaction was positively associated with doctors’ facilitating patients’ expression of their perspective and negatively associated with behaviors, which inhibited such expression, especially in patients who were less confident in communicating with their doctor. In addition, facilitating behaviors were positively related to adherence to treatment in patients with a language different to the health professional. Facilitative behaviors included attentive silence; verbal and nonverbal encouragements; summarizing patients’ words; and reflections of facts, emotions, and processes.

Jones et alCitation21 found a formal process of supportive care that involved identifying unmet needs as identified by patients using a validated screening tool and a supportive care resource kit for clinicians, which improved communication between cancer patients and their clinicians. Patients in Jones et al’sCitation21 study focused on the effectiveness of communication encompassing the areas of reflecting and clarifying needs; initiating discussions with clinicians; validating needs; seeking help and support; and focusing the clinicians’ attention and the therapeutic environment. The overall consensus of the participants was that the implementation of supportive care processes facilitated and, to an extent, enhanced therapeutic interpersonal communication.

Patient centeredness and therapeutic engagement

Patient centeredness and therapeutic engagement emerged as fundamental aspects of therapeutic encounters and relationships between health professionals and patients. Lees et alCitation20 found that therapeutic interpersonal engagement between nurses and patients for suicidal crisis intervention was the central tenet in quality of care. Lees et alCitation20 interviewed eleven nurses who had worked with suicidal clients and nine clients who had recently recovered from a suicidal crisis. Lees et alCitation20 identified through these interviews that therapeutic engagement could facilitate a reduction in feelings of isolation, loss of control, and distress. Therapeutic engagement was seen by Less et alCitation20 as incorporating rapport, listening, empathy, relating as equals, compassion, genuineness, trust, time responsiveness, and unconditional positive regard. Taking the opportunity to engage therapeutically was seen as crucial by one Registered Nurse in Lees et al’sCitation20 study:

The opportunity to interact is the ultimate … it’s a really important interaction … It can be the difference between life and death.Citation20

The importance of therapeutic engagement was made clear by a patient in Lees et alCitation20 study who stated:

I wanted someone to sit down and talk with and go through it all … to just support me and ask me about it and how I was feeling … someone to make contact with me about it.Citation20

Through a secondary analysis of interview data collected from older people, Mitchell and McCanceCitation22 explored encounters and relationships within the context of person-centered care. Mitchell and McCanceCitation22 identified that many older patients experience a sense of “rolelessness” and are deprived of active participation in their care. They state that nurse–patient encounters are largely dominated by task-orientated care, and therefore patients feel burdened by the perception that nurses are busy:

Well the nurses come in early in the morning and wash you … but apart from that, I just be in bed, you know. Nurses are supposed to look after you … I feel I’m just in here, I’m just left.Citation22

These perceptions reinforce a culture of patient passivity within a health care climate that requires the implementation of strategies to enhance the capacity of person-centered care for both the patient and the nurses.

In contrast, Mitchell and McCanceCitation22 also identified five key aspects that defined person-centered care for elderly patients as encompassing informed mutuality – the opportunity for patients to be equal partners in decision making; transparency, making clear the intentions and motivations for actions and sympathetic presence; engagement with the patient that recognizes their value and uniqueness.

Respect for uniqueness or individuality was also one of the findings from a study by SanghaviCitation25 who reviewed the elements of compassionate patient–caregiver relationships. SanghaviCitation25 analyzed questionnaires and transcripts of rounds with patients, families, and staff conducted at 54 hospitals across 21 states in the USA. The analysis revealed communication, common ground, and respect for individuality as key aspects of compassionate relationships. SanghaviCitation25 states that traditional structures of health care delivery are inadequate to sustain a culture of compassionate care and that a new innovative approach to the delivery of health care is required. Aspects of the new paradigm (compassionate relationships) include activities such as the attendance at rounds that focus clinicians’ attention on the necessity for compassionate care, senior clinicians modeling behavior for junior health professionals, and teaching and reinforcement of compassionate interpersonal interactions throughout the career of the health professional to engender a culture of compassionate.

In a grounded theory study conducted in an acute care setting, Williams and IruritaCitation19 explored the patients’ perception of the perceived therapeutic effect of interpersonal interactions with nurses. Interviews were conducted with 40 recently hospitalized patients, and participant observation and interviews were conducted with 32 nursing staff. The substantive theory of optimizing personal control to facilitate emotional comfort was developed. Emotional comfort was identified as an emotional state that enhanced patients’ recovery. During their admission, patients interpreted interpersonal interactions as either emotionally comforting or discomforting. Patients identified feeling insecure, uncertain, and devalued as of concern and feeling secure, valued, and informed as important for emotional comfort. In addition, the study identified six specific types of therapeutic interaction that contributed to emotional comfort. Patients felt emotional comfort when staff displayed ability and confidence in performing task; developed relationships through frequent contact and getting to know each other as people; were available and responded quickly to calls for assistance; provided information openly and honestly; used nonverbal interactions such as eye contact, touch, active listening, and positioning to enhance communication; and engaged in verbal interactions such as social chitchat and making encouraging comments.Citation19

In a study on therapeutic play, GreenbergCitation26 found that within the acute care setting, the use of humor facilitated emotional comfort and support and therapeutic engagement. GreenbergCitation26 defined the use of humor as therapeutic play that enhances health and well-being by developing therapeutic interpersonal alliances in illness. Humor was used as an effective icebreaker and allowed the development of trust within the therapeutic interpersonal relationship. GreenbergCitation26 states that mutual laughter is a powerful form of therapeutic interpersonal communication as it creates a culture of positive emotions between the patient and health professional as demonstrated by a participant nurse:

I use [humor] situationally. A lot of times you come into rooms and it is so confrontational because patients and families feel they are receiving some form of mistreatment. [Humor] tends to make you less threatening.Citation26

Discussion

The catalyst for this review was the necessity to identify strategies that enhance therapeutic interpersonal relationships in the acute care setting. It was found that “Therapeutic listening”, “Responding to patient emotions and unmet needs”, and “Patient centeredness” were key characteristics of strategies for improving therapeutic interpersonal relationships. These three themes are depicted in as key interrelated components of therapeutic interpersonal relationships within the acute care setting.

The acute health care environment has been described as “dangerous, disconnecting, identity disaffirming, and without possibilities”.Citation28 ShattellCitation29 states that patients struggle to get health care professionals to listen and claim the necessity for an advocate such as a family member or friend present in the hospital with patients at all times to ensure high-quality care. Moreover, McCabeCitation12 found that a lack of communication was a recurring theme related to staff being task-oriented leading to patients feeling frustrated and attributed nurses’ poor communications skills to the nurses being too busy. Given the challenging acute care environment, it is not surprising that building therapeutic interpersonal relationships is fundamental focus of current trends in patient care.Citation29

The findings suggest that the act of developing therapeutic interpersonal relationships has the capacity to nurture and fortify relations between the clinician and the patient. Consequently, providing a supportive environment enhances clinician–patient engagement and communication. This is also echoed by Tabler et alCitation30 who investigated patient care experiences and perceptions of clinician–patient relationships and concluded that communication underpins patients’ perception of interpersonal continuity. Fakhr-Movahedi et alCitation31 also identified therapeutic interpersonal relationships as the essence of care and the development of trust as an enabler for patient engagement.

Literature on the health care environment in western countries has highlighted the awareness of the importance of developing therapeutic interpersonal relationships between the clinician and the patient.Citation32 Morton et alCitation33 suggest that implementation of nurse leader rounds has the capacity to increase patient satisfaction. Strategies such as rounds allow for real-time feedback concerning patients’ care and therefore allow coaching opportunities. Consequently, implementing education and training for the development of communication skills among health care professionals is linked to positive clinical outcomes,Citation34 adherence to treatment, patient satisfaction,Citation35 and positive therapeutic interpersonal relationships.Citation2 Furthermore, those receiving personal coaching and training on the art of communication demonstrate vast improvements in patients’ perception of quality care activities.Citation36

The findings highlight that cultural and therapeutic engagement influences interpersonal relationships. Increasing therapeutic engagement has been identified as a priority within health care.Citation37 Consequently, therapeutic interpersonal relationships need to be recognized in clinical practice, education, and research.Citation13 Cioffi,Citation38 exploring culturally diverse patient experiences in the acute care setting, found the development of therapeutic interpersonal relationships difficult, and therefore nurses require greater capacity to develop a deeper consideration with educational support to enable effective and meaningful interactions. Within the acute care environment, however, increasing workloads, patient acuity, and a highly technological environment makes cultural engagement challenging.Citation13 Given these challenges, humor was identified in the review of the literature as a means to enhance therapeutic interpersonal relationships. There is plentiful evidence to suggest the development of guidelines aimed to increase the cultural competence of clinicians, increases service utilization and promotes positive outcomes.Citation39 DowlingCitation40 identified how humor is an effective aspect of patients’ care experiences. Humor has been used to reduce tense circumstances,Citation41 and so it has been suggested that the implementation of humor facilitates the development of clinician–patient therapeutic interpersonal relationships.Citation42

The review has highlighted the lack of conceptual clarity and the confusion created by multiple terms used interchangeably when representing the same idea confounds a better understanding of the phenomenon under investigation here. Patient-centeredness is an equally diffuse and poorly circumscribed phenomenon, and this makes it difficult to measure the effect of strategies implemented to enhance such an ideal. Although there are clearly identified understandings of what a therapeutic encounter might embody, the literature is not easy to interpret and is at times conflicting in its reports of what and how nurses and other health professionals should enact such an encounter. Moreover, there appear to be a number of obstacles inherent in the way health care practice is able to be realized. These include ever-increasing complexity of the patients, a technologically sophisticated and demanding health care setting and health professional attitudes, and values about the nature of the work they are charged with doing.

Limitations and strength of evidence

This integrative review includes the use of a validated methodologyCitation15 and the use of three independent reviewers during data evaluation, data extraction, and synthesis. It is conceivable, however, that some papers may have been missed despite implementing a comprehensive and rigorous search strategy across key databases for published peer-reviewed literature.

Despite the geographical breadth captured in this review, the majority of papers included were from developed nations/regions including Denmark, the Netherlands, the UK, Australia, the USA, and Canada. Consequently, only one paper emanated from a developing region. Therefore, the themes and conclusion drawn upon is mainly representative of those from developed nations and may differ from those of the developing regions/countries. Furthermore, the primary clinical populations represented were physicians and nurses. Representation from other areas of health care including allied health is required for a holistic overview of therapeutic interpersonal relationships.

The review is limited to the adult population, and consequently experiences and strategies to enhance therapeutic interpersonal relationships concerning the pediatric and adolescent population are not represented. The definition of acute care for this review included medical, surgical, and mental health care, and it is acknowledged that these settings may have different communication styles and therapeutic patient-centered approaches, not captured in this review.

Conclusion

Therapeutic interpersonal relationships in health care within the acute care setting require clinicians to develop and sustain relationships that are geared toward best practice. The development of a therapeutic interpersonal relationship requires reflective practice and knowledge of how these influence relationships. Therefore, the process of therapeutic interpersonal relationships is critical to the basis of all practice having implications for cost burden and length of stay. It is through these therapeutic interpersonal relationships that health professionals can help the patient navigate their care.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • MottramATherapeutic relationships in day surgery: a grounded theory studyJ Clin Nurs200918202830283719747255
  • PriebeSMcCabeRThe therapeutic relationship in psychiatric settingsActa Psychiatr Scand20061136972
  • CousinGSchmid MastMRoterDLHallJAConcordance between physician communication style and patient attitudes predicts patient satisfactionPatient Educ Couns201287219319721907529
  • StepMMRoseJHAlbertJMCheruvuVKSiminoffLAModeling patient-centered communication: oncologist relational communication and patient communication involvement in breast cancer adjuvant therapy decision-makingPatient Educ Couns200977336937819811883
  • ShayLADumenciLSiminoffLAFlockeSALafataJEFactors associated with patient reports of positive physician relational communicationPatient Educ Couns20128919610122554386
  • KelleyJMKraft-ToddGSchapiraLKossowskyJRiessHThe influence of the patient-clinician relationship on healthcare outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsPLoS One201494e9420724718585
  • BolsterDManiasEPerson-centred interactions between nurses and patients during medication activities in an acute hospital setting: qualitative observation and interview studyInt J Nurs Stud201047215416519577752
  • ZandbeltLCSmetsEMAOortFJGodfriedMHde HaesHCJMMedical specialists’ patient-centered communication and patient-reported outcomesMed Care200745433033917496717
  • RossLFacilitating rapport through real patient encounters in health care professional educationAustralas J Paramed2014104
  • O’ConnellETherapeutic relationships in critical care nursing: a reflection on practiceNurs Crit Care200813313814318426469
  • FosterTHawkinsJThe therapeutic relationship: dead or merely impeded by technology?Br J Nurs2005141369870216116369
  • McCabeCNurse-patient communication: an exploration of patients’ experiencesJ Clin Nurs2004131414914687292
  • McQueenANurse-patient relationships and partnership in hospital careJ Clin Nurs200095723731
  • EmeisCCurrent resources for evidence based practiceJ Midwifery Womens Health2012572196200
  • WhittemoreRKnaflKThe integrative review: updated methodologyJ Adv Nurs200552554655316268861
  • RussellCLAn overview of the integrative research reviewProg Transplant. (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)2005151813
  • TorracoRJWriting integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examplesHum Resource Dev Rev200543356367
  • NorthouseLLKatapodiMCSchafenackerAMWeissDThe impact of caregiving on the psychological well-being of family caregivers and cancer patientsSem Oncol Nurs2012284236245
  • WilliamsAMIruritaVFTherapeutic and non-therapeutic interpersonal interactions: the patient’s perspectiveJ Clin Nurs200413780681515361154
  • LeesDProcterNFassettDTherapeutic engagement between consumers in suicidal crisis and mental health nursesInt J Ment Health Nurs201423430631524575883
  • JonesRReganMRistevskiEBreenSPatients’ perception of communication with clinicians during screening and discussion of cancer supportive care needsPatient Educ Couns2011853e20921521251789
  • MitchellEAMcCanceTNurse–patient encounters in the hospital ward, from the perspectives of older persons: an analysis using the Authentic Consciousness FrameworkInt J Older People Nurs2012729510421631873
  • JagoshJBoudreauJSteinertYMacDonaldMIngramLThe importance of physician listening from the patients’ perspective: enhancing diagnosis, healing, and the doctor–patient relationshipPatient Educ Couns201185336937421334160
  • AdamsKCiminoJEWArnoldRMAndersonWGWhy should I talk about emotion? Communication patterns associated with physician discussion of patient expressions of negative emotion in hospital admission encountersPatient Educ Couns2012891445022575434
  • SanghaviDMWhat makes for a compassionate patient-caregiver relationship?Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf200632528329216761793
  • GreenbergMTherapeutic play: developing humor in the nurse-patient relationshipJ N Y State Nurses Assoc2003341253114639778
  • NørgaardBKofoedP-EKyvikKOAmmentorpJCommunication skills training for health care professionals improves the adult orthopaedic patient’s experience of quality of careScand J Caring Sci201226469870422420418
  • ShattellMEventually it’ll be over: the dialectic between confinement and freedom in the world of the hospitalized patientPollioHRThomasSPListening to Patients: A Phenomenological Approach to Nursing Research and PracticeNew York, NYSpringer2002214236
  • ShattellMNurse bait: Strategies hospitalized patients use to entice nurses within the context of the interpersonal relationshipIssues Ment Health Nurs200526220522315962923
  • TablerMScammonMDebraLPatient care experiences and perceptions of the patient-provider relationship: a mixed method studyPatient Exper J2014117587
  • Fakhr MovahediASalsaliMNegharandehRRahnavardZA qualitative content analysis of nurse–patient communication in Iranian nursingInt Nurs Rev201158217118021554289
  • BakkenSHolzemerWLBrownMRelationships between perception of engagement with health care provider and demographic characteristics, health status, and adherence to therapeutic regimen in persons with HIV/AIDSAIDS Patient Care STDS2000144189197189p10806637
  • MortonJBrekhusJReynoldsMDykesAImproving the patient experience through nurse leader roundsPatient Exper J2014125361
  • ChouCLCooleyLPearlmanEWhiteMKEnhancing patient experience by training local trainers in fundamental communication skillsPatient Exper J2014123645
  • KennedyMDeniseMFasolinoMJohnPGullenMDavidJImproving the patient experience through provider communication skills buildingPatient Exper J2014115660
  • KennedyDCaselliRBerryLA roadmap for improving healthcare service qualityJ Healthc Manag201156638522201201
  • CioffiJCulturally diverse patient–nurse interactions on acute care wardsInt J Nurs Pract200612631932517176304
  • TetleyAJinksMHubandNHowellsKA systematic review of measures of therapeutic engagement in psychosocial and psychological treatmentJ Clin Psychol201167992794121633956
  • WestermanTGuest editorial: engagement of indigenous clients in mental health services: what role do cultural differences play?Australian e-journal for the Adv Ment Health2004338893
  • DowlingMThe meaning of nurse–patient intimacy in oncology care settings: from the nurse and patient perspectiveEur J Oncol Nurs200812431932818499522
  • BoltonSCWho cares? Offering emotion work as a ‘gift’in the nursing labour processJ Adv Nurs200032358058611012799
  • SavageJNursing Intimacy: An Ethnographic Approach to Nurse-patient InteractionLondon, UKScutari Press1995