Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly: role of the pharmacist in a multidisciplinary health care team

Abstract

Intensive glycemic control using insulin therapy may be appropriate for many healthy older adults to reduce premature mortality and morbidity, improve quality of life, and reduce health care costs. However, frail elderly people are more prone to develop complications from hypoglycemia, such as confusion and dementia. Overall, older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at greater risk of death from cardiovascular disease (CVD) than from intermittent hyperglycemia; therefore, diabetes management should always include CVD prevention and treatment in this patient population. Pharmacists can provide a comprehensive medication review with subsequent recommendations to individualize therapy based on medical and cognitive status. As part of the patient’s health care team, pharmacists can provide continuity of care and communication with other members of the patient’s health care team. In addition, pharmacists can act as educators and patient advocates and establish patient-specific goals to increase medication effectiveness, adherence to a medication regimen, and minimize the likelihood of adverse events.

Keywords:

• glycemic control
• hyperglycemia
• continuity of care
• hypertension and cardiovascular disease
• elderly
• type 2 diabetes
• pharmacist

Introduction

More than 20% of elderly Americans (65 years or older) have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).¹ T2DM is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the elderly,² and half of elderly patients receiving diabetes treatment do not achieve adequate glycemic control.³ Although glycemic control is important, elderly patients with diabetes are more likely to benefit from the additional treatment for hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD) than with only tight glycemic control.¹ Compared with a younger cohort, older Americans with diabetes are more likely to have geriatric syndrome, which is a cluster of conditions that include injurious falls, cognitive impairment, and depression.⁴ These conditions can complicate the management of diabetes and increase the likelihood of hypoglycemia, confusion, and dementia. As part of the patient’s health care team, pharmacists can act as educators and patient advocates and establish patient-specific goals to increase medication effectiveness and adherence to their medication regimen, and minimize adverse events. For example, pharmacists who participated in the Diabetes Ten City Challenge (DTCC) provided coaching, used evidence-based diabetes care guidelines, and implemented patient self-management strategies, which resulted in reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure in 573 patients with diabetes after 1 year of follow-up.⁵ Pharmacists referred patients to physicians for further assessment, contacted other providers (such as a dietitian) for intensive nutrition education, or communicated with diabetes education centers for additional education support.

Special considerations for elderly patients with diabetes

Elderly persons are more likely to develop and be more susceptible to diabetes-related complications.¹ In particular, this population should be evaluated for complications that develop over short periods of time and/or for those that would significantly impair functional status, such as vision and lower-extremity complications (ie, peripheral neuropathy and subsequent diabetic foot infections). Diabetes treatment-related complications may be more problematic in elderly persons than in the nonelderly; for example, hypoglycemia may aggravate dementia⁶ and can increase the risk of falls. Elderly persons may be at greater risk than younger patients for comorbid conditions such as depression, which can lead to treatment apathy and reduced medication effectiveness.

Adherence to a prescribed medication regimen should not be assumed. About 30% of Medicare patients with medication coverage are nonadherent to their medication regimens for financial reasons.⁷ Patients who repeatedly miss medical appointments may be at increased risk for nonadherence and will likely require diligent follow-up measures to resolve underlying issues. A comprehensive medication review by the pharmacist, which includes medication adherence and individual strategies to decrease nonadherence, can help identify other medication-related issues. Elderly patients may not be able to read their medication instructions or understand how to take the medications; these issues can be addressed with additional education and repeated interventions. Taking multiple drugs several times a day can lead to medication errors, adverse events, reduced medication efficacy, increased costs, and poor regimen adherence.⁸ Polypharmacy is common, as elderly persons tend to keep medications that were prescribed years ago, and may keep medications that were switched to another drug within the same drug class after a hospitalization. Medication reconciliation should include discontinuing medications that are a therapeutic duplication, or that contain the same active ingredient but were prescribed as a different formulation or as part of a combination drug.

Diabetes self-management weaknesses and the patient’s history of hypoglycemic events should be addressed by a pharmacist and other health care providers so action can be taken to prevent future events. Assessing for cognitive decline or depression is necessary to differentiate these disorders from symptoms related to hypoglycemia. If a patient is diagnosed with and treated for depression, the patient should be reevaluated to assess treatment efficacy and symptom improvement. Working with the patient and prescribers to simplify treatment regimens may increase medication regimen adherence, minimize adverse effects, and increase medication effectiveness.

Diabetes treatment guidelines for the elderly

Treatment goals should be developed and achieved in line with the elderly patient’s medical, functional, social, and financial status.⁴ Aggressive treatment is appropriate for most healthy older adults to reduce premature mortality and morbidity, improve quality of life, and reduce health care costs.¹ These patients may benefit from regimens that include insulin to allow dosage adjustment with food intake and level of exercise. However, due to a patient’s advancing age, treatment decisions become more complex, and their capacity to cope with adverse effects and complicated treatment regimens declines. To minimize the risk of hypoglycemia and associated complications such as falls or confusion, less aggressive fasting glucose targets may be necessary for frail elderly patients⁹ (those with an unintentional weight loss of 10 pounds in the past year, chronic exhaustion, and low grip strength, walking speed, and physical activity).¹⁰ For these frail elderly patients, treatment selection should include therapies with a low risk of hypoglycemia, such as metformin or an incretin mimetic; therapies with a high risk of hypoglycemia, such as long-acting sulfonylureas (ie, chlorpropamide or glyburide), should be avoided.

The long-term benefits of tight control of fasting blood glucose will likely not be observed in patients with advanced age. Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death in this population,¹¹ and a greater reduction in morbidity and mortality is expected by controlling CVD risk factors.¹² Elevated postprandial glucose (PPG) levels may increase the risk of CVD.¹³ Data on PPG control in the elderly are limited; however, selecting drug therapy that targets PPG should be considered to further reduce CVD risk. Elderly patients and caregivers should be educated about controlling CVD risk factors by discussing the importance of smoking cessation and blood pressure control. Pharmacists can provide continuity of care by communicating changes in over-the-counter medications or herbal therapies to the patient’s prescriber and other health care team members.

Treatment options for diabetes in the elderly

Dietary changes may only moderately help with glycemic control in the elderly. These patients may have defective dentition, loss of taste/poor appetite, or an unwillingness to change a lifetime of eating habits.⁹ Elderly patients should consult with a dietitian to create a well balanced diet that facilitates weight loss (if needed) and helps maintain glycemic control.¹⁴ Exercise should be consistent and based on what the patient can tolerate. Preferably, these patients should walk or swim for 30 minutes a day to maintain muscle conditioning.⁹ Foot and eye care should be discussed with the patient. Pharmacists should review nonpharmacologic therapy, including lifestyle modifications, to determine if any changes could be made to improve effectiveness of recommended nonpharmacologic interventions. In addition, the pharmacist could discuss daily foot care, and could conduct a basic foot exam to assess pedal pulses, abnormalities in anatomy, and changes in sensation.

Pharmacologic treatment options are briefly presented in Table 1.^{1,4,9,14–19} To assess the effectiveness and safety of antihyperglycemic medications, the pharmacist should carefully monitor glucose levels (including PPG), weight, renal function, and blood pressure. Elderly persons are more likely to have renal dysfunction than other adults. Therefore, medications such as metformin should be used with caution in these patients because of the risk of developing lactic acidosis, a rare but potentially fatal adverse effect that is more common in those with renal dysfunction. Gastrointestinal adverse effects can be debilitating in the older person. For example, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists are associated with treatment-limiting nausea; however, these agents have a low risk of hypoglycemia. The pharmacist can discuss ways to reduce or manage drug-induced nausea or recommend switching to a therapy with a low risk of this adverse effect. Clinician inertia, delaying insulin therapy because of fears of hypoglycemia, and perceived lack of benefit can also be addressed by a pharmacist by communicating patient-specific needs to other members of the health care team.

Table 1 Summary points for drugs used to treat diabetes in the elderly

Drug class/name	Possible drug or disease interactions	Adverse events that may limit use	Important notes
Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors^Citation9	Erratic oral intake; must take with main meals to be effective	Gastrointestinal effects	Adjust dose with renal or liver dysfunction
Meglitinides^Citation1 Incretin therapies DPP-4 inhibitors^Citation15	Frequent daily dosing Concomitant use with insulin secretagogues increases risk of hypoglycemia	Hypoglycemia, weight gain Headache, infection, dermatologic effects^Citation16	Rapid onset Effects are glucose dependent, so low risk for hypoglycemia Weight neutral Target PPG levels
Incretin therapies GLP-1 agonists^Citation15	Concomitant use with insulin secretagogues increases risk of hypoglycemia	Gastrointestinal effects (less than alpha-glucosidase inhibitors),^Citation15 pancreatitis, immune reactions (incidence less with liraglutide than exenatide)^Citation16	Effects are glucose dependent, so low risk for hypoglycemia Weight loss Target PPG levels Decrease blood pressure; improve other CVD markers^Citation16
Insulins^Citation17,Citation18	Erratic oral intake can increase risk of hypoglycemia; low vision and dexterity may limit use of vial and syringes, clinician inertia	Hypoglycemia	Better glycemic control if difficulty adhering to oral medications, receiving multiple oral medications, or not achieving glycemic targets than with oral medications alone Early use may restore and improve beta-cell function Insulin pens increase adherence for patients with low vision and/or dexterity issues
Metformin^Citation1	Impaired renal function	Lactic acidosis (rare but serious), gastrointestinal effects	Measure serum creatinine and liver function periodically and with any increase in dose Weight neutral versus placebo^Citation19 Avoid initiating in patients ≥80 years of age unless creatinine clearance is within normal limits
Pioglitazone^Citation14	Class III and class IV congestive heart failure	Weight gain, fluid retention, peripheral edema, fractures among women^Citation19	Hypoglycemia rare
Sulfonylureas^Citation4	Erratic oral intake can increase risk of hypoglycemia with long-acting agents	Hypoglycemia, weight gain	Avoid long-acting sulfonylureas; short-acting (ie, glipizide) minimize risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia, and may also help avoid hypoglycemia in patients with erratic oral intake

Abbreviations: CVD, cardiovascular disease; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase IV; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide 1; NPH, neutral protamine Hagedorn; PPG, postprandial glucose.

As an individual ages, beta-cell function declines. Studies suggest that early use of insulin in the elderly restores and improves beta-cell function and induces disease remission.^18,20 Simple insulin regimens with premeasured doses and easier injection systems (eg, insulin pens with easy-to-set dosages) are preferred in the elderly patient.²¹ Timing of insulin doses relative to meals and adjusting doses based on meal content and caloric intake minimize the risk of hypoglycemia. For some elderly people, two daily injections using premixed insulin analog preparations or a long-acting insulin analog for basal control may be preferred to multiple oral medications. Fasting and post-prandial glucose levels should be monitored and assessed to determine if target levels have been obtained. If control is unsatisfactory, a dose of rapid-acting insulin analog for prandial glucose control during the main meal could be added to the basal regimen. For the healthy older person, a combination of rapid- and long-acting insulin analogs would provide tight glycemic control and allow dosing flexibility. Elderly people who are not frail are more likely to benefit from long-term tight glycemic control, which is associated with a reduced risk of diabetes-related microvascular complications and amputations. In addition, long-acting insulin analogs do not have the pronounced peak observed with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and are less likely to produce nocturnal hypoglycemia.²²

Pharmacists are in a key position to improve diabetes control in this potentially high-risk population. In observational and controlled trials, medication management and diabetes education provided by the pharmacist has been reported to improve A1c, blood pressure, and lipid parameters.²³ In addition, these services increase patient satisfaction and decrease health care costs. The DTCC is an example of how pharmacy practice around the country is evolving to include patient education, medication therapy management, basic physical assessment, routine patient and caregiver follow up, and constant collaboration with other health care providers.⁵ A brief list of recently published primary literature evaluating clinical outcomes and pharmacist-provided diabetes care of the older patient is provided in Table 2.^5,24,25

Table 2 Pharmacist-provided patient care and associated outcomes in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Study	Methods	Results
Cranor et al^Citation24	Quasi-experimental, longitudinal, pre and post cohort trial design 12 community-based pharmacists trained in diabetes education Asheville Project Change in clinical and economic outcomes before and after up to 5 years of implementation of services	n = 620 financial cohort, n = 565 clinical cohort Baseline median age 48 years Median A1c decreased by 0.8% after first follow-up visit (P < 0.001) LDL-C decreased by 2.5 mg/dL after the first follow-up visit (P = 0.13) Total direct medical costs decreased by US$1662–$3356 per patient per year depending on the follow-up year, despite increases in mean prescription costs
Fera et al^Citation5	Prospective, observational, pre- and post-cohort trial design Collaborative practice model Community-based pharmacists Evidence-based guidelines Clinical and economic outcomes Diabetes Ten City Challenge Change in clinical and economic outcomes before and after 1 year of implementation of services	N = 573 42% were 60 years or older Mean A1c decreased by 0.4% (P = 0.002) Mean LDL-C decreased by 4 mg/dL (P < 0.001) Mean SBP decreased by 3 mmHg (P < 0.001) Average total health care costs per patient per year decreased by US$1079 (7.2%) Influenza vaccination rate increased by 33% Foot examination rate increased by 40%
Jameson and Baty^Citation25	Prospective, randomized, controlled trial Pharmacist management versus usual medical care Change in A1c after 1 year of care Poorly controlled diabetes (A1c > 9%) One pharmacist with advanced diabetes education training Intervention consisted of targeted patient outreach program plus medication management, patient education, disease control by a pharmacist Control group used targeted patient outreach programs and registries	N = 103 (intervention group n = 52, control group n = 51) Mean age 49 years Mean A1c decreased by 1.5% for the intervention group and 0.4% for the control group (P = 0.06) A1c decreased by at least 1% for 67.3% versus 41.2%, respectively (P = 0.02) Male and nonwhite patients had greater improvement in A1c than female or white patients

Abbreviations: A1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

Older persons with diabetes are at greater risk of death from CVD than from intermittent hyperglycemia. Frail elderly people are more prone to develop complications from hypoglycemia, such as confusion and dementia. Continuity of care, communication with other members of the patient’s health care team, and a comprehensive medication review by the pharmacist, with subsequent recommendations to individualize therapy based on medical and cognitive status, will minimize adverse effects and optimize treatment effectiveness.

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Beatriz Manzor Mitrzyk, PharmD, of MedVal Scientific Information Services, LLC, for providing medical writing and editorial assistance. This manuscript was prepared according to the International Society for Medical Publication Professionals’ Good Publication Practice for Communicating Company-Sponsored Medical Research: the GPP2 Guidelines. Funding to support the preparation of this manuscript was provided by Novo Nordisk Inc.

Disclosure

The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.