188
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Migraine with Brainstem Aura Accompanied by Disorders of Consciousness

, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 1119-1127 | Published online: 20 Apr 2021

Abstract

Migraine with brainstem aura (MBA) accompanied by disorders of consciousness (DOC) is a rare subtype of migraine. The pathophysiology of MBA with DOC has not been elucidated yet. Some patients have a family history of migraine, and women are more affected than men. The aura symptoms are diverse; however, when MBA is combined with DOC, the clinical manifestations are more complicated. Coma is the most common clinical manifestation. The overall duration of the patient’s DOC is short and can often return to normal within half an hour. Headache often occurs after regaining consciousness and can also occur at the same time as DOC. The most common headache is located at the occipital region. Although DOC is reversible, considering the current small number of cases, we still need to improve our understanding of the disease to avoid misdiagnosis. The MBA patient’s electroencephalogram and cerebral blood flow perfusion may have transient changes and may return to normal in the interictal period or after the DOC. Although triptans have traditionally been contraindicated in MBA under drug instructions, the evidence of basilar artery constriction, as postulated in MBA, is lacking. Lasmiditan is currently the first and only 5-HT 1F receptor agonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration. The calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists and monoclonal antibody therapies may be the most promising for future consideration. Here, the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic tools, and treatment progress for MBA with DOC are reviewed.

Introduction

Migraine with brainstem aura (MBA) is a rare migraine subtypeCitation1Citation15 and accounts for about 1.5% of headache and 6.6–10% of migraine with aura.Citation16,Citation17 The aura features include vertigo, dysarthria, diplopia, tinnitus, ataxia, and disorders of consciousness (DOC).Citation18 HiccupsCitation19 or exploding head syndrome (EHS)Citation14 may also occur in some patients. In 1961, Edwin reported for the first time a subtype of migraine with brainstem dysfunction and proposed the concept of basilar artery migraine.Citation20 Since then, impairment of consciousness in migraine was considered as a prominent aura symptom.Citation1 At present, Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) has renamed basilar artery migraine to MBA.Citation18 It is notable that the complex symptoms and signs of DOC can negatively affect the differential diagnosis for the DOC-accompanied primary disorder.Citation21 Therefore, more attention should be paid to achieve early recognition, rapid diagnosis, and timely treatment.

Pathophysiology of MBA with DOC

The pathophysiology of MBA has not been elucidated yet.Citation22 It mainly includes three hypotheses: vasomotor dysfunction,Citation23 cortical spreading depression,Citation24,Citation25 and neurogenic inflammation.Citation26Citation28 Regarding the MBA with DOC, abnormal neurotransmitter secretion may cause reticular activating system (RAS) dysfunction.Citation5,Citation10 Increased secretion of the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in migraine patientsCitation29 may be involved in the dysfunction of RAS, thereby changing the state of consciousness.Citation30 The hypothalamus plays an important role in migraine. Resting regional cerebral blood flow decreases in the lateral hypothalamus immediately prior to a migraine headache.Citation31 Moreover, resting functional connectivity strength decreases between the lateral hypothalamus and the pain processing pathways (such as the midbrain periaqueductal gray, dorsal pons, rostral ventromedial medulla, and cingulate cortex) before a migraine episode. Abnormal cerebral cortex function can also cause migraine aura symptoms.Citation32 Abnormal neural activation within specific consciousness networks, including the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices, can lead to the alteration of consciousness. Most MBA with DOC patients have a family history of migraine. A variety of mutations in genes (such as CACNA1A, ATP1A2, SCN1A, KCKN18, PRRT2, and CSNK1D)Citation33 and rare functional gene network abnormalities (such as thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor and oxytocin receptor signaling pathways, Alzheimer’s disease pathway, serotonin receptor pathway, and general heterotrimeric G-protein signaling pathways) are related to migraine.Citation34 However, there are no reports of genetic susceptibility in patients with DOC.

The etiology of MBA with DOC is unclear; therefore, patients can only avoid exposure to MBA with DOC-inducing factors to reduce the frequency of attacks. The most common predisposing factorsCitation17 are strong emotional stimulation and sleep disturbance, followed by weather changes, direct sunlight, cold air, high-intensity stress, alcohol consumption, and fatigue.

Clinical Manifestations

The aura symptoms of MBA are diverse, and when MBA is combined with DOC, the clinical manifestations are more complicated. In this review, we used PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to collect case reports of migraine with DOC from 1961 to 2020 ().Citation1Citation15 To improve the recall ratio of the literature, we used different search terms besides “migraine with brainstem aura” (including previously used terms: “basilar artery migraine”, “basilar migraine”, or “basilar-type migraine”). Then, we review the relevant literature to further determine whether there was a MBA with DOC. We found that only five cases (5/27, 18.5%) meet the current diagnostic criteria according to the third edition of the International Headache Classification (ICHD-3).Citation18 This was related to the update of the diagnostic criteria released in 2018. However, this cannot accurately calculate the incidence of MBA with DOC.

Table 1 Previously Diagnosed MBA with DOC Cases

Aura Symptoms

The premonitory symptoms of migraine include, among others, blurred vision, distorted vision, flashing light, nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and sound fear; these can occur several hours to several days before the onset of migraine,Citation35 and usually last no more than one hour.Citation36 The typical aura symptoms of MBA include vertigo, dysarthria, diplopia, tinnitus, ataxia, and/or DOC, with the most common being diplopia, followed by vertigo, tinnitus, ataxia, and dysarthria.Citation17 Notably, motor and retinal symptoms are not considered aura symptoms of MBA according to the ICHD-3 criteria released in 2018.Citation18 MBA diagnoses previously reported in the literature may be outdated according to the current diagnostic criteria (). Most patients have difficulty in accurately describing the duration of aura symptoms due to their discomfort. The duration is mostly estimated by the time periods in medical records. The aura symptoms can be short for some patients (few seconds), while for most of them, the duration ranges from a few minutes to 30 minutes. The longer aura durations reported, ranged from several hours to days ().

Disorders of Consciousness

Drowsiness, stupor, and coma are the main terms describing a decreased level of consciousness in MBA with DOC patients, with coma being the most common. The duration of DOC can range from a few secondsCitation14,Citation15 to two weeks.Citation7 The majority of patients gradually regain consciousness within a few hours; most commonly within half an hour. In coma patients, DOC lasts from a few seconds to a few minutes (). In general, the duration of DOC in MBA patients is short, and consciousness levels can often return to normal within half an hour.

Headache Characteristics

Headache often occurs after regaining consciousness or at the same time as DOC.Citation2,Citation13 Headaches are frequently severe, accompanied by unbearable, throbbing pain. The most common type of headache is the occipital. About half of the patients have headache symptoms relieved within a few hours, while others can relieve headache symptoms by vomitingCitation1,Citation3,Citation4 or sleeping.Citation12,Citation13,Citation37

Diagnostic Tools

Routine blood tests and cerebrospinal fluid tests for MBA with DOC patients yield normal results,Citation1,Citation3Citation15,Citation37Citation39 except for a single case that reported elevated blood ammonia.Citation2 Abnormalities in MBA with DOC patients are usually reversible, as indicated by studies employing electroencephalogram (EEG), transcranial Doppler (TCD), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and neuroelectrophysiological examination. In 30% of patients, EEGCitation2,Citation5Citation9,Citation13,Citation38 showed a diffuse slow-wave rhythm during a DOC attack; a result commonly obtained from the occipital lobe, followed by the frontal or bilateral temporal lobe. There are no sharp waves, sharp-slow complex waves, or other epileptic waves. EEG becomes normal after recovery or in between the DOC episodes. TCD and MRI can detect basilar artery spasm,Citation5 abnormal signals in the occipital lobe,Citation8 and brain stem capillary dilation during the attack.Citation37 SPECT can detect hypoperfusion of occipital cortex and cerebellar hemisphere.Citation38 The above abnormal signs are reversible and are related to aura symptoms and headaches. Moreover, studies have shown abnormal brainstem auditory evoked potentials in MBA patients,Citation6 which are mainly manifested as the prolonged latency between the III–IV waves, and this abnormality can be normal with the recovery of the clinical symptoms. A case report of MBA with vertebrobasilar dilatation (VBD),Citation39 suggested that VBD may cause chronic pathological changes in the brainstem followed by the corresponding symptoms.

Treatment and Outlook

The main treatments for MBA with DOC aim to relieve symptoms in the acute phase and prevent the recurrence of an attack. Traditional drugs administered during the acute phase include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,Citation12 ergotaminesCitation2 and 5-HT receptor agonists.Citation40 Administration of 5-HT receptor agonists is currently the most common treatment of acute migraine. The 5-HT 1B/1D receptor agonists (triptans) were used to treat MBA patients.Citation41 Triptans can induce vasoconstriction, which leads to cardio-cerebrovascular side effects; therefore, their use in MBA treatment has ceased.Citation7,Citation9 Although triptans have traditionally been contraindicated in MBA under drug instructions, as the understanding of migraine has evolved substantially, multiple publications have suggested the relative safety of triptans in related patient populations.Citation42 Evidence of basilar artery constriction as postulated in MBA is lacking. This prohibition of triptans is being reconsidered in the face of evidence suggesting that their use may be safe.Citation43

A recent study found that administration of Lasmiditan does not induce the aforementioned side effects; hence, it can be used to relieve the acute symptoms of MBA.Citation44 It is currently the first and only 5-HT1F receptor agonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration.Citation45 In addition, analysis of the drug’s efficacy found that a dose of 200 mg is more effective than a dose of 100 mg.Citation46 The prevention of migraine should be combined with non-drug measures,Citation47 such as avoiding triggers,Citation17 controlling weight,Citation48 and maintaining a good lifestyle; cognitive behavioral therapyCitation49 can also reduce the frequency of migraine attacks. The pharmacological treatments for migraine prevention include β-receptor antagonists,Citation2 calcium channel blockers,Citation8,Citation13,Citation15,Citation37,Citation38 anti-epileptics,Citation37,Citation39 and tricyclic antidepressants.Citation8,Citation38 Recent studiesCitation50 have found that vitamin B12 and folic acid levels are low in patients with migraine. Thus, vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation can also play a preventive role in migraine. It was recently found that the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is involved in the pathophysiology of migraine.Citation51 CGRP monoclonal antibodies and receptor antagonistsCitation52 are now used as a treatment for the acute phase and the prevention of migraine.Citation53,Citation54

The first-generation CGRP receptor antagonists, gepants, were effective for abortive treatment of migraine.Citation55 However, they were not fully developed because of hepatotoxicity.Citation56 Ubrogepant, also known as MK-1602, is an oral, small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonist for acute migraine treatment.Citation57 A study found that 2 hours after ubrogepant administration, the patient’s headache and aura symptoms were relieved.Citation58 Unlike other gepants, ubrogepant has no hepatotoxicity at therapeutic doses.Citation59 The most common adverse reactions are nausea, somnolence, and dry mouth. The ACHIEVE II Randomized Clinical Trial study found that both 50-mg and 25-mg doses can significantly relieve migraine.Citation60 However, only a 50 mg dose helped to reduce the aura. A Phase III, randomized, 52-week extension trial further confirmed the safety of long-term intermittent use of ubrogepant 50 and 100 mg doses.Citation61 Short-term use of ubrogepant was not related to an increased risk for adverse events.Citation62 The time course of ubrogepant efficacy was demonstrated out to 48 h,Citation63 providing evidence of the long-lasting effect. For the subjective feelings of patients, the potential benefits of ubrogepant could improve patient-centered satisfaction.Citation64

Rimegepant received FDA approval in February, 2020, for acute migraine treatment.Citation65 A randomized, phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial found that 75 mg rimegepant, given via orally disintegrating tablets, were more effective than placebo in the acute treatment of migraine.Citation66 The 75 mg dose of rimegepant had good tolerance and safety for acute treatment of migraine.Citation67 The patients were free of pain attack and free from the most bothersome symptom compared to placebo treated patients.Citation68 For migraine prevention, a recently published Phase 2/3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral rimegepant indicated the tolerability was similar to that of placebo, and no unexpected or serious safety issues were noted.Citation69

In addition to CGRP receptor antagonists, European headache federation guideline recommended monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the CGRP receptor (erenumab) and the CGRP (eptinezumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab) for migraine prevention.Citation70 A small sample study found that rimegepant with CGRP mAbs, as preventive treatment, was safe and well tolerated.Citation71 This suggests that CGRP mAbs combined receptor antagonists have a promising future in the prevention and treatment of migraine. However, it is still necessary to pay attention to the consequences of long-term CGRP blockade, especially when combined with ischemic diseases and when other anti-migraine drugs are used.Citation72

In recent years, there have been some potential biomarkers that can be measured in plasma for migraine patients: (1) the abundance of CD4+ effector memory helper T lymphocytes;Citation73 (2) high serum cystatin C level;Citation74 (3) elevated plasma CGRP level;Citation75Citation77 (4) increased Apo E protein levels;Citation78 (5) mRNA expression of prostacyclin receptor in peripheral blood lymphocytes;Citation79 (6) increased interictal vasoactive intestinal peptide level;Citation80 (7) decreased serum S100B level.Citation81 Among the abovementioned biomarkers, CGRP seems to be a popular target. However, there were also conflicting studies that found serum CGRP concentration may not be a feasible biomarker for chronic migraine.Citation82 Unfortunately, there is no research on the MBA with DOC subtype.

Conclusion

The basilar artery is less likely to be involved in the onset of MBA and the third edition of the International Headache Classification (ICHD-3) released by IHS has proclaimed that the term “migraine with brainstem aura” will replace the original term “basilar artery migraine” or “basilar-type migraine”.Citation18 Many MBA patients have multiple typical aura symptoms.Citation32 At this time, migraine with typical aura and MBA should be diagnosed simultaneously. Notably, many patients exhibiting motor or retinal symptoms were diagnosed with MBA; however, these symptoms are excluded in the diagnostic criteria for MBA and therefore the diagnosis was outdated according to the ICHD-3 criteria ().

MBA is a rare disease with complex and diverse aura symptoms. Patients may be referred to the relevant departments when the first symptoms of aura start. Coma is the most common clinical manifestation in MBA with DOC patients. Although the overall duration of the patient’s DOC is short and can often return to normal within half an hour, it is still necessary for clinicians to improve their understanding of the disease to avoid misdiagnosis. Although triptans have traditionally been contraindicated in MBA under drug instructions, the evidence of basilar artery constriction as postulated in MBA is lacking. This prohibition of triptans is being reconsidered in the face of evidence suggesting that their use may be safe. Lasmiditan is currently the first and only 5-HT 1F receptor agonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists and monoclonal antibody therapies may be the most promising for future consideration.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by grants from Shanxi Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission (No. 2017033); Doctoral Fund of the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (No. YB161706, No. BS03201631); Shanxi Applied Basic Research Program (No. 201801D221426).

References

  • Bickerstaff E. Impairment of consciousness in migraine. Lancet. 1961;2(7211):1057–1059. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(61)92538-7
  • Lee C, Lance J. Migraine stupor. Headache. 1977;17(1):32–38. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.1977.hed1701032.x
  • Hockaday J. Basilar migraine in childhood. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1979;21(4):455–463. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1979.tb01649.x
  • Smith M, Glass S. An adolescent girl with headache and syncope. J Adolesc Healthc. 1989;10(1):54–56. doi:10.1016/0197-0070(89)90049-1
  • Frequin S, Linssen W, Pasman J, Hommes O, Merx H. Recurrent prolonged coma due to basilar artery migraine. A case report. Headache. 1991;31(2):75–81. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.1991.hed3102075.x
  • Ganji S, Hellman S, Stagg S, Furlow J. Episodic coma due to acute basilar artery migraine: correlation of EEG and brainstem auditory evoked potential patterns. Clin EEG. 1993;24(1):44–48. doi:10.1177/155005949302400110
  • Muellbacher W, Mamoli B. Prolonged impaired consciousness in basilar artery migraine. Headache. 1994;34(5):282–285. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.1994.hed3405282.x
  • Maytal J, Libman R, Lustrin E. Basilar artery migraine and reversible imaging abnormalities. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19(6):1116–1119.
  • Li Q, Tan G, Zhou J. Basilar-type migraine with coma: case reports and literature review. Pain Med. 2011;12(4):654–656. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01080.x
  • Marsala S, Gioulis M. Basilar migraine mistaken for encephalitis. Neurolog Sci. 2012;33(1):213–214. doi:10.1007/s10072-011-0658-5
  • Inoue Y, Yabe T. Lomerizine therapy for the treatment of benign paroxysmal vertigo of childhood transitioning into atypical basilar migraine: a case report. Exp Ther Med. 2013;5(6):1573–1575. doi:10.3892/etm.2013.1035
  • Nesbitt A, Leschziner G. Migraine with brainstem aura presenting as recurrent hypersomnia (Kleine-Levin syndrome). Pract Neurol. 2016;16(5):402–405. doi:10.1136/practneurol-2016-001418
  • Chou I, Lee I, Hong S. Basilar-type migraine: an overlooked cause of loss of consciousness in pediatric emergency rooms. Pediatr Neonatol. 2018;59(3):315–316. doi:10.1016/j.pedneo.2017.08.010
  • Rossi F, Gonzalez E, Rossi E, Tsakadze N. Exploding head syndrome as aura of migraine with brainstem aura: a case report. J Orofac Pain Headache. 2018;32(2):e34–e36. doi:10.11607/ofph.1950
  • Chirchiglia D, Chirchiglia P, Marotta R. A singular association of migraine with brainstem aura and Alice in Wonderland syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019;35(8):1435–1437. doi:10.1007/s00381-019-04170-8
  • Kirchmann M, Thomsen L, Olesen J. Basilar-type migraine: clinical, epidemiologic, and genetic features. Neurology. 2006;66(6):880–886. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000203647.48422.dd
  • Ying G, Fan W, Li N, et al. Clinical characteristics of basilar-type migraine in the neurological clinic of a university hospital. Pain Med. 2014;15(7):1230–1235. doi:10.1111/pme.12402
  • [No authors listed]. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1–211. doi:10.1177/0333102417738202
  • Chaudhry P, Friedman D. Hiccups as a migraine aura. Cephalalgia. 2015;35(9):831–834. doi:10.1177/0333102414560633
  • Bickerstaff E. Basilar artery migraine. Lancet. 1961;277(7167):15–17. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(61)92184-5
  • Kondziella D, Bender A, Diserens K, van Erp W. European academy of neurology guideline on the diagnosis of coma and other disorders of consciousness. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(5):741–756. doi:10.1111/ene.14151
  • Nagata E. Recent advances in the elucidation of migraine pathophysiology. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2020;60(1):20–26. doi:10.5692/clinicalneurol.cn-001348
  • Shevel E. The extracranial vascular theory of migraine–a great story confirmed by the facts. Headache. 2011;51(3):409–417. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.01844.x
  • Charles A, Baca S. Cortical spreading depression and migraine. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9(11):637–644. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.192
  • Cui Y, Kataoka Y, Watanabe Y. Role of cortical spreading depression in the pathophysiology of migraine. Neurosci Bull. 2014;30(5):812–822. doi:10.1007/s12264-014-1471-y
  • Ramachandran R. Neurogenic inflammation and its role in migraine. Semin Immunopathol. 2018;40(3):301–314. doi:10.1007/s00281-018-0676-y
  • Edvinsson L, Haanes K, Warfvinge K. Does inflammation have a role in migraine? Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(8):483–490. doi:10.1038/s41582-019-0216-y
  • Cavestro C, Ferrero M, Mandrino S, Di Tavi M, Rota E. Novelty in Inflammation and Immunomodulation in Migraine. Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(27):2919–2936. doi:10.2174/1381612825666190709204107
  • Aguila M, Rebbeck T, Leaver A, et al. The association between clinical characteristics of migraine and brain GABA levels: an Exploratory Study. J Pain. 2016;17(10):1058–1067. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2016.06.008
  • Requena I, Indakoetxea B, Lema C, Santos B, García-Castiñeira A, Arias M. Coma associated with migraine. Revista Neurologia. 1999;29(11):1048–1051.
  • Meylakh N, Marciszewski K, Di Pietro F, Macefield V, Macey P, Henderson L. Altered regional cerebral blood flow and hypothalamic connectivity immediately prior to a migraine headache. Cephalalgia. 2020;40(5):448–460. doi:10.1177/0333102420911623
  • Demarquay G, Ducros A, Montavont A, Mauguiere F. Migraine with brainstem aura: why not a cortical origin? Cephalalgia. 2018;38(10):1687–1695. doi:10.1177/0333102417738251
  • Sutherland H, Griffiths L. Genetics of migraine: insights into the molecular basis of migraine disorders. Headache. 2017;57(4):537–569. doi:10.1111/head.13053
  • Rasmussen A, Kogelman L, Kristensen D, Chalmer M, Olesen J, Hansen T. Functional gene networks reveal distinct mechanisms segregating in migraine families. Brain. 2020;143(10):awaa242. doi:10.1093/brain/awaa242
  • Karsan N, Goadsby P. Biological insights from the premonitory symptoms of migraine. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(12):699–710. doi:10.1038/s41582-018-0098-4
  • Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33(9):629–808. doi:10.1177/0333102413485658
  • Beukers R, Roos Y. Pontine capillary telangiectasia as visualized on MR imaging causing a clinical picture resembling basilar-type migraine: a case report. J Neurol. 2009;256(10):1775–1777. doi:10.1007/s00415-009-5204-5
  • Cannas A, Solla P, Mascia M, et al. Medulloblastoma induces unusual headache with clinical picture of basilar-type migraine complicated by ischaemic infarcts. Cephalalgia. 2006;26(10):1238–1241. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01176.x
  • Huang L, Yu C, Wang B, Zhang H, Li L, Wang Y. Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia causing a presentation resembling basilar-type migraine. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115(6):784–786. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.07.007
  • Huang P, Yang F, Chang C, Yang C. Targeting the 5-HT and 5-HT receptors for acute migraine treatment. Prog Brain Res. 2020;255:99–121. doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.05.010
  • Negro A, Koverech A, Martelletti P. Serotonin receptor agonists in the acute treatment of migraine: a review on their therapeutic potential. J Pain Res. 2018;11:515–526. doi:10.2147/jpr.S132833
  • Vgontzas A, Burch R. episodic migraine with and without aura: key differences and implications for pathophysiology, management, and assessing risks. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018;22(12):78. doi:10.1007/s11916-018-0735-z
  • Mathew PG, Klein BC. Getting to the heart of the matter: migraine, triptans, DHE, ditans, CGRP antibodies, First/Second-Generation gepants, and cardiovascular risk. Headache. 2019;59(8):1421–1426. doi:10.1111/head.13601
  • Curto M, Cipolla F, Cisale G, et al. Profiling lasmiditan as a treatment option for migraine. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020;21(2):147–153. doi:10.1080/14656566.2019.1694004
  • Lamb Y. Lasmiditan: first approval. Drugs. 2019;79(18):1989–1996. doi:10.1007/s40265-019-01225-7
  • Yang Y, Sun Y, Gao B, Wang Z, Chen Z, Wang Z. Lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. CNS Drugs. 2020;34(10):1015–1024. doi:10.1007/s40263-020-00753-1
  • Hamann T, Kamm K, Kropp P, Rimmele F, Jürgens T. Migraine prophylaxis-all just antibodies?: medical and nonmedical migraine preventive treatment in times of CGRP antibodies. Schmerz. 2020;34(6):476–485. doi:10.1007/s00482-020-00500-x
  • Kristoffersen E, Børte S, Hagen K, Zwart J, Winsvold B. Migraine, obesity and body fat distribution - a population-based study. J headache Pain. 2020;21(1):97. doi:10.1186/s10194-020-01163-w
  • Oskoui M, Pringsheim T, Billinghurst L, et al. Practice guideline update summary: pharmacologic treatment for pediatric migraine prevention: report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Headache Society. Neurology. 2019;93(11):500–509. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000008105
  • Aydin H, Bucak I, Geyik M. Vitamin B12 and folic acid levels in pediatric migraine patients. Acta Neurol Belg. 2020. doi:10.1007/s13760-020-01491-3
  • Meßlinger K. Pathophysiological role of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine and cluster headache. Schmerz. 2020;34(2):181–187. doi:10.1007/s00482-020-00448-y
  • Goadsby P, Dodick D, Ailani J, et al. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of orally administered atogepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults: a double-blind, randomised phase 2b/3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(9):727–737. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30234-9
  • Charles A, Pozo-Rosich P. Targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide: a new era in migraine therapy. Lancet. 2019;394(10210):1765–1774. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32504-8
  • Ferrari M, Diener H, Ning X, et al. Fremanezumab versus placebo for migraine prevention in patients with documented failure to up to four migraine preventive medication classes (FOCUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3b trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10203):1030–1040. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31946-4
  • Hong P, Tan T, Liu Y, Xiao J. Gepants for abortive treatment of migraine: a network meta-analysis. Brain Behav. 2020;10(8):e01701. doi:10.1002/brb3.1701
  • Moreno-Ajona D, Perez-Rodriguez A, Goadsby PJ. Gepants, calcitonin-gene-related peptide receptor antagonists: what could be their role in migraine treatment? Curr Opin Neurol. 2020;33(3):309–315. doi:10.1097/WCO.0000000000000806
  • Curto M, Capi M, Cipolla F, Cisale GY, Martelletti P, Lionetto L. Ubrogepant for the treatment of migraine. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020;21(7):755–759. doi:10.1080/14656566.2020.1721462
  • Dodick DW, Lipton RB, Ailani J, et al. Ubrogepant for the treatment of migraine. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(23):2230–2241. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1813049
  • Dhir A. Ubrogepant to treat migraine. Drugs Today (Barc). 2020;56(7):459–467. doi:10.1358/dot.2020.56.7.3157311
  • Lipton RB, Dodick DW, Ailani J, et al. Effect of ubrogepant vs placebo on pain and the most bothersome associated symptom in the acute treatment of migraine: the ACHIEVE II Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;322(19):1887–1898. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.16711
  • Ailani J, Lipton RB, Hutchinson S, et al. Long-term safety evaluation of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: phase 3, randomized, 52-Week Extension Trial. Headache. 2020;60(1):141–152. doi:10.1111/head.13682
  • Yang Y, Chen M, Sun Y, Gao B, Chen Z, Wang Z. Safety and efficacy of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of episodic migraine: a meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. CNS Drugs. 2020;34(5):463–471. doi:10.1007/s40263-020-00715-7
  • Goadsby PJ, Blumenfeld AM, Lipton RB, et al. Time course of efficacy of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: clinical implications. Cephalalgia. 2020:333102420970523. doi:10.1177/0333102420970523
  • Dodick DW, Lipton RB, Ailani J, et al. Ubrogepant, an acute treatment for migraine, improved patient-reported functional disability and satisfaction in 2 single-attack phase 3 Randomized Trials, ACHIEVE I and II. Headache. 2020;60(4):686–700. doi:10.1111/head.13766
  • Negro A, Martelletti P. Rimegepant for the treatment of migraine. Drugs Today (Barc). 2020;56(12):769–780. doi:10.1358/dot.2020.56.12.3211624
  • Croop R, Goadsby PJ, Stock DA, et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet for the acute treatment of migraine: a randomised, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10200):737–745. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31606-X
  • Gao B, Yang Y, Wang Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine: evidence from Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1577. doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.01577
  • Lipton RB, Croop R, Stock EG, et al. Rimegepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, for migraine. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(2):142–149. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1811090
  • Croop R, Lipton RB, Kudrow D, et al. Oral rimegepant for preventive treatment of migraine: a phase 2/3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10268):51–60. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32544-7
  • Sacco S, Bendtsen L, Ashina M, et al. European headache federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor for migraine prevention. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):6. doi:10.1186/s10194-018-0955-y
  • Berman G, Croop R, Kudrow D, et al. Safety of rimegepant, an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, plus CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine. Headache. 2020;60(8):1734–1742. doi:10.1111/head.13930
  • de Vries T, Al-Hassany L, MaassenVanDenBrink A. Evaluating rimegepant for the treatment of migraine. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021;1–7. doi:10.1080/14656566.2021.1895749
  • Pavelek Z, Soucek O, Krejsek J, et al. The role of the immune system and the biomarker CD3 + CD4 + CD45RA-CD62L- in the pathophysiology of migraine. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):12277. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69285-4
  • Akda GT, Uca AU. Cystatin C as a potential biomarker to evaluate migraine. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2020;78(6):337–341. doi:10.1590/0004-282X20200005
  • Cernuda-Morollon E, Larrosa D, Ramon C, Vega J, Martinez-Camblor P, Pascual J. Interictal increase of CGRP levels in peripheral blood as a biomarker for chronic migraine. Neurology. 2013;81(14):1191–1196. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a6cb72
  • Ramon C, Cernuda-Morollon E, Pascual J. Calcitonin gene-related peptide in peripheral blood as a biomarker for migraine. Curr Opin Neurol. 2017;30(3):281–286. doi:10.1097/WCO.0000000000000440
  • Fan PC, Kuo PH, Lee MT, Chang SH, Chiou LC. Plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide: a potential biomarker for diagnosis and therapeutic responses in pediatric migraine. Front Neurol. 2019;10:10. doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00010
  • Yuasa N, Nagata E, Fujii N, Ito M, Tsukamoto H, Takizawa S. Serum apolipoprotein E may be a novel biomarker of migraine. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190620. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190620
  • Kheirollahi M, Kazemi M, Amini G, et al. Expression of prostaglandin I2 (prostacyclin) receptor in blood of migraine patients: a potential biomarker. Adv Biomed Res. 2015;4(1):121. doi:10.4103/2277-9175.158030
  • Cernuda-Morollon E, Martinez-Camblor P, Alvarez R, Larrosa D, Ramon C, Pascual J. Increased VIP levels in peripheral blood outside migraine attacks as a potential biomarker of cranial parasympathetic activation in chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2015;35(4):310–316. doi:10.1177/0333102414535111
  • Celikbilek A, Sabah S, Tanik N, Ak H, Atalay T, Yilmaz N. Is serum S100B protein an useful biomarker in migraine? Neurol Sci. 2014;35(8):1197–1201. doi:10.1007/s10072-014-1679-7
  • Lee MJ, Lee SY, Cho S, Kang ES, Chung CS. Feasibility of serum CGRP measurement as a biomarker of chronic migraine: a critical reappraisal. J Headache Pain. 2018;19(1):53. doi:10.1186/s10194-018-0883-x