53
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Corneal clarity measurements in patients with keratoconus undergoing either penetrating or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

, , , , &
Pages 577-585 | Published online: 23 Mar 2018

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the corneal clarity measurement between penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in patients with keratoconus, using densitometry software for the Oculus Pentacam.

Methods

A retrospective comparative study was carried out at Manchester Royal Eye Hospital. Data were collected 12–18 months after corneal transplantation for keratoconus, including postoperative corneal densitometry, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and other relevant clinical details.

Results

Analysis of 37 keratoconus eyes from 36 patients found there was a significantly higher corneal densitometry measurement after DALK than PK. This was predominantly in the posterior layer of the concentric zone 0–2 mm of the cornea (P=0.0004). A significant correlation was found between postoperative BCVA and corneal densitometry in DALK groups at full thickness (P=0.03). This correlation was seen in the central 0–2 mm (P=0.03) and posterior 0–2 mm (P=0.04) zones. In addition, within the DALK group, a correlation was found between central corneal thickness and densitometry at full thickness 2–6 mm (P=0.007), central 0–2 (P=0.04), central 2–6 mm (P=0.01), and at posterior 2–6 mm (P=0.01) zones.

Conclusion

This study showed that corneal densitometry measurement differs depending on the type of corneal transplantation used to treat keratoconus patients. Densitometry may have an important role to play in the final BCVA achieved by patients undergoing corneal transplantation for keratoconus. Analysis of Oculus Pentacam images provides an objective evaluation to monitor the cornea status after the surgery.

Introduction

Keratoconus (KCN) is a non-inflammatory ectatic dystrophy characterized by successive thinning, steepening, and apical conical projection of the cornea. Irregular astigmatism and myopic changes result in progressive visual impairment, which arises due to shifts in the shape of the cornea.Citation1 In KCN, vision is improved with spectacle correction and/or soft contact lenses until irregular astigmatism demands the use of rigid gas permeable (RGB) contact lenses.Citation2,Citation3 In severe cases, a corneal transplant may be necessary for visual improvement.Citation4

When a corneal transplant is deemed necessary, a full thickness penetrating keratoplasty (PK)Citation5 has historically been the treatment of choice. However, advances in surgical techniques over the last decade have led to less invasive procedures such as deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) becoming more popular.Citation6

PK involves the complete replacement of the affected (8–9 mm) cornea with healthy donor corneal tissue. However, it is now the trend to perform lamellar transplants, aimed at replacing only abnormal corneal tissue.Citation7 DALK is now used to treat KCN and other diseases that may cause anterior scarring or ectasia. This procedure involves the replacement of only the affected corneal stroma and overlying epithelium, thereby preserving the patient’s endothelial layer and Descemet’s membrane. This established technique confers a number of advantages. Throughout this surgical procedure, the eye remains “closed”, reducing the potential risk of intraocular infection (endophthalmitis) and choroidal hemorrhage. As the patient’s own endothelial layer is preserved, the risk of rejection is significantly reduced.Citation8 Structural integrity is preserved, thereby reducing the risk of traumatic graft dehiscence.Citation9 One concern of this technique, however, has been the loss of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), thought to be due to the interface between the donor and recipient tissue.Citation10

The healthy cornea does not absorb discernible light, and the dispersal of light is minimal. Therefore, densitometry can provide a measurement of the level of the transparency of the cornea. Densitometry of the whole cornea can be measured in a single scan using the Pentacam. The standardization of the density begins from 0 to 100. As a result, 0 implies that the cornea demonstrates no blurring, while 100 signifies that the cornea is totally obscure.Citation11 The Pentacam (Oculus Inc., Wetzlar, Germany) facilitates assessment of the whole anterior section from the anterior corneal surface, through to the surface of the posterior lens by use of a rotary Scheimpflug camera.Citation12

Despite the large number of transplants performed for keratoconus, no corneal densitometry measurements have been reported. Historically, post-surgery analyses for patients recovering from corneal grafts are conducted by use of qualitative analysis of slit-lamp bio microscopy.Citation13Citation15 This is possibly inadequate, because it appears to differ from visit to visit and from clinician to clinician.

In this study we have used densitometry to assess and compare the outcome of both PK and DALK grafts in keratoconus patients.

Methods

Participants

This was a retrospective, comparative, and non-randomized cross-sectional study and was approved by Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK and NREC local ethics committee. The research followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the subjects after explanation of the nature of the study. Patients with keratoconus attending the Manchester Royal Eye Hospital (MREH) cornea clinic were selected if they had undergone corneal transplantation, either DALK or PK. Inclusion criteria for the study were patients 18 years or above who had a postoperative follow-up between 12 and 18 months where Pentacam images had been taken.

Clinical notes were examined where relevant information, including patient age, gender, corneal disease, date of surgery, and type of surgery, were recorded for descriptive data analysis. Postoperative parameters including BCVA in logMAR, and clinical details were also extracted from the notes for data analysis.

Surgical technique

The surgical procedures (DALK and PK) were performed by one of three surgeons, who used the same surgical technique.Citation7 PK was performed with a standard technique using a Hessburg–Barron trephine (JedMed Instrument Co., St Louis, MO).Citation16 All DALK procedures were performed using Anwar’s big-bubble technique,Citation17Citation19 with the aim to obtain a type 1 big-bubble.Citation9

In all cases, the graft diameter was between 8.00 and 8.25 mm. Corneal tissue was issued by NHS Blood and Transplant (UK) services. All tissue met or exceeded the minimum standard for transplantation to include a minimum cell count of 2,200 cells/mm2 and a central clear cornea of 9.00 mm. All recipients received tissue within a 30 years age difference. Wherever possible, all sutures had been removed before the time of imaging and BCVA measurements.

Pentacam imaging

Pentacam images are routinely used clinically to assess patients undergoing transplant surgery. A new update in the computer software now allows the corneal clarity to be measured from the same image across different corneal zones and layers. Pentcam gives numeric value of the clarity at anterior, central, posterior, and total depth layers. In addition, similar numeric values are given by Pentacam at 0–2, 2–6, 6–10, and 10–12 mm of the concentric corneal zone, and for the total corneal dimeter.Citation11 The protocol takes 5 min and is non-invasive. Patients were imaged prior to any other eye examination or drop administration. A single image of the cornea was taken at each visit. All images were taken by a trained member of staff in a darkened room to minimize the effect of ambient lighting on the corneal measurements. All images selected met the quality requirement, as determined by Pentacam analysis.

Postoperative data of corneal densitometry for all layers at zones 0–2 mm and 2–6 mm, in addition to central corneal thickness (CCT) were retrieved from the Oculus Pentacam database. The measurements from the Pentacam images were compared with BCVA and CCT to determine if these quick and easy measurements could provide additional information on the surgical outcome of corneal transplants using different techniques.

Statistical analysis

Data analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac, Version 23.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY), and Graph pad prism7 for Windows. Descriptive statistics were presented as the mean ± SD. Normality of data was examined using the Shapiro–Wilk test, which is more appropriate for small sample sizes (<50 samples). Student’s t-test for two independent samples was used when parametric analysis was possible. Pearson correlation (r) was used when looking at the relationship between surgical outcomes of the study. A P-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

A total of 37 eyes from 36 patients were studied in the keratoconus group. The sample characteristics are comparable between both groups. However, there were more males than females in this study (14:7 PK and 11:5 DALK). Both the PK and DALK groups showed good similarity in their demographic characteristics and demonstrated no statistical difference in the age of patients (P=0.43) (). The mean period of time between surgery and BCVA measurement in this study was comparable, and showed no statistical significant between both groups (P=0.80). In the PK group, 66% of eyes (n=14) achieved postoperative BCVA of 0.3 LogMAR (6/12) or better, while in the DALK group, 81% of eyes (n=13) achieved postoperative BCVA of 0.3 LogMAR (6/12) or better.

Table 1 Mean and SD of age, time of the densitometry, and BCVA in both PK and DALK

There was no statistical significance between the mean period of time between surgery and densitometry measurements between the two groups. summarizes the demographic data. Densitometry measurements were taken for both the central 0–2 mm and the surrounding 2–6 mm concentric zone; results are summarized in . The measurements showed that there is a significant statistical difference between the two groups when the full depth cornea was examined at 0–2 mm concentric zone (P=0.02). However, further statistical analysis showed a higher corneal densitometry measurement in the posterior layer after DALK, which was statistically significant for the 0–2 mm of the cornea zone (P=0.0004). There was no statistical difference in postoperative central corneal thickness between the two groups ().

Table 2 Summary of the postoperative densitometry in the surrounding 0–2 and 2–6 mm annulus zone of the cornea

Table 3 Corneal thickness postsurgery in both groups

There was a correlation, but it did not reach significance, between postoperative BCVA and the densitometry measurement after the surgery in the keratoconus group for PK, except with the posterior layer at zone 2–6 mm of the cornea, which was statistically significant at P<0.05 ().

Figure 1 Correlation between BCVA and corneal densitometry in different corneal zones and layers in the PK group (r = correlations coefficient).

Note: *Significant at P<0.05.
Abbreviations: BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; PK, penetrating keratoplasty.
Figure 1 Correlation between BCVA and corneal densitometry in different corneal zones and layers in the PK group (r = correlations coefficient).

In the DALK group, a correlation was shown between BCVA and the densitometry measurement after the surgery. These correlations were found at central zone at 0–2 mm corneal concentric zone. Correlation with BCVA was found also in the posterior layer of the corneal zone at 0–2 mm and at the full depth of corneal zone at 0–2 mm, P<0.05 ().

Figure 2 Correlation between BCVA and corneal densitometry in different corneal zones and layers for the DALK groups. (r = correlations coefficient).

Note: *Significant at P<0.05.
Abbreviations: BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Figure 2 Correlation between BCVA and corneal densitometry in different corneal zones and layers for the DALK groups. (r = correlations coefficient).

Central corneal thickness was found to be correlated with corneal densitometry in the DALK group only. These correlations were found to take place at full depth 2–6 mm, posterior 2–6 mm, and at both central 0–2 mm and 2–6 mm, P<0.05 ().

Figure 3 Correlation between central corneal thickness and corneal densitometry in different corneal zones and layers in the DALK group (r = correlations coefficient).

Note: *Significant at P<0.05 and **P<0.01.
Abbreviation: DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Figure 3 Correlation between central corneal thickness and corneal densitometry in different corneal zones and layers in the DALK group (r = correlations coefficient).

Discussion

DALK is becoming the procedure of choice when corneal transplantation is needed to treat advanced keratoconus. It has several advantages compared to PK as it reduces the number of risk factors related to intraocular surgery, resulting in fewer allograft rejections and other long-term problems.Citation20

This study has shown that, between 12 and 18 months after surgery, the mean corneal densitometry for patients with KCN, having had either PK or DALK, was still higher compared to a normal control value within a matched-age group, as illustrated by Dhubhghaill et alCitation21 and Alzahrani et al.Citation22 At all corneal regions, apart from the central area at 2–6 mm annulus, the average corneal densitometry was greater in DALK than PK. This suggests that a greater scattering of light was provided by DALK as opposed to PK. Variations in corneal densitometry quantification at the posterior layer were statistically significant (P<0.05) in the 0–2 mm corneal zone. This result in the DALK group suggests the host/donor interface reduces clarity, and could have an effect on vision.Citation23

The corneal densitometry was quantified using the manufactures pre-set for the posterior 60 µm of the cornea. In DALK, the quantification of densitometry may be even higher if the quantification marker has been customized to concentrate on the host/donor interface of the region. The same pre-set was applied for all layers, the host/donor interface morphology, which results in considerably greater quantification of densitometry in the posterior layer following DALK, which is best described by research employing confocal microscopy. When employing a confocal microscope after DALK, researchersCitation24 discovered a keratocyte configuration that was uneven and minimized as compared to PK in keratoconus. Several contributory elements were considered by Feizi et alCitation24 to clarify their results, including mechanical injury of the host and donor sides during surgery, and transient lack of an endothelium pump, resulting in an influx of fluid at the interface (Marchini et al).Citation25

A subsequent wound healing response may also cause undesirable complications like corneal haze, which may reduce corneal clarity. Remodeling of the extracellular matrix and repopulation of keratocytes following the surgical induced injury of DALK can influence the corneal transparency resulting from reorganization of the corneal fibrils. Netto et al,Citation26 showed that significant apoptosis has been detected within 4 h after corneal injury. Following keratocyteapoptosis, the cells undergo secondary necrosis and later activate other keratocytes at deeper layers of the stroma. In addition, there is an activation of inflammatory cells to invade the stromal layer and engulf the resulting dead cells.Citation27 Keratocytes that die in the anterior stroma are replenished in just 2–4 days by proliferation and migration of neighboring keratocytes.Citation28 The proliferation and migration of residually activated keratocytes begins 12–24 h after epithelial injury. These activated cells may start synthesizing matrix metalloproteinases for tissue remodeling. The replenishing cells in the anterior keratocytes are the activated myofibroblast cells between 1 and 2 weeks postinjury, which produce collagen, hyaluronic acid, growth factors modulating epithelial healing, and more.Citation26 The role of myofibroblast cells is very important in remodeling the extracellular matrix and stroma.

The whole process of keratocytes apoptosis, secondary necrosis, activation, proliferation, migration, and transformation regulates corneal wound healing and, consequently, causes haze formation.Citation29 As discussed above, the raised densitometry quantification in DALK could be the result of mechanical injury from the surgical technique used within this study. It would be interesting to contrast the densitometry result in different DALK procedures to include those performed using Big-Bubble type 1, Big-Bubble type 2, and manual dissection.

It is debateable if reduced endothelial cell density (ECD) can also contribute to our results, as the endothelium pump is crucial for sustaining the transparency of the cornea. It was establishedCitation30 that, if there was no perforation of Descement’s membrane (DM) in surgery, there was considerably less attrition of endothelial cells following DALK as opposed to PK.Citation10,Citation31,Citation32 This raises the question that, as the host’s own endothelium is maintained by DALK, is the reduction in the transparency of the cornea in DALK entirely due to the host/donor interface following this technique when ECD is higher as opposed to PK.

Our study demonstrated that the average postoperative BCVA result employing the LogMAR chart in DALK is better than that of PK, although this does not reach statistical significance. This was interesting but unexpected, given the raised corneal densitometry quantified in the DALK patients. There are uncertainties surrounding the quality of vision after DALK. There is conflicting published evidence on BCVA, with some studies demonstrating similarity between PK and DALK,Citation33Citation35 whilst others have reported decreased vision in eyes after DALK.Citation23,Citation36,Citation37 However, a numbers of studies have concluded that DALK provides better BCVA,Citation36,Citation38Citation40 in keeping with our own findings. Researchers have proposed that, after lamellar graft surgery, unevenness at the host/donor interface could reduce vision in some eyes.Citation41 The almost complete exposure of DM by using the big-bubble technique most likely has a role in the improved postoperative BCVA in DALK, as opposed to PK.Citation35

The limitation in this study was its retrospective nature and the relatively small sample size for each group that could impede statistical analysis, hence a larger sample size would increase the strength of any further analysis.

In conclusion, this study has found increased densitometry measurements in DALK compared to PK, primarily at the posterior layer within the 0–2 mm zone. This doesn’t appear to have an effect on BCVA when compared with those patients undergoing PK for KCN. We have discussed a number of factors which may have contributed to the raised densitometry result.

This is the first study to demonstrate raised densitometry in patients undergoing DALK and provides further information on this lamellar technique. In the future, other forms of corneal imaging to include spectral domain optical coherence tomography and confocal microscopy may help provide greater understanding on this important surgical zone. Corneal densitometry measurements provided by the Oculus Pentacam provide an objective evaluation to further monitor the treatment outcome of corneal transplants surgery in KCN. It provides a non-invasive technique which is safe to use and useful in planning the management of surgery.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Manchester Royal Eye hospital (Corneal Clinic) for supporting patient’s recruitments for this study. The study was supported by the Armed Forces Medical Services, Ministry of Defence, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • KrachmerJHFederRSBelinMWKeratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disordersSurv Ophthalmol19842842933226230745
  • SmiddyWEHamburgTRKracherGPStarkWJKeratoconus. Contact lens or keratoplasty?Ophthalmology19889544874923050693
  • AtebaraNAsbellPAzarDContact lens, Chapter 5Clinical Optics, Basic and Clinical Science CourseSan Franscisco, CAAmerican Academy of Ophthalmology2009167200
  • KanellopoulosAJKruegerRRAsimellisGCross-linking and corneal imaging advancesBiomed Res Int2015201530643925949993
  • LassJHLembachRGParkSBClinical management of keratoconus. A multicenter analysisOphthalmology19909744334452183122
  • JhanjiVSharmaNVajpayeeRBManagement of keratoconus: current scenarioBr J Ophthalmol20119581044105020693553
  • KeenanTDCarleyFYeatesDTrends in corneal graft surgery in the UKBr J Ophthalmol201195446847220584718
  • JonuscheitSDoughtyMJCorneal transplantation for keratoconusScand J Optom Vis Sci20136118
  • McKeeHDBaruaABrahmaAKJhanjiVCarleyFMRupture pressure of the posterior lamella obtained during big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplastyCornea201231111285128722333666
  • ReinhartWJMuschDCJacobsDSLeeWBKaufmanSCShteinRMDeep anterior lamellar keratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty. A report by the American Academy of OphthalmologyOphthalmology2011118120921821199711
  • ChoYKChangHSLaTYAnterior segment parameters using Pentacam and prediction of corneal endothelial cell loss after cataract surgeryKorean J Ophthalmol201024528429021052508
  • SwartzTMartenLWangMMeasuring the cornea: the latest developments in corneal topographyCurr Opin Ophthalmol200718432533317568210
  • RowseyJJFowlerWCTerryMAScoperSVUse of keratoscopy, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and retinoscopy in the management of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplastyRefract Corneal Surg19917133412043541
  • PriceFWPriceMODescemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherenceJ Cataract Refract Surg200632341141816631048
  • MoutsourisKDapenaIHamLBalachandranCOellerichSMellesGROptical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and slit-lamp biomicroscopy in the early detection of graft detachment after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplastyCornea201130121369137521993458
  • LimLPesudovsKCosterDJPenetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: visual outcome and successOphthalmology200010761125113110857832
  • AnwarMTeichmannKDBig-bubble technique to bare Descemet’s membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplastyJ Cataract Refract Surg200228339840311973083
  • JhanjiVBeltzJSharmaNGraueEVajpayeeRB“Double bubble” deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for management of corneal stromal pathologiesInt Ophthalmol201131425726221805107
  • MellesGRRemeijerLGeerardsAJBeekhuisWHA quick surgical technique for deep, anterior lamellar keratoplasty using visco-dissectionCornea200019442743210928751
  • OlsonEATuEYBastiSStromal rejection following deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: implications for postoperative careCornea201231996997322677636
  • DhubhghaillSNRozemaJJJongenelenSHidalgoIRZakariaNTassignonM-JNormative values for corneal densitometry analysis by Scheimpflug optical assessmentInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci201455116216824327608
  • AlzahraniKCarleyFBrahmaAMorleyDHillarbyMCCorneal clarity measurements in healthy volunteers across different age groups: observational studyMedicine20179646e856329145265
  • FunnellCLBallJNobleBAComparative cohort study of the outcomes of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconusEye (Lond)200620552753215877089
  • FeiziSJavadiMAKanaviMRCellular changes of donor corneal tissue after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with keratoconus: a confocal studyCornea201029886687020489579
  • MarchiniGMastropasquaLPedrottiENubileMCiancagliniMSbaboADeep lamellar keratoplasty by intracorneal dissection: a prospective clinical and confocal microscopic studyOphthalmology200611381289130016877068
  • NettoMVMohanRRAmbrosioRJrHutcheonAEZieskeJDWilsonSEWound healing in the cornea: a review of refractive surgery complications and new prospects for therapyCornea200524550952215968154
  • ZieskeJDGuimaraesSRHutcheonAEKinetics of keratocyte proliferation in response to epithelial debridementExp Eye Res2001721333911133180
  • AlioJLJavaloyJCorneal inflammation following corneal photoablative refractive surgery with excimer laserSurv Ophthalmol2013581112523217585
  • AbdelkaderAElewah elSMKaufmanHEConfocal microscopy of corneal wound healing after deep lamellar keratoplasty in rabbitsArch Ophthalmol20101281758020065221
  • ChengYYVisserNSchoutenJSEndothelial cell loss and visual outcome of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty: a randomized multicenter clinical trialOphthalmology2011118230230920832121
  • KubalogluASariESUnalMLong-term results of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for the treatment of keratoconusAm J Ophthalmol2011151576076721333267
  • KhattakANakhliFRAbdullatif AbouolloHMMorphometric changes of corneal endothelial cells following intracameral air for micro perforation of the descemet membrane during big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplastySaudi J Ophthalmol20163029810427330384
  • CoombesAGKirwanJFRostronCKDeep lamellar keratoplasty with lyophilised tissue in the management of keratoconusBr J Ophthalmol200185778879111423449
  • ShimazakiJShimmuraSIshiokaMTsubotaKRandomized clinical trial of deep lamellar keratoplasty vs penetrating keratoplastyAm J Ophthalmol2002134215916512140020
  • SugitaJKondoJDeep lamellar keratoplasty with complete removal of pathological stroma for vision improvementBr J Ophthalmol19978131841889135380
  • WatsonSLRamsayADartJKBunceCCraigEComparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconusOphthalmology200411191676168215350322
  • PandaABageshwarLMRayMSinghJPKumarADeep lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for corneal lesionsCornea199918217217510090362
  • TanDTMehtaJSFuture directions in lamellar corneal transplantationCornea2007269 Suppl 1S21S2817881911
  • FontanaLParenteGTassinariGClinical outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconusAm J Ophthalmol2007143111712417188045
  • BorderieVMWerthelALTouzeauOAllouchCBoutboulSLarocheLComparison of techniques used for removing the recipient stroma in anterior lamellar keratoplastyArch Ophthalmol20081261313718195215
  • SainiJSJainAKSukhijaJSarohaVIndications and outcome of optical partial thickness lamellar keratoplastyCornea200322211111312605042