Indistinguishable gene expression between healthy eyes and eyes with unilateral exfoliative glaucoma

Abstract

Background

Glaucoma is an optic neuropathy associated with visual field loss. There are different types of glaucoma, among them exfoliative glaucoma. Glaucoma can present as unilateral or bilateral. The present study aimed to show the association between gene expression and exfoliation in unilateral glaucoma cases.

Methods

Included patients were suffering from exfoliative glaucoma in one eye, meanwhile the other eye was healthy and used as a control. Lens capsule and conjunctival biopsies were taken from both eyes. Gene expression was analyzed.

Results

Both groups were completely different at baseline regarding intraocular pressure, visual acuity before the operation, visual field damage, optic nerve damage, etc. As for gene expression, the only significant difference was found in CYP1B1 from lens capsules. None of the other genes studied showed differential expression in either lens capsules or conjunctival biopsies.

Conclusion

No difference in gene expression was found between eyes with and without exfoliative glaucoma. Exfoliative glaucoma seems to be a bilateral disease, though the phenotype is not always clinically present.

Keywords:

• exfoliation
• glaucoma
• gene expression
• unilateral

Background

Glaucoma is a family of eye diseases defined by the progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells. Clinically, glaucoma presents as an optic neuropathy leading to visual field defects. Primary open-angle glaucoma, chronic angle-closure glaucoma, and exfoliative glaucoma (XFG) are the most prevalent forms of glaucoma globally and are the most common causes of glaucoma-related blindness worldwide. It has been described that glaucoma development probably depends on both genetic and environmental factors.¹

Exfoliation syndrome (XFS) is an accumulation of greyish material in the anterior part of the eye. These deposits are located on the trabecular meshwork and may contribute to elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), optic nerve degeneration, and XFG. The presence of exfoliation material (XFM) seems to be associated not only with glaucoma. It has been increasingly observed in cataract surgery complications and retinal venous occlusive disease.² Deposits of greyish protein material on the anterior lens surface is the most common and essential diagnostic feature of XFS. The classic pattern of exfoliation becomes visible only when the pupil is fully dilated. The exact chemical composition of XFM remains unknown. It has been suggested that overproduction and abnormal metabolism of glycosaminoglycan could induce the presence of XFS. Regardless of etiology, typical XFM has been demonstrated by electron microscopy in different parts of the eye. Exfoliation has been described in the lens epithelium, the non-pigmented ciliary epithelium, the iris pigment epithelium, the corneal endothelium, the trabecular endothelium, and conjunctiva.^3,4 XFM deposits at the trabecular meshwork creates increased IOP leading to damage to the optic nerve and visual field defects, ie, XFG. Clinically, it is quite common that patients with XFS reveal only unilateral ocular involvement. However, the generalized nature of the disorder suggests that XFS is probably an asymmetric rather than unilateral condition.⁵ The presence of XFS among patients who were scheduled to undergo cataract operation was unilateral in 41.3% of the subjects and bilateral in 58.7%, according to a Turkish study.⁶ In a significant cohort study performed in Sweden, 55% of subjects with unilateral XFS converted to bilateral XFS during a follow-up period of 21 years.⁷

Previous investigations revealed that LOXL1 gene was associated with exfoliation in a population-based study conducted in Iceland. The possible explanation was that products of LOXL1 catalyzed the formation of elastin fibers, found to be a significant component of the lesions in exfoliative glaucoma.⁸ Several other genes have been shown to be associated with the presence of glaucoma, eg, MYOC, OPTN, WDRD36, CYP1B1, GSTM1, and NTF4.^1,9–15

This study aimed to investigate the association between gene expression of LOXL1, MYOC, OPTN, WDRD36, CYP1B1, GSTM1, and NTF4 genes and the presence of XFG in unilateral cases. The contralateral healthy eye served as control.

Methods

Design: nonrandomized cross-sectional control–case study.

Inclusion criteria: patients suffering from XFG in one eye, meanwhile the other eye was healthy (no glaucoma) and free from XFM; both eyes had cataracts which required surgery.

Patients coming to the Eye Department at the Skaraborg Hospital who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were asked to participate in the study. Patients were enrolled between January 2014 and December 2016. Every patient provided written informed consent to participate in the study (including publication of images). The authors have considered the ethical aspects of the research and followed the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee at the Gothenburg University (approval number: 119-12). Due to ethical reasons, the decision to perform cataract surgery was made before asking patients to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria: patients with small pupils (<5 mm); patients with corneal opacities; patients who underwent previous surgeries; patients with poor cooperation under local anesthesia; or patients suffering from conjunctival diseases.

Comprehensive medical and ocular history were obtained for each patient. All patients were examined by the same physician (MA). Included patients were referred to the ophthalmology department due to high IOP detected by an optician. Ophthalmological examinations were performed, and decisions regarding cataract operations were made before including patients in the study. Visual acuity, IOP measurements, gonioscopy, optic nerve status, and the presence or absence of exfoliation were recorded. All patients previously performed visual field tests. Visual acuity was recorded using a Snellen chart. The IOP was measured by Goldmann tonometry three times, and the average was calculated. Gonioscopy was performed in a dark room using a goniolens with undilated pupils, and the anterior chamber angle was classified as 0–4 (according to Shaffer), pigmentation was classified as 0–3, and the inferior angle was registered. The presence of Sampaolesi’s line was also recorded at the inferior angle. The patient’s pupils were dilated, and exfoliation was determined to be present or absent. Unilateral exfoliation was defined clinically as the presence of biomicroscopically detectable XFM on the anterior capsule of the lens or at the pupillary border in one eye after pupillary dilatation with 2.5% phenylephrine and tropicamide 0.5% (Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ, USA). Eyes were classified as “no exfoliation” if there was no evidence of XFM on the pupil, lens or the angle. The optic nerve status was evaluated using a 90 D lens, and the average of vertical cupping was recorded as the cup-to-disc ratio. The optic nerve was also assessed using optical coherence tomography (OCT), (3D OCT-2000; Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The protocol used was the 3D optic disc protocol (6 × 6 mm, 512 × 128) which generates images from 128 horizontal linear scans performed by 512 A-scans and measures the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in a 6 × 6 mm area around the optic disc. OCT scans were considered reliable when the reliability index displayed by the machine was $60. In case of a lower index, the patient was rechecked, and if the index was still under 60 the patient was excluded from the study. All patients performed repeated visual field testing by Humphrey Field Analyzer (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) using the software threshold 24-2. Only reliable visual fields were considered.

XFG was defined as untreated IOP of 22 mmHg or beyond, open anterior chamber angle in gonioscopy, glaucomatous visual field defect (at least two repeatable Humphrey 24-2 test results), and glaucomatous optic nerve damage, concomitant with the presence of XFM, observed at the anterior lens capsule and/or at the pupillary border according to the definition of the European Glaucoma Society.¹⁶

The healthy contralateral eye was defined as normal IOP (≤21 mmHg), normal visual fields (at least two repeatable Humphrey 24-2 test results) and normal optic nerve. Reliable visual fields were defined as ≤10% false positives, ≤20% false negatives, and ≤20% fixation losses. The optic nerve was clinically evaluated using a 90 D lens and OCT. Pupils were dilated, and no exfoliation was present.

The time between XFG diagnosis and the operation were defined as the time between the first occasion XFG was mentioned in the patient’s medical records and the date of surgery.

Surgical procedure

All patients underwent cataract surgery using phacoemulsification technique in both eyes but on different dates. No patient underwent surgery in both eyes on the same day. All operations were performed under local anesthesia by the same surgeon (MA). All surgeries followed our protocol regarding anesthesia and mydriatics. The same protocol was used for patients with and without exfoliation.

A clear corneal incision in the temporal quadrant was made. Then, the anterior chamber was filled with a viscoelastic solution (Duovisc; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA). Continuous curve capsulorrhexis (CCC) was performed using Utrata forceps. CCC was approximately 5–5.5 mm in diameter. No trypan blue was used to dye the capsule. After CCC, the anterior capsule was put in an Eppendorf tube (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St Louis, MO, USA) containing 0.2 mL balanced salt solution (BSS) and transported immediately to a freezer (-80°C) and stored. Then, the rest of the surgery followed the standard steps of phacoemulsification cataract surgery described elsewhere.¹⁷

After completion of cataract surgery, a conjunctival biopsy was taken from the lower fornix. The biopsy was taken with forceps and Vannas scissors. The biopsy was approximately 16–20 mm in length and 10 mm in breadth. The biopsy was put into an Eppendorf tube containing 0.2 mL BSS and immediately transported to a freezer (−80°C) and stored.

RNA extraction, RT and qPCR analysis of human anterior lens capsule and conjunctiva

Twenty snap-frozen lens capsules and 20 snap-frozen conjunctiva biopsies in individual tubes were shipped on dry ice to TATAA Biocenter (TATAA Biocenter AB, Gothenburg, Sweden). The samples were stored at −80°C until analysis. Extraction was carried out using RNeasy Micro RNA isolation kit (Qiagen NV, Venlo, the Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, including carrier and DNAse I treatment. The extracted RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using TATAA Grandscript cDNA synthesis kit (TATAA Biocenter AB) according to protocol. Upon qPCR analysis, the cDNA was diluted 10 × for all samples. qPCR was performed using TATAA SYBR Grand Master mix (TATAA Biocenter AB) on Lightcycler480 (Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) for 12 human reference gene assays from the TATAA Reference Gene Panel (TATAA Biocenter AB) and seven validated assays for genes of interest. Also included was the ValidPrime assay (TATAA Biocenter AB) for control of genomic DNA contamination. All information regarding assays and qPCR setup can be found in the Supplementary material according to MIQE guidelines (Tables S1–S4).¹⁸ The primary analysis of qPCR data was performed with GenEx software (MultiD, Gothenburg, Sweden) using implemented functions for relative quantification. A reference gene screening was performed with Normfinder¹⁹ to find the optimal reference genes.

Assay validation

All assays were validated according to the TATAA Biocenter assay validation system. In short, this includes control of specificity on gBlocks^® Gene Fragments (Integrated DNA Technologies, Skokie, IL, USA), cDNA, and gDNA. The melt curves were controlled for single peaks, and the generated PCR product was checked for the correct fragment size by capillary electrophoresis. Assay efficiency was determined by a seven-point standard curve down to 20 copies.

RT-input

The total RNA concentration was below quantification limit for spectrophotometric measurement (<5 ng/µL), thus the reverse transcription input was not known but did not exceed input limitations. The resulting cDNA yield was expected to be sufficient for the current qPCR experiments, and accordingly, the Cq-values were in an acceptable range (Cq < 30) in all samples for most screened reference genes (Tables S1–S4).

Data analysis

Technical replicates were averaged. The data were corrected for genomic background with ValidPrime (did not change the Cq-values significantly). The data were normalized to reference genes (GAPDH and UBC). Each right eye was normalized to its corresponding left eye. Relative expression to the maximum was set (lowest expression was set to 1). Log2 was applied to data.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). For the baseline analysis, first, a Kolmogorov–Smirnov analysis was performed, in case of normality, Student’s t-test was used. Analysis of gene expression was done using the paired samples Student’s t-test method in case the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test showed normality, otherwise a non-parametric Mann–Whitney test was used.

Results

All included patients were born in Sweden, and all patients’ parents were born in Sweden. The average age of the included patients at the time of surgery was 78.8 ± 4.9 years. Gender distribution was six women and four men. In all cases, the eye showing glaucoma was operated on first due to lower visual acuity than the healthy eye. The mean time between cataract operations (always XFG first) was 3.7 ± 1.1 months. All patients in the glaucoma group were treated with anti-glaucomatous eye drops, the number of medicines was 2.4 ± 0.5. No medications were used in the healthy control group.

A photograph of one of the patients included in the study suffering from XFG is shown in Figure 1. The photograph shows the typical patterns presented in XFG. XFM is most prominent at the pupillary border.

Figure 1 Photograph showing the right eye of a patient included in the study suffering from exfoliative glaucoma.

Notes: Exfoliation material is seen as a margin on the lens surface. The pupil has been dilated.

The time between glaucoma diagnosis and cataract operation was very variable among the patients included, the average time was 4.5 ± 2 years.

Table 1 shows comparisons between the groups at baseline. All comparisons at baseline were significant. The mean visual acuity before the operation was lower in the eyes suffering from exfoliation (0.34) than in the contralateral eyes with cataracts only (0.52) (p = 0.001). It is possible that a reduction in visual acuity in glaucoma patients was not only due to cataracts. The mean IOP was normal in the contralateral healthy eyes (16.3 mmHg), meanwhile it was border-line (21.2 mmHg) in the eyes with glaucoma. All glaucoma patients were receiving IOP-reducing treatment. The visual fields in the glaucoma patients showed a mean deviation (MD) of -9.9 dB and visual field index of 70.2%, revealing that the included patients suffered from moderate glaucoma. The gonioscopy showed open angle in both groups but a significantly increased pigmentation in the XFG patients (p < 0.001).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the included patients

Variables	Eyes with exfoliative glaucoma (n = 10)	Eyes without exfoliative glaucoma (n = 10)	p-value (Student’s t-test)
Mean visual acuity before operation	0.34	0.52	0.001
Mean IOP (mmHg)	21.2	16.3	0.0001
Visual fields MD (dB)	−9.9	−0.58	<0.0001
Visual fields VFI (%)	70.4	98.5	<0.0001
Mean RNFL thickness OCT (µm)	72.7	99.4	<0.0001
Cup-to-disc ratio (0–0.99)	0.78	0.55	<0.0001
Gonioscopy; anterior chamber angle (0–4)	2.7	1.8	0.0003
Gonioscopy: pigmentation (0–3)	2.4	0.7	<0.0001

Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; MD, mean deviation; VFI, visual field index; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; OCT, optical coherence tomography.

Regarding gene expression in the lens capsule and conjunctival biopsies, the only gene that showed a significant result was CYP1B1 in the lens capsule. The rest of the genes in both lens capsule and conjunctival biopsies showed no significant comparisons (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2 Gene expression in conjunctival biopsies comparing healthy individuals versus exfoliative glaucoma patients

Gene	Healthy	Exfoliative glaucoma	Test	p-value
LOXL-1 $(\overline{x}\pm \text{SD})$	10.22 ± 0.91	10.01 ± 0.79	Student’s t-test	0.61
NTF4 $(\overline{x}\pm \text{SD})$	9.27 ± 0.83	9.30 ± 0.92	Student’s t-test	0.94
OPT-N $(\overline{x}\pm \text{SD})$	3.47 ± 0.25	3.52 ± 0.30	Student’s t-test	0.73
WDR36 $(\overline{x}\pm \text{SD})$	5.14 ± 0.35	5.17 ± 0.29	Student’s t-test	0.86
CYP1B1 $(\overline{x}\pm \text{SD})$	6.98 ± 0.95	6.30 ± 1.30	Student’s t-test	0.23

Notes: Data analysis: 1) genes with more than 50% missing data were removed (hMYOC and hGSTM1); 2) technical replicates were averaged; 3) the data were corrected for genomic background with ValidPrime (did not change the Cq-values significantly, except for some samples in hNTF4); 5) the data were normalized to reference genes (PPIA and UBC); 6) each diseased eye was normalized to its corresponding healthy eye; 7) Log2 was applied to data.

Table 3 Gene expression in the lens capsule comparing healthy individuals versus glaucoma patients

Gene	Healthy	Exfoliative glaucoma	Test	p-value
LOXL-1 $(\overline{x}\pm \text{SD})$	7.01 ± 0.89	6.78 ± 0.38	Student’s t-test	0.42
NTF4 $(\overline{x}\pm \text{SD})$	11.94 ± 0.78	12.67 ± 1.05	Student’s t-test	0.15
OPT-N $(\overline{x}\pm \text{SD})$	2.97 ± 0.26	2.80 ± 0.37	Student’s t-test	0.22
WDR36 $(\overline{x}\pm \text{SD})$	5.58 ± 0.15	5.38 ± 0.43	Student’s t-test	0.16
CYP1B1 $(\overline{x}\pm \text{SD})$	4.79 ± 0.90	3.99 ± 0.97	Student’s t-test	0.04*
MYOC $(\overline{x}\pm \text{SD})$	5.94 ± 1.10	6.54 ± 0.91	Student’s t-test	0.16
GSTM1 $(\overline{x}\pm \text{SD})$	7.38 ± 4.94	7.84 ± 5.02	Mann–Whitney	0.52

Notes: Data analysis: 1) technical replicates were averaged; 2) the data were corrected for genomic background with ValidPrime (did not change the Cq-values significantly); 3) the data were normalized to reference genes (GAPDH and UBC); 4) each right eye was normalized to its corresponding left eye; 5) relative expression to the maximum was set (lowest expression was set to 1); 6) Log2 was applied to data.

* Comparison was significant.

Discussion

The present study showed no difference in gene expression of several genes between eyes suffering from XFG versus contralateral healthy eyes of the same patients.

XFS is an accumulation of greyish material in the anterior part of the eye. These deposits may contribute to elevated IOP, optic nerve degeneration, and glaucoma, ie, XFG. Deposits of greyish protein material on the anterior lens surface is the most common and essential diagnostic feature of XFS. XFG has been defined as open-angle glaucoma usually presenting with high IOP levels. The nuclear gene associated with the presence of exfoliation is the LOXL1. Thorleifsson et al first described the importance of this gene in 2007.⁸ The authors described two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the gene LOXL1 that could explain the association with exfoliation. The data suggest that LOXL1 could confer risk of XFG through XFS. The product of LOXL1 catalyzes the formation of elastin fibers, found to be a significant component of the lesions in XFG. Thorleifsson et al studied an Icelandic population. Several reports followed showing different levels of association between the presence of exfoliation and LOXL1 related to ethnicity. A meta-analysis performed by Wang et al²⁰ showed different results comparing studies conducted in several countries. SNP rs1048661 was found to be associated with XFS/XFG, but the risk allele in white populations was found to be G, as opposed to the T allele in Japanese, Chinese, and Korean populations. The SNP rs3825942 was significantly associated with XFS in a black South African population. Several studies have been published showing a correlation between ethnicity and prevalence of LOXL1 in association with exfoliation.^21–23 No study was found in the literature that included patients coming from Sweden, but it is possible to speculate that ethnicity in Sweden resembles the Icelandic ethnicity. All patients included in the present study were born in Sweden, and their parents were also born in Sweden. However, in the present study, LOXL1 expression at mRNA level was similar when comparing affected and unaffected eyes. These results correlate well with results published by Schöltzer-Schehardt et al²⁴ that showed no difference in mRNA expression comparing enucleated eyes with versus without exfoliation at more advanced stages. Included patients in the present study were all patients suffering from XFG and not only showing exfoliation, thus, no patient at an early stage of exfoliation was included. Other factors beyond gene expression can probably explain the presence or absence of XFM. Local environmental factors like chemical compounds at the anterior chamber of the eye can probably influence the development of XFM.

A significant issue to discuss is the fact of unilateral versus bilateral exfoliation. Is XFM one-sided? Is it possible that we cannot detect exfoliation clinically even though XFM is present? These questions have been raised in previous studies. Hammer et al⁵ described ultrastructural changes in lenses that were clinically unaffected by exfoliation even when the fellow eye was affected. Ultrastructural alterations were observed in anterior segment tissues of all apparently not involved fellow eyes. These included deposits of exfoliation on the iris and ciliary epithelia and in the dilator muscle of the iris; increased accumulation of extracellular matrix and degenerative changes of the iris pigment epithelium. Similar findings were described by Parekh et al,⁴ they studied 32 patients showing clinically unilateral exfoliation and found ultrastructural changes in the conjunctiva and lens capsules in approximately 80% of eyes. The authors concluded that XFS must be described as a bilateral disorder with a clinically marked asymmetric manifestation. The present study seems to confirm previous ultrastructural results, but at gene expression level.

XFS is an age-related disorder with an estimated prevalence ranging from 10% to 20% of the general population over 60 years of age.³ The presence of the condition varies among different countries. Tarkkanen and Kivela²⁵ published a retrospective study in 2004 including 35 patients with clinically unilateral XFS. The authors showed that the median age at conversion to bilateral XFS was 72 years (range, 66–86). However, 48% of patients remained unilaterally affected in a 15-year follow-up period. In the Reykjavik Eye Study, it was reported that 71% of patients converted to bilateral in 12-year follow-up period.²⁶ Aström et al⁷ reported a conversion rate of 55% in northern Sweden in a 21-year follow-up period. Puska²⁷ described a conversion rate of 38% from no exfoliation to exfoliation and a 32% rate considering XFG in 10-year follow-up. The patients included in our study were operated on when they were aged approximately 78.8 years on average, meanwhile the diagnosis of XFG was reported 4.5 years before surgery. Our patients were in general older than patients included in previous studies. The reason could be that we included patients suffering from XFG and not only exfoliation. It takes several years to develop XFG with a probably significant individual variation. Furthermore, all previously described studies included patients showing exfoliation only and not suffering from XFG. Unfortunately, no evidence in the literature was found about time conversion from unilateral to bilateral XFG.

In our study, the only gene that showed a slight difference in gene expression between XFG and healthy eyes was CYP1B1 isolated in the lens capsule. This gene encodes a member of the cytochrome P450 superfamily of enzymes. The cytochrome P450 proteins are monooxygenases which catalyze many reactions involved in drug metabolism, synthesis of cholesterol and other lipids. Mutations in CYP1B1 have been associated with primary congenital glaucoma; therefore it is thought that the enzyme also metabolizes a signaling molecule involved in eye development.^28,29 Results coming from our study must be interpreted with caution, the level of significance was not high (p = 0.04) and the sample size was not big. The role of CYP1B1 in exfoliation is not clear; previous studies postulated that this gene could be related to oxidation processes.^30,31 Although the specific pathogenesis of exfoliation remains unknown, data support a pathogenic concept of exfoliation being a type of stress-induced elastosis. This process has been associated with the excessive production of an abnormal cross-linking of elastic fibers.³² Increased oxidative stress has been identified as a potential cause of exfoliation;³³ it is possible to speculate that CYP1B1 can mediate exfoliation through oxidative stress. Further investigations are needed to clarify the role of CYP1B1 in exfoliation.

A strength of the present study is that all patients were diagnosed with XFG several years before inclusion, the diagnosis was based both on structural and functional tests. Functional tests like repeated Humphrey visual fields and structural tests like the clinical observation of the optic nerve and measurements with OCT device were used. Furthermore, all surgeries both in exfoliation and no exfoliation patients were performed by the same surgeon (MA), diminishing the risk of bias induced by several surgeons.

The present study has several limitations. The sample size was not so big. However, the study design was quite unusual, we used the contralateral eye as control, in this way we were quite sure that the reason for no clinical presentation of exfoliation could not be attributed to the DNA level, both eyes have the same DNA. The reason for no clinical appearance of exfoliation might be due to mRNA or protein level. The significant majority of the previously published studies related to exfoliation and genes were based on blood samples. Studies considered gene expression at the DNA level and compared affected versus unaffected individuals. No similar studies testing gene expression at the mRNA level comparing the same individuals were found in the literature. To further support the results of the current study, in addition to increasing the physiological understanding, changes in protein level should be studied.

Another limitation of the present study is that cases with very advanced exfoliation and small pupils were not included. The reason for exclusion is that in these cases the surgical procedure is different, it is necessary to use iris hooks and trypan blue that could alter the results of gene expression measurements. However, the included patients had moderate glaucoma (MD = 9.9 dB), the XFM might have been sufficient to perform analysis in the affected eyes.

In summary, the present study supports results from previous ultrastructural studies showing that exfoliation is an asymmetrical clinically expressed disorder instead of a single condition. Local factors at the anterior chamber of the eye might either expedite exfoliation or slow it down in one eye, explaining the asymmetric clinical presentation.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Västra Götaland Region and the Swedish Glaucoma Association for financial support.

Supplementary materials

Table S1 Genes of interest

Gene	FWD-primer	REV-primer
LOXL1	GTGGGGAGCGGAACGG	TGCTTGCACATAGTTGGGGT
MYOC	GGAGGTAGCAAGGCTGAGAA	CTGGAAGGCCAAAGTGTCCAA
OPTN	CATGGGGCGAGAACAAGTGA	GGGGCAGGAATGAATCGGAA
WDRD36	GGCTTTTAGTCCTGATGGTCGT	GAGGAGCCGAGTCCAACAAA
CYP1B1	AACGTACCGGCCACTATCAC	TGATCCAATTCTGCCTGCACT
GSTM1	CCTCCACCGTATATTTGAGCC	TGAGAACACAGGTCTTGGGA
NTF4	CTGCAAGGCTGATAACGCTG	TCAGATACCCAGTGCCTCCT

Abbreviations: FWD, forward; REV, reverse.

Table S2 TATAA human reference gene panel and ValidPrime

Gene	FWD-primer	REV-primer
ACTB	AGAAAATCTGGCACCACACC	AGAGGCGTACAGGGATAGCA
B2M	GGGTTTCATCCATCCGACA	ACACGGCAGGCATACTCATC
GAPDH	CAGTCAGCCGCATCTTCTTTT	TGGCAACAATATCCACTTTACCAG
GUSB	GATGGAAGAAGTGGTGCGTAG	TTGCTCACAAAGGTCACAGG
HPRT	TGACACTGGCAAAACAATGCA	GGTCCTTTTCACCAGCAAGCT
UBC	CGCAGTTCTTGTTTGTGGA	GGGTGGACTCTTTCTGGATG
PPIA	AGGTCCCAAAGACAGCAGAA	CACCACCCTGACACATAAACC
RPLP	TCAACATCTCCCCCTTCTCC	GCAGACAGACACTGGCAACA
18S	GACTCAACACGGGAAACCTC	AGACAAATCGCTCCACCAAC
TBP	TTCGGAGAGTTCTGGGATTG	ATCAGTGCCGTGGTTCGT
TUBB5	CTTCAGACCAGACAACTTCGTG	ACTCCTTCCTCACCACATCC
YWHAZ	AGACGGAAGGTGCTGAGAAA	TTGGTATGCTTGTTGTGACTGA
ValidPrime	AGCACATTTCTATTCTCCGT	TCTTGACCTTCTCTACCTCC

Abbreviations: FWD, forward; REV, reverse.

Table S3 Quantitative PCR setup

Program	Temperature (°C)	Time (s)	Cycles
Polymerase activation	95	60	1
Denaturation	95	5
Annealing	60	30	45
Extension	72	10
Melt curve	60–95	–	–

Table S4 Quantitative PCR reaction mix

Reagent	Volume (µL)
Primers (Fwd + Rev)	0.4
TATAA SYBR Grandmaster mix	5
H2O	2.5
cDNA	2
Total	10

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.