231
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Factors associated with diet barriers in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 37-44 | Published online: 12 Jan 2016

Abstract

Background

The study was conducted to investigate the diet barriers perceived by patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes and examine the associations between diet barriers and sociodemographic characteristics, medical condition, and patient-centered variables.

Methods

Secondary subgroup analyses were conducted based on the responses of 246 adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes from a multicenter, cross-sectional study. Diet barriers were captured by the Diet Barriers subscale of the Personal Diabetes Questionnaire. Participants also completed validated measures of diet knowledge, empowerment level, and appraisal of diabetes. Multiple regression techniques were used for model building, with a hierarchical block design to determine the separate contribution of sociodemographic characteristics, medical condition, and patient-centered variables to diet barriers.

Results

Diet barriers were moderately evident (2.23±0.86) among Chinese patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. The feeling of deprivation as a result of complying with a diet was the most recognized diet barrier (3.24±1.98), followed by “eating away from home” (2.79±1.82). Significantly higher levels of diet barriers were observed among those with lower levels of diet knowledge (β=−0.282, P<0.001) and empowerment (β=−0.190, P=0.015), and more negative appraisal (β=0.225, P=0.003).

Conclusion

Culturally tailored, patient-centered intervention programs that acknowledge individuals’ preferences and allow for flexibility in diet management should be launched. Interventions programs that could enhance diet knowledge, promote positive appraisal, and improve empowerment level might effectively address diet barriers perceived by patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

Introduction

Despite the advances in treatment and self-management education, poor glycemic control is an evident issue among patients with type 2 diabetes.Citation1 A recent multinational, cross-sectional study estimated that nearly 60% of patients with type 2 diabetes suffered from poor glycemic control worldwide.Citation2 Mounting evidence demonstrates that such patients are at increased risk of developing irreversible micro- and macrovascular complications.Citation2,Citation3 Optimization of glycemic control in this vulnerable population is a high priority for diabetes care.Citation3

The poor glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes is due to multiple factors. As indicated by the Health Promotion Model and Patient Empowerment Model, perceived barriers are among the key factors that predict sustained behavioral change.Citation4,Citation5 Diet barriers often lead to undesirable diet management (ie, behavioral dysregulation and lapse), which attributes mostly to poor glycemic control.Citation6,Citation7 Recognizing and addressing diet barriers have been prioritized as a crucial step in providing patient-centered care to patients with poorly controlled diabetes.Citation8Citation11

Previous research indicated that patients with poorly controlled diabetes perceived more diet barriers compared with subjects with good glycemic control.Citation12 Given the variance in experiences and concerns for different metabolic conditions, diet barriers perceived by patients with poor glycemic control might be different from those perceived by subjects with good glycemic control.Citation13 Few studies have investigated the diet barriers perceived by underserved adults with type 2 diabetes and all glycemic control levels using validated instruments.Citation7,Citation14,Citation15 None of these studies mentioned any attempt to report diet barriers perceived by patients with poor glycemic control via subgroup analysis. The needs and characteristics of patients with poorly controlled diabetes thereby remain unclear. Although diet barriers have been the focus of self-management research and clinical care efforts, the existing self-management interventions may not adequately address the concerns of patients with poor glycemic control.Citation16

Building a culture of patient-centeredness requires identification of key factors that account for diet barriers.Citation17 Consistent evidence showed that deficiencies in diet knowledge were associated with increased diet barriers.Citation16 The Transactional Model of Stress and Coping and results from the recent Diabetes Attitudes Wishes and Needs 2 study indicated that negative appraisal of diabetes consisted of barriers to adequate diet management.Citation18,Citation19 Previous reviews supported that the empowerment level predicts the extent of an individual’s active engagement in overcoming self-management barriers.Citation5,Citation20,Citation21 Of note is that a paucity of published studies simultaneously examined the independent effects of sociodemographic characteristics, medical condition, and patient-centered variables on diet barriers among patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. A comprehensive understanding of diet barriers would facilitate the conceptualization of a design for tailored, patient-centered intervention programs for patients with poor glycemic control.

Building on the available evidence, in this study, we aimed to 1) examine diet barriers specifically perceived by patients with poor glycemic control; and 2) explore the associations between diet barriers and sociodemographic characteristics, medical condition, and patient-centered variables.

Methods

Data presented here are secondary analyses from a multicenter, cross-sectional study with an overall goal to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Personal Diabetes Questionnaire (PDQ).Citation22 The study was carried out between February and October in 2012. Potential participants were recruited from four tertiary university-affiliated hospitals in Xi’an, People’s Republic of China. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards, including Xi’an Jiaotong University and each study site.

Participants

To be eligible, participants were adults with type 2 diabetes, with intact cognitive function with the Abbreviated Mental Test more than 7, had no psychiatric illness, and were able to provide written informed consent. Patients who had cancer or severe complications, end-stage illnesses, or were unwilling to participate in the study were excluded. In total, 361 eligible patients were approached; 346 of them gave their informed consent to participate in the study (response rate =95%). This analysis only included subjects with poor glycemic control (n=246), as defined by patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values greater than 7.5% advocated by the International Diabetes Federation.Citation1

Measures

Outcome variables: diet barriers

Perceived diet barriers were measured by the Diet Barriers subscale of the PDQ which was a seven-item, patient-centered, self-report questionnaire. Participants were asked questions such as “In the past three months have you had problems eating because you feel discouraged due to lack of results?”. Each item was scored based on a six-Likert scale, with a possible range of 1 (never) to 6 (one or more times per day). Scores were calculated by averaging the participants’ response. A higher score indicates higher levels of perceived barriers in diet management.Citation22 In the current study, the Chinese version of the Diet Barriers subscale of the PDQ demonstrated adequate internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.705) and test–retest reliability (r=0.990). The Diet Barriers subscale also displayed significant associations with HbA1c (r=0.697, P<0.001), supporting satisfactory criterion validity.

Independent variables

Sociodemographic data included sex, age, educational level, and monthly income level. Medical condition data included exposure to diabetes education talk (yes/no), diabetes duration, the number of complications, and insulin use (yes/no).

Patient-centered variables

Diet knowledge

Diet knowledge was measured by the Diet Knowledge sub-scale of the PDQ, using items such as “Use the information about the number of calories in food to make decisions about what to eat?”.Citation13 The participants responded to each item using a six-point Likert scale with a possible range of 1 to 6. A higher score indicated better knowledge in diet management. The Chinese version of the Diet Knowledge subscale demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.73) and significant association with HbA1c (r=−0.66, P<0.001).Citation22

Appraisal of diabetes: Appraisal of Diabetes Scale

The Appraisal of Diabetes Scale (ADS) is a seven-item instrument designed to capture individuals’ appraisal of his or her diabetes.Citation23 Responses for each item range from 1 to 5. The average mean rating of the scale is used, with a higher score indicating more negative appraisal of diabetes. The psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the ADS were established with acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.810) and excellent test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient =0.94).Citation24 The significant correlation between ADS and HbA1c also supported the appropriate criterion validity (r=0.556, P<0.001).Citation24

Empowerment level: Diabetes Empowerment Scale-Short Form

The eight-item Diabetes Empowerment Scale-Short Form (DES-SF) was used to measure the empowerment level of people with diabetes.Citation25 A five-point Likert scale was employed and the scoring is performed by averaging participants’ response. A higher score is interpreted as a higher level of empowerment. The Chinese version of DES-SF demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.848) and test–retest reliability (r=0.817). In addition, the score of DES-SF was positively correlated with general self-efficacy (r=0.556, P<0.01), giving evidence of acceptable convergent validity.Citation26

Procedure

Eligible patients were approached and provided with information sheets. After obtaining the consents, face-to-face structured interviews were conducted to collect participants’ information on sociodemographic characteristics and patient-centered variables by a trained research nurse. Data regarding medical condition were collected through the health system computerized medical records.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0: Armonk, New York, NY, USA. Sociodemographic characteristics, medical condition, and patient-centered variables of participants were reported as frequency (percentage) and mean ± standard deviation (SD) for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Imputation was used to deal with the missing data: mean value substitution was used for continuous variables, and non-ignorable models were used for categorical missing values.Citation27

Multiple regression techniques were used for model building, with a hierarchical block design to determine the separate contribution of sociodemographic characteristics, medical condition, and patient-centered variables to diet barriers. The first step of hierarchical regression included sociodemographic characteristics in the first block; this was followed by the addition of medical condition in the second block; and the third step added patient-centered variables into the third block. All statistical tests were two-sided and differences were accepted as significant at P<0.05.

Results

Characteristics of the study sample

shows the sociodemographic characteristics, medical condition, and patient-centered variables of the participants. Overall, the mean age was 58.90±10.85 years; the mean diabetes duration was 9.68±6.22 years, and the mean HbA1c level was 10.47±2.29%. Patients with poor glycemic control had a low level of diet knowledge (2.33±0.85) and empowerment (2.72±0.84), and a high level of negative appraisal (3.04±0.75).

Table 1 Sociodemographics characteristics, medical condition, and patient-centered variables of patients with poor glycemic control (n=246)

displays the barriers perceived by patients with poor glycemic control. “Feeling deprived due to attempts to follow a diet” was the most highly endorsed diet barriers perceived by patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (3.24±1.98), followed by “Eating away from home” (2.79±1.82).

Table 2 Diet barriers perceived by patients with poor glycemic control (n=246)

Factors associated with diet barriers

Results of the hierarchical regression analyses are shown in . The final model (Model 3) was considered the best-competing model, as indicated by significantly increasing values of adjusted R2. The inclusion of the three patient-centered variables increased the magnitude of variance explained by 23.1%. The results of Model 3 revealed that higher levels of diet barriers were associated with lower levels of diet knowledge (β=−0.282, 95% CI: [−0.341, −0.120], P<0.001) and empowerment (β=−0.190, 95% CI: [−0.317, −0.035], P=0.015), and more negative appraisal (β=0.225, 95% CI: [0.093, 0.443], P=0.003). In addition, male subjects and younger subjects were more likely to report increased diet barriers, as shown in the first and second steps of hierarchical regression analyses. However, after adding patient-centered variables into the model, neither sex nor age was significantly associated with the magnitude of diet barriers.

Table 3 Factors associated with diet barriers among patients with poor glycemic control

Discussion

Our findings suggested that diet barriers were moderately evident among patients with poor glycemic control. The feeling of deprivation due to complying with a diet was the most frequently cited diet barrier perceived by patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Subjects with lower levels of diet knowledge and empowerment and those with a more negative appraisal of diabetes were more likely to report higher levels of diet barriers.

From the patients’ perspective, healthy eating is a complex and demanding decision-making process.Citation5 Our study confirmed that patients with poor glycemic control faced an array of diet barriers, including psychological-dimension and situational-dimension barriers.Citation28 In our study, “Feeling deprived due to attempts to follow a diet” was the frequently cited diet barrier, followed by “Eating away from home”. The feeling of food deprivation as an important diet barrier perceived by patients with poor glycemic control has been reported by other diabetes populations.Citation29Citation32 The feeling of deprivation is often accompanied by the restrictive attitudes and loss of pleasure in eating and autonomy, which in turn led to increased susceptibility to disordered eating behaviors.Citation31Citation34 One possible reason for the feeling of food deprivation is that diet recommendations are either too general, idealistic, or not culture-specific.Citation5,Citation35 With limited clear and practical dietary advice, patients are more likely to strictly and passively follow the instructions, thereby inducing the feeling of food deprivation. To decrease the levels of diet barriers perceived by patients with poor glycemic control, effective diet management intervention programs that provide concrete, practical, and culturally specific diet information (including portion control, meal planning, and food shopping) should be launched. Individuals’ preferences should be acknowledged, and flexibility in diet management should be allowed. A flexible restrained approach has been suggested as an advantageous approach to foster healthy eating habit in the long term.Citation32

All the patient-centered variables, including diet knowledge, diabetes appraisal, and empowerment, are significantly associated with diet barriers in the final hierarchical regression model.

After standardizing the coefficients, we found the strongest association between diet knowledge and diet barriers, suggesting that knowledgeable individuals are more likely to perceive a lower level of diet barriers. This point of view is in agreement with results of previous reviews, which assert that subjects who lack diet knowledge perceived more diet barriers, thereby increasing the likelihood of poor adherence in diet management.Citation16,Citation36 Johnson and colleagues demonstrated that knowledgeable individuals were likely to gain awareness of their self-regulatory capacity to address diet barriers.Citation32 Individuals with more diet knowledge are more competent in making informed decisions that are flexibly suited to their goals, priorities, and lifestyle.Citation37 Patients with poorly controlled diabetes might particularly benefit from the development of intervention programs that can fill the gaps in knowledge required to achieve the goal of healthy eating. However, diet knowledge alone does not necessarily lead to decreased levels of perceived diet barriers.Citation36 Future works should establish effective ways to facilitate the transferability of diet knowledge within individuals’ social and cultural networks.

Negative appraisal of diabetes is positively associated with perceived barriers in diet management. This finding is in agreement with results of previous research, which showed the deleterious effect of negative appraisal on self-management barriers.Citation38Citation40 Several reasons may account for the relationship between diabetes appraisal and perceived barriers. Appraisal of diabetes affects the likelihood of adoption of a given behavior.Citation41 The Transactional Model of Stress and Coping supported the declaration that patients with negative appraisal may use “avoidance or passive resignation” instead of problem-focused and meaning-focused methods as potential coping strategies.Citation42,Citation43 Patients with negative appraisal may consider diabetes as a condition that is beyond their own control and passively engage in problem-solving activities; these patients may perceive higher levels of diet barriers when complying with healthy eating recommendations.Citation5,Citation44 Moreover, negative appraisal of diabetes was evidenced by increased vulnerability to psychological distress.Citation40,Citation45 Psychological distress could cognitively distract patients and impede their autonomy and decision-making skills. Thus, psychological distress poses a great challenge in overcoming barriers.Citation16,Citation43,Citation46 Hence, the negative appraisal is a medically meaningful component that would likely contribute to the diet barriers perceived by patients with poor glycemic control. The current findings suggest that an assessment of diabetes appraisal could provide valuable clues on the identification of individuals with increased levels of diet barriers. Intervention programs that promote a more positive and adaptive appraisal may decrease the diet barriers perceived by patients with poor glycemic control.

The association between the empowerment level and diet barriers indicates that diet barriers are disproportionally challenging for those with lower empowerment level. This finding corroborated the theoretical assertions in Patient Empowerment Model and Empowerment Process Model, which state that empowerment as a psychological self-efficacy could determine the commitment and perseverance of self-management efforts in the presence of barriers.Citation20,Citation47,Citation48 The negative association of diet barriers with empowerment has been detected in previous integrative literature reviews.Citation5,Citation21 Empowerment has been linked to active roles in decision making in diet management.Citation49,Citation50 Patients with a higher level of empowerment are more self-motivated to have a dynamic perception of diet knowledge and take meaningful behaviors accordingly.Citation51Citation55 A patient-centered approach to enhance empowerment may potentially be effective in addressing diet barriers. However, assessment of the effectiveness of such intervention programs in patients with poor glycemic control is beyond the scope of the current study.

We found two variables are significantly associated with diet barriers in the first and second steps of the hierarchical regression analyses, namely, male and age. Male subjects and younger subjects were more likely to report more diet barriers. However, the relationships between sex, age and diet barriers became nonsignificant, when patient-centered variables were added into the model. One potential explanation for the loss of significant statistical association between being a male and diet barriers might be the sex differences in use of diabetes education.Citation56 Studies in diverse populations showed that male patients reported a lower diabetes education attendance rate and exhibited a lower level of diet knowledge, compared with female subjects.Citation57Citation61 Thus, sex may confound the effect of diet knowledge on predicting the levels of diet barriers. Moreover, younger patients were found to be more sensitive to diabetes-related stigma (such as blaming, shaming, negative stereotyping, discrimination, and lost opportunities), thereby leading to increased psychological burden and negative appraisal of diabetes.Citation62,Citation63 Such negative emotional and cognitive reactions may “wash out” the association between younger age and diet barriers.

Limitations

Our results should be interpreted within the context of our design and methods. First, this study is cross-sectional in nature. Therefore, firm conclusions cannot be made on the causal effects of sociodemographic characteristics, medical condition, and patient-centered variables on diet barriers. Population-based and longitudinal studies are needed to gain more insight into the associations indicated by the current study. Second, the diet knowledge, diabetes appraisal, empowerment level, and diet barriers were assessed using self-report instruments; thus, responses may be biased. Nevertheless, self-report is the only feasible and cost-effective method known for collecting such data.Citation64 Finally, our study only recruited participants from tertiary university-affiliated hospitals, which place limits on the generalizability of our exploratory results. Nevertheless, in the People’s Republic of China, most of the patients will be followed up at the clinics after diagnosis. Due to the uneven development of hospital and primary care, patients with poor glycemic control have a tendency to consult health care professionals in tertiary hospitals. Further studies that recruit a larger sample size of patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in the community are warranted.

Implications

Although causality cannot be obtained, the results of the investigation still have great potential to provide information for clinical practice. Diet barriers appeared to be challenging for patients with poor glycemic control. The exploration of the correlates confirms the significance of diet knowledge and emphasizes the roles of diabetes appraisal and empowerment in this vulnerable diabetes subgroup. The mechanisms underlying these associations are not clear and need to be elucidated in future studies.

Health care professionals need to consider subjects with low levels of diet knowledge, empowerment, and positive appraisal as an “at-risk” group among patients with poor glycemic control. It is imperative to evaluate these patient-centered variables as parts of routine practice to detect patients who need interventions. Culturally tailored intervention programs that aim to improve diet knowledge and facilitate knowledge transferability should be prioritized for patients with poor glycemic control. Further research is needed to develop effective intervention programs to promote positive appraisal and empowerment for individuals with poor glycemic control.

Conclusion

Diet barriers are moderately evident among Chinese patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Culturally tailored, patient-centered intervention programs that acknowledge individuals’ preferences and allow for flexibility in diet management should be launched. Intervention programs that enhance diet knowledge, promote positive appraisal, and improve empowerment level might effectively address diet barriers among patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • International Diabetes FederationIDF Diabetes Atlas6th edBrussels, BelgiumInternational Diabetes Federation2013
  • LitwakLGohS-YHusseinZMalekRPrustyVKhamsehMEPrevalence of diabetes complications in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its association with baseline characteristics in the multinational A1chieve studyDiabetol Metab Syndr2013515724228724
  • American Diabetes AssociationStandards of medical care in diabetes – 2014Diabetes Care201437Suppl 11480
  • HarveyJNLawsonVLThe importance of health belief models in determining self-care behaviour in diabetesDiabet Med200926151319125754
  • HoAYKBerggrenIDahlborg-LyckhageEDiabetes empowerment related to Pender’s Health Promotion Model: a meta-synthesisNurs Heal Sci2010122259267
  • LaraJMcCrumLAMathersJCAssociation of Mediterranean diet and other health behaviours with barriers to healthy eating and perceived health among British adults of retirement ageMaturitas201479329229825096829
  • MarcyTRBrittonMLHarrisonDIdentification of barriers to appropriate dietary behavior in low-income patients with type 2 diabetes mellitusDiabetes Ther20112191922127765
  • EsdenJLNicholsMRPatient-centered group diabetes care: a practice innovationNurse Pract2013384424823507913
  • BarryMJEdgman-LevitanSShared decision making – the pinnacle of patient-centered careN Engl J Med2012366978078122375967
  • InzucchiSEBergenstalRMBuseJBManagement of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)Diabetes Care20123561364137922517736
  • KochLDiabetes: efficacy of behavioral interventions in patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitusNat Rev Endocrinol201171269122045108
  • KhattabMKhaderYSAl-KhawaldehAAjlouniKFactors associated with poor glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetesJ Diabetes Complications2010242848919282203
  • StetsonBSchlundtDRothschildCFloydJERogersWMokshagundamSPDevelopment and validation of The Personal Diabetes Questionnaire (PDQ): a measure of diabetes self-care behaviors, perceptions and barriersDiabetes Res Clin Pract201191332133221215487
  • KnightHStetsonBKrishnasamySMokshagundamSPDiet self-management and readiness to change in underserved adults with type 2 diabetesPrim Care Diabetes20159321922525457433
  • ThorntonLEJefferyRWCrawfordDABarriers to avoiding fast-food consumption in an environment supportive of unhealthy eatingPublic Health Nutr201316122105211323182344
  • AholaAJGroopPHBarriers to self-management of diabetesDiabet Med201330441342023278342
  • Mc SharryJBishopFLMoss-MorrisRKendrickT“The chicken and egg thing”: cognitive representations and self-management of multimorbidity in people with diabetes and depressionPsychol Health201328110311922924481
  • PeyrotMBurnsKKDaviesMDiabetes Attitudes Wishes and Needs 2 (DAWN2): a multinational, multi-stakeholder study of psychosocial issues in diabetes and person-centred diabetes careDiabetes Res Clin Pract201399217418423273515
  • LazarusRSFolkmanSTransactional theory and research on emotions and copingEur J Pers198713141169
  • CattaneoLBChapmanARThe process of empowerment: a model for use in research and practiceAm Psychol201065764665920873882
  • StrycharIElishaBSchmitzNType 2 diabetes self-management: role of diet self-efficacyCan J Diabetes2012366337344
  • ChengLWuYLiXThe reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Personal Diabetes QuestionnaireChin J Nur201449749753
  • CareyMPJorgensenRSWeinstockRSReliability and validity of the appraisal of diabetes scaleJ Behav Med199114143512038044
  • ChengLLiXGaoCHuiRYangJWuYThe reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Appraisal of Diabetes ScaleChin J Nurs Educ201310485488
  • AndersonRMFitzgeraldJTGruppenLDFunnellMMOhMSThe Diabetes Empowerment Scale-Short Form (DES-SF)Diabetes Care200326516351660
  • HuBLouQTianYZhangQZhuJStudy on empowerment and its influencing factors among diabetes inpatientsChin J Nur201146225228
  • LittleRJARublinDStatistical Analysis with Missing DataNew YorkJohn Wiley & Sons1987
  • GlanzKRimerBKViswanathKHealth Behaviour and Health EducationNew YorkJohn Wiley & Sons2008
  • YannakouliaMEating behavior among type 2 diabetic patients: a poorly recognized aspect in a poorly controlled diseaseRev Diabet Stud200631111617491707
  • VijanSStuartNSFitzgeraldJTBarriers to following dietary recommendations in type 2 diabetesDiabet Med2005221323815606688
  • CleveringaFGWMinkmanMHGorterKJVan Den DonkMRuttenGEHMDiabetes Care Protocol: effects on patient-important outcomes. A cluster randomized, non-inferiority trial in primary careDiabet Med201027444245020536517
  • JohnsonFPrattMWardleJDietary restraint and self-regulation in eating behaviorInt J Obesity2012365665674
  • QuickVMByrd-BredbennerCNeumark-SztainerDChronic illness and disordered eating: a discussion of the literatureAdv Nutr20134327728623674793
  • PenckoferSFerransCEVelsor-FriedrichBSavoySThe psychological impact of living with diabetes: women’s day-to-day experiencesDiabetes Educ201433468069017684169
  • ChoiSSongMChangSJKimSAStrategies for enhancing information, motivation, and skills for self-management behavior changes: a qualitative study of diabetes care for older adults in KoreaPatient Prefer Adherence2014821922624627626
  • NamSCheslaCStottsNAKroonLJansonSLBarriers to diabetes management: patient and provider factorsDiabetes Res Clin Pract20119311921382643
  • SmallsBLWalkerRJHernandez-TejadaMACampbellJADavisKSEgedeLEAssociations between coping, diabetes knowledge, medication adherence and self-care behaviors in adults with type 2 diabetesGen Hosp Psychiatry201234438538922554428
  • HaraYKoyamaSMorinagaTThe reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Appraisal of Diabetes Scale for type 2 diabetes patientsDiabetes Res Clin Pract2011911404621040993
  • Holmes-TruscottESkinnerTCPouwerFSpeightJNegative appraisals of insulin therapy are common among adults with type 2 diabetes using insulin: results from diabetes MILES – Australia cross-sectional surveyDiabet Med201532101297130310.1111/dme.1272925683652
  • FisherEBThorpeCTDevellisBMDevellisRFHealthy coping, negative emotions, and diabetes management: a systematic review and appraisalDiabetes Educ20153361080110318057276
  • AflakseirARole of illness and medication perceptions on adherence to medication in a group of Iranian patients with type 2 diabetesJ Diabetes20124324324722221835
  • WhitebirdRRKreitzerMLauren CrainALLewisBAHansonLREnstadCJMindfulness-based stress reduction for family caregivers: a randomized controlled trialGerontologist201353467668623070934
  • ShahBMGupchupGVBorregoMERaischDWKnappKKDepressive symptoms in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: do stress and coping matter?Stress Health201228211112222282035
  • RustveldLOPavlikVNJibaja-WeissMLKlineKNGosseyJTVolkRJAdherence to diabetes self-care behaviors in English-and Spanish-speaking Hispanic menPatient Prefer Adherence2009312313019936154
  • HudsonJLBundyCCoventryPADickensCExploring the relationship between cognitive illness representations and poor emotional health and their combined association with diabetes self-care. A systematic review with meta-analysisJ Psychosom Res201476426527424630175
  • PanditAUBaileySCCurtisLMDisease-related distress, self-care and clinical outcomes among low-income patients with diabetesJ Epidemiol Community Health201468655756424489044
  • AndersonRMFunnellMMButlerPMArnoldMSFitzgeraldJTFesteCCPatient empowerment: results of a randomized controlled trialDiabetes Care19951879439497555554
  • FunnellMMAndersonRMEmpowerment and self-management of diabetesClini Diabetes2004223123127
  • SharpPBSalyerJSelf-efficacy and barriers to healthy diet in cardiac rehabilitation participants and nonparticipantsJ Cardiovasc Nurs201227325326221760521
  • SchulzPJNakamotoKHealth literacy and patient empowerment in health communication: the importance of separating conjoined twinsPatient Educ Couns201390141123063359
  • DuHEverettBNewtonPJSalamonsonYDavidsonPMSelf-efficacy: a useful construct to promote physical activity in people with stable chronic heart failureJ Clin Nurs2012213–430131022175249
  • PulvirentiMMcmillanJLawnSEmpowerment, patient centred care and self-managementHeal Expect2011173303310
  • SchmuhlHDemskiHLamprinosIDogacAPloessnigMHildebrandCConcept of knowledge-based self-management pathways for the empowerment of diabetes patientsEur J Biomed Informatics20141021216
  • TolABaghbanianAMohebbiBEmpowerment assessment and influential factors among patients with type 2 diabetesJ Diabetes Metab Disord2013121623497631
  • ZoffmannVKirkevoldMRealizing empowerment in difficult diabetes care: a guided self-determination interventionQual Health Res201222110311821876206
  • BurnerEMenchineMTaylorEAroraSGender differences in diabetes self-management: a mixed-methods analysis of a mobile health intervention for inner-city Latino patientsJ Diabetes Sci Technol20137111111823439166
  • PunSPCoatesVBenzieIFBarriers to the self-care of type 2 diabetes from both patients’ and providers’ perspectives: literature reviewJ Nurs Healthc Chronic Illn200911419
  • Lemes dos SantosPFdos SantosPRFerrariGSLFonsecaGAAFerrariCKBKnowledge of diabetes mellitus: does gender make a difference?Osong Public Heal Res Perspect20145199203
  • GucciardiEWangSCTDeMeloMAmaralLStewartDECharacteristics of men and women with diabetes: observations during patients’ initial visit to a diabetes education centreCan Fam Physician200854221922718272638
  • GucciardiEDemeloMBoothGTomlinsonGStewartDEIndividual and contextual factors associated with follow-up use of diabetes self-management education programmes: a multisite prospective analysisDiabet Med200926551051719646191
  • MathewRGucciardiEDe MeloMBarataPSelf-management experiences among men and women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a qualitative analysisBMC Fam Pract20121312223249410
  • WoodardLDLandrumCRAmspokerABRamseyDNaikADInteraction between functional health literacy, patient activation, and glycemic controlPatient Prefer Adherence201481019102425092966
  • BrowneJLNefsGPouwerFSpeightJDepression, anxiety and self-care behaviours of young adults with type 2 diabetes: results from the International Diabetes Management and Impact for Long-term Empowerment and Success (MILES) StudyDiabet Med201532113314025131861
  • HankonenNKinnunenMAbsetzPJallinojaPWhy do people high in self-control eat more healthily? Social cognitions as mediatorsAnn Behav Med201347224224824114328